基于演化博弈的农村环境治理众筹机制研究

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2020.2033

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 农村环境治理已经成为乡村振兴战略的一项重要任务，仅依靠政府单一治理主体无力应对全国70多万行政村的环境治理需求，发挥农户治理主体作用成为一种新的农村环境治理机制。本文将众筹模式引入环境治理中，采用演化博弈理论，在公平贡献和利他偏好两种情景下，分析有限理性农户决策行为演化动态，研究风险发生概率、亲环境偏好、团体效用、初始财富、融资目标、众筹份额等对环境治理众筹融资成功的影响。研究发现：公平贡献和利他偏好两种情形下，考虑环境污染给农户初始财富带来风险时，当初始财富期望损失、团体效用与声誉损失之和大于参与众筹的支出时，参与环境治理众筹成为农户的演化稳定策略。风险发生的概率越大、初始财富越多、参与众筹获得的群体认同价值越大、不参与时声誉损失越大，越有利于参与众筹策略成为农户的演化稳定策略。而在公平贡献模式下，当初始财富期望损失、团体效用与声誉损失之和小于参与众筹的支出时，农户群体中会出现不参与和不参与环境治理众筹两种策略共存的稳定均衡状态。通过对农户参与环境治理众筹成为演化稳定策略的内在机理分析，为农村环境治理众筹融资实践提供决策参考。

关键词: 农村环境治理, 演化博弈, 众筹, 复制动态方程

Abstract: Rural environmental governance is one of the important tasks of Rural Revitalization Strategy. The government alone is unable to meet the environmental governance needs of more than 700,000 administrative villages in China. It has become a new mechanism to play the role of the main body of farmers,this will fundamentally relieve the pressure on government finances. In this paper, the crowdfunding is introduced into the environmental governance. The evolutionary game models of two strategies for multiple players are constructed under two scenarios of fair contribution and altruistic preference. Then the effects of risk probability, environment-friendly preference, group utility, initial wealth, financing target and crowdfunding shares on crowdfunding success are analyzed, and the internal mechanism of the emergence of cooperative environmental governance behavior of farmers is revealed.

Key words: rural environmental governance, evolutionary game, crowdfunding, replicator dynamics equation

中图分类号:

F203.9

何奇龙, 罗兴, 陈力朋, 顾翠伶. 基于演化博弈的农村环境治理众筹机制研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(11): 170-181.

HE Qi-long, LUO Xing, CHEN Li-peng, GU Cui-ling. Crowdfunding Mechanism of Rural Environmental Governance Based on Evolutionary Game Theory[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(11): 170-181.

参考文献

［1］于法稳.乡村振兴战略下农村人居环境整治［J］.中国特色社会主义研究,2019(2):80-85.Yu Fawen. Improvement of rural living environment under rural revitalization strategy［J］.The Study of Socialism with Chinese Characteristics, 2019(2):80-85.
［2］王晓宇,原新,成前.中国农村人居环境问题、收入与农民健康［J］.生态经济,2018, 34(6):150-154.Wang Xiaoyu, Yuan Xin, Cheng Qian. Human Settlements, Income and Health of the Rural China［J］.Ecological Economy, 2018, 34(6):150-154.
［3］杜焱强,刘平养,包存宽.社会资本视阈下的农村环境治理研究——以欠发达地区J村养殖污染为个案［J］.公共管理学报,2016(4):101-112.Du Yanqiang, Liu Pingyang, Bao Cunkuan. A study on the rural environmental governance through the lens of social capital: A case of livestock farming pollution in the undeveloped region［J］. Journal of Public Management, 2016(4):101-102.
［4］唐林,罗小锋,黄炎忠.劳动力流动抑制了农户参与村域环境治理吗?——基于湖北省的调查数据［J］.中国农村经济，2019(9):88-103.Tang Lin, Luo Xiaofeng, Huang Yangzhong. Does labor mobility inhibit farmers’ participation in village environmental governance? an analysis based on survey data from hubei province［J］. Chinese Rural Economy, 2019(9):88-103.
［5］杜焱强.PPP模式下农村环境治理的多元主体何以共生?——基于演化博弈视角的研究［J］.华中农业大学学报(社会科学版),2019(6):89-96.Du Yanqiang. Research on the symbiotic logic of multiple subjects in rural environmental governance under the PPP Model: based on the Three-party evolution game［J］. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University (Social Sciences Edition), 2019(6):89-96.
［6］宋言奇．发达地区农民环境意识调查分析——以苏州市714个样本为例［J］.中国农村经济,2010(1):53-63.Song Yanqi. Investigation and analysis of peasants’ environmental awareness in developed areas: A case study of 714 samples in suzhou city［J］. Chinese Rural Economy,2010(1):53-63.
［7］黄森慰,唐丹,郑逸芳.农村环境污染治理中的公众参与研究［J］.中国行政管理,2017(3):55-60.Huang Senwei, Tang Dan, Zheng Yifang. Research on public parcipation mechanism of rural environmental governance: Taking fujian province as an observation case［J］. Chinese Pubilc Administration, 2017(3):55-60.
［8］唐林,罗小锋,黄炎忠,等.主动参与还是被动选择:农户村域环境治理参与行为及效果差异分析［J］.长江流域资源与环境,2019(7):1747-1756.Tang Lin, Luo Xiaofeng, Huang Yanzhong, et al. Active participation or passive choice: Analvsis of the participation behaviors and effects of villege domain environmental governance［J］. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2019(7):1747-1756.
［9］杜焱强,刘平养,吴娜伟.政府和社会资本合作会成为中国农村环境治理的新模式吗?——基于全国若干案例的现实检验［J］.中国农村经济,2018,408(12):69-84.Du Yanqiang, Liu Pingyang, Wu Nawei. Can public private partnership (PPP) in rural environmental governance become a new governance model in China? An analysis based on a reality testing on six cases［J］. Chinese Rural Economy, 2018, 408(12):69-84.
［10］ Shao Shuai, Tian Zhihua, Fan Meiting. Do the rich have stronger willingness to pay for environmental protection? New evidence from a survey in China［J］. World Development, 2018, 105:83-94.
［11］史恒通,睢党臣,徐涛.生态价值认知对农民流域生态治理参与意愿的影响——以陕西省渭河流域为例［J］.中国农村观察,2017(2):70-82.Shi Hengtong, Sui Dangchen, Xu Tao. The influence mechanism of ecological value cogniton on farmers’ willingness to participate in ecological management: An example from weihe basin in shanxi province［J］. China Rural Survey, 2017(2):70-82.
［12］ Halkos G, Matsiori S.Exploring social attitude and willingness to pay for water resources conservation［J］. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 2014, 49:54-62.
［13］施卓敏,吴路芳,邝灶英.面子意识如何逆转自私行为?——社会价值取向对生态消费的影响［J］.营销科学学报,2014,10(2):59-81.Shi Zhuomin, Wu Lufang, Kuang Zaoying. How face consciousness reverse pro-self behavior? A study on sustainable consumption from the perspective of social value orientation［J］. Journal of Marketing Science.
［14］史恒通,睢党臣,吴海霞.社会资本对农户参与流域生态治理行为的影响:以黑河流域为例［J］.中国农村经济,2018, 397(1):36-47.Shi Hengtong, Sui Dangchen, Wu Haixia. The influence of social capital on farmers’ participation in watershed ecological management behavior: Evidence from heihe basin［J］. Chinese Rural Economy, 2018, 397(1):36-47.
［15］ Musso J A， Weare C. From participatory reform to social capital: Micro-motives and the macro-structure of civil society networks［J］. Public Administration Review, 2015, 75(1)：150-164.
［16］ Bisung E, Elliott S J, Schuster-Wallace C J,et al. Social capital, collective action and access to water in rural Kenya［J］.Social Science & Medicine,2014,119: 147-154.
［17］ Kevin L. How authoritarian is the environmental governance of China?［J］. Environmental Science & Policy, 2015, 54:152-159.
［18］ Klandermans B.How group identificati on helps to overcome the dilemma of collective action［J］. American Behavioral Scientist, 2002,45(5): 887-900.
［19］ Chen Xiaoping, Arzu Wasti S, Triandis H C.When does group norm or group identity predict cooperation in a public goods dilemma? The moderating effects of idiocentrism and allocentrism［J］.International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 2007,31(2):259-276.
［20］王雪莉,董念念.中国式众筹的信任如何构建和演化?——基于水木客众筹行为的案例研究［J］.管理评论,2018(1):242-255.Wang Xueli, Dong Niannian. How trust is built and evolves in the context of Chinese crowfunding? A case study of Shui Mu Ke’ s crowfunding［J］. Management Review, 2018(1):242-255.
［21］黄玲,周勤.创意众筹的异质性融资激励与自反馈机制设计研究——以“点名时间”为例［J］.中国工业经济,2014(7):135-147.Huang Ling, Zhou Qin. Study on heterogeneity of financing incentives and self-feedback mechanism in creative crowdfunding: The case of the “Demohour”［J］. China Industrial Economics, 2014(7):135-147.
［22］屈绍建,卢艳玲.社交网络推送下的众筹融资机制分析［J］.中国管理科学,2019, 27(3):1-10.Qu Shaojian, Lu Yangling. The analysis of crowfunding financing mechanism based on social network［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2019, 27(3):135-147.
［23］ Bekkers R H F P, Wiepking P. A literature review of empirical studies of philanthropy: Eight mechanisms that drive charitable giving［J］.Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 2011, 40(5), 924-973.
［24］ Li Yung-Ming, Wu J D, Hsieh C Y,et al. A social fundraising mechanism for charity crowdfunding［J］. Decision Support Systems,2020, DOI:10.1016/j.dss.2019. 113170.
［25］ Lin Mingfeng, Prabhala N R, Viswanathan S. Judging borrowers by the company they keep: Friendship networks and information asymmetry in Online Peer-to-Peer lending［J］. Management Science, 2013, 59(1):17-35.
［26］ Kang Lele, Jiang Qiqi, Tan C H. Remarkable advocates: An investigation of geographic distance and social capital for crowdfunding［J］. Information& Management, 2016, 54(3):336-348.
［27］ Lukkarinen A, Teich J E, Wallenius H, et al. Success drivers of online equity crowdfunding campaigns［J］. Decision Support Systems, 2016,87:26-38.
［28］ Hoerisch J. Crowdfunding for Environmental Ventures: An empirical analysis of the influence of environmental orientation on the success of crowdfunding initiatives［J］. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2015, 107(16):636-645.
［29］ Takahiro Kubo, Diogo Veríssimo,Shinya Uryu, etal. What determines the success and failure of environmental crowdfunding?［J］. Ambio, 2021, DOI:10.1007/s13280- 021-01522-0.
［30］张文浩,刘镜妍.乡村再造的边界众筹模式探索——基于揭阳古村酒业案例的分析［J］.广东农工商职业技术学院学报,2018,34(4):76-81.Zhang Wenhao, Liu Jingyan. Exploration on the model of boundary crowd-funding for rural redevelopment: Based on the case study of jieyang ancient village wine industry［J］. Journal of Guangdong Agriculture Industry Business Polytechnic, 2018, 34(4):76-81.
［31］费孝通.乡土中国(第三版)［M］.北京:北京出版社,2011.Fei Xiaotong. Rural China (3rd Edition)［M］. Beijing: Beijing Press, 2011.
［32］曹舒,冯玉荣,陈晓玲,胡梅.农村环境整治工作模式探析——以凤翔县为例［J］.新西部,2020(3):51-52+61.Cao Shu, Feng Yurong, Chen Xiling, et al. Analysis on the work mode of rural environment improvement: taking Fengxiang County as an example［J］. New West, 2020(3):51-52+61.
［33］于少青,王芳.环保众筹模式下社会资本参与环境治理研究［J］.改革与战略,2017,33(3):38-41.Yu Shaoqing, Wang Fang. The study capital for environmental governance in the environment protection’ s crowd-funding in China［J］. Reformation & Strategy, 2017, 33(3):38-41.
［34］傅熠华.众筹型治理:基本内涵、典型特征与治理价值［J］.求索,2018,307(3):47-55.Fu Yihua. Crowdfunding governance: Basic connotation, typical characteristics and governance value［J］. Probe, 2018, 307(3):47-55.
［35］王先甲,顾翠伶,赵金华,等.选择差异下Moran过程的随机博弈模型及其应用［J］.系统工程理论与实践,2020, 40(5):1193-1209.Wang Xianjia,Gu Cuiling, Zhao Jinhua, et al.Stoch astic evolution dynamic model of Moran Process with selection difference and its application［J］.Systems Engineering- Theory & Practice, 2020, 40(5):1193-1209.
［36］何奇龙,李琴英,李晶.污染产业转移下府际间合作治理大气污染的演化博弈分析［J］.运筹与管理, 2020, 29(4): 86-92.He Qilong, Li Qinying, Li Jing. The evolutionary game analysis of cooperative governance air pollution models between the local government considering pollution industries transferred［J］. Operations Research and Management Science, 2020, 29(4):86-92.
［37］ Belleflamme P, Lambert T, Schwienbacher A. Crowdfunding: Tapping the right crowd［J］.Journal of Business Venturing, 2014,29(5):585-609.
［38］王先甲,何奇龙,全吉.基于复制动态的消费者众筹策略演化动态［J］.系统工程理论与实践, 2017, 37(11): 2812- 2820.Wang Xianjia,He Qilong, Quan Ji. Evolutionary dynamics of consumers’crowdfunding strategies based on replicator dynamics［J］.Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice,2017, 37(11):2812-2820.

[1]	孟斌, 张欣, 匡海波, 钮尔轩. 基于政府调控的绿色智慧港口转型演化及扩散研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(8): 21-35.
[2]	张骥骧, 席轩. 流域排污权交易下地方政府和企业氮减排演化博弈分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(8): 185-195.
[3]	李新建, 杨红, 曾玲, 李小玲. 参与农产品区域公用品牌提升的三方演化博弈[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(8): 196-209.
[4]	和征, 张志钊, 杨小红. 云制造创新生态系统知识共享激励的演化博弈分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(7): 77-87.
[5]	冯长利, 马睿泽. 基于服务化的制造企业与服务提供商的演化博弈分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(6): 263-274.
[6]	王璐, 马庆庆, 杨劼, 郑君君. 基于复杂网络演化博弈的绿色消费者对新能源汽车扩散的影响研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(4): 74-85.
[7]	徐乐, 马永刚, 王小飞. 基于演化博弈的绿色技术创新环境政策选择研究：政府行为VS.公众参与[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(3): 30-42.
[8]	邢根上, 鲁芳, 周忠宝, 叶锦龙. 数据可携权能否治理“大数据杀熟”？[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(3): 85-95.
[9]	刘家国, 孔玉丹, 镇璐. 考虑双均衡的港航供应链可持续投资研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(3): 142-153.
[10]	孙淑慧, 朱立龙. 消费者反馈下企业质量改进投入决策Moran演化分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(2): 244-255.
[11]	卢艳秋, 廖爱红. 基于三方演化博弈的新创科技型企业集群网络嵌入机制研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(2): 276-286.
[12]	梁雁茹, 刘亦晴. COVID-19疫情下医疗防护用品市场监管演化博弈与稳定性分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(10): 85-95.
[13]	李冬冬, 李春发, 王晟锴. 行业自律机制下P2P网贷平台违规治理演化博弈[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(10): 96-108.
[14]	陈俊霖, 王山. 双渠道供应链中紧俏产品升级成本分担演化博弈分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(10): 224-235.
[15]	王超发, 蔡鑫, 杨德林. 考虑决策者期望的企业R&D项目投资路径演化博弈研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(8): 116-125.