基于Hawkes过程的国际原油市场与中国股票市场大幅波动联动性研究

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2019.1889

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 考虑国际原油市场与中国股票市场之间的大幅波动存在联动性，本文采用二维标值Hawkes模型对2007年至2019年8月的布伦特原油期货和沪深300指数的日度数据中大幅波动的单市场延续和跨市场传染的传播特性进行建模。实证结果表明：(1)Hawkes过程可以较好地拟合国际原油和中国股市之间大幅波动的自激发和互激发效应，并捕捉资产收益率在时间和空间上的聚集性、持续性和溢出性；(2)原油市场和中国股市的大幅波动均存在较强的自激发效应；(3)原油市场和中国股市之间大幅波动的互激发效应具有统计意义上的显著性，但在实际影响方面相比于自激发效应更为微弱。本研究对股票市场建设、资产配置和风险防范均有一定意义。

关键词: Hawkes过程；极值理论；大幅波动；市场联动

Abstract: In this essay, large volatility mutually exciting effect between international crude oil market and Chinese stock market are discussed under the circumstances that the two markets have shown greater synchronicity in terms of volatile events over the past ten years. For example, on August 24, 2015, the global stock market crashed and fell into a precipitous spiral, with the CSI300 index plunging 8.75%. Crude oil prices were hit hard by market concerns that a slower recovery in crude oil demand would exacerbate the global supply glut. Brent crude oil futures plunged 6.56% from the previous trading day. It is of great significance to research the propagation characteristics of large fluctuations between international crude oil market and Chinese stock market from the perspectives of stock market construction, asset allocation and risk prevention. There are some defects in the three traditional research methods on the volatility spill-over effect: Multivariate GARCH Model, Extreme Value Theory and Copula. Hawkes process is a path-dependent random point process, whose core idea is that the occurrence of any event will increase the frequency of subsequent events, but this effect will decay in some form over time. So Hawkes process is a more compatible choice for modeling large volatility mutually exciting effect. The 2-dimensional marked Hawkes process is used to model the self- and mutual-excitation of large fluctuations of Brent crude oil futures and CSI300 index from 2007 to August 15, 2019, after the adjustment of statutory holidays and bilateral exchange rate. It is found that: (1) The Hawkes process can properly describe the single market continuation and cross-market contagion between international crude oil market and Chinese stock market, and capture the aggregation, persistence and spillover of asset returns in time and space. (2) There is a strong self-excitation in both crude oil market and Chinese stock market, respectively. (3) The mutual-exciting effect between the two markets is statistically significant, but weaker in actual impact than the self-excitation.

Key words: Hawkes process; extreme value theory; large fluctuations; mutually exciting effect

中图分类号:

F832.5

汪冬华, 姚钰雯, 王暖. 基于Hawkes过程的国际原油市场与中国股票市场大幅波动联动性研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(8): 36-43.

WANG Dong-hua, YAO Yu-wen, WANG Nuan. Research on Linkage Effect of Large Fluctuations Between International Crude Oil Market and Chinese Stock Market Based on Hawkes Process[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(8): 36-43.

参考文献

［1］ Ferson W E, Harvey C R. The variation of economic risk premiums［J］. Journal of Political Economy, 1991, 99(2): 385-415.
［2］王鹏,蒋焰,吴金宴.原油价格与世界股票市场之间的高阶矩相依性研究［J］.管理科学,2017,30(3):136-146.Wang Peng, Jiang Yan, Wu Jinyan. Dependence of higher moments between oil price and international stock markets［J］. Journal of Management Science, 2017, 30(3): 136-146.
［3］ Fisher R A, Tippett L H C. Limiting forms of the frequency distribution of the largest or smallest member of a sample［J］. Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 1928, 24(2): 11.
［4］金洪飞,金荦.石油价格与股票市场的溢出效应——基于中美数据的比较分析［J］.金融研究,2008,2:83-97.Jin Hongfei, Jin Luo. Spillover effects between oil prices and stock markets: Using data on the stock markets of China and USA and international oil market［J］. Journal of Financial Research, 2008, 2: 83-97.
［5］ Sukcharoen K, Zohrabyan T, Leatham D, et al. Interdependence of oil prices and stock market indices: A copula approach［J］. Energy Economics, 2014, 4(44): 331-339.
［6］ Wen Xiaoqian, Wei Yu, Huang Dengshi. Measuring contagion between energy market and stock market during financial crisis: A copula approach［J］. Energy Economics, 2012, 5(34): 1435-1446.
［7］ Ogata Y, Akaike H. On linear intensity models for mixed doubly stochastic Poisson and self-exciting point processes［J］. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 1982, 44(1): 102-107.
［8］ Brillinger D R. Some statistical methods for random process data from seismology and neurophysiology［J］. Annals of Statistics, 1988, 16(1): 1-54.
［9］ Lewis E, Mohler G, Brantingham P J, et al. Self-exciting point process models of civilian deaths in Iraq［J］. Security Journal, 2012, 25(3): 244-264.
［10］ Filimonov V, Wheatley S, Sornette D. Effective measure of endogeneity for the autoregressive conditional duration point processes via mapping to the self-excited Hawkes process［J］. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 2015, 22(1-3): 23-37.
［11］吴奔, 张波. Hawkes过程分支比估计——一种简单的非参数方法［J］. 统计研究, 2015, 32(3): 92-99.Wu Ben, Zhang Bo. Branching ratio estimation for the Hawkes process: An improved nonparametric method［J］. Statistical Research, 2015, 32(3): 92-99.
［12］马勇, 张卫国, 闫杜娟. 中国股市暴涨暴跌的交互作用及其预测［J］. 系统管理学报, 2014, 23(5): 755-760.Ma Yong, Zhang Weiguo, Yan Dujuan. The interaction between large rises and large declines in China’s stock market and its prediction［J］. Journal of Science and Management, 2014, 23(5): 755-760.
［13］汪冬华, 张裕恒. 基于Hawkes过程中美股市大幅波动互激效应的研究［J］. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(7): 32-39.Wang Donghua, Zhang Yuheng. Research on large volatility mutually exciting effect of Chinese and American stock markets based on Hawkes process［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2018, 26(7): 32-39.
［14］ Herrera R. Energy risk management through self-exciting marked point process［J］. Energy Economics, 2013, 4(38): 64-76.
［15］ Fuentes F, Herrera R, Clements A. Modeling extreme risks in commodities and commodity currencies［J］. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 2018, 5(51): 108-120.
［16］马勇, 潘冬涛, 曾兆祥. 美元指数与原油价格暴涨暴跌的交互刺激研究［J］. 财经理论与实践, 2018, 39(6): 29-35.Ma Yong, Pan Dongtao, Zeng Zhaoxiang. The cross excitement between the jumps and slumps of US index and crude oil price［J］. The Theory and Practice of Finance and Economics, 2018, 39(6): 29-35.
［17］ Bernis G, Salhi K, Scotti S. Sensitivity analysis for marked Hawkes processes: Application to CLO pricing［J］. Mathematics and Financial Economics, 2018, 12(4): 541-559.
［18］ Park M H, Kim J H T. Estimating extreme tail risk measures with generalized Pareto distribution［J］. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 2016, 6(98): 91-104.
［19］ McNeil A J, Reiss R D, Thomas M. Statistical analysis of extreme values: From insurance, finance, hydrology and other fields［J］. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1998, 93(444): 1516-1516.

[1]	杨瑞成, 邢伟泽. CRMW风险缓释效用目标跟踪的债券投资组合优化策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(7): 150-163.
[2]	黄顺武, 余霞光. IPO信息披露与监管的演化博弈分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(6): 127-134.
[3]	于孝建, 程宇, 肖炜麟. 中国股市泡沫破裂临界时点动态置信区间研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(5): 41-53.
[4]	吴献博, 惠晓峰. 中国A股市场金融板块间风险相依关系及动态演化研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(5): 54-64.
[5]	朱光伟, 杨涛, 杜在超. 融资融券约束与股市波动[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(4): 13-29.
[6]	钟婉玲, 李海奇. 国际油价、宏观经济变量与中国股市的尾部风险溢出效应研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(2): 27-37.
[7]	张伟平, 庄新田, 王健. 中国股市跨行业系统性风险空间溢出关联及风险预测分析——基于尾部风险网络模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(12): 15-28.
[8]	张跃军, 张晗, 王金丽. 考虑结构变化和长记忆性的国际原油价格波动率预测研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(9): 54-64.
[9]	赵林海, 陈名智. 金融机构系统性风险溢出和系统性风险贡献——基于滚动窗口动态Copula模型双时变相依视角[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(7): 71-83.
[10]	金秀, 尘娜, 王佳. 安全投资转移视角下的跨行业投资组合模型及实证[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(11): 12-22.
[11]	严冠, 刘志东. 基于贝叶斯方法的中国商业银行同业借贷网络中系统风险研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(4): 14-26.
[12]	吴平, 恽钧超, 董斌. 基于多因子LIBOR模型的CMS数字范围债券定价[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(3): 132-141.
[13]	俞莹, 易荣华. 来自新兴市场的公司上市对目的地市场的影响——以中国香港市场为例[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(2): 37-47.
[14]	刘维奇, 李建莹. 媒体热议度能有效降低股价暴跌风险吗？——基于公司透明度调节作用的研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(11): 39-49.
[15]	柴尚蕾, 周鹏. 基于非参数Copula-CVaR模型的碳金融市场集成风险测度[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(8): 1-13.