Chinese Journal of Management Science ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (2): 63-72.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2020.0896
• Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
GAN Liu1, LI Qun-chi2
Received:
2020-05-17
Revised:
2020-07-03
Online:
2023-02-20
Published:
2023-02-28
Contact:
甘柳
E-mail:ganliu2016@163.com
CLC Number:
GAN Liu, LI Qun-chi. Research on R&D Project Investment Decision and Optimal Government Subsidies[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(2): 63-72.
[1] 肖文, 林高榜. 政府支持、研发管理与技术创新效率——基于中国工业行业的实证分析[J]. 管理世界, 2014, 247(4):71-80.Xiao Wen, Lin Gaobang. Government support, R&D management and technological innovation efficiency—an empirical analysis based on Chinese industrial sectors[J]. Journal of Management World, 2014, 274(4):71-80. [2] Geske R. The valuation of compound options[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1979, 7(1): 63-81. [3] Dixit A K, Pindyck R S. Investment under uncertainty[M]. Princeton, NY: Princeton University Press, 1994. [4] Geske R, Subrahmanyam A, Zhou Y. Capital structure effects on the prices of equity call options [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2016, 121(2): 231-253. [5] Perlitz M, Peske T, Schrank R. Real options valuation: the new frontier in R&D project evaluation?[J]. R&D Management, 1999, 29(3): 255-270. [6] Martin S. Spillovers, appropriability, and R&D[J]. Journal of Economics, 2002,75(1): 1-32. [7] Martzoukos S H, Zacharias, E. Real option games with R&D and learning spillovers[J]. Omega, 2013, 41(2): 236-249. [8] 宋之杰, 孙其龙. 技术创新型企业研发投资的三阶段博弈——基于吸收能力的观点[J]. 管理工程学报, 2009, 23(1): 112-115+138.Song Zhijie, Sun Qilong. Three stage game of technical innovation firms—based on the conception of absorptive capacity[J]. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2009, 23(1): 112-115+138. [9] 王超发, 孙静春. 基于决策者认知水平和完全信息竞争博弈的R&D项目投资决策研究[J]. 管理工程学报, 2019, 33(4): 136-143.Wang Chaofa, Sun Jingchun. The investment decisions of the R&D project based on the policymakers’ cognitive level and completely information competition game[J]. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2019, 33(4): 136-143. [10] Pennings E. Taxes and stimuli of investment under uncertainty[J]. European Economic Review, 2000, 44 (2): 383-391. [11] Sarkar S. Attracting private investment: tax reduction, investment subsidy, or both?[J]. Economic Modelling, 2012, 29 (5): 1780-1785. [12] Scandizzo P L, Ventura M. Sharing risk through concessi on contracts[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, 207 (1): 363-370. [13] Sarkar S. Can tax convexity be ignored in corporate financing decisions?[J]. Journal of Banking and Finance, 2008, 32 (7): 1310-1321. [14] Armada M J, Pereira P J, Rodrigues, A. Optimal subsidies and guarantees in public—private partnerships[J]. The European Journal of Finance, 2012, 18 (5): 469-495. [15] Danielova A, Sarkar S. The effect of leverage on the tax-cut versus in-vestment-subsidy argument[J]. Review of Financial Economics, 2011, 20 (4): 123-129. [16] Lukas E, Thiergart S. The interaction of debt financing, cash grants and the optimal investment policy under uncertainty[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2019, 276(1), 284-299. [17] Sarkar S, Zhang C. Investment policy with time-to-build[J]. Journal of Banking and Finance, 2015, 55(c): 142-156. [18] 甘柳, 罗鹏飞, 杨招军. 运营滞后与信用担保互换下的项目投资决策模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(3): 22-32.Gan Liu, Luo Pengfei, Yang Zhaojun. An investment decision-making model under implementation lag and equity-for-guarantee swap[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2018, 26(3): 22-32. [19] Sarkar S. Optimal size, optimal timing and optimal financing of an investment[J]. Journal of Macroeconomics, 2011, 33(4): 681-689. [20] Wong K P. On the neutrality of debt in investment intensity[J]. Annals of Finance, 2010, 6(3): 335-356. [21] Hackbarth D, Hennessy C A, Leland H E. Can the trade-off theory explain debt structure?[J]. The Review of Financial Studies, 2007, 20(5): 1389-1428. [22] Morellec E, Valta P, Zhdanov A. Financing investment: the choice between bonds and bank loans[J]. Management Science, 2015, 61(11): 2580-2602. [23] Fan Hua, Sundaresan S M. Debt valuation, renegotiation, and optimal dividend policy[J]. The Review of Financial Studies, 2000, 13(4): 1057-1099. [24] Sundaresan S, Wang Neng. Investment under uncertainty with strategic debt service[J]. American Economic Review, 2007, 97(2): 256-261. [25] Leland H E. Agency costs, risk management, and capital structure[J]. The Journal of Finance, 1998, 53(4): 1213-1243. [26] 甘柳, 杨波. 时间偏好不一致下控制权私利与最优股权结构[J].中国管理科学, 2020, 28(6): 51-62.Gan Liu, Yang Bo. Private benefits of control and optimal equity structure under time-inconsistent preferences [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2018, 26(3): 22-32. |
[1] | LUO Peng-fei, LU Ting. Dynamic Investment and Consumption Decisions and Firm’s Asset Pricing of Entrepreneurs with Liquidity Preferences [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(2): 1-8. |
[2] | LIU Xia, LIU Shan-cun, ZHANG Qiang. Cognitive Biases, Limited Competition and Asset Pricing [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(2): 9-17. |
[3] | YANG Kun, WEI Yu, LI Shou-wei, HE Jian-min. Does Geopolitical Risk Drive China’s Crude Oil Futures Market? A Wavelet-based Nonparametric Causality-in-Quantiles Test [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(2): 51-62. |
[4] | CUI Feng, HAN Chuan-feng, LIU Xing-hua, TENG Min-min. Trading Signal Index Optimization of Co-integration Strategy Based on Wavelet GARCH Model [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(2): 129-137. |
[5] | LIANG Mo, LI Hong-xiang, ZHANG Shun-ming. A Measure for Financial Distress based on ST Predictive Model and the Cross-section of Stock Returns [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(2): 138-149. |
[6] | WU Jin-yan, WANG Peng,. Research on Openness and Risk Contagion in Chinese Capital Market Based on Co-higher-moments Test System [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(1): 37-46. |
[7] | LIU Zhi-dong, ZHANG Pei-yuan, JING Zhong-bo. Research on the Systemic Risk of China’s Banking Industry under the Impact of Cross-industry Risk Spillover [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(12): 1-12. |
[8] | HE Chao-lin, ZHANG Qi-xiang, CAO Wang-dong. The Forming Mechanism of Financial Asset Bubble Based on the Heterogeneous Price Beliefs [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(12): 162-173. |
[9] | CHEN Kai-jie, TANG Zhen-peng, WU Jun-chuang, ZHANG Ting-ting, DU Xiao-xu. Prediction Method and Empirical Study of Precious Metal Futures Price [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(12): 245-253. |
[10] | LOU Yong, CHANG Yu-xing, HAO Feng-xia. The Influence of Blockchain on Supply Chain Finance——Based on Tripartite Game Theory and Dynamic Evolutionary Game Theory [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(12): 352-360. |
[11] | LI Jia-lan, WAN Di-fang, CHEN Nan. Governance Structure, Ownership Background and Derivatives Innovation of Exchanges [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(11): 31-41. |
[12] | ZHANG Xiao-wan, YI Rong-hua, YU Ying, WANG Ying. The Measure of Volatility Spillover Effect of Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock Connect Based on Rolling Window VAR [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(11): 42-51. |
[13] | WANG Xiao-yan, YUAN Teng, DUAN Xiang-bin. Loan Default Forecasting Based on Zero-inflated Quantile Two-part Model [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(10): 1-13. |
[14] | CHEN Li-feng, WANG Jun-jie, ZHONG Yu-ting, LI Liang-yan. Default Risk, Banking Credit Screening and the Asymmetric Effects Monetary Policy [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(10): 35-45. |
[15] | LIU Chao, GUO Ya-dong. Systemic Financial Risk Spillover and Its Topology Analysis of Sector Indexes in China under a Multi-Scale View [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(10): 46-59. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
|