主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院

中国管理科学 ›› 2019, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (11): 50-60.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2019.11.006

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

定向增发抑价分解研究——基于双边随机边界分析的新视角

徐辉, 周孝华   

  1. 重庆大学经济与工商管理学院, 重庆 400030
  • 收稿日期:2018-06-16 修回日期:2018-10-08 出版日期:2019-11-20 发布日期:2019-11-28
  • 通讯作者: 徐辉(1987-),男(汉族),河南信阳人,重庆大学经济与工商管理学院,博士研究生,研究方向:定向增发与公司金融,E-mail:1657711434@qq.com. E-mail:1657711434@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    重庆市研究生科研创新资助项目(CYB18015);国家社会科学基金资助项目(13&ZD156)

Research on the Underpricing Decomposition of Private Placement: Based on the New Perspective of Two-tiered Stochastic Frontier Model

XU Hui, ZHOU Xiao-hua   

  1. School of Economics and Business Administration, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China
  • Received:2018-06-16 Revised:2018-10-08 Online:2019-11-20 Published:2019-11-28

摘要: 针对定向增发新股存在价格溢出现象,本文首次引入双边随机边界模型探究定向增发高抑价的形成机理,发展了一个新的定向增发抑价分解模型,将定向增发抑价分解为一级市场折价效应和二级市场溢价效应,并对2007-2017年度内已完成定向增发新股的沪深两市A股上市公司进行了实证检验,结果表明:定向增发新股的发行价格与二级市场交易价格均被高估,存在价格泡沫;折价效应与溢价效应均对定向增发抑价施加了显著的影响,但溢价效应是导致定向增发高抑价的主导因素;溢价效应对定向增发高抑价的影响程度在国有企业、大股东全认购、牛市以及信息透明度较低的子样本中更显著。基于中国本土文化拓展了抑价分解理论,结论更符合中国股市实情,为定向增发抑价现象的后续研究提供了理论指导与方法支撑。

关键词: 定向增发抑价, 双边随机边界模型, 折价效应, 溢价效应

Abstract: The problem of high underpricingof private placement is becoming more and more serious.In the past, foreign researches mainly focused on the primary market and ignored the mispricing of the secondary market.However, as an emerging economy, China's market environment and institutional background are quite different from that of developed economies, and these differences may lead to the fact that the existing pricing theory of private placement abroad does not apply to the Chinese stock market. So the two-tier stochastic frontier model is introduced to explore the formation mechanism of high underpricing, and a new underpricing decomposition model of the private placement is developed. The underpricing effect of private placement is decompased into discount effect of primary market and premium effect of secondary market. In addition, an empirical test is conducted for A-share listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen that has completed the private placement of new shares. The empirical results are as follows:(1) The offering price and exchanging priceare both overvalued, and there is a price bubble.(2) Both the discount effect and the premium effect have exerted a significant influence on the underpricing of private placement, but the premium effect is the leading factor leading to the high underpricing of private placement. (3)The influence of the premium effect on the high underpricing is more significant in the sub-samples of state-owned enterprises,the full subscription of major shareholders, the bull market and the low information transparency. Our sample includes 2,927 effective observations over the period from 2007 to 2017. Besides, the original samples were screened and processed as follows:Eliminate listed companies in financial industry; For the listed companies with two or more private placement (including), only the data of the first private placement is kept to exclude the possibility of wrong statistical results caused by overlapping study intervals; Excluding the listed companies that entered bankruptcy reorganization in the last year of private placement; Excluding listed companies whose offering price is lower than the net asset per share before private placement.The data of private placement used in this paper are from WindDatabase, while the remaining financial data are from CSMAR and CCER Databases. Above all, based on the local Chinese culture, the underpricing decomposition theory of private placement is developed, and the conclusion is more in line with the reality of Chinese stock market, which provides a new perspective and method for the follow-up study of private placement.

Key words: private placement underpricing decomposition, two-tiered stochastic frontier model, discount effect, premium effect

中图分类号: