绿色购买行为演化路径与影响机理分析

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2015.11.020

中国管理科学 ›› 2015, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (11): 163-170.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2015.11.020

绿色购买行为演化路径与影响机理分析

赵爱武¹, 杜建国¹, 关洪军^2,3

1. 江苏大学社会科学计算实验中心, 江苏镇江 212013;
2. 山东财经大学管理科学与工程学院, 山东济南 250014;
3. 中央财经大学信息学院, 北京 100081

收稿日期:2013-08-24 修回日期:2014-03-11 出版日期:2015-11-20 发布日期:2015-12-01
作者简介:赵爱武(1970-),女(汉族),山东胶南人,江苏大学社会科学计算实验中心,管理科学与工程专业博士后,研究方向:复杂系统理论与方法.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(71171099,71201071,71471076,71411140250);教育部人文社科规划基金项目(14YJAH025);山东省自然科学基金资助项目(ZR2013GM003)

Evolution Trajectory and Intrinsic Machanism of Green Purchase Behavior

ZHAO Ai-wu¹, DU Jian-guo¹, GUAN Hong-jun^2,3

1. Computational Experiment Center for Social Sciencl, Jiangsu university, Zhenjiang 212013, China;
2. School of Management Science and Engineering, Shandong University of Finance and Economic, Ji'nan 250014, China;
3. School of Information Central University of Finance and Economic, Beijing 100081, China

Received:2013-08-24 Revised:2014-03-11 Online:2015-11-20 Published:2015-12-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 绿色消费理念转化为绿色购买行动,消费者需要承担一定的溢价支出。将环保因素引入消费者购买动机函数,考虑消费者的微观异质性、有限理性和环境复杂性,运用计算实验方法,基于情景建模构建消费者绿色购买行为计算实验模型,动态模拟不同情境下消费者参与绿色购买的过程,从宏观方面探索消费者绿色购买行为的演化路径,并从微观方面剖析其影响机理。实验结果显示,虽然价格敏感程度和环保意识水平是消费者绿色购买决策的关键因素,但绿色商品信息占优情境下,"朋友影响"可以显著提高绿色商品市场份额。绿色消费者在自身践行绿色购买的同时,应积极宣传绿色商品信息,这对于促使更多消费者将绿色消费理念转化为绿色购买行动,推动绿色消费市场的健康发展具有重要的现实意义。

关键词: 绿色购买行为, 有限理性, 计算实验, 代理

Abstract: Because of the premium of green products, it is more difficult for consumers to purchase green products instead of just holding green thoughts. In order to find out the real evolution trajectory and intrinsic mechanism of green purchase behavior, the effect of environmental awareness is introduced into purchase motivation function. Considering consumers' microscopic heterogeneity, limited rationality and the complexity of environment, the advantage of computational experiment method is taken to model green purchase behavior according to real-life scenario. By dynamic simulation under different scenarios, the evolution trajectory of green purchase behavior is explored from the macro aspect, and the intrinsic mechanism is analyzed from the microscopic aspect. Experimental results show, although the price sensitivity and the awareness of environment are two key factors in consumers' green purchase decision-making, "friend influence" can significantly improve the green market share when green product information is more widespread. Green consumers should actively spread green product information while they practice their own green purchase, which would prompt more consumers to turn the concept of green consumption into green purchasing action, and has important practical significance to promote the healthy development of green market.

Key words: green purchase behavior, bounded rationality, computational experiment, agent

中图分类号:

F224.9

赵爱武, 杜建国, 关洪军. 绿色购买行为演化路径与影响机理分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(11): 163-170.

ZHAO Ai-wu, DU Jian-guo, GUAN Hong-jun. Evolution Trajectory and Intrinsic Machanism of Green Purchase Behavior[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2015, 23(11): 163-170.

参考文献

[1] Diamantopoulos A, Schlegelmilch B B, Sinkovics R R, et al. Can socio-demographics still play a role in profiling green consumers? A review of the evidence and an empirical investigation[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2003, 56(6):465-480.

[2] Hartmann P, Ibánez V A. Green value added[J]. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 2006, 24(7):673-680.

[3] Papaoikonomou E, Ryan G, Valverde M. Mapping ethical consumer behavior:Integrating the empirical research and identifying future directions[J]. Ethics & Behavior, 2011, 21(3):197-221.

[4] Cowe R, Williams S. Who are the ethical consumers?.Working paper, London, UK:The Co-operative Bank,2000.

[5] Meagan W, Anne S, Magda N. The effect of'green' messages on brand purchase and brand rejection[J]. Australasian Marketing Journal. 2013, 21(2):105-110.

[6] Mainieri T, BarnettE G, Valdero T R, et al. Green buying:The influence of environmental concern on consumer behavior[J]. Journal of Social Psychology, 1997, 137(2):189-204.

[7] Shrum L M, Mccarty J A, Lowrey T M. Buyer characteristics of the green consumer and their implications for adverting strategy[J]. Journal of Advertising, 1995, 24(2):71-82.

[8] Ilker M A. The impact of green product innovation on firm performance and competitive capability:The moderating role of managerial environmental concern[J]. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2012, 62(24):854-864.

[9] 孙剑,李崇光,黄宗煌.绿色食品信息、价值属性对绿色购买行为影响实证研究[J].管理学报, 2010, 7(1):57-63.

[10] Samantha S, Angela P. Eating clean and green? Investigating consumer motivations towards the purchase of organic food[J]. Australasian Marketing Journal. 2010,18(2):93-104.

[11] Ramayah T, Lee JWC, Mohamad O. Green product purchase intention:Some insights from a developing country[J]. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 2010,54(12):1419-1427.

[12] Engel J F, Blackwell R D, Miniard P W. Consumer Behavior[M]. 8th ed. Philadephia:The Dryden Press, 1995.

[13] Ariel R. Modeling bounded rationality[M]. Massachusetts:The MIT Press, 1997.

[14] 井绍平.绿色营销及其对消费者心理与行为影响的分析[J].管理世界, 2004, (5):145-146.

[15] Ling Xue. Evolution of spatial structure of commerce center in global city-region:A dynamic agent-based simulation[J]. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2013, 77:308-321.

[16] 盛昭瀚,金帅.湖泊流域系统复杂性分析的计算实验方法[J].系统管理学报. 2012, 21(6):771-780.

[17] 金帅,盛昭瀚,杜建国.排污权交易系统中政府监管策略分析[J].中国管理科学. 2011, 19(4):174-183.

[18] Liu Yong, Ye Hong. The dynamic study on firms' environmental behavior and influencing factors:An adaptive agent-based modeling approach[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2012, 37:278-287.

[19] Martin G, Timothy B. Company environmental performance and consumer purchase intentions[J]. Journal of Business Research. 2013,66:1945-1953.

[20] 仇立.基于绿色品牌的消费者行为研究[D].天津:天津大学,2012.

[21] Zhang Tao, Zhang D. Agent-based simulation of consumer purchase decision-making and the decoy effect[J]. Journal of Business Research. 2007,60(8):912-922.

[22] Kim B, Blattberg R C, Rossi P E. Modeling the distribution of price sensitivity and implications for optimal retail pricing[J]. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 1995; 13(3):291-303.

[23] Camerer C, Ho T H. Experience-weighted attraction learning in normal-form games[J]. Econometrica, 1999, 67(4):827-874.

[24] Zhao Huihui, Gao Qian, Wu Yaoping, et al. What affects green consumer behavior in China? A case study from Qingdao[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2013, 63:143-151.

绿色购买行为演化路径与影响机理分析

Evolution Trajectory and Intrinsic Machanism of Green Purchase Behavior

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	宫庆彬, 杨哲. 有限理性下序贯价格竞争的动态演化[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(4): 186-194.
[2]	杨剑, 方易新, 杜少甫. 考虑参照依赖的企业合作创新演化博弈分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(1): 191-200.
[3]	黄春萍, 赵林, 刘璞, 都扬扬, 张芙幸. 新创企业品牌联合伙伴选择的计算实验研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(8): 129-141.
[4]	王欢, 方志耕. 制造商相对弱势格局下“主制造商-供应商”双方叫价拍卖灰博弈模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(6): 103-112.
[5]	孙彤, 薛爽. 管理层自利行为与外部监督——基于信息披露的信号博弈[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(2): 187-196.
[6]	许保光, 徐静, 高敏刚, 邵雪焱. 具有风险传导特征的信息加工业务薪酬激励研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(10): 128-137.
[7]	赵爱武, 杜建国, 关洪军. 消费者异质需求下企业环境创新行为演化模拟与分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(6): 124-132.
[8]	黄顺武, 俞凯, 贾捷. 询价制下IPO定价的演化博弈分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(12): 78-89.
[9]	李健, 王雅洁, 吴军, 杨丰梅. 考虑声誉效应的存货质押融资中银行对物流企业的激励机制研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(7): 86-92.
[10]	高广鑫, 樊治平. 考虑投标者有限理性行为的网上临时一口价拍卖的卖方收益分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(7): 102-112.
[11]	郭汉丁, 郝海, 张印贤. 工程质量政府监督代理链分析与多层次激励机制探究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(6): 82-90.
[12]	赵宸元, 蒲勇健, 潘林伟. 链式多重委托-代理关系的激励——基于完全理性与过程性公平偏好模型的比较[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(6): 121-131.
[13]	鲁渤, 王辉坡. 国际集装箱货运代理市场逆向选择问题的治理[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(4): 95-103.
[14]	任龙, 刘骏. 考虑下侧风险厌恶参与者的技术外包合同研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(4): 184-189.
[15]	徐朝辉, 周宗放. 内部控制、过度投资与公司信用风险[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(9): 21-27.