环境规制强度与经济增长——基于生产性资本和健康人力资本视角

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2019.08.006

中国管理科学 ›› 2019, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (8): 57-65.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2019.08.006

环境规制强度与经济增长——基于生产性资本和健康人力资本视角

纪建悦^1,2, 张懿¹, 任文菡¹

1. 中国海洋大学经济学院, 山东青岛 266100;
2. 中国海洋大学海洋发展研究院, 山东青岛 266100

收稿日期:2018-01-09 修回日期:2018-06-12 出版日期:2019-08-20 发布日期:2019-08-27
通讯作者: 纪建悦(1974-),男(汉族),山东青岛人,中国海洋大学经济学院,教授,博士,博士生导师,研究方向:国民经济、公司金融,E-mail:jijianyue@163.com. E-mail:jijianyue@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目（7157328，71873127）

Research on the Relationship between Environmental Regulation Intensity and China's Economic Growth Rate——based on Physical Capital and Human Capital Perspective

JI Jian-yue^1,2, ZHANG Yi¹, REN Wen-han¹

1. School of economics, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China;
2. Institute of Marine Development, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China

Received:2018-01-09 Revised:2018-06-12 Online:2019-08-20 Published:2019-08-27

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 近年来，环境保护与经济增长之间的"两难悖论"引起了广泛的关注，环境规制强度如何影响经济增长的问题亟待解决。本文基于代际交替模型（OLG），将环境规制、健康人力资本及生产性资本纳入分析框架，指出环境规制通过影响健康人力资本和生产性资本投资的方式对经济增长产生正负两方面影响。当环境规制强度较低时，环境规制强度与经济增长率正相关；当环境规制强度过高时，则与经济增长率负相关，存在一个最优环境规制强度。在此基础上，利用我国1997-2015年30个省级的面板数据，通过广义矩估计进行实证研究，验证了在我国存在这种显著的"倒U型"的非线性关系。

关键词: 环境规制强度, 经济增长率, OLG模型, 广义矩估计, “倒U型”关系

Abstract: Recently, the dilemma between environmental protection and economic growth has caused widely concerns, it is urgent to explore the influence of environmental regulation intensity on economic growth. Prior research has mainly focused on the compliance cost theory and Porter hypothesis. Important issues that have long been ignored are the effect of environmental regulations on physical capital and human capital. However, their role in promoting sustainable growth and improving the level of residents' welfare cannot be neglected. Thus, the relationship between environmental regulation intensity and China's economic growth rate is studied in this paper from the perspective of physical capital and human capital. Based on the Overlapping Generation Model (OLG), environmental regulation, health human capital and physical capital are brought into an analytical framework. Theoretical analyses show that strict environmental regulations brought about both positive and negative influences to economic growth by reducing productive capital investment and promoting health human capital. When the intensity of environmental regulation is low, there is a positive correlation between environmental regulation intensity and economic growth, but excessive environmental regulation is negatively correlated with economic growth. On this basis, using data from China at the provincial level for the period 1997-2015, the inverted U-shaped relationship between environmental regulation intensity and economic growth is examined by GMM. It is suggested that the appropriate environmental regulations can improve the environmental quality standards without hurting the economy.

Key words: environmental regulation intensity, economic growth rate, OLG model, GMM, inverted U-shaped relationship

中图分类号:

F832

纪建悦, 张懿, 任文菡. 环境规制强度与经济增长——基于生产性资本和健康人力资本视角[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(8): 57-65.

JI Jian-yue, ZHANG Yi, REN Wen-han. Research on the Relationship between Environmental Regulation Intensity and China's Economic Growth Rate——based on Physical Capital and Human Capital Perspective[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2019, 27(8): 57-65.

参考文献

[1] Shadbegian R J, Gray W B. What determines environmental performance at paper mills:The roles of abatement spending, regulation, and efficiency[J].Economic Analysis & Policy,2003, 3(1), 1144-1163.
[2] 曲卫华,颜志军. 环境污染、经济增长与医疗卫生服务对公共健康的影响分析——基于中国省际面板数据的研究[J].中国管理科学,2015,23(7):166-176.
[3] 张同斌. 提高环境规制强度能否"利当前"并"惠长远"[J].财贸经济, 2017, 38(3):116-130.
[4] Christainsen G B, Haveman R H. The contribution of environmental regulations to the slowdown in productivity growth[J].Journal of Environmental Economics & Management,1981,8(4):381-390.
[5] Gray W B. The cost of regulation:OSHA, EPA and the productivity slowdown[J]. American Economic Review,2001,77:998-1006.
[6] Levinsohn J, Petrin A. Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables[J]. Review of Economic Studies,2003,70(2):317-341.
[7] 于立, 张嫚. 美国政府规制成本及其经济影响分析[J].世界经济,2002,(12):33-39.
[8] 许冬兰,董博. 环境规制对技术效率和生产力损失的影响分析[J].中国人口·资源与环境, 2009,19(6):91-96.
[9] 武晓利.环保技术、节能减排政策对生态环境质量的动态效应及传导机制研究——基于三部门DSGE模型的数值分析[J].中国管理科学,2017,25(12):88-98.
[10] 叶祥松,彭良燕. 我国环境规制下的规制效率与全要素生产率研究:1999-2008[J].财贸经济,2011,(2):102-109.
[11] Porter M E, Linde C V D. Toward a new conception of the environment competitiveness relationship[J].Journal of Economic Perspectives,1995,9(4):97-118.
[12] 杨骞,刘华军. 环境技术效率、规制成本与环境规制模式[J].当代财经,2013(10):16-25.
[13] 涂红星,肖序. 环境管制对自主创新影响的实证研究——基于负二项分布模型[J].管理评论,2014,26(1):57-65.
[14] Berman E, Bui L T M. Environmental regulation and productivity:Evidence from oil refineries[J].Review of Economics and Statistics,2001,83(3):498-510.
[15] Alpay E, Kerkvliet J, BuccolaS. Productivity growth and environmental regulation in mexican and U.S. food manufacturing[J]. American Journal of Agricultural Economics,2002,84(4):887-901.
[16] 杨仕辉,魏守道. 企业环境研发、产品差异化与政府环境管制[J].中国管理科学,2016,24(1):159-168.
[17] 龙小宁, 万威. 环境规制、企业利润率与合规成本规模异质性[J].中国工业经济, 2017,(6):155-174.
[18] Talebnia G, Vakilifard H R, Yaghoubnezhad A, et al. Corporate social and environmental disclosure in developing countries:Evidence from Iran[J]. Management Science Letters,2013,3(1):135-146.
[19] 余伟, 陈强, 陈华. 不同环境政策工具对技术创新的影响分析——基于2004-2011年我国省级面板数据的实证研究[J].管理评论,2016,28(1):53-61.
[20] Jaffe A B, Palmer K. Environmental regulation and innovation:A panel data study[J].Review of Economics & Statistics,1997,79(4):610-619.
[21] Albrizio S, Koz'luk T, Zipperer V. Environmental policies and productivity growth:Evidence across industries and firms[J].Journal of Environmental Economics & Management, 2016, 81:209-226.
[22] 赵爱武,杜建国,关洪军. 消费者异质需求下企业环境创新行为演化模拟与分析[J].中国管理科学,2018,26(6):124-132.
[23] 马艳艳,张晓蕾,孙玉涛. 环境规制激发企业努力研发?——来自火电企业数据的实证[J].科研管理,2018,39(2):66-74.
[24] 王洪庆. 人力资本视角下环境规制对经济增长的门槛效应研究[J]. 中国软科学, 2016,(6):52-61.
[25] Grossman M. The demand for health:A theoretical and empirical investigation[M]. New York:Columbia University Press, 1972.
[26] Strauss J, Thomas D. Empirical modelling of investment in health and nutrition[R]. Collaborative Research Project,1998:1-58.
[27] 王弟海. 健康人力资本、经济增长和贫困陷阱[J].经济研究,2012(6):143-155.
[28] Chang T, Zivin J G, Gross T, et al. Particulate pollution and the productivity of pear packers[R].Nber Working Papers,2014,8(3):141-169.
[29] 陈素梅, 何凌云. 环境、健康与经济增长:最优能源税收入分配研究[J].经济研究, 2017,(4):120-134.
[30] 程都, 李钢. 环境规制强度测算的现状及趋势[J].经济与管理研究,2017,(8):75-85.
[31] An C B, Jeon S H. Demographic change and economic growth:An inverted-U shape relationship[J].Economics Letters,2006,92(3):447-454.
[32] 祁毓,卢洪友.污染、健康与不平等——跨越"环境健康贫困"陷阱[J].管理世界,2015,(9):32-51.

环境规制强度与经济增长——基于生产性资本和健康人力资本视角

Research on the Relationship between Environmental Regulation Intensity and China's Economic Growth Rate——based on Physical Capital and Human Capital Perspective

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 5

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	刘晓君, 姜伟, 胡劲松. 基于TVP-VAR模型的信心、货币政策与中国经济波动研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(8): 37-46.
[2]	王郧, 华仁海. 投资者行为与期货市场波动:基于OLG模型和高频数据的理论与实证[J]. 中国管理科学, 2012, (1): 91-101.
[3]	叶阿忠. 非参数计量经济联立模型的局部线性广义矩估计[J]. 中国管理科学, 2003, (2): 40-44.
[4]	谢赤, 吴雄伟. 基于Vasicek和CIR模型中的中国货币市场利率行为实证分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2002, (3): 22-25.
[5]	王志宏. 一个关于潜在经济增长率的模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 1996, (2): 8-12.