考虑组织失效与协调的复杂产品研发项目设计变更风险传播模型

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2020.1242

中国管理科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (10): 265-276.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2020.1242cstr: 32146.14.j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2020.1242

考虑组织失效与协调的复杂产品研发项目设计变更风险传播模型

李芮萌¹, 杨乃定², 刘慧³, 张延禄²

1.重庆邮电大学经济管理学院，重庆400065； 2.西北工业大学管理学院，陕西西安710129；3.中南大学商学院，湖南长沙410083

收稿日期:2020-06-30 修回日期:2020-11-08 出版日期:2022-10-20 发布日期:2022-10-12
通讯作者: 杨乃定（1964-），男(汉族)，陕西西安人，西北工业大学管理学院，教授、博士生导师，研究方向：管理系统工程、项目管理、应急管理等，Email：naidingy@nwpu.edu.cn. E-mail:naidingy@nwpu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(71871182)；教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目资助(20XJA630003)；中国博士后科学基金资助项目(2021M700560)；重庆市自然科学基金资助项目(cstc2021jcyj-bsh0215)；重庆邮电大学人才引进基金资助项目(E012K2020209)

Design Change Risk Propagation for Complex Product Development Projects Considering Organizational Failure and Cooperation

LI Rui-meng¹, YANG Nai-ding², LIU Hui³, ZHANG Yan-lu²

1. School of Economics and Management, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Chongqing 400065, China;2. School of Management, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710129, China;3. Business school, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China

Received:2020-06-30 Revised:2020-11-08 Online:2022-10-20 Published:2022-10-12
Contact: 杨乃定 E-mail:naidingy@nwpu.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于产品部件间的设计关联和组织产品间的镜像假设，构建一对一依赖的复杂产品研发项目组织-产品相依网络模型。在此基础上，构建考虑组织失效和组织间协调的复杂产品研发项目设计变更风险传播动力学模型，并针对由少数部件发生设计变更风险事件引发的复杂产品研发项目相依网络上的设计变更风险传播进行数值仿真。结果表明：组织失效和组织协调不足均会导致设计变更风险的积累，使得设计变更风险传播经历缓慢传播、失控传播后达到相对稳定状态；组织设计能力充足且组织间协调充分时设计变更风险传播不发生。复杂产品研发项目设计变更风险传播受到部件设计变更风险容量的显著影响，存在设计变更风险传播阈值η*3使得设计变更风险传播不发生；传播阈值η*3与初始变更源规模正相关；研发组织的冗余设计能力存在作用条件，使得传播阈值η*3保持在最低水平。研究成果完善了项目管理中风险动态分析框架，为提高复杂产品研发项目抵御设计变更风险的能力提供建议。

关键词: 复杂产品研发项目；设计变更风险；风险传播；组织失效；组织协调

Abstract: Influenced by internal and external risk factors such as customer demand uncertainty, technological change, scheme error, a small number of components are prone to design change risk events. In the context of complex inter-component dependency and concurrent development, the design change of one or a few components may trigger the potential design change risk of other dependent components, resulting in design change risk propagation. The propagation of design change risk brings great uncertainty to complex product development (CPD), which may lead to serious project delay, budget overrun, and low quality. Complex products contain a large number of components, which cannot be independently developed by a single organization. Therefore, CPD projects mainly adopt the form of multi-organizational collaboration network. Although networked form has the advantages of reducing the cost of development and realizing complementary resources, it further increases the complexity of design change risk management in the face of design change propagation, which poses a great challenge to the CPD projects. Therefore, it is of great significance to consider the role of organizations and reveal the propagation law of design change risk under the influences of organizations.

Key words: complex product development project; design change risk; risk propagation; organizational failure; organizational cooperation

中图分类号:

F224

李芮萌,杨乃定,刘慧, 等. 考虑组织失效与协调的复杂产品研发项目设计变更风险传播模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(10): 265-276.

LI Rui-meng,YANG Nai-ding,LIU Hui, et al. Design Change Risk Propagation for Complex Product Development Projects Considering Organizational Failure and Cooperation[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(10): 265-276.

参考文献

［1］ Hobday M. Product complexity, innovation and industrial organisation［J］. Research Policy, 1998, 26(6): 689-710.
［2］陈占夺, 齐丽云, 牟莉莉. 价值网络视角的复杂产品系统企业竞争优势研究——一个双案例的探索性研究［J］.管理世界, 2013(10): 156-169.Chen Zhanduo, Qi Liyun, Mou Lili. Competitive advantage of complex product system enterprises from the perspective of value network—an exploratory study of two cases［J］. Journal of Management World, 2013(10): 156-169.
［3］ Shankar P, Morkos B, Summers J D. Reasons for change propagation: A case study in an automotive OEM［J］. Research in Engineering Design, 2012, 23(4): 291-303.
［4］ Li Ruimeng, Yang Naiding, Zhang Yanlu, et al. Risk propagation and mitigation of design change for complex product development (CPD) projects based on multilayer network theory［J］. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2020, 142: 106370.
［5］杨乃定, 李芮萌, 张延禄等. 复杂产品研发项目技术风险扩散建模与仿真［J］. 系统工程理论与实践, 2019, 39(6): 1496-1506.Yang Naiding, Li Ruimeng, Zhang Yanlu, et al. Modeling and simulation of technical risk diffusion in the complex product research and development projects［J］. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2019, 39(6): 1496-1506.
［6］王京北, 杨乃定, 张延禄等. 基于CA模型的研发网络级联失效建模及其对任务网络工期风险的影响研究［J］. 管理工程学报, 2019, 33(4): 176-183.Wang Jingbei, Yang Naiding, Zhang Yanlu, et al. Modeling of R&D network’s cascading failure based on CA model and its impact on the duration risk of task network［J］. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2019, 33(4): 176-183.
［7］杨乃定, 刘慧, 张延禄等. 考虑项目关联关系的R&D网络风险传播建模与仿真［J］. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(10): 179-188.Yang Naiding, Liu Hui, Zhang Yanlu, et al. Risk propagation modeling and simulation in R&D network considering the interrelation between projects［J］.Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2019, 27(10): 179-188.
［8］刘慧, 杨乃定, 张延禄等. 考虑风险感知和项目关联的R&D网络风险传播模型［J］. 系统工程学报, 2019, 34(3): 301-311.Liu Hui, Yang Naiding, Zhang Yanlu, et al. Risk propagation model of R&D network considering risk perceptionand project interrelation［J］.Journal of Systems Engineering, 2019, 34(3): 301-311.
［9］ Clarkson P J, Simons C, Eckert C. Predicting change propagation in complex design［J］. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2004, 126(5): 788-797.
［10］ Lee J, Hong Y S. Data-driven prediction of change propagation using dependency network［J］. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2018, 70: 149-158.
［11］ Lee J, Hong Y S. Bayesian network approach to change propagation analysis［J］. Research in engineering design, 2017, 28(4): 437-455.
［12］ Pasqual M C, de Weck O L. Multilayer network model for analysis and management of change propagation［J］. Research in engineering design, 2012, 23(4): 305-328.
［13］ Lee H, Seol H, Sung N, et al. An analytic network process approach to measuring design change impacts in modular products［J］. Journal of Engineering Design, 2007, 21(1): 75-91.
［14］ Hamraz B, Caldwell N H M, Clarkson P J. A holistic categorization framework for literature on engineering change management［J］. Systems Engineering, 2013, 16(4): 473-505.
［15］ Qiao Hu, Mo Rong, Xiang Ying. The generation of adaptive assembly from predicting change propagation［J］. Assembly Automation, 2015, 35 (3):269-80.
［16］ Haynes J. Risk as an economic factor［J］. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1895, 9(4): 409-449.
［17］ Cheng Hui, Chu Xuening. A network-based assessment approach for change impacts on complex product［J］. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2012, 23(4): 1419-1431.
［18］ Wang Jingbei, Yang Naiding, Zhang Yanlu, et al. Modeling and simulation of the cascading failure of R&D network considering the community structure［J］. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2019, 522: 43-53.
［19］ Li Yupeng, Chu Xuening, Chu Dexin, et al. An integrated module partition approach for complex products and systems based on weighted complex networks［J］. International Journal of Production Research, 2014, 52 (15):4608-4622.
［20］ Zhang Yanlu, Yang Naiding. Vulnerability analysis of interdependent R&D networks under risk cascading propagation［J］. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2018, 505: 1056-1068.
［21］ Zhang Yanlu, Yang Naiding. Development of a mitigation strategy against the cascading propagation of risk in R&D network［J］. Safety science, 2014, 68: 161-168.
［22］ Liu Hui, Yang Naiding, Yang Zhao, et al. The impact of firm heterogeneity and awareness in modeling risk propagation on multiplex networks［J］. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2020, 539: 122919.
［23］ Colfer L, Baldwin C Y. The mirroring hypothesis: Theory, evidence, and exceptions［J］. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2016, 25(5): 709-738.
［24］ Sosa M E, Eppinger S D, Rowles C M.The misalignment of product architecture and organizational structure in complex product development［J］. Management science, 2004, 50(12): 1674-1689.
［25］ Gokpinar B, Hopp W J, Iravani S M. The impact of misalignment of organizational structure and product architecture on quality in complex product development［J］. Management science, 2010, 56(3): 468-484.
［26］ Li C, Maini P K. An evolving network model with community structure［J］. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 2005, 38(45): 9741-9749.
［27］李玉鹏, 李孟泽, 王召同. 基于有向加权网络模型的复杂产品多源设计变更传播路径优化［J］. 机械工程学报, 2019, 55(6): 213-222.Li Yupeng, Li Mengze, Wang Zhaotong.Multi-source design change propagation path optimization for complex product based on weighted and directed network model［J］.Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2019, 55(6): 213-222.

[1]	孙嘉轶, 路阳阳, 滕春贤. 区块链技术对低碳供应链合作策略的影响研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(10): 293-303.
[2]	王莺潼, 计小宇, 孟庆春. 动态不确定环境下基于多层级备份策略的供应链网络性能研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(10): 316-326.
[3]	李梦祺, 李登峰, 南江霞. 考虑链间竞争与链内研发成本共担的绿色供应链决策——基于非合作-合作两型博弈方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(10): 339-349.
[4]	何爽, 赵亮, 张剑, 李琳. 替代竞争情境下关联需求固定产出比联产品加工决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(10): 76-85.
[5]	伏红勇, 雷一峰, 但斌, 掌曙光. 应对供应商减排不合规的碳审计策略：独立vs联合[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(9): 339-348.
[6]	陈威, 田永乐, 白春光, 马永开. 考虑极端天气的电力供应链可再生能源维护策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(9): 359-368.
[7]	吕希琛, 田银凤, 田世海, 刘佳缘, 孔庆伟. MRV机制下碳数据质量监管多主体行为决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(8): 355-368.
[8]	李志文, 徐贤浩, 关旭, 柏庆国, 陈程. 农产品市场双寡头区块链采纳决策的演化博弈分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(7): 324-336.
[9]	孙中苗, 徐琪. 区块链技术下政府对可再生能源电力消纳的动态激励补贴研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(7): 346-359.
[10]	扈衷权, 梁倩, 沈奥, 刘阳. 基于期权契约的应急物资生产能力储备模型研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(5): 247-258.
[11]	张文明, 杜玉禄. 相邻价格相关的在线单向交易问题的数据驱动型策略设计[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(5): 26-33.
[12]	何洪阳, 张彬, 田苏俊. 平台经济政企协同治理的演化博弈分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(5): 76-87.
[13]	周驰, 李赫, 于静. 委托代理关系下品牌商网络直播营销激励机制设计[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(4): 265-274.
[14]	白雨, 赵昕, 丁黎黎. 考虑企业时间偏好的碳配额存储与借贷机制研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(4): 357-368.
[15]	许书琴, 徐琪. 能源平台供应链可再生能源电力消纳激励契约研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(3): 326-338.

考虑组织失效与协调的复杂产品研发项目设计变更风险传播模型

Design Change Risk Propagation for Complex Product Development Projects Considering Organizational Failure and Cooperation

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0