主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
论文

第三方回收商领导型两级闭环供应链的回收与定价策略

展开
  • 1. 南京大学工程管理学院, 江苏 南京 210093;
    2. 南京财经大学博弈行为与运作管理研究所, 江苏 南京 210046

收稿日期: 2016-05-10

  修回日期: 2016-12-15

  网络出版日期: 2018-03-19

基金资助

国家杰出青年科学基金资助项目(71425001);国家自然科学基金资助项目(71371093);江苏省研究生科研与实践创新计划项目(KYCX17_0014)

Recycling and Pricing Strategies of Closed-Loop Supply Chain by the Leader of Third-Party Recycler

Expand
  • 1. School of Management and Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China;
    2. Institute of Game Behavior and Operations Management, Nanjing University of Finance and Economics, Nanjing 210046, China

Received date: 2016-05-10

  Revised date: 2016-12-15

  Online published: 2018-03-19

摘要

与一般废旧产品的回收产品再制造相比,废弃电子电器产品回收拆解后需要兼顾产品与零部件再制造,从而减少电子电器产品对环境的污染,推进资源的重复利用。为了探讨第三方回收商的回收与定价策略对供应商和制造商的影响,本文构建由单一供应商、制造商和第三方回收商组成的两级再制造闭环供应链,建立Stackelberg博弈模型,研究两级再制造情形下和仅产品再制造情形下回收商的有效回收比例、回收定价和回收努力程度等决策,并对两种再制造情形下供应链各成员的决策与收益进行对比分析。研究发现:对于回收商而言,回收数量、有效回收比例的增加有助于回收商获得更多的额外收益。如果在仅产品再制造情形下的有效回收比例较大,回收商的决策和收益主要取决于无效零部件的回收价。当无效零部件的回收价较低时,回收商在仅产品再制造情形下的决策和收益更优;反之,回收商在两级再制造情形下的决策和收益更优。对于其他供应链成员而言,两种再制造策略都能够降低供应商和制造商的定价,促进市场需求的增加。具体而言,不同的再制造策略对批发价、零售价和市场需求的影响与有效回收比例和无效零部件的回收价密切相关。

本文引用格式

冯章伟, 肖条军, 柴彩春 . 第三方回收商领导型两级闭环供应链的回收与定价策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018 , 26(1) : 118 -127 . DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2018.04.012

Abstract

Many suppliers and manufacturers allow a third-party recycler to perform recycling operations of Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment, then encourage the third-party recycler to disassemble these end-of-life products either for products remanufacturing or parts remanufacturing, which is of great importance in reducing environment pollution and promoting the reuse of resources. In this paper, recycling and pricing strategies of the third-party recycler are investigated in a closed-loop supply chain with two-echelon remanufacturing. Stackelberg game models of a closed-loop supply chain with two-echelon remanufacturing consisting of one supplier, one manufacturer, and one third-party recycler are developed. The returns price, effective recovery ratio, and recycling effort level are integrated within a modeling framework.The positive effect of two-echelon remanufacturing on effective utilization of the invalid parts,and its negative effect on the probability that the third-party recycler should handle the dismantling cost,are explicitly modeled. By the comparison of equilibrium decisions and profits under two remanufacturing strategies, it is found that (i) high quantity and the effective recovery ratio will contribute to the third-party recycler's profit; and (ii) remanufacturing strategies can reduce the wholesale price and sale price, and promote the demand, while the profits may not be improved; and (iii) when the effective recovery ratio under product remanufacturing is higher than that under two-echelon remanufacturing, recyclers' decisions and profit mainly depend on invalid parts' recycling price. Recyclers' decisions and profit under product remanufacturing turns better if the recycling price of invalid parts is sufficiently low. Otherwise, the recyclers' decisions and profit under two-echelon remanufacturing turns better. Moreover, numerical studies are employed to gain more intuitive insights. The field of two-echelon remanufacturing strategies are extended in the closed-loop supply chain and some new results are found. These new results may propose some constructive suggestions for the dominant third-party recycler in the reverse logistics.

参考文献

[1] Stock J R. Reverse logistics:White paper[M]. OakBrook:Council of Logistics Management, 1992.

[2] Fleischmann M, Bloemhof-Ruwaard J M, Dekker R, et al. Quantitative models for reverse logistics:A review[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1997, 103(1):1-17.

[3] Guide V D R, Jayaraman V, Linton J D. Building contingency planning for closed-loop supply chains with product recovery[J]. Journal of Operations Management, 2003, 21(3):259-279.

[4] Van Nunen J A E E, Zuidwijk R A. E-enabled closed-loop supply chains[J]. California Management Review, 2004, 46(2):40-54.

[5] Fishbein B K. EPR:What does it mean? Where is it headed?[J]. Pollution Prevention Review, 1998, 8(4):43-55.

[6] Fishbein B K. Carpet take-back:EPR American style[J]. Environmental Quality Management, 2000, 10(1):25-36.

[7] 曹柬, 胡强, 吴晓波, 等. 基于EPR制度的政府与制造商激励契约设计[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2013, 33(3):610-621.

[8] 姚卫新. 再制造条件下逆向物流回收模式的研究[J]. 管理科学, 2004,17(1):76-80.

[9] Gu Qiaolun, Ji Jianhua, Gao, Tiegang. Pricing management for a closed-loop supply chain[J]. Journal of Revenue & Pricing Management, 2008, 7(1):45-60.

[10] 黄祖庆, 达庆利. 直线型再制造供应链决策结构的效率分析[J]. 管理科学学报, 2006, 9(4):51-57.

[11] 张红, 王道平. 节能减排驱动下的汽车金属零部件回收处理方案评估[J]. 系统工程, 2014, 04(06):37-44.

[12] 倪明, 邵小伟, 郭军华, 等. 不确定需求及WTP差异条件下废弃电子产品再制造回收模式选择[J]. 系统工程, 2015, 10(07):44-53.

[13] 赵晓敏, 林英晖, 苏承明. 不同渠道权力结构下的S-M两级闭环供应链绩效分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2012, 20(02):78-86.

[14] Savaskan R C, Bhattacharya S, Van Wassenhove L N. Closed-loop supply chain models with product remanufacturing[J]. Management Science, 2004, 50(2):239-252.

[15] 姚卫新. 电子商务环境下闭环供应链的原子模型研究[J]. 管理科学, 2003, 37(l):65-68.

[16] Chuang C H, Wang C X, Zhao Yabing. Closed-loop supply chain models for a high-tech product under alternative reverse channel and collection cost structures[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2014, 156(5):108-123.

[17] Thierry M. Analysis of the impact of product recovery management on manufacturing companies[D]. Rotterdam:Erasmus University, 1997.

[18] 黄祖庆, 易荣华, 达庆利. 第三方负责回收的再制造闭环供应链决策结构的效率分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2008,16(3):73-77.

[19] Hong Xianpei, Xu Lei, Du Peng, et al. Joint advertising, pricing and collection decisions in a closed-loop supply chain[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2015, 167:12-22.

[20] Goh M, Lu Qing, Souza R D. Remanufacturing in Asia:Location choice and outsourcing[J]. International Journal of Logistics Management, 2014, 25(1):20-34.

[21] Zou Zongbao, Wang Jianjun, Deng Guishi S,et al. Third-party remanufacturing mode selection:Outsourcing or authorization?[J]. Transportation Research Part E Logistics & Transportation Review, 2016, 87:1-19.

[22] 陈逸伦, 石晶, 肖条军. 基于交易定价的再制造供应链回收处理服务决策[J]. 物流工程与管理, 2014,36(6):55-59.

[23] Ferrer G, Swaminathan J M. Managing new and remanufactured products[J]. Management Science, 2006, 52(1):15-26.

[24] Lebreton B. Strategic closed-loop supply chain management[M]. Berlin:Springer, 2007.

[25] 丁斌, 马海庆. 两级再制造的S-M闭环供应链的决策与绩效分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(6):118-125.

[26] 孙浩, 达庆利. 基于不同权力结构的废旧产品回收再制造决策分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2009, 17(5):104-112.

[27] 马海庆. 两级再制造S-M闭环供应链的定价决策分析[D]. 合肥:中国科学技术大学, 2014.

[28] Huang Min, Song Min, Lee L H, et al. Analysis for strategy of closed-loop chain with dual recycling channel[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2013, 144(2):510-520.
文章导航

/