媒体热议度能有效降低股价暴跌风险吗？——基于公司透明度调节作用的研究

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2019.11.005

中国管理科学 ›› 2019, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (11): 39-49.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2019.11.005

媒体热议度能有效降低股价暴跌风险吗？——基于公司透明度调节作用的研究

刘维奇^1,2, 李建莹³

1. 山西大学管理与决策研究所, 山西太原 030006;
2. 山西财经大学金融学院, 山西太原 030006;
3. 山西大学经济与管理学院, 山西太原 030006

收稿日期:2018-07-11 修回日期:2019-02-26 出版日期:2019-11-20 发布日期:2019-11-28
通讯作者: 李建莹(1994-),女(汉族),山西运城人,山西大学经济与管理学院,博士研究生,研究方向:金融工程与风险管理,E-mail:1282812359@qq.com. E-mail:1282812359@qq.com
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金资助项目（15BJY164）

Can Media Buzz Effectively Reduce Stock Price Crash Risk?——Based on the Research of Corporate Transparency

LIU Wei-qi^1,2, LI Jian-ying³

1. Institute of Management and Decision, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China;
2. Faculty of Finance, Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, Taiyuan 030006, China;
3. School of Economics and Management, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China

Received:2018-07-11 Revised:2019-02-26 Online:2019-11-20 Published:2019-11-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 互联网新闻集快速、真实、海量信息等特征于一身，成为证券市场不可或缺的监督力量。互联网新闻有助于深度挖掘上市公司隐藏的内幕消息，避免不利消息在公司持续囤积带来的股价暴跌。基此，研究选取2014-2017年优矿平台证券关联新闻信息构建媒体热议度指标，探究媒体热议度对公司未来股价暴跌风险的影响，同时考察了公司透明度的调节作用。研究发现，上市公司的媒体热议度越高，未来面临的股价暴跌风险越小。在透明度低（国有企业、机构持股比例低和财务报告透明度低）的企业中，媒体热议度对股价暴跌风险的抑制作用更强。这表明，在证券市场监督机制日益健全的进程中，应正确引导各类财经新闻的报道，有效发挥新闻媒体的监督作用，降低股价暴跌风险，保护投资者权益。

关键词: 互联网金融, 普惠金融, 媒体热议度, 股价暴跌, 公司透明度

Abstract: Internet news integrates advantages of fast, real and massive information, and has become an indispensable supervisory force in the security market. Internet news can dig deep into the hidden inside information of listed companies and avoid the collapse of stock prices caused by the continuous hoarding of bad news. Therefore, the unstructured data associated with news information of the securities are chooses. The data from UQER quantitative trading platform are obtained. The sample period is from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2017. The Heatindex and the Daynumber variables are used to measure the media buzz degree of a stock. The risk of stock price collapse is measured by CRASH variable, NCSKEW variable and DUVOL variable. We aim to explore the influence of media buzz degree on the risk of future stock price collapse and the role of corporate transparency's moderating. The empirical analysis shows that the higher media buzz degree represents the lower the risk of stock price collapse. Media buzz degree can suppress significantly the corporate stock price crash risk, specifically in the low transparency firms such as state-owned enterprises, low institutional ownership and low transparency of financial reporting. The findings indicate that we should correctly guide all kinds of financial news reports in the process of securities market supervision system is increasingly perfect and strengthen the supervisory role of news media so that reduce the stock price crash risk and protect the interests of the investors. This research supports the demonstration of effective media governance and makes up for the deficiency of single source on media attention.

Key words: internet finance, inclusive finance, media buzz degree, stock price crash, corporate transparency

中图分类号:

F832.5

刘维奇, 李建莹. 媒体热议度能有效降低股价暴跌风险吗？——基于公司透明度调节作用的研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(11): 39-49.

LIU Wei-qi, LI Jian-ying. Can Media Buzz Effectively Reduce Stock Price Crash Risk?——Based on the Research of Corporate Transparency[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2019, 27(11): 39-49.

参考文献

[1] Chen J, Hong H, Stein J C. Forecasting crashes:trading volume, past returns, and conditional skewness in stock prices[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2001, 61(3):345-381.
[2] Jin L, Myers S C. R² around the world:new theory and new tests[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2006, 79(2):257-292.
[3] Kim J, Zhang L. Accounting conservatism and stock price crash risk:firm-level evidence[J]. Contemporary Accounting Research, 2016, 33(1):412-441.
[4] 周晓苏,王磊,陈沉.环境不确定性、财务报告透明度和股价暴跌风险[J].审计与经济研究,2016,31(6):57-66+76.
[5] 高昊宇,杨晓光,叶彦艺.机构投资者对暴涨暴跌的抑制作用:基于中国市场的实证[J].金融研究,2017,(2):163-178.
[6] 刘秋平.机构投资者能否发生稳定器作用——基于个股暴跌风险的实证检验[J].现代财经,2015,35(3):27-37.
[7] 刘春,孙亮.税收征管能降低股价暴跌风险吗?[J].金融研究,2015,(8):159-174.
[8] Hutton A P, Marcus A J, Tehranian H. Opaque financial reports, R², and crash risk[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2009, 94(1):67-86.
[9] 潘越,戴亦一,林超群.信息不透明、分析师关注与个股暴跌风险[J].金融研究,2011,(9):138-151.
[10] Defond M L, Hung M, Li S, et al. Does mandatory IFRS adoption affect crash risk?[J]. Accounting Review, 2015, 90(1):1-65.
[11] 权小锋,吴世农,尹洪英.企业社会责任与股价崩盘风险:"价值利器"或"自利工具"?[J].经济研究,2015,50(11):49-64.
[12] Kim J B, Wang Z, Zhang L. CEO overconfidence and stock price crash risk[J].Contemporary Accounting Research, 2016, 33(4):1720-1749.
[13] Callen J L, Fang X. Religion and stock price crash risk[J]. Journal of Financial & Quantitative Analysis, 2015, 50(1-2):169-195.
[14] 李培功,沈艺峰.媒体的公司治理作用:中国的经验证据[J].经济研究,2010,45(4):14-27.
[15] 戴亦一,潘越,刘思超.媒体监督、政府干预与公司治理:来自中国上市公司财务重述视角的证据[J].世界经济,2011,(11):121-144.
[16] 罗进辉,杜兴强.媒体报道、制度环境与股价崩盘风险[J].会计研究,2014,(9):53-59+97.
[17] 蒋翠清,梁坤,丁勇,等. 基于社会媒体的股票行为预测[J].中国管理科学,2015,23(1):17-24.
[18] Fang L, Peress J. Media coverage and the cross-section of stock returns[J]. Journal of Finance, 2009, 64(5):2023-2052.
[19] Dyck A, Volchkova N, Zingales L. The corporate governance role of the media:evidence from russia[J]. Journal of Finance, 2008, 63(3):1093-1135.
[20] Engelberg J E, Christopher A P. The causal impact of media in financial markets[J]. Journal of Finance, 2011,(1):67-97.
[21] 罗进辉,蔡地.媒体报道能够提高股价的信息含量吗?[J]. 投资研究,2013,(5):38-53.
[22] 谢雅璐,王冲.媒体治理、信息不对称与股价暴跌风险[J].山西财经大学学报,2014,36(7):36-47.
[23] 高雷,宋顺林.公司治理与公司透明度[J].金融研究,2007,(11):28-44.
[24] 王谨乐,史永东.机构投资者、代理成本与公司价值——基于随机前沿模型及门槛回归的实证分析[J].中国管理科学,2016,24(7):155-162.
[25] 刘维奇,刘新新.个人和机构投资者情绪与股票收益——基于上证A股市场的研究[J].管理科学学报,2014,17(3):70-87.
[26] Boone A L, White J T. The effect of institutional ownership on firm transparency and information production[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2015, 117(3):508-533.
[27] Kim J B, Li Y, Zhang L. Corporate tax avoidance and stock price crash risk:firm-level analysis[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2011, 100(3):639-662.
[28] Kim J B, Li Y, Zhang L. CFOs versus CEOs:equity incentives and crashes[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2011, 101(3):713-730.
[29] Dimson E. Risk measurement when shares are subject to infrequent trading[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1979, 7(2):197-226.
[30] Atiase R K. Predisclosure information, firm capitalization, and security price behavior around earnings announcements[J]. Journal of Accounting Research, 1985, 23(1):21-36.
[31] Collins D W, Kothari S P, Rayburn J D. Firm size and the information content of prices with respect to earnings[J]. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 1987, 9(2):111-138.
[32] Roychowdhury S, Watts R L. Asymmetric timeliness of earnings, markets-to-book and conservatism in financial reporting[J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2007, 44(1):2-31.

媒体热议度能有效降低股价暴跌风险吗？——基于公司透明度调节作用的研究

Can Media Buzz Effectively Reduce Stock Price Crash Risk?——Based on the Research of Corporate Transparency

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 4

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	陈荣达, 周寒娴, 余乐安, 金骋路. 基于互联网金融模式的结构性理财产品风险度量研究进展[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(11): 23-34.
[2]	刘伟, 夏立秋. 网络借贷市场参与主体行为策略的演化博弈均衡分析——基于三方博弈的视角[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(5): 169-177.
[3]	米传民, 李丹丹, 张婷, 钱媛媛, 周志鹏. 考虑社交网络和互联网金融的金融市场超网络均衡研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(12): 56-65.
[4]	石宝峰, 王静, 迟国泰. 普惠金融、银行信贷与商户小额贷款融资——基于风险等级匹配视角[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(9): 28-36.