主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院

中国管理科学 ›› 2017, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (12): 68-77.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2017.12.008

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑发电商异质性的双寡头电力市场减排锦标博弈分析

黄守军1, 杨俊2   

  1. 1. 中山大学山岭南(大学)学院, 广东 广州 510275;
    2. 重庆大学经济与工商管理学院, 重庆 400044
  • 收稿日期:2016-01-22 修回日期:2016-07-04 出版日期:2017-12-20 发布日期:2018-02-10
  • 通讯作者: 黄守军(1985-),男(汉族),安徽马鞍山人,中山大学岭南学院,特聘副研究员,博士,研究方向:电力经济及技术创新管理,E-mail:huangshj29@mail.sysu.edu.cn E-mail:huangshj29@mail.sysu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金资助项目(71373297);国家社会科学基金重点资助项目(15AZD014);重庆市研究生科研创新项目(CYB14004)

Game Analysis of Mitigation Tournament Considering Generator Heterogeneity in Duopoly Electricity Market

HUANG Shou-jun1, YANG Jun2   

  1. 1. Lingnan(University) College, SunYat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China;
    2. School of Economics and Business Administration, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China
  • Received:2016-01-22 Revised:2016-07-04 Online:2017-12-20 Published:2018-02-10

摘要: 考虑电网公司利用减排锦标机制开发发电侧潜在减排空间,对发电商初始调度禀赋与减排能力等影响因素进行参数定义,构建双寡头发电商参与减排竞争的最优决策模型。分别求解出不同强势发电商数量时均衡的边际获胜概率及其最优减排努力程度,并对此三种博弈结构下的均衡结果进行了比较分析。由于减排锦标中存在强者失败心理损失与弱者胜利心理收益,将模型拓展到考虑发电商减排决策社会比较的行为经济学模型,并给出了模型的最优解与行为参数之间满足的解析关系。研究结果表明:在二人对称减排锦标中,不论强势发电商数量如何,同一情形下参与者均衡的减排量都始终相等。但是与两种同质发电商竞争情形相比,作为电网公司对发电商异质性界定的政策响应,强、弱者均会选择降低各自最优的减排水平;与基本模型相比,在考虑心理因素的广义模型中不同类型发电商的均衡减排努力程度都会提高,且各自增量均与行为参数值正相关。异质发电商竞争下最优减排水平不再恒相等,且也不一定小于同质情形时的均衡值。

关键词: 发电商异质性, 减排锦标, 边际获胜概率, 努力水平, 行为经济学模型

Abstract: The grid corporation is considered to develop potential mitigation space in generation side by using mitigation tournament mechanism. The duopolistic optimal decision models of mitigation competition are constructed based on parameter definition of generators' initial dispatching endowment and mitigation capacity. The equilibrium marginal probabilities of winning and optimal mitigation efforts with different superior generators are determined respectively,and the equilibrium results in these three game structures are comparatively analyzed. Due to losing causes superior generator to suffer a psychological loss and vulnerable generator winning garners an additional psychological benefit,the models are extended to behavioral economics models which take into account social comparison of generator's mitigation decision. The analytical relationships between optimal solutions and behavioral parameters are given. It's found that equilibrium mitigation quantities in the same circumstance are always equal,no matter the number of superior generators in a two-player asymmetric tournament. However,compared with the two cases of homogeneous generators competing,both superior and vulnerable generators will choose to decrease their optimal mitigation levels as the policy response of grid corporation defining generator heterogeneity. The equilibrium mitigation efforts of different types of generators in the generalized models considering psychological factors are greater than the results in the basic models,and respective increment is positively correlated with the value of behavior parameter. The optimal mitigation levels under heterogeneous generators competition are no longer identically equal,and not necessarily less than the equilibrium values in homogeneous circumstances.

Key words: generator heterogeneity, mitigation tournament, marginal probability of winning, effort level, behavioral economics model

中图分类号: