主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院

中国管理科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (1): 238-247.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2020.1390

• 论文 • 上一篇    

基于双层网络的第三方支付机构与商业银行竞合演化机理研究

罗暘洋1, 李存金2, 罗斌2   

  1. 1.华北电力大学经济与管理学院,北京102206;2.北京理工大学管理与经济学院,北京100081
  • 收稿日期:2020-07-19 修回日期:2020-09-29 发布日期:2023-02-09
  • 通讯作者: 罗斌(1963-),男(汉族),湖北荆州人,北京理工大学管理与经济学院,副教授,博士,研究方向:战略管理,Email:bj_luo@bit.edu.cn. E-mail:bj_luo@bit.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金资助项目(17BGJ002)

Research on Evolutionary Mechanism of Coopetition Between Third-party Payment Institutions and Commercial Banks Based on Double-layer Network

LUO Yang-yang1, LI Cun-jin2, LUO Bin2   

  1. 1. School of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University,Beijing 102206, China;2. School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2020-07-19 Revised:2020-09-29 Published:2023-02-09
  • Contact: 罗斌 E-mail:bj_luo@bit.edu.cn

摘要: 本文以中国第三方支付机构和商业银行为研究对象,借鉴演化博弈论思想和双层网络演化博弈仿真方法,剖析两类企业竞合互动的演化规律以及相关因素对演化稳定策略的影响。研究发现,第三方支付机构与商业银行竞合的演化稳定策略存在不确定性,合作收益的提升、合作成本的降低、违约惩罚的提高以及利益分配的合理性有助于提高两类企业的合作水平,推动两群体向合作主导演化。细化研究发现,两类企业体现出显著的异质性,第三方支付机构对相关因素的变化更为敏感,对利益的要求更低。同时各群体内部收益差距明显,实力较强的大型第三方支付机构和商业银行能够获得较高的合作收益和较多的合作机会,而中小第三方支付机构和商业银行难以从竞合中获得理想收益。

关键词: 第三方支付机构;商业银行;演化博弈;双层网络

Abstract: With the leapfrog development of financial technology, the third-party payment institutions due to their diverse, flexible, safe and swift serving model is rising rapidly in China’s payment market, posing an unprecedented challenge for the bank’s dominant position in finance. As the most vital payment service providers, their businesses keep crossing and merging, being complementary to each other while inevitably conflicting. To properly understand the coopetition mechanism between the third-party payment institutions and commercial banks is conducive to promote the stability of cooperative relations, prevent the the financial risks, improve innovative development of national financial system. Chinese third-party payment institutions and commercial banks are taken as the research objects, related annual reports and forecast data are adopted, the idea of evolutionary game theory and two-layer network evolutionary game simulation methods are drawn on, and the evolutionary laws of coopetition between two types of enterprises and the impact of related factors on evolutionary stability strategies are analyzed. It is found that the evolutionary stability strategy of third-party payment institutions and commercial banks are uncertain, the increase of cooperation benefits, the reduction of cooperation cost, the rise of default penalties and the rationality of benefit distribution will help to improve the ratio of cooperation between the two types of enterprises, and promote the evolution to be cooperation-dominated. Detailed research shows that the two types of enterprises possess significant heterogeneity, third-party payment institutions are more sensitive to changes in related factors and have lower requirements for benefits. The income gap among enterprises is obvious. Large and powerful third-party payment institutions and commercial banks can obtain higher cooperation benefits and more opportunities for coopetition, while small and medium-sized payment institutions and banks cannot obtain ideal benefits from coopetition. The use of the evolutionary game model of two-layer complex network overcomes the realistic defect of individual homogeneity in the previous evolutionary game model, and analyzes the cooperation income of heterogeneous individuals in coopetition. At the same time, the research points out the development trend of the relationship between the third-party payment institutions and commercial banks in the future, which to some extent enlightens enterprises of various types to choose the optimal strategy.

Key words: third-party payment institutions; commercial banks; coopetition game; double-layer network

中图分类号: