主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院

中国管理科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (10): 327-338.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2023.806

• • 上一篇    下一篇

店播制造商的第三方达人播渠道引入研究

陈悦1,3, 王勇1,3, 段玉兰2(), 郑静1,3   

  1. 1.重庆大学经济与工商管理学院,重庆 400044
    2.浙江财经大学管理学院,浙江 杭州 310018
    3.重庆大学现代物流重庆重点实验室,重庆 400044
  • 收稿日期:2023-05-17 修回日期:2024-05-17 出版日期:2025-10-25 发布日期:2025-10-24
  • 通讯作者: 段玉兰 E-mail:duanyulan@zufe.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(71672015);浙江省社科联省属高校基本科研业务费改革试点专项一般项目(24NDJC314YBMS);重庆市社会科学规划项目(KJQN202000820)

Research on Manufacturers of Shop Live Streaming to Introduce Celebrity Live Streaming Channels

Yue Chen1,3, Yong Wang1,3, Yulan Duan2(), Jing Zheng1,3   

  1. 1.School of Economics and Business Administration,Chongqing University,Chongqing 400044,China
    2.School of Management,Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics,Hangzhou 310018,China
    3.Chongqing Key Laboratory of Logistics,Chongqing University,Chongqing 400044,China
  • Received:2023-05-17 Revised:2024-05-17 Online:2025-10-25 Published:2025-10-24
  • Contact: Yulan Duan E-mail:duanyulan@zufe.edu.cn

摘要:

店播和达人播是两种典型的电商直播销售渠道,当前电商市场中过半的制造商已建成自己的店播渠道,本文主要讨论店播制造商对于第三方达人播渠道的引入问题。若考虑单渠道策略(暂停店播&引入达人播),当达人播渠道的等待成本和佣金费率双低时,店播制造商与达人主播将在“纯佣金”收费模式下实现单渠道策略“双赢”合作。若考虑双渠道策略(保留店播&引入达人播),当店播渠道的不确定性较高且达人播渠道的等待成本和佣金费率双低时,“纯佣金”收费模式下的最终均衡结果将退化为不引入达人播的“双输”结果。但有趣的是,在上述“双输”情境下,将收费模式改为“佣金+坑位费”,店播制造商与达人主播就有机会达成双渠道策略“双赢”合作。此外,无论是在单渠道还是双渠道策略下,店播制造商都能通过引入一个等待成本较低的第三方达人播渠道,来实现更高的销售价格。

关键词: 电商直播, 双渠道, 店播, 达人播, 达人主播

Abstract:

E-commerce live streaming has emerged as a prevailing trend in China in recent years, prompting an increasing number of e-commerce manufacturers to participate actively in this popular online sales mode for enhanced consumer engagement. Within the e-commerce market, two distinct types of live streaming channels have been identified: The shop live streaming channel (S-Channel) and the third-party celebrity live streaming channel (T-Channel). Over half of the e-commerce manufacturers have established their own shop live streaming channels to facilitate product sales, thus being referred to as SLSC-manufacturers throughout this paper. Despite possessing their dedicated S-Channels, these manufacturers occasionally resort to T-Channel for conducting product sales through live streams. Consequently, it is imperative for SLSC-manufacturers to devise effective strategies that enable a rational integration of T-Channel.Drawing on the real context of e-commerce live streaming, consumer uncertainty and waiting costs are incorporated to differentiate between S-Channel and T-Channel, thereby influencing consumers' preference choices and SLSC-manufacturers' decision-making regarding the introduction of T-Channels. If the SLSC-manufacturer opts against introducing T-Channel, they will solely rely on S-Channel for product sales. However, if they choose to introduce T-Channel, two potential strategies emerge: a dual-channel strategy (retaining S-Channel and introducing T-Channel) or a single-channel strategy (suspending S-Channel while introducing T-Channel). Ultimately, employing backward induction analysis enables us to determine equilibrium in both scenarios.The primary findings are outlined below. (1) Whether adopting a dual-channel or single-channel strategy, the SLSC-manufacturer can achieve higher pricing for their product by introducing a T-Channel with low waiting costs. (2) If the SLSC-manufacturer adopts a single-channel strategy (suspending S-Channel and introducing T-Channel), the final equilibrium strategy will only be influenced by the waiting cost and commission rates of T-Channel. When both the waiting cost and commission rates of T-Channel are low, the SLSC-manufacturer can achieve "win-win" cooperation with the celebrity live streamer through a single-channel strategy under the "pure commission rate" charging mode. Otherwise, the SLSC-manufacturer will not choose to introduce T-Channel. (3) If the SLSC-manufacturer adopts a dual-channel strategy (retaining S-Channel while introducing T-Channel), the final equilibrium strategy will primarily depend on consumer uncertainty regarding S-Channel, waiting costs, and commission rates associated with T-Channel, as well as charging modes for celebrity live streamers' services. When consumer uncertainty in the S-Channel is high, and both waiting costs and commission rates in the T-Channel are low, the equilibrium strategy will degenerate to non-introduction of the T-Channel under “pure commission rates” charging mode, resulting in a “lose-lose” for both the SLSC-manufacturer and celebrity live streamer. Interestingly, switching to a “commission rate & fixed fee” charging mode in this aforementioned scenario allows both SLSC manufacturers and celebrity live streamer to achieve “win-win” cooperation through that dual-channel strategy.

Key words: e-commerce live streaming, dual-channel, shop live streaming, celebrity live streaming, celebrity live streamer

中图分类号: