碳交易驱动下的政企碳减排演化博弈分析

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2021.1401

Abstract

Abstract:

Carbon trading， as one of the most efficient market means in emission reduction policy， has a profound impact on enterprise carbon-reduction. Based on system dynamic theory， within the constraints of public willingness， an evolutionary game model of government and enterprise carbon-reduction is constructed under the driven of carbon trading. Taking Hubei Province as an example， through the visual analysis of government and enterprise behavior， possible game situations between government and enterprises in the development of carbon trading are discussed， and the corresponding strategies are given. The results show that there are several different game results in the development of carbon market. For the game equilibrium of （action， carbon-reduction）， it is necessary to encourage enterprises to take emission reduction measures and prolong the "window period" of carbon reduction. Adopting the strategies of dynamic punishment and dynamic subsidy can eliminate the periodic behavior pattern in the game between government and enterprises. By reducing carbon emission and regulating carbon price， the strategy combination can be changed from （inaction， no reduction） to （action， carbon-reduction）. The proportion of the latter combination should be increased. The initial willingness is very important in the game between government and enterprises. The higher initial willingness is more conducive to achieve （action， carbon-reduction） strategy combination. The conclusions have strong implications for enterprise carbon reduction strategies and government action in the process of carbon trading， and provide a reference for the development of carbon market.

Key words: carbon trading, carbon reduction, evolutionary game, stable strategy

CLC Number:

F062.1

Guochang Fang,Yu He,Lixin Tian. Evolutionary Game Analysis of Government and Enterprises Carbon-reduction under the Driven of Carbon Trading[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(5): 196-206.

Figures/Tables 13

参数	定义
$U 1 (U 2)$	企业减排(不减排)时政府的收益 $(U 1 > U 2)$
$R 1 (R 2)$	企业减排(不减排)时的综合收益( $R 1 > R 2$ )
$C 1$	企业的减排成本
$C 2$	政府的监管成本
$S$	政府给予企业的减排补贴
$F$	企业不减排政府收取的罚金
$θ$	交易额分配系数
$D 1$	企业意愿对政府的约束
$D 2$	民众意愿对企业的约束
$D 3$	民众意愿对政府的约束
$p$	碳交易价格
$T$	免费分配的碳配额 $(T > T 1, T < T 2)$
$T 1 (T 2)$	企业减排(不减排)时的碳排放量 $(T 1 < T 2)$
$x P 1$	碳配额的出售收入
$(1 - x) P 2$	碳配额的买入成本

博弈

双方

企业

减排

不减排

地方政府

作为

U 1 - C 2 - S + θ P 1

R 1 - C 1 + S + P 1

U 2 - C 2 + F + θ P 2

R 2 - F - D 2 - P 2

不作为

U 1 - D 1

R 1 - C 1

U 2 - D 3

R 2 - D 2

均衡点	$D e t (J) ??$
$(0,0)$	$(F - C 2 + D 3 + θ P 2) · (R 1 - C 1 - R 2 + D 2)$
$(0,1)$	( $(D 1 - C 2 - S + θ P 1) · (- R 1 + C 1 + R 2 - D 2)$
$(1,0)$	$(- F + C 2 - D 3 - θ P 2) · (R 1 - C 1 + S + P 1 - R 2 + D 2 + P 2 + F)$
$(1,1)$	$(- R 1 + C 1 - S - P 1 + R 2 - D 2 - P 2 - F) · (- D 1 + C 2 + S - θ P 1)$
$(x 0, y 0)$	$X * Y$

References 25

1	张国兴，张振华，刘鹏，等. 我国碳排放增长率的运行机理及预测［J］. 中国管理科学， 2015， 23（12）： 86-93.
	Zhang G X， Zhang Z H， Liu P， et al. The running mechanism and prediction of the growth rate of China’s carbon emissions［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science， 2015， 23（12）： 86-93.
2	蔡乌赶，李广培. 碳交易框架下企业生态创新策略研究［J］. 中国管理科学， 2018， 26（12）： 168-176.
	Cai W G， Li G P. Research on enterprise eco-innovation strategy based on carbon trading system［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science， 2018， 26（12）：168-176.
3	Carl J， Fedor D. Tracking global carbon revenues： a survey of carbon taxes versus cap-and-trade in the real world［J］. Energy Policy， 2016， 96： 50-77.
4	Fang G C， Liu M H， Tian L X， et al. Optimization analysis of carbon emissionrights allocation based on energy justice——the case of China［J］. Journal of Cleaner Production， 2018， 202： 748-758.
5	Liu H H， Zhang Z X， Chen Z M， et al. The impact of China's electricity price deregulation on coal and power industries： Two-stage game modeling［J］. Energy Policy， 2019， 134： 110957.
6	曹爱红，韩伯棠，齐安甜. 低碳经济下政企的动态博弈分析［J］. 生态经济， 2011（3）：74-78.
	Cao A H， Han B T， Qi A T. The dynamic analysis between government and enterprise in low-carbon economy［J］. Low-carbon Economy， 2011（3）： 74-78.
7	Zu Y， Chen L， Fan Y. Research on low-carbon strategies in supply chain with environmental regulations based on differential game ［J］. Journal of Cleaner Production， 2018， 177： 527-546.
8	Simon H A. Invariants of human behavior［J］. Annual Review of Psychology， 1990， 41（1）： 1-20.
9	Kahneman D. A perspective on judgmentand choice： Mapping bounded rationality［J］. American Psychologist， 2003， 58（9）：697-720.
10	Kang K， Zhao Y， Zhang J， et al. Evolutionary game theoretic analysis on low-carbon strategy for supply chain enterprises［J］. Journal of Cleaner Production， 2019， 230： 981-994.
11	刘开迪，杨多贵，王光辉，等. 基于系统动力学的生态文明建设政策模拟与仿真研究［J］. 中国管理科学， 2020， 28（8）：209-220.
	Liu K D， Yang D G， Wang G H， et al. Policy modeling and simulation on ecological civilization construction in china based on system dynamics［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science， 2020， 28（8）： 209-220.
12	焦建玲，陈洁，李兰兰，等. 碳减排奖惩机制下地方政府和企业行为演化博弈分析［J］. 中国管理科学， 2017， 25（10）：140-150.
	Jiao J L， Chen J， Li L L， et al.A study of local governments’ and enterprises’ actions in the carbon emission on mechanism of subsidy or punishment based on the evolutionary game［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science， 2017， 25（10）： 140-150.
13	陆敏，方习年. 考虑不同分配方式的碳交易市场博弈分析［J］. 中国管理科学， 2015， 23（S1）：807-811.
	Lu M， Fang X N. Game analysis on carbon market from allocation of allowance［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science， 2015， 23（S1）： 807-811.
14	谢晶晶，窦祥胜. 基于合作博弈的碳配额交易价格形成机制研究［J］. 管理评论， 2016， 28（2）：15-24.
	Xie J J， Dou X S. Carbon cap-and-trade pricing mechanism based on cooperative game theory［J］. Management Review， 2016， 28（2）： 15-24.
15	Hong Z F， Chu C B， Zhang L， et al. Optimizing an emission trading scheme for local governments： A stackelberg game model and hybrid algorithm［J］. International Journal of Production Economics， 2017， 193： 172-182.
16	Pan Y C， Yang W， Ma N， et al. Game analysis of carbon emission verification： A case study from Shenzhen's cap-and-trade system in China［J］. Energy Policy， 2019， 130： 418-428.
17	Wilson K A， Davis K J， Matzek V， et al. Concern about threatened species andecosystem disservices underpin public willingness to pay for ecological restoration［J］. Restoration Ecology， 2019， 27（3）： 513-519.
18	Friedman D. Evolutionary games in economics ［J］. Econometrica， 1991， 59（3）： 637-666.
19	石敏俊，袁永娜，周晟吕，等. 碳减排政策：碳税、碳交易还是两者兼之？［J］. 管理科学学报， 2013， 16（9）：9-19.
	Shi M J， Yuan Y N， Zhou S L， et al. Carbontax，cap-and-trade or mixed policy： Which is better for carbon mitigation？［J］. Journal of Management Sciences in China， 2013， 16（9）： 9-19.
20	Li S， Cai J， Feng Z， et al. Government contracting with monopoly in infrastructure provision： regulation or deregulation？［J］. Transportation Research Part E： Logistics and Transportation Review， 2019， 122： 506-523.
21	沈满洪，贺震川. 低碳经济视角下国外财税政策经验借鉴［J］. 生态经济， 2011（3）： 83-89.
	Shen M H， He Z C. The experience of foreign fiscal policy on low-carbon economy［J］.Ecological Economy， 2011（3）： 83-89.
22	秦炳涛，李晨.上海新能源交通与空气污染治理——投入成本-减排收益的视角［J］. 技术与创新管理，2018，39（4）：409-414.
	Qing B T， Li C. Shanghai New energy transportation and air pollution control from the perspective of input cost——emission reduction benefit［J］. Technology And Innovation Management， 2018， 39（4）： 409-414.
23	Levinson R， Akbari H. Potential benefits of cool roofs on commercial buildings： Conserving energy， saving money， and reducing emission of greenhouse gases and air pollutants［J］. Energy Efficiency， 2010， 3（1）： 53-109.
24	沈红波，谢越，陈峥嵘. 企业的环境保护，社会责任及其市场效应——基于紫金矿业环境污染事件的案例研究［J］. 中国工业经济， 2012（1）： 141-151.
	Shen H B， Xie Y， Chen Z R. Environmental protection， corporate social responsibility and its market response——case study based on the environmental pollution incident of zijin mining group co［J］. China Industrial Economics， 2012（1）： 141-151.
25	台冰，厉有为.人均工业增加值与人口城市化水平关系研究［J］. 深圳大学学报（人文社会科学版）， 2006， 23（6）：28-32.
	Tai B， Li Y W. The relationship between the population urbanization level and the per-capita industrial added value［J］.Journal of Shenzhen University （Humanities & Social Sciences）， 2006，23（6）：28-32.

[1]	Bo Wu, Jianheng Zhou. Incentives for Carbon Emission Reduction in the Supply Chain under the Demand and the Trading Price of the Emission Permit Uncertainty [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2025, 33(9): 349-358.
[2]	Xichen Lyu, Yinfeng Tian, Shihai Tian, Jiayuan Liu, Qingwei Kong. Research on Multi-Agent Decision-Making in Carbon Data Quality Supervision under MRV Mechanism: A Blockchain Technology Empowerment Perspective [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2025, 33(8): 355-368.
[3]	Jihai Zhang, Qichang Guo, Xu Jiang, Zhengfan Yang. Research on Emergency Supplies Reserve Strategy of Government-enterprise Cooperation from the Perspective of Hierarchical Responsibility [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2025, 33(7): 232-242.
[4]	Zhiwen Li, Xianhao Xu, Xu Guan, Qingguo Bai, Cheng Chen. Evolutionary Game Analysis for Blockchain Adoption Decisions of Two Oligopolies in An Agricultural Market [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2025, 33(7): 324-336.
[5]	Zhongmiao Sun, Qi Xu. Dynamic Incentive Subsidy of Government for Renewable Energy Power Consumption under Blockchain Technology [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2025, 33(7): 346-359.
[6]	Jin Li, Heqi Jiang, Shengqi Ding, Haixia Zhang, Bei Wu. Research on Optimal Emission Reduction and Regulatory Policies for Competitive Supply Chains under Carbon Trading Mechanism [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2025, 33(7): 360-368.
[7]	Tingqiang Chen, Wenjuan Lin, Lei Wang, Lean Yu. Low-carbon Behavior Decision of Chemical Enterprises Based on Carbon Trading and Green Credit [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2025, 33(6): 322-334.
[8]	Lili Ding, Zhongchao Zhao, Kaixuan Zhang. Research on the Mechanism of Perceived Value on the Development of Personal Carbon Account Green Credit [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2025, 33(5): 344-355.
[9]	Hongyang He, Bin Zhang, Sujun Tian. Evolutionary Game Analysis of Government-Enterprise Collaborative Governance in Platform Economy [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2025, 33(5): 76-87.
[10]	Yu Bai, Xin Zhao, Lili Ding. Research on Chinese Emission Allowances Storage and Lending Mechanism Considering Enterprise Time Preference [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2025, 33(4): 357-368.
[11]	Weian Li, Ruirui Feng, Guangqian Ren, Minna Zheng. Differences in Government Incentive Models, Mixed Ownership Reform and Strategic Choice of State /Non-state Capital [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2025, 33(2): 356-368.
[12]	Huifang Nie, Jianjun Zhu. Two-Stage Decision-making Method in Response to Public Opinion Crisis Derived from Emergency Considering Emotion Evolution [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2025, 33(10): 112-125.
[13]	Hengjie Zhang, Juan Liu, Wenfeng Zhu, Yucheng Dong. Conflict Management in Carbon Reduction in Dual-channel Supply Chain: An Approach Based on Minimum Cost Inverse GMCR [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2025, 33(10): 212-224.
[14]	Zhi Yang. Quadripartite Evolutionary Game of Public Participation in Interactive Transboundary Pollution Control Compensation [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(8): 261-273.
[15]	Xiangyan Sun,Xinchi Qu. Multi-stage Dynamic Evolution of Over-treatment Behavior under Drug-proportion Regulation [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(8): 308-321.

Evolutionary Game Analysis of Government and Enterprises Carbon-reduction under the Driven of Carbon Trading

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 13

References 25

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0