主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院

中国管理科学 ›› 2021, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (5): 231-239.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2018.0411

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

不完备判断信息情境下群组DEMATEL决策方法

韩玮, 孙永河, 缪彬   

  1. 昆明理工大学管理与经济学院, 云南 昆明 650093
  • 收稿日期:2018-03-29 修回日期:2018-10-30 出版日期:2021-05-20 发布日期:2021-05-26
  • 通讯作者: 孙永河(1978-),男(汉族),山西浑源人,昆明理工大学,教授,博士生导师,博士,研究方向:复杂系统管理决策,E-mail:syhch@126.com. E-mail:syhch@126.com.
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(71561015,71261013,72061018);云南省应用基础研究面上资助项目(2016FB116);云南省哲学社会科学创新团队建设项目(2014cx05)

A Group DEMATEL Decision-making Method with Incomplete Judgment Information

HAN Wei, SUN Yong-he, MIAO Bin   

  1. Faculty of Management and Economics, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650093, China
  • Received:2018-03-29 Revised:2018-10-30 Online:2021-05-20 Published:2021-05-26

摘要: 为克服群组决策试行与评价实验室(DEMATEL)方法难以处理不完备专家判断信息问题,以及预先指定评价标度和群组信息集成规则不适应复杂决策环境的内在缺陷,本文基于群共识排序理论,提出一种能够有效处理不完备判断信息的群组DEMATEL决策方法。该方法的创新之处在于:第一,它能够以灵活的标度方式有效地反映群组专家的偏好判断表达。第二,它也能通过序列转换和共识度的引入较好地处理群组DEMATEL不完备判断信息。第三,它能够合理地反映决策结果因群共识水平不同而变化的复杂机理。实例验证结果表明,所提方法是切实可行的,能够有效解决实践中的决策问题。

关键词: 复杂系统, DEMATEL, 群组共识, 不完备判断信息, 评价标度

Abstract: Decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) is a widely applied method to research the causal relationship of complicated socioeconomic system issues. DEMATEL method has drawbacks such as its invalidity with incomplete judgment information (IJI), unconformity of appointed evaluation scale with different granules of experts' knowledge. To overcome the above mentioned disadvantages, a group DEMATEL method with IJI is proposed in this paper. In the method, in order to aggregate the incomplete and multi-granular information, the influences between factors are considered as alternatives to be compared in a total ordered sequence with different lengths. Then, a group ranking approach for ordinal preferences based on group maximum consensus sequences is applied to aggregate the sequences of influences. Next, as a result of aggregation, the consensus scores are generated by a group consensus-ranking model, and to be regard as elements of group initial direct influence matrix. Finally, the group DEMATEL method can be processed based on the consensus scores direct influence matrix. A case study about the decision-making of medical-integrated pension institutions is given to illustrate the proposed method and demonstrate the feasibility and validity of the proposed method. It should be noted that this suggested method extends DEMATEL to handle IJI with multi-granular evaluation scales, which may improve flexibility of expert's preference judgment and the rationality of system analysis.

Key words: complex systems, decision-making trial evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL), group consensus, incomplete judgment information(IJI), evaluation scale

中图分类号: