一般均衡理论视角下绿色金融的减排效应研究：从模型构建到实证检验

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2021.2630

中国管理科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (12): 173-184.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2021.2630

• 论文 • 上一篇

一般均衡理论视角下绿色金融的减排效应研究：从模型构建到实证检验

文书洋¹, 史皓铭², 郭健³, ⁴

1.西南财经大学中国金融研究中心，四川成都610031；2.西南财经大学金融学院，四川成都610031；3.中央财经大学管理科学与工程学院，北京100089；4.中国石油大学北京克拉玛依校区工商管理学院，新疆维吾尔自治区克拉玛依834000

收稿日期:2021-07-31 修回日期:2022-03-21 发布日期:2023-01-10
通讯作者: 文书洋(1991-)，男(白族)，云南丽江人，西南财经大学中国金融研究院，讲师，研究方向：经济增长、绿色金融,Email: wenshuyang1123@163.com. E-mail:wenshuyang1123@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助青年项目（72203175）;国家社会科学基金重点项目 (19AZD010)；西南财经大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项经费；西南财经大学中国特色现代金融理论研究平台资助；中央财经大学金融可持续发展研究团队资助

Research on the Emission Reduction Effect of Green Finance from the Perspective of General Equilibrium Theory: Modeling and Empirical Test

WEN Shu-yang¹, SHI Hao-ming², GUO Jian³, ⁴

1. Institute of Chinses Financial Study, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 610000, China;2. School of Finance,Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 610000, China;3. School of Management Science and Engineering, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100089, China;4. School of Business Administration, Karamay Campus, China University of Petroleum Beijing, Karamay City, 834000, China

Received:2021-07-31 Revised:2022-03-21 Published:2023-01-10
Contact: 文书洋 E-mail:wenshuyang1123@163.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 绿色金融是否能够有效促进碳减排？其内在机制是什么？在碳达峰与碳中和的时代目标下，科学、严谨地回答这一问题意义重大。本文将经典理论与最新前沿相结合，提出绿色金融能够通过促进绿色技术进步帮助碳减排的理论假说。构建带有碳排放约束并内生减排技术进步的一般均衡模型，解释了绿色金融通过支持技术进步实现碳减排的内在机制，并提供了基于中国省级面板数据的实证证据。本文的研究从理论和实证两个维度论证了绿色金融对碳减排的影响，指出支持技术创新是绿色金融发挥减排效应的重要机制。因而在发展绿色金融的过程中，注重金融资源的实际用途，有效支持减排技术更新，比单纯限制高排放行业的金融资源获取更加有效。同时，理论分析表明，绿色金融并非越多越好，而是存在最优规模。在积极推动绿色金融发展的同时，依然需要注重统筹规划，避免金融“过绿”带来不必要的损失。

关键词: 绿色金融；碳排放；一般均衡模型

Abstract: Can green finance effectively promote carbon emission reduction? What is its internal mechanism? With the goal of carbon peaking and carbon neutrality, it is of great significance to answer this question scientifically and rigorously. The theoretical hypothesis is put forward that green finance can help carbon emission reduction by promoting the progress of green technology. This general equilibrium model with carbon emission constraints and endogenous emission reduction technology progress in the paper explains the internal mechanism of green finance to achieve carbon emission reduction by supporting technological progress, and provides empirical evidence based on China’s provincial panel data. The impact of green finance on carbon emission reduction from both theoretical and empirical dimensions is demonstrated, and it is pointed out that supporting technological innovation is an important mechanism for green finance to exert its emission reduction effect. Therefore, in the process of developing green finance, it is more effective to focus on the practical use of financial resources and effectively support the updating of emission reduction technologies than simply restricting the acquisition of financial resources in high-emission industries. At the same time, theoretical analysis shows that more green finance is not necessarily better, but there is an optimal scale. While actively promoting the development of green finance, it is still necessary to pay attention to overall planning to avoid unnecessary losses caused by financial “over-greening”.

Key words: green finance; carbon emissions; general equilibrium model

中图分类号:

文书洋, 史皓铭, 郭健,. 一般均衡理论视角下绿色金融的减排效应研究：从模型构建到实证检验[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(12): 173-184.

WEN Shu-yang, SHI Hao-ming, GUO Jian,. Research on the Emission Reduction Effect of Green Finance from the Perspective of General Equilibrium Theory: Modeling and Empirical Test[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(12): 173-184.

参考文献

［1］ Zhang Dayong, Zhang Zhiwei, Managi S. A bibliometric analysis on green finance: Current status, development, and future directions［J］. Finance Research Letters, 2019, C(29): 425-430.
［2］文书洋,林则夫,刘锡良.绿色金融与经济增长质量：带有资源环境约束的一般均衡模型构建与实证检验［J］.中国管理科学, 2022, 30(3):55-65.Wen Shuyang, Lin Zefu, Liu Xiliang. Green finance and economic growth quality: construction of general equilibrium model with resource constraints and empirical test［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(3): 55-65.
［3］ Ross L. Finance and growth: Theory and evidence ［J］. in Handbook of Economic Growth, 2005, 12(1):865-934.
［4］彭水军,包群.资源约束条件下长期经济增长的动力机制——基于内生增长理论模型的研究［J］. 财经研究, 2006(6): 110-119.Peng Shuijun, Bao Qun. Resource depletion and long run economic growth based on an endogenous growth model［J］. Journal of Finance and Economics, 2006(6): 110-119.
［5］ Menuet M, Minea A, Villieu P, et al. Growth, Endogenous environmental cycles, and indeterminacy［R］. Working Paper, Economic Research Department of the University of Orléans (LEO), 2021.
［6］王馨,王营.绿色信贷政策增进绿色创新研究［J］. 管理世界, 2021, 37(6): 173-188+11.Wang Xin, Wang Ying. Research on the green innovation promoted by green credit policies［J］. Management World, 2021,37(6): 173-188+11.
［7］谢乔昕.环境规制、绿色金融发展与企业技术创新［J］. 科研管理, 2021, 42(6): 65-72.Xie Qiaoxin. Environmental regulation, green financial development, and technological innovation of firms［J］. Science Research Management, 2021, 42(6): 65-72.
［8］ Dasgupta P, Heal G. The optimal depletion of exhaustible resources［J］, Review of Economic Studies, 1974, 41(5): 3-28.
［9］ Stiglitz J E. Growth with exhaustible natural resources: Efficient and optimal growth paths［J］. Review of Economic Studies, 1974, 41(5): 123-137.
［10］ Bovenberg A L, Smulders S. Environmental quality and pollution-augmenting technological change in a two-sector endogenous growth model［J］. Journal of Public Economics, 1995, 57(3): 369-391.
［11］ Brock W A, Taylor M S. The green solow model［J］. Journal of Economic Growth, 2010, 15(2): 127-153.
［12］ Nordhaus W D . An optimal transition path for controlling greenhouse gases［J］. Science, 1993, 259(5100):1384-1384.
［13］ Nordhaus W D. Managing the global commons: The economics of climate change［M］. Cambridge, MA: MIT press, 1994.
［14］ Nordhaus W D, Yang Zili. A regional dynamic general-equilibrium model of alternative climate-change strategies ［J］. The American Economic Review, 1996, 4(86): 741-765.
［15］龚瑶,严婷.技术冲击、碳排放与气候环境——基于DICE模型框架的模拟［J］. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22 (S1): 801-809.Gong Yao, Yan Ting. Technology impact, carbon emissions and climate environment based on economy and climate simulation—In the framework of DICE model［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2014, 22 (S1): 801-809.
［16］ White M A. Environmental finance: value and risk in an age of ecology［J］. Business Strategy and the Environment, 1996, 5(3): 198-206.
［17］ Berensmann K, Volz U, Alloisio I, et al. Fostering sustainable global growth through green finance-what role for the G20 ［R］.Working Paper, T20 Task Force on Climate Policy and Finance, 2017.
［18］宁伟,佘金花.绿色金融与宏观经济增长动态关系实证研究［J］. 求索, 2014(8): 62-66.Ning Wei, She Jinhua, Ning Wei, She Jinhua. An empirical study on the dynamic relationship between green finance and macroeconomic growth［J］. Seeker, 2014(8): 62-66.
［19］邱海洋.绿色金融的经济增长效应研究［J］.经济研究参考,2017(38): 53-59.Qui Haiyang. Research on the economic growth effect of green finance［J］. Review of Economic Research, 2017(38): 53-59.
［20］王遥,潘冬阳,彭俞超,等.基于DSGE模型的绿色信贷激励政策研究［J］. 金融研究, 2019(11): 1-18.Wang Yao, Pan Dongyang, Peng Yuchao, at al. China’s incentive policies for green Loans: A DSGE approach［J］. Journal of Financial Research, 2019(11): 1-18.
［21］苏冬蔚,连莉莉.绿色信贷是否影响重污染企业的投融资行为?［J］. 金融研究, 2018(12): 123-137.Su Dongwei, Lian Lili. Does green credit policy affect corporate financing and investment? Evidence from publicly listed firms in pollution-intensive industries［J］. Journal of Financial Research, 2018(12): 123-137.
［22］ Liu Rongyan, Wang Deqing, Zhang Li , et al. Can green financial development promote regional ecological efficiency? A case study of China［J］. Natural Hazards, 2019,95: 325-341.
［23］ Abbasi F , Riaz K . CO2 emissions and financial development in an emerging economy: an augmented VAR approach［J］. Energy Policy, 2016, 90(3): 102-114.
［24］ Shao Qinglong, Li Jiaying, Zhao Lingling. A four-dimensional evaluation of the urban comprehensive carrying capacity of the Yangtze River Delta, China［J］. Sustainability, 2019, 23(11): 1-15.
［25］ Liu Honyan, Song Yanrong, Financial development and carbon emissions in China since the recent world financial crisis: evidence from a spatial-temporal analysis and a spatial Durbin model［J］. Science of the Total Environment, 2020,715: 1-14.
［26］刘锡良,文书洋.中国的金融机构应当承担环境责任吗?——基本事实、理论模型与实证检验［J］.经济研究, 2019, 54(3): 38-54.Liu Xiliang, Wen Shuyang. Should financial institutions be environmentally responsible in China? facts, theory and evidence［J］. Economic Research Journal, 2019, 54(3): 38-54.
［27］文书洋,张琳,刘锡良.我们为什么需要绿色金融?——从全球经验事实到基于经济增长框架的理论解释［J］.金融研究, 2021(12): 20-37.Wen Shuyang, Zhang Lin, Liu Xiliang. Why do we need green finance? global empirical facts and theoretical explanations in an economic growth framework［J］. Journal of Financial Research, 2021(12): 20-37.
［28］ Lashof D. Policy options for stabilizing global climate ［M］. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis, 1990.
［29］ Dean A, Hoeller P. Costs of reducing C02 emissions: evidence from six global models［R］.Working Paper, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 1992.
［30］ Acemoglu D, Akcigit U, Hanle y D, et al. Transition to clean technology［J］. Journal of Political Economy,2016, 124(1): 52-104.
［31］ Acemoglu D, Aghion P, Bursztyn L, et al. The environment and directed technical change［J］. American Economic Review, 2012, 102(1): 131-166.
［32］ Jeucken M. Sustainable finance and banking［M］. London, UK: Earthscan Publications Ltd, 2001.
［33］侯玉巧,汪发元.绿色创新与经济增长动态关系研究——基于VAR模型的实证分析［J］. 生态经济, 2020, 36(5): 44-49.Hou Yuqiao, Wang Fayuan. Dynamic relationship between green innovation and economic growth: Empirical analysis based on VAR model［J］. Ecological Economy, 2020, 36(5): 44-49.
［34］陈宇科,刘蓝天,董景荣.环境规制工具、区域差异与企业绿色技术创新——基于系统GMM和动态门槛的中国省级数据分析［J］.科研管理, 2022, 43(4): 111-118.Chen Yuke, Liu Lantian, Dong Jingrong. Environmental regulation tools, regional differences, and green technology innovation of enterprises—An analysis of China’s provincial panel date based on the system GMM and dynamic threshold［J］. Science Research Management, 2022, 43(4): 111-118.
［35］郭晔,房芳.新型货币政策担保品框架的绿色效应［J］.金融研究, 2021(1): 91-110.Guo Ye, Fang Fang. The green financing effect of the expanded central bank collateral framework［J］. Journal of Financial Research, 2021(1): 91-110.
［36］ Chevallier J, Goutte S, Ji Qiang,et al. Green finance and the restructuring of the oil-gas-coal business model under carbon asset stranding constraints［J］. Energy Policy, 2021, (149): 1-13.
［37］丁宁,任亦侬,左颖.绿色信贷政策得不偿失还是得偿所愿?——基于资源配置视角的PSM-DID成本效率分析［J］.金融研究, 2020(4): 112-130.Ding Ning, Ren Yinong, Zuo Ying. Do the losses of the green-credit policy outweigh the Gains? A PSM-DID cost-efficiency analysis based on resource allocation［J］. Journal of Financial Research, 2020(4): 112-130.

一般均衡理论视角下绿色金融的减排效应研究：从模型构建到实证检验

Research on the Emission Reduction Effect of Green Finance from the Perspective of General Equilibrium Theory: Modeling and Empirical Test

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0