基于RFID技术的双供应链投资决策研究

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2020.11.013

中国管理科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (11): 120-129.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2020.11.013

基于RFID技术的双供应链投资决策研究

江秋阳¹, 陶峰¹, 范体军¹, 黎建强²

1. 华东理工大学商学院, 上海 200237;
2. 深圳大学经济学院, 广东深圳 518060

收稿日期:2018-10-13 修回日期:2019-04-24 出版日期:2020-11-20 发布日期:2020-12-01
通讯作者: 黎建强(1950-),男(汉族),广东人,深圳大学经济学院,教授,博士,研究方向:系统工程、运作与供应链管理、金融风险分析,E-mail:mskklai@outlook.com. E-mail:mskklai@outlook.com.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目（71872064，71431004，71972071，71772063）；上海浦江人才计划（18PJC025）；上海自然科学基金资助项目（18ZR1409400）

Research on Decision-making of Two Supply Chains with RFID Technology

JIANG Qiu-yang¹, TAO Feng¹, FAN Ti-jun¹, LAI Kin-keung²

1. School of Business, China East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai 200237, China;
2. College of Economics, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China

Received:2018-10-13 Revised:2019-04-24 Online:2020-11-20 Published:2020-12-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文考虑零售商主导的分别由一个供应商和一个零售商组成的两条竞争型供应链中，当两个供应商都未投资RFID技术、只有一个供应商投资RFID技术以及两个供应商同时投资RFID技术时，考虑供应商成本结构的差异，对比分析供应链的投资决策。由于模型解析解过于复杂，本文通过算例分析，着重考虑产品的替代率、RFID标签价格以及库存可获得率三个因素对供应链成员利润的影响。结果表明两条供应链对RFID技术的投资决策会因成本结构和产品替代率的不同而发生变化，其中在两个供应商生产成本差异较大且产品竞争强度较低时，生产成本较高的供应商更愿意投资RFID技术，而生产成本较低的供应商不愿意投资RFID技术，两个零售商则希望使用RFID技术，所以此时仅会有一条供应链上的成员达成一致，决定投资使用RFID技术。

关键词: 供应链竞争, RFID技术, 库存不准确, 投资决策

Abstract: Two supply chains which are led by retailers consisting of one supplier and one retailer are considered in this paper. The study is divided into three situations:two suppliers have not invested in RFID technology, only one supplier invests in RFID technology and two suppliers simultaneously invest in RFID, respectively. The differences in supplier cost structure and compares are considered and investment decisions in the supply chain are analyzed. Because the analytical solution of the model is too complicated, this paper focuses on the impact of the product replacement rate, RFID tag price and inventory availability on the profit of supply chain members through numerical analysis. The results show that the investment decisions of RFID technology in the two supply chains will change due to the difference in cost structure and product replacement rate. When the production cost difference between the two suppliers is obvious and the product competition intensity is relatively flat, the supplier with higher production cost is more willing to invest in RFID technology, while the supplier with lower production cost is reluctant to invest, and two retailers want to use RFID technology, so there will only be one supply chain that decides to invest in RFID technology. If only one supply chain invests in RFID technology, the impact of RFID tag cost on supplier revenue changes due to the cost of the supplier. When the supplier's production cost is high, his revenue decreases with the tag cost. When the supplier's production cost is low, his revenue increases with the tag cost. When the supplier's production cost is in the middle, the revenue rises and then decreases with the tag cost. The impact of inventory availability on supplier profit is similar to the cost of RFID tags.

Key words: supply chain management, RFID technology, inventory inaccuracy, investment decisions

中图分类号:

F224

江秋阳, 陶峰, 范体军, 黎建强. 基于RFID技术的双供应链投资决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(11): 120-129.

JIANG Qiu-yang, TAO Feng, FAN Ti-jun, LAI Kin-keung. Research on Decision-making of Two Supply Chains with RFID Technology[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2020, 28(11): 120-129.

参考文献

[1] Tao F, Fan T J, Lai K K. Inventory management under power structures with consignment contract subject to inventory inaccuracy[J]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. 2018, Doi:10.1109/TEM.2018.2850003.
[2] Alexander K, Gilliam T, Gramling K, et al. IBM business consulting services:Applying Auto-ID to reduce losses associated with shrink.[R]. Working Paper, Auto-ID Center, Cambridge, MA, 2002.
[3] Dehoratius N, Raman A. Inventory record inaccuracies:An empirical analysis[J]. Management Science, 2008, 54(4):627-641.
[4] Atali A, Lee H, Ozer O. Inventory control under imperfect information:Bounds, heuristics and approximations with demand prioritization[R]. Working Paper, 2004.
[5] Alexander K. et al. Applying Auto-ID to reduce losses associated with Shrink[R]. White Paper, Auto-ID Center, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2003.
[6] Dai H, Tseng M. The impacts of RFID implementation on reducing inventory inaccuracy in a multi-stage supply chain[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2012, 139:634-641.
[7] Kök A G. A break-even analysis of RFID technology for inventory sensitive to shrinkage[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2008, 112(2):521-531.
[8] Rekik Y, Sahin E, Dallery Y. Analysis of impact of RFID on reducing product misplacement errors at retail Stores[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2008, 12(1):266-274.
[9] Gaukler G M, Özalp Özer, Hausman W H. Order progress information:Improved dynamic emergency ordering policies.[J]. Production and Operations Management,2010,17(6), 599-613.
[10] Delen D, Hardgrave B C, Sharda R. RFID for better supply-chain management through enhanced information visibility[J]. Production and Operations Management, 2007, 16(5):613-624.
[11] Heese H. Inventory record inaccuracy, double marginalization, and RFID adoption[J]. Production and Operations Management, 2007, 16(5):542-553.
[12] Camdereli A Z, Swaminathan J M. Misplaced inventory and radio-frequency identification (RFID) technology:Information and coordination[J]. Production and Operations Management, 2010, 19(1):1-18.
[13] 范体军, 张丽, 李琳, 等. 基于RFID技术的零售型供应链投资决策研究[J]. 管理学报, 2013, 10(8):1230-1237.
[14] Zhang L H, Fan T J, Chiang W C, et al. Misplaced inventory and lead-time in the supply chain:analysis of decision-making on RFID investment with service level[J]. Journal of Applied Mathematics, 2014,(24):1-17.
[15] Fan Tijun, Tao Feng, Deng Sheng, et al. Impact of RFID technology on supply chain decisions with inventory inaccuracies[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2015, 159:117-125.
[16] 龚本刚, 汤家骏, 张孝琪,等. 基于RFID技术的双渠道供应链投资收益与协调[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2017, 23(9):2068-2080.
[17] Tao F, Fan T J, Lai K K, et al. Impact of RFID technology on inventory control policy[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2017, 68(2):207-220.
[18] 崔利刚, 邓洁, 王林, 等. 基于改进联合采购及配送模型的RFID投资决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(5):86-97.
[19] 鲁其辉, 朱道立. 质量与价格竞争供应链的均衡与协调策略研究[J]. 管理科学学报, 2009, 12(3):56-64.
[20] Banker R, Khosla I, Sinha K. Quality and competition[J]. Management Science, 1998, 44(9):1179-1192.

基于RFID技术的双供应链投资决策研究

Research on Decision-making of Two Supply Chains with RFID Technology

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	丁龙, 胡斌, 常珊, 石纯来. 基于灰色市场可追溯的RFID技术策略与窜货行为的博弈研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(2): 78-88.
[2]	孙浩, 王磊, 李晨, 胡劲松, 钟永光, 达庆利. 回收模式相异的零售商主导型闭环供应链竞争模型研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(4): 86-98.
[3]	王立夏. 基于产品生命周期的多阶段剩余收益项目决策模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(6): 158-166.
[4]	李佳宁, 钟田丽. 企业投资决策同伴效应及其特征的实证检验——基于中国上市公司的面板数据[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(12): 22-31.
[5]	崔利刚, 邓洁, 王林, 张金隆, 许茂增. 基于改进联合采购及配送模型的RFID投资决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(5): 86-97.
[6]	贺晓波, 王冬梅, 曾诗鸿. 附碳汇收益的林业投资项目价值评估——基于实物期权定价理论[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(3): 39-48.
[7]	许启发, 周莹莹, 蒋翠侠. 带有范数约束的CVaR高维组合投资决策[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(2): 40-49.
[8]	张尧, 关欣, 孙杨, 佐飞. 考虑背景风险的项目投资决策[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(9): 71-80.
[9]	李庆, 陈敏. 中国风电固定上网电价政策的实物期权理论与实证分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(5): 65-73.
[10]	张李浩, 范体军, 杨惠霄. 基于RFID技术的供应链投资决策及协调策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(8): 112-121.
[11]	谷晓燕. 基于实物期权的研发项目动态投资决策模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(7): 94-102.
[12]	李琳, 范体军. 零售商主导下生鲜农产品供应链的定价策略对比研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(12): 113-123.
[13]	张李浩, 范体军. 供应链企业投资RFID技术的成本分摊研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(4): 25-35.
[14]	徐兵, 杨金梅. 需求与回收确定下闭环供应链的竞争与链内协调研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(2): 48-55.
[15]	谢兆霞, 李莉. 两寡头序贯进入下的B2B电子商务网站IT投资决策[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(2): 56-64.