主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院

中国管理科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (9): 258-268.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2022.1847

• • 上一篇    下一篇

非对称竞争中劣势零售商竞争保价政策研究

昝田芳1, 徐金鹏1, 李一1, 尤晓岚2(), 冯耕中3   

  1. 1.西安电子科技大学经济与管理学院,陕西 西安 710126
    2.西安邮电大学经济与管理学院,陕西 西安 710061
    3.西安交通大学管理学院,陕西 西安 710049
  • 收稿日期:2022-08-23 修回日期:2022-12-23 出版日期:2025-09-25 发布日期:2025-09-29
  • 通讯作者: 尤晓岚 E-mail:youxiaolan@xupt.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社会科学青年项目(22YJC630173);国家社会科学基金重大项目(20&ZD053);陕西省创新能力支撑计划项目(2023-CX-RKX-139);陕西省创新能力支撑计划项目(2025KG-YBXM-069);陕西省教育厅哲学社会科学重点研究基地项目(18JZ053);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(ZYTS25017)

The Competitive Price-matching Policy of an Inferior Retailer in Asymmetric Competition

Tianfang Zan1, Jinpeng Xu1, Yi Li1, Xiaolan You2(), Gengzhong Feng3   

  1. 1.School of Economics & Management,Xidian University,Xi'an 710126,China
    2.School of Economics & Management,Xi'an University of Posts & Telecommunications,Xi'an 710061,China
    3.School of Management,Xi'an Jiaotong University,Xi'an 710049,China
  • Received:2022-08-23 Revised:2022-12-23 Online:2025-09-25 Published:2025-09-29
  • Contact: Xiaolan You E-mail:youxiaolan@xupt.edu.cn

摘要:

竞争保价政策有利于消除消费者的价格疑虑,受到了非对称竞争中劣势零售商的青睐。本文根据消费者购买习惯,考虑市场上存在转移型和忠诚型两类消费者,基于霍特林模型构建了双寡头零售商非对称博弈模型,研究了在成本与规模方面处于劣势地位的零售商采用竞争保价政策的市场条件,分析了该政策对均衡价格、利润和消费者福利的影响。研究结果表明,竞争保价政策具有一定的竞争抑制作用,会提高劣势零售商的价格和市场均衡价格,劣势零售商能否获益于竞争保价政策,取决于消费者结构、保价政策的市场刺激效应和退款成本。优势零售商可能会受益或受害于劣势零售商的保价政策,同时,保价政策并不总会损害消费者福利。本研究的主要贡献在于从消费者结构的角度探讨了劣势零售商采取竞争保价政策改善竞争态势的机制和条件,同时,解释了劣势零售商更积极地采用竞争保价政策的原因,并分析了消费者结构、保价政策的市场刺激效应和退款成本对均衡价格、零售商利润和消费者福利提升条件的交互影响。

关键词: 竞争保价政策, 非对称竞争, 劣势零售商, 消费者结构, 霍特林模型

Abstract:

With the development of the e-commerce, it is common for consumers to compare prices on multiple channels. In order to eliminate consumers' doubts about high prices and attract more consumers, competitive price-matching policy, which can influence consumers' purchasing decisions, is favored by some inferior retailers in asymmetric competition (i.e., Dangdang, Suning and Gome etc.). When one retailer offers competitive price-matching policy, consumers can apply to the retailer for price difference compensation if they find a lower retail price within a certain period of time and within a certain area after purchasing the product. The existing literature has a theoretical gap in how an inferior retailer should adopt competitive price-matching policy in asymmetric competition with a superior retailer, which motivates us to ask the following research question: First, under what market conditions can the inferior retailer obtain greater profits by adopting competitive price-matching policy? Does the superior retailer benefit from the inferior retailer's competitive price-matching policy? Second, how do the structure of consumers, the market stimulus effect of the policy, and the cost of price-matching affect the conditions under which the inferior retailer adopts competitive price-matching policy? Third, how will the equilibrium price and profit of the inferior and superior retailers, and consumer welfare change after the inferior retailer adopts the policy? To address these questions, it is considered that the market is consisting of two types of consumers, i.e., switchers and loyals, and a game-theoretical model is developed based on Hotelling model to study the price competition between an inferior retailer and a superior retailer. The scenarios of non-adoption and adoption of competitive price-matching policy by the inferior retailer (i.e., scenario N and scenario M) is analyzed.The research results show that the competitive price-matching policy has a competition-dampening effect, which will increase the price of the inferior retailer and the average market price. The possibility of the two retailers colluding to reach the same price increases with the proportion of consumers who request refunds. Whether the inferior retailer can benefit from the policy depends on the structure of consumers, the policy's market stimulus effect and the price-matching cost, and the superior retailer may either benefit or suffer from the policy. In addition, the policy does not always hurt consumer welfare. From the perspective of consumer structure, the mechanism and conditions of an inferior retailer adopting competitive price-matching policy to improve the competition situation are discussed. In other words, the main contribution of this study is to explain why inferior retailers are more aggressive in adopting competitive price-matching policy, and analyze how consumer structure, the policy's market stimulus effect, and price-matching cost jointly affect the equilibrium prices, and the conditions under which the two retailers and consumers can benefit from the policy. The results provide guidance for inferior retailers on whether or not adopting competitive price-matching policy and how to decide on the retail price under the policy. Specifically, inferior retailers should decide whether to adopt competitive price-matching policy based on market structure and cost. After adopting the policy, they should strengthen publicity to expand the market promotion effect of the policy, and establish a refund application review system to reduce refund costs. In addition, consumers should not put too much faith in competitive price-matching policy.

Key words: competitive price-matching policy, asymmetric competition, inferior retailer, consumer structure, Hotelling model

中图分类号: