主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院

中国管理科学 ›› 2016, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (4): 111-120.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2016.04.013

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

碳信息不对称下的供应链谎报决策与协调研究

杨磊, 郑晨诗, 纪静娜   

  1. 华南理工大学经济与贸易学院, 广东 广州 510006
  • 收稿日期:2014-03-21 修回日期:2015-10-17 出版日期:2016-04-20 发布日期:2016-04-29
  • 通讯作者: 纪静娜(1990-),女(汉族),广东汕头人,华南理工大学经济与贸易学院,博士研究生,研究方向:低碳供应链,E-mail:ji.jn@mail.scut.edu.cn. E-mail:ji.jn@mail.scut.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金资助项目(71101054,71101055,71572058);华南理工大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(2015ZZ057)

Misreporting Decisions and Coordination in Supply Chain under Asymmetric Carbon Information

YANG Lei, ZHENG Chen-shi, JI Jing-na   

  1. School of Economics and Commerce, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China
  • Received:2014-03-21 Revised:2015-10-17 Online:2016-04-20 Published:2016-04-29

摘要: 低碳环境下,供应链上下游企业之间面临碳排放量及碳价格信息不对称带来的风险。针对该问题,文章在碳交易环境下,基于"基准法"的碳配额分配机制,构建以制造商为主导的两级供应链模型,在碳信息不对称下分析供应链成员的谎报行为及其对供应链绩效的影响,研究表明,若制造商拥有碳信息优势并在满足最优谎报方程的前提下采取谎报行动,制造商的利润没有得到实质的提升,且其谎报决策并不对供应链绩效产生影响;而当零售商拥有碳信息优势时,一定会为了提高自身利润而谎报碳信息,且在最优谎报方程下能提高零售商及供应链总利润,同时降低制造商的利润,但该谎报行为不能使供应链绩效达到最优。针对零售商的谎报行为,文章采用收益共享契约进行协调,使供应链绩效达到最优,并验证了该契约对激励零售商真实反馈碳信息的有效性。

关键词: 碳排放量, 碳价格, 不对称信息, 谎报行为, 收益共享契约

Abstract: Low-carbon policies have been implemented by governments to reduce carbon emissions in recent years, which bring new challenges to firms' operation and supply chain management. Under low-carbon economy, the supply chain members have risks caused by asymmetric carbon information, including carbon emission and carbon price information. Under such circumstances, a two-echelon supply chain involved one manufacturer and one retailer is developed, where the manufacturer is the leader and the retailer is the follower. With carbon trading policy, the misreporting behavior of the supply chain members and their influences on supply chain performance are ivestigated based on "Benchmarking" carbon quota allocation mechanism. The study analytically shows that under the condition that the manufacturer has carbon information advantages and seeks the maximum profit, his misreporting behavior has no effect on his own performance as well as the supply chain performance. However, conclusions are drawn that the retailer, who is in a subordinate position, will lie about the information when he has the advantages of carbon information. The lying behavior of retailer will increase the profit of both the retailer and the supply chain, but decrease the profit of the manufacturer. Such behavior cannot lead to the maximum supply chain performance. In this paper,the revenue sharing contract is used to coordinate the supply chain.Furthermore,this work derives the reasonable range of the revenue sharing contract coefficient,under which the profit of the supply chain can be maximized. It can also motivate the retailer to reflect the carbon information honestly.

Key words: carbon emission, carbon price, asymmetric information, misreporting, revenue sharing contract

中图分类号: