主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
论文

共创视角下考虑开放式创新的供应链价值创造研究

展开
  • 1. 山东大学管理学院, 山东 济南 250100;
    2. 山东大学价值共创网络研究中心, 山东 济南 250100;
    3. 山东大学数学学院, 山东 济南 250100

收稿日期: 2016-04-16

  修回日期: 2017-01-20

  网络出版日期: 2017-09-25

基金资助

国家自然科学基金资助项目(71572096)

Supply Chain Value Creation considering Open Innovation from the Perspective of Co-creation

Expand
  • 1. School of Management, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China;
    2. Research Center for Value Co-creation Network, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China;
    3. School of Mathmatics, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China

Received date: 2016-04-16

  Revised date: 2017-01-20

  Online published: 2017-09-25

摘要

既往研究只遵从供应链链上主体的价值创造逻辑,却忽略了链外主体对供应链价值创造的影响。本文从供应链创新实践角度,首先构建了考虑开放式创新的供应链价值创造模型,然后分别对供应链价值、企业联盟价值、消费者价值以及开放式创新主体价值创造进行了讨论,同时探讨了企业联盟成本降低幅度、创新成本以及支付给开放式创新主体的单位报酬对供应链价值、企业联盟价值、消费者价值以及开放式创新主体价值的影响,得到了一些有益的结论,最后通过MATLAB软件进行数值分析与模拟仿真。在广义共创视角下所进行的这一研究对于全面揭示供应链价值的提升、丰富供应链价值管理理论具有重要意义。

本文引用格式

万骁乐, 郝婷婷, 戎晓霞, 孟庆春 . 共创视角下考虑开放式创新的供应链价值创造研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017 , 25(7) : 57 -66 . DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2017.07.007

Abstract

Previous studies complied with the value creation logics of the main chain in the supply chain only, while ignoring the impact of the main body outside the chain on the supply chain value creation. Therefore, a supply chain value creation model is constructed in consideration of open innovation from the perspective of supply chain innovative practice firstly based on the supply chain value creation logics of "main creation of the main body in the supply chain + main body auxiliary creation outside the chain". And then, the supply chain value, the value of enterprise alliance, customer value and main body value of open innovation are discussed, the cost reduction of enterprise alliance, innovation cost and the impact of payment made to the open innovation main body on the supply chain value, the value of enterprise alliance, consumer value and main body of open innovation are also discussed. The following conclusions are given through model analysis: (1) Whether the future market is of high demand or low demand, to increase the value created by the supply chain, the parameter set composed of the cost reduction of enterprise alliance, the cost of innovation and the payment made to the open innovation main body shall meet certain conditions. (2) When the future market demand is high, and the unit cost lowered by the enterprise alliance is higher than the unit reward given to the main body of open innovation, the enterprise alliance value increases; and when the future market demand is low, the enterprise alliance value is uncertain. (3) Regardless of the market demand, consumer value increases to varying degrees, consumers are always the beneficiaries of supply chain value creation with open innovation. (4) The income of open innovation main body is not stable, influenced by the future market demand, unit reward given to the open innovation and the innovation cost. The paper also finds that under open innovation, the enterprise alliance and the main body of open innovation may suffer from the value loss. The risk of open innovation is shared by the enterprise alliance and the open innovation main body together. Finally, numerical analysis, and analog simulation are made with MATLAB software. This study is of great significance in revealing the value of supply chain comprehensively and enriching supply chain value management theory under the perspective of common creation in a broad sense.

参考文献

[1] 沈小平. 供应链价值系统与竞争优势[J]. 物流工程与管理, 2010,32(8):137-139 +142.

[2] Anderson J C, Narus J A. Business market management: Understanding, creating and delivering value[M]. Upper Saddle River:Pearson Education, 2008.

[3] Mizik N, Jacobson, R. Trading off between value creation and value appropriation: The financial implications of shifts in strategic emphasis[J]. Journal of Marketing, 2003,67(1):63-76.

[4] Prahalad C K, Ramaswamy V. The future of competition: Co-creating unique value with customers[M]. Boston: Harvard Business School Press,2004.

[5] Vargo S L, Lusch R F.It's all B2Band beyond: Toward a systems perspective of the market[J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2011,40(2):181-187.

[6] Payne A F, Storbacka K, Frow P. Managing the co-creation of value[J].Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2008,36(1):83-96.

[7] Vargo S L, Lusch R F.From goods to service(s): Divergences and convergences of logics[J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2008,37(3):254-259.

[8] Vargo S L, Lusch R F.Service-dominant logic: Continuing the evolution[J]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2008,36(1):1-10.

[9] Yi Y, Gong T. Customer value co-creation behavior scale development and validation[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2013,66(9):1279-1284.

[10] Grönroos C, Voima P. Critical service logic: Making sense of value creation and co-creation[J]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2013,41:133-150.

[11] Ross A, Selling uniqueness—Mass customization: The new religion for manufacturers[J]. Management Engineer, 1996,75 (6):260-263.

[12] Duray R. Mass customization origins: Mass or custom manufacturing[J]. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 2002,22 (3):314-328.

[13] 张祥,陈荣秋.顾客参与链:让顾客与企业共同创造竞争优势[J]. 管理评论, 2006,18(1):51-56+64.

[14] Zhang Xiang, Chen Rongqiu. Examining the mechanism of the value co-creation with customers[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2008,116(2):242-250.

[15] Groönroos C. Service logic revisited: Who creates value? And who co-creates[J]. European Business Review, 2008,20(4):298-314.

[16] GrönroosC, Ravald A. Service as business logic: Implications for value creation and marketing[J]. Journal of Service Management, 2011,22(1):5-22.

[17] 王凤彬. 供应链网络组织与竞争优势[M]. 北京:中国人民大学出版社,2006.

[18] Kähkönen A-K, Lintukangas K. The underlying potential of supply management in value creation[J]. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 2012,18(2):68-75.

[19] 林文进,江志斌,李娜. 服务型制造理论研究综述[J]. 工业工程管理, 2009,14(6):1-6.

[20] 何哲,孙林岩,朱春燕. 服务型制造的概念、问题和前瞻[J]. 科学学研究, 2010,28(1):53-60.

[21] 王康周,江志斌,林文进,等. 服务型制造混合供应链管理研究[J]. 软科学, 2013,27(5):93-100.

[22] 孟庆春,董建华,厉聪聪. 基于新产消合一的供应链价值最大化研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2012,20(6): 102-109.

[23] 孟庆春,曹晨,马硕. 新产消合一理念研究[J]. 理论学刊, 2014,(5):39-42+129.

[24] 孟庆春,李慧慧. 基于新产消合一考虑链间竞争的供应链价值最大化研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(3):168-176

[25] Hult G T, Hurley R F, Knight G A. Innovativeness: Its antecedents and impact on business performance[J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2004,33(5):429-438.

[26] Janeiro P, Proença I, Gonçalves V D C. Open innovation: Factors explaining universities as service firm innovation sources[J]. Journal of Business Research, 2013,66:2017-2023.

[27] Sisodiya S R, Johnson J L, Grégoire Y. Inbound open innovation for enhanced performance: Enablers and opportunities[J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2013,42(5):836-849.

[28] Choi K, Narasimhan R, Kim S W, Opening the technological innovation black box: The case of the electronics industry in Korea[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2016, 250(1):192-203

[29] 韦铁,鲁若愚. 多主体参与的开放式创新模式研究[J]. 管理工程学报, 2011,25(3):133-137.

[30] 夏恩君,张明,王素娟,张一. 开放式创新社区网路绩效研究—基于数理分析与实证检验[J]. 中国管理科学, 2013,21(11):549-556.

[31] Gambardella A, Panico C. On the management of open innovation[J]. Research Policy, 2014,43:903-913.

[32] 吕璞,林莉. 基于开放式创新的供应链企业协同创新模型研究[J]. 科技管理研究, 2014,(1):197-200.
文章导航

/