主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院

中国管理科学 ›› 2019, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (8): 107-117.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2019.08.011

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑计算资源容量的云服务垄断定价研究

吴士亮, 仲琴, 张庆民   

  1. 南京财经大学管理科学与工程学院, 江苏 南京 210023
  • 收稿日期:2017-11-04 修回日期:2018-04-22 出版日期:2019-08-20 发布日期:2019-08-27
  • 通讯作者: 吴士亮(1972-),男(汉族),山东临沂人,南京财经大学管理科学与工程学院副教授,博士,研究方向:云服务管理,E-mail:shiliang.wu@163.com. E-mail:shiliang.wu@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社会科学基金资助项目(15YJC630177)

Monopoly Pricing for Cloud Services Considering Computing Resource Capacity

WU Shi-liang, ZHONG Qin, ZHANG Qing-min   

  1. School of Management Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Finance and Economics, Nanjing 210023, China
  • Received:2017-11-04 Revised:2018-04-22 Online:2019-08-20 Published:2019-08-27

摘要: 云服务是针对虚拟计算资源的访问服务,客户价值差异与资源能力约束是影响云服务定价决策的重要因素。针对云服务市场中按固定价格和按用量定价两种常用定价方式,提出一般性假设并构建旨在最大化垄断利润的非线性定价模型,对模型求解并对模型解的含义进行揭示。给出数值算例,从市场覆盖、计算资源影子价格、厂商利润及客户剩余等方面对两种定价方法进行比较,结果表明:客户类型分布影响厂商利润、客户剩余及计算资源需求,厂商应努力掌握客户类型分布信息;计算资源充足时应采用按用量定价方法;市场覆盖与客户类型分布及可用计算资源量有关,按用量定价时市场覆盖更大;增加计算资源有利于提升社会福利。本文为云服务厂商定价决策提供理论与方法支持。

关键词: 云计算, 垄断市场, 价格歧视, 固定价格, 按用量定价

Abstract: Cloud services are access services for virtual computing resources, of which the two important factors affecting pricing decision are customer value differences and resource capacity constraints. Aiming at the two common pricing methods of fixed price and usage-based pricing in the cloud service market, the general assumptions are proposed and a nonlinear pricing model aiming at maximizing the profit of monopolist is constructed. The model is solved and the implication of the model is revealed. Numerical examples are illustrated to compare the two pricing methods from the aspects of market coverage, shadow price of computing resources, monopolist's profit and customer surplus. The main findings include four aspects. First, monopolist's profit, customers' surplus and computing resources demand are affected by customer type distribution. Efforts should be made to grasp customer type distribution information. Second, usage-based pricing should be used when computing resources are sufficient. Third, market coverage is related to the customer type distribution and the available computing resources, and the market coverage is larger when pricing by usage. Last, increasing the computing resources is conducive to improving social welfare. Theoretical and methodological support are provided for cloud service providers' pricing decisions.

Key words: cloud computing, monopoly market, price discrimination, fixed price, pricing by usage

中图分类号: