主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院

中国管理科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (12): 306-317.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2022.1936cstr: 32146.14.j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2022.1936

• • 上一篇    下一篇

绿色可替代性产品供应链的合作策略与Pareto改进分析

陈克兵1, 孔颖琪1, 肖迪2, 雷东3()   

  1. 1.南京航空航天大学经济与管理学院,江苏 南京 210016
    2.浙江工商大学工商管理学院,浙江 杭州,310018
    3.电子科技大学经济与管理学院,四川 成都 611731
  • 收稿日期:2022-09-02 修回日期:2023-08-26 出版日期:2025-12-25 发布日期:2025-12-25
  • 通讯作者: 雷东 E-mail:leidong@uestc.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(72371127);国家自然科学基金面上项目(71971113);国家社会科学基金项目(21BGL109);国家社会科学基金项目(23BGL137)

Cooperation Policy Selection and Pareto Improvement Analysis of the Green Substitutable Product Supply Chain

Kebing Chen1, Yingqi Kong1, Di Xiao2, Dong Lei3()   

  1. 1.College of Economics and Management,Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics,Nanjing 210016,China
    2.School of Business Administration,Zhejiang Gongshang University,Hangzhou 310018,China
    3.School of Management and Economics,University of Electronic Science and Technology of China,Chengdu 611731,China
  • Received:2022-09-02 Revised:2023-08-26 Online:2025-12-25 Published:2025-12-25
  • Contact: Dong Lei E-mail:leidong@uestc.edu.cn

摘要:

在经济与环境双重驱动下,绿色产品与普通产品在市场上普遍共存。在绿色与非绿色产品的生产运营中,如何有效地权衡竞争与合作关系至关重要。本文构建由分别生产具有可替代性的普通产品和绿色产品的两个制造商与一个零售商组成的二级供应链,基于消费者绿色偏好,研究两个制造商与零售商间三种不同的合作策略及其供应链协调问题,并通过比较分析探讨供应链成员的最优合作策略。研究结果表明:合作有助于绿色制造商提高产品绿色度,且产品绿色度与零售商分担的绿色制造成本比例正相关;当消费者绿色偏好较高时,合作可以实现对制造商利润的改善;零售商在与两个制造商均合作的模式下可获得较高的利润。从供应链全局角度,零售商与单一制造商合作可改善供应链利润,却不能实现供应链整体协调;当零售商与两个制造商均合作时,供应链才可能实现协调。并且,当绿色成本共担比例满足一定条件时,供应链成员均可以实现利润的Pareto改进。

关键词: 绿色产品, 收益共享, 成本共担策略, 策略选择, Pareto改进

Abstract:

The rapid development of economy, society and cities is leading to environmental pollution and shortage of natural resources worldwide, and it also makes the issue of green environmental protection the focus of attention. Now that the issue of green development has received extensive attention from all parties, how to conduct green supply chain cooperation has also become the focus of business management research. Motivated by these actual problems, a secondary supply chain composed of one traditional products manufacturer, one green manufacturer and one retailer is constructed. Both manufacturers sell their products through the retailer. There is substitutability between these two products.As a member of the supply chain, each manufacturer can trade with the retailer through the wholesale price contracts, or cooperation with the retailer based on the revenue sharing. In addition, for the green manufacturer, besides of adopting a revenue-sharing contract, he can also choose to cooperate with the retailer to share green manufacturing costs to maximize his profit. Therefore, the following three possible cooperation modes are discussed in this paper: (i) the traditional manufacturer chooses to cooperate with the retailer based on the revenue sharing contract, and the green manufacturer doesn’t cooperate with the retailer; (ii) the traditional manufacturer doesn’t cooperate, and green manufacturers choose to cooperate with the retailer based on revenue sharing and greening cost sharing; (iii) the traditional manufacturer chooses to cooperate with the retailer based on revenue sharing, and the green manufacturer and the retailer carry out revenue sharing and green production cost sharing cooperation. Based on this, the optimal decision-makings and the profits of supply chain members under different cooperation modes are studied, and through comparative analysis, which cooperation strategy the supply chain members should choose is explored to be most profitable under the green and substitutability supply chain. Finally, supply chain coordination under the three cooperation strategies is discussed.The main insights obtained from this article are as follows. First, under the three cooperation models, the retail/wholesale prices of both green and traditional products are directly proportional to the consumer’s green sensitivity coefficient. Second, under the circumstance of manufacturer-led, the revenue-sharing cooperation with the retailer has a positive effect on the green manufacturer to improve the greenness of products; the cost-sharing cooperation between the green manufacturer and the retailer will also help them improve the greenness of green products. The finding shows that the greater the proportion of green manufacturing costs borne by the retailer, the higher the green level that green products can achieve. Besides, under these three cooperation models, the optimal profit that each manufacturer can obtain when only traditional manufacturer cooperates with the retailer is the smallest, indicating that green manufacturer should actively seek to share revenue and green production cost to increase their own profits; and the optimal profit of each manufacturer is proportional to the proportion of the green manufacturing cost borne by the retailer. It can be seen that the green manufacturer can increase the manufacturer’s profitability by cooperating with the retailer. However, the retailer only has a poor improvement effect and obtains lower profits when only cooperating with the manufacturer producing the traditional product, and can obtain higher profit by cooperating with both manufacturers. Finally, from the perspective of the whole supply chain, the coordination of supply chain can be realized only when both manufacturers cooperate with the retailer. It is also shown that Pareto improvement can be achieved between channel members when the green cost sharing ratio is in a certain range.

Key words: green products, profit sharing policy, cost sharing policy, policy selection, Pareto improvement

中图分类号: