跨组织知识整合下的创新网络结构分析

中国管理科学 ›› 2012, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (6): 176-184.

跨组织知识整合下的创新网络结构分析

单海燕¹, 王文平²

1. 南京信息工程大学经济管理学院,江苏南京 210044;
2. 东南大学经济管理学院, 江苏南京 210096

收稿日期:2011-12-18 修回日期:2012-09-26 出版日期:2012-12-29 发布日期:2012-12-28
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(71172044,71273047);江苏省高校哲学社会科学基金(2012SJB630046);南京信息工程大学科研启动基金项目(SK20110119)

Analysis of the Structure of Inter-organization Innovation Network during the Process of Knowledge Integration

SHAN Hai-yan¹, WANG Wen-ping²

1. School of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China;
2. School of Economics and Management, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China

Received:2011-12-18 Revised:2012-09-26 Online:2012-12-29 Published:2012-12-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对跨组织合作形成的创新网络,构建了跨组织知识整合下的创新网络模型,仿真分析得出,组织间互补程度及知识整合效率对跨组织知识整合下的创新网络结构有一定的影响,具体表现为:组织间互补程度及知识整合效率很高时,创新网络具有较短的平均路径长度与较低的集聚系数,此时网络具有随机网络特征;组织间互补程度及知识整合效率很低时,创新网络具有较长的平均路径长度与较高的集聚系数,此时网络具有规则网络的特征;组织间互补程度及知识整合效率大小适度时,创新网络具有相对较短的平均路径长度与较高的集聚系数,因此创新网络具有"小世界"网络的特征。

关键词: 知识整合, 创新网络, 小世界网络, 集聚系数, 平均路径长度

Abstract: In this paper, the formation of inter-organization innovation network during the process of knowledge integration is modeled. By simulation analysis, it is found that the complementary extent of inter-organization and the efficiency of knowledge integration have a certain impact on the structure of innovation network. More specifically, the innovation network has the property of random network, i.e., short average path length and low clustering coefficient, when the complementary extent of inter-organization and the efficiency of knowledge integration are high; the innovation network has the property of regular network, i.e., long average path length and high clustering coefficient, when the complementary extent of inter- organization and the efficiency of knowledge integration are low; the innovation network has the property of small-world network, i.e., relatively short average path length and high clustering coefficient, when the complementary extent of inter- organization and the efficiency of knowledge integration are neither too high nor too low.

Key words: knowledge integration, innovation network, small-world network, clustering coefficient, average path length

中图分类号:

单海燕,王文平. 跨组织知识整合下的创新网络结构分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2012, 20(6): 176-184.

SHAN Hai-yan,WANG Wen-ping. Analysis of the Structure of Inter-organization Innovation Network during the Process of Knowledge Integration[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2012, 20(6): 176-184.

参考文献

[1] Drucker P F. Post-capitalist society [M]. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 1994.
[2] Hendriks P. Why share knowledge? the influence of ICT on the motivation for knowledge sharing[J]. Knowledge and Process Management, 1999, 6(2): 91-100.
[3] Uzzi B, Lancaster R. Relational embeddedness and learning: the case of bank loan managers and their clients [J]. Management Science, 2003, 49(4): 383-399.
[4] 植草益. 信息通讯业的产业融合[J]. 中国工业经济, 2001, (2): 24-27.
[5] Kastelli I, Caloghirou Y, Ioannides S. Cooperative R&D as a means for knowledge creation. Experience from European publicly funded partnerships [J]. International Journal of Technology Management, 2004, 27(8): 712-730.
[6] Teece D J. Capturing value from knowledge assets: the new economy, markets for know-how, and intangible assets[J]. California Management Review, 1998, 40(3): 55-79.
[7] 李金华, 孙东川. 创新网络的演化模型[J]. 科学学研究, 2006, 24(1): 135-140.
[8] Freeman C. Networks of innovators: a synthesis of research issues [J]. Research Policy, 1991, 20(5): 499-514.
[9] Hardy C, Phillips N, Lawrence T B. Resources, knowledge and influence: the organizational effects of interorganizational collaboration[J]. Journal of Management Studies, 2003, 40(2): 321-347.
[10] Nooteboom B. Institutions and forms of co-ordination in innovation systems [J]. Organization Studies, 2000, 21(5): 915-939.
[11] Cummings J N. Work groups,structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization[J]. Management Science, 2004, 50(3): 352-364.
[12] Reagans R, McEvily B. Network structure and knowledge transfer: the effects of cohesion and range [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2003, 48(2): 240-267
[13] Boer M D, Bosch F A J V D, Volberda H W. Managing organizational knowledge integration in the emerging multimedia complex [J]. Journal of Management Studies, 1999, 36(3): 379-398.
[14] 魏成龙, 张洁梅. 企业并购后知识整合传导机理的实证研究 [J]. 中国工业经济, 2009, (5): 119-128.
[15] 张可军, 廖建桥, 张鹏程. 变革型领导对知识整合影响:信任为中介变量[J]. 科研管理, 2011, 32(3): 150-158.
[16] Schilling M A, Phelps C C. Interfirm collaboration networks: the Impact of small world connectivity on firm innovation[J]. Management Science, 2007, 53(7): 1113-1126.
[17] 张兵, 王文平, 孟庆松. 非正式创新网络结构仿真研究 [J]. 管理工程学报, 2008, 22(4): 62-66.
[18] Ozman M. Knowledge integration and network formation [J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2006, 73(9): 1121-1143.
[19] Cowan R, Jonard N, Zimmermann J B. Bilateral collaboration and the emergence of innovation networks[J]. Management Science, 2007, 53(7): 1051-1067.
[20] 张兵, 王文平. 非正式知识网络关系强度分布与知识流动小世界 [J]. 中国管理科学, 2011, 19(4): 159-166.
[21] 单海燕, 王文平, 王娇俪. 知识网络演化模型的仿真研究[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2011, 23(1): 80-84.
[22] Cohen W M, Levinthal D A. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990, 35(1): 128-152.
[23] Watts D J, Strogatz S H. Collective dynamics of 'small-world' networks[J]. Nature, 1998, 393: 440-442.