主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院

中国管理科学 ›› 2018, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (7): 187-196.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2018.07.020

• 论文 • 上一篇    

建设项目绿色创新努力及利他偏好诱导

陈哲1,2, 陈国宏1   

  1. 1. 福州大学经济与管理学院, 福建 福州 350116;
    2. 福建工程学院管理学院, 福建 福州 350118
  • 收稿日期:2017-02-24 修回日期:2017-05-23 出版日期:2018-07-20 发布日期:2018-09-20
  • 通讯作者: 陈国宏(1953-),男(汉族),福建福州人,福州大学经济与管理学院,教授,博士生导师,研究方向:科技管理,E-mail:cgh@fzu.edu.cn. E-mail:cgh@fzu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金资助项目(71403052);国家社科后期资助项目(15FGL005);教育部人文社科专项任务项目(17JDGC020);福州大学经济与管理学院管理科学与工程研究院高水平建设经费资助项目

Green Innovation Efforts and Altruistic Preference Elicitation in Construction Project

CHEN Zhe1,2, CHEN Guo-hong1   

  1. 1. School of Economics and Management, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350116, China;
    2. School of Management, Fujian University of Technology, Fuzhou 350118, China
  • Received:2017-02-24 Revised:2017-05-23 Online:2018-07-20 Published:2018-09-20

摘要: 建设项目绿色创新有赖于相关参与方的协同努力,利他偏好对合作参与方的自身努力与合作努力行为决策存在影响,通过建立项目绿色创新中主导方与成员方间的Stackelberg博弈模型,分析"分散—分散"与"集中—集中"两种决策结构情境下考虑利他偏好影响的绿色创新努力行为决策,得到以下结论:(1)在大多数情形下,利他偏好会对建设项目参与方努力行为产生正面作用,但具体影响程度与影响方向受所处的决策结构情境以及参与方间的利他偏好差异影响;(2)收益分配等因素影响参与方的两类努力行为决策,但是参与方间的利他偏好差异变化会改变收益分配对努力行为的影响方向,即利他偏好通过收益分配间接影响参与方努力决策;(3)收益的公平分配、适度的努力成本以及社会声誉激励可对利他行为形成诱导。由此,在利他偏好之于努力行为决策影响的研究中考虑情境及相关因素的影响,将使得结论更贴近现实。

关键词: 绿色创新, 利他偏好, 努力决策, 偏好诱导

Abstract: Construction activities have a significant impact on the environment; green innovation in construction project depends on participants' cooperation efforts, green cooperation is an important way to promote the green innovation performance of construction projects. Taking behavior preference influence into account in behavior decision-making process is closer to the reality, and altruistic preference is one of the behavior preferences which will influence the cooperation behavior decision significantly. Based on a Stackelberg model between the leader and other participants of construction project, green efforts(including self-working effort and cooperative working effort) decision making process is analyzed with the consideration of altruism preference in decentralized and centralized decision context. Conclusions are as follows:(1)In most cases, the altruistic preference has a positive effect on the participant's effort, but the extent of influence and the direction of influence are affected by the decision context and the altruistic preference difference between participants. Participants' self-working effort has nothing to do with altruistic preference in decentralized decision context, while cooperative working effort only has positive correlation with his own altruism preference. In the centralized decision context, two kinds of efforts have a positive relationship with their own altruism preference, and negatively associate with partners' altruistic preference. The altruistic preference difference between participants will also affect the effect of altruism preference. The one who has stronger altruistic preference is willing to offer more self-working and corporative efforts in cooperation, while the one who has weaker altruistic preference will probably have an opportunistic tendency to reduce the level of effort in certain conditions. (2) Income distribution will affect both self-working effort and cooperative working effort of participants, but difference between participants' altruistic preferences will change the income distribution effect on efforts decision, namely altruistic preferences will also affect participants' efforts decision indirectly through income distribution; (3) The income distribution, altruistic preferences difference, working costs, social reputation and other factors will affect the altruism preference. A fair distribution of income will have a positive guidance effect on participants' altruism preference, and also a reasonable cooperative tasks and moderate social reputation incentive will induce altruistic behaviors effectively. In conclusion, contexts and related factors are necessary to be taken into account in the study of the altruistic preferences' influence in the behavior decision, which will make the research findings more realistic.

Key words: green innovation, altruistic preference, effort decision, preference elicitation

中图分类号: