在考虑各地区内在联系的前提下,为以最少的双边比较次数,实现地区间可传递的多边比较,本文把最小生成树理论与空间结构分解分析相结合,提出了空间比较路径选择(SCPS)模型。利用2007年和2012年中国27地区的投入产出表,以碳生产率的五因素乘法分解为例,示范了SCPS模型的构建过程,并对中国碳生产率区域差异性及其影响因素问题进行了实证研究。结果表明,部门碳强度是影响区域碳生产率差异性以及各省碳生产率提高的关键因素,最终需求和产业结构也对碳生产率差异性起到了重要的作用。各地区可通过加大低碳投资力度,增强信息、技术及其他资源的跨省区合作,加快产业转型升级等措施,缩小碳生产率差异性,提升碳生产率的整体水平,促进经济社会发展向低碳绿色模式转型。
With the increasingly outstanding conflict between social progress and the climate change, how to develop low-carbon green economy has become a hot topic in academic circle and among governmental policy makers. As the core issue of developing carbon economy, increasing carbon productivity is already taken as the key strategy to cope with climate changes. At present, there is a great disparity between China and developed countries in terms of carbon productivity. At the same time, apparent disparities of regions have also severely hindered the growth of low carbon economy in our country. Therefore, to narrow the gaps of regions and enhancing the overall carbon productivity, the study of the disparities in regional carbon productivity and the influencing factors behind it is of great theoretical and practical significance to the formulation of proper energy and environmental policies and the development of low carbon economy.In this paper, the theory of minimum spanning tree (MST) is introduced into structural decomposition analysis and the spatial comparative path selection (SCPS) model is creatively constructed, which can help us to analysis the drive factor of regional disparities of carbon productivity disparities among 27 regions. For building the SCPS model, based on the method of structural decomposition analysis, each region is regarded as one vertex and the variation of bilateral comparison as side length (Paache-Laspeyres spread index is used, which is represented as PLS for direct comparison and CPLS for indirect comparison). In this way, the MST that has a minimum sum of side lengths in a forms spanning tree can be got. Based on SCPS model, the regional input-output tables of China in 2012 is used and five factors, which are GDP, value-added coefficients, production technology level, local and foreign final demand, are chosen to decompose the carbon productivity. The results show that the major driving factor for the regional disparities of carbon productivity is the sectors' carbon intensity. In accordance with the results, it is suggested that balancing the regional discordance, enhancing investments on low carbon industry and promoting development of low carbon technology can help us achieve the "overall increasing goal" for regional carbon productivity in China.
[1] 何建坤, 苏明山. 应对全球气候变化下的碳生产率分析[J]. 中国软科学, 2009,(10):42-47,147.
[2] Xu Shichun, He Zhengxia, Long Ruyin. Factors that influence carbon emissions due to energy consumption in China:Decomposition analysis using LMDI[J]. Applied Energy, 2014, 127:182-193.
[3] 黄芳, 江可申, 卢愿清,等. 中国碳强度的影响因素解析——基于LMDI分解方法[J]. 数学的实践与认识, 2012, 42(6):40-46.
[4] 王会娟,夏炎.中国居民消费碳排放的影响因素及发展路径分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(8):1-10.
[5] 蔡圣华, 牟敦国, 方梦祥. 二氧化碳强度减排目标下我国产业结构优化的驱动力研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2011, 19(04):167-173.
[6] Song Malin, Guo Xu, Wu Kaiya, et al. Driving effect analysis of energy-consumption carbon emissions in the Yangtze River Delta region[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2015, 103:620-628.
[7] Moutinho V, Moreira A C, Silva P M. The driving forces of change in energy-related CO2 emissions in Eastern, Western, Northern and Southern Europe:The LMDI approach to decomposition analysis[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 50:1485-1499.
[8] Su Bin, Ang B W. Multi-region comparisons of emission performance:The structural decomposition analysis approach[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2016, 67:78-87.
[9] Beinhocker E, Oppenheim J, Irons B, et al. The carbon productivity challenge:Curbing climate change and sustaining economic growth[R]. Sydney:McKinsey Global Institute, McKinsey & Company, 2008.
[10] Wang Qiuxian, Gao Zhiqiang, Ning Jicai. Model-based assessment of the pattern differences and the equity of national carbon emissions in China during 2000-2010[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2015, 103:696-704.
[11] Meng Ming, Niu Dongxiao. Three-dimensional decomposition models for carbon productivity[J]. Energy, 2012, 46(1):179-187.
[12] Hu Xiancun, Liu Chunlu. Carbon productivity:A case study in the Australian construction industry[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016, 112:2354-2362.
[13] Gao Wenjing, Zhu Zhishuang. The technological progress route alternative of carbon productivity promotion in China's industrial sector[J]. Natural Hazards, 2016,82(3):1803-1815.
[14] Long Ruyin, Shao Tianxiang, Chen Hong. Spatial econometric analysis of China's province-level industrial carbon productivity and its influencing factors[J]. Applied Energy, 2016, 166:210-219.
[15] Zhang Huan, Xu Kangning. Impact of environmental regulation and technical progress on industrial carbon productivity:An approach based on proxy measure[J]. Sustainability, 2016, 8(8):819.
[16] Lu Zhengnan, Yang Yang, Wang Jian. Factor decomposition of carbon productivity chang in china's main industries:Based on the laspeyres decomposition method[J]. Energy Procedia, 2014, 61:1893-1896.
[17] Ang B W, Xu X Y, Su Bin. Multi-country comparisons of energy performance:The index decomposition analysis approach[J]. Energy Economics, 2015, 47:68-76.
[18] Yamaji K, Matsuhashi R, Nagata Y, et al. A study on economic measures for CO2 reduction in Japan[J]. Energy Policy, 1993, 21(2):123-132.
[19] Shao Chaofeng, Guan Yang, Wan Zheng, et al. Performance and decomposition analyses of carbon emissions from industrial energy consumption in Tianjin, China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2014, 64(2):590-601.
[20] Dietzenbacher E, Los B. Structural decomposition techniques:Sense and sensitivity[J]. Economic Systems Research, 1998, 10(4):307-324.
[21] 夏炎, 陈锡康, 杨翠红. 关于结构分解技术中两种分解方法的比较研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2010, 19(05):27-33.
[22] Fernandez-Vazquez E, Los B, Ramos-Carvajal C. Using additional information in structural decomposition analysis:The path-based approach[J]. Economic Systems Research, 2008, 20(4):367-394.
[23] Dietzenbacher E, Los B. Structural decomposition analyses with dependent determinants[J]. Economic Systems Research, 2000, 12(4):497-514.
[24] Hill R J. Comparing price levels across countries using minimum-spanning trees[J]. Review of Economics and Statistics, 1999, 81(1):135-142.
[25] 蒋雪梅. 基于最小生成树理论的空间结构分解模型[J]. 数量经济技术经济研究, 2011,(4):150-160.
[26] Hill R J. Measuring inflation and growth using spanning trees[J]. International Economic Review, 2001, 42(1):167-185.
[27] Lanza R, Martinsen T, Mohammad A K W, et al. 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories[R]. World Meteorological Organization, 2006.