主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
论文

随机产出下数量柔性采购策略研究

展开
  • 重庆大学经济与工商管理学院, 重庆 400030

收稿日期: 2015-06-21

  修回日期: 2016-02-14

  网络出版日期: 2017-08-26

基金资助

国家自然科学基金资助项目(71572021);中央高校基本科研业务费(106112016CDJXY020014)

Quantity Flexible Procurement Strategy Under Random Yield

Expand
  • School of Economics and Business Administration, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030. China

Received date: 2015-06-21

  Revised date: 2016-02-14

  Online published: 2017-08-26

摘要

本文研究制造商如何利用数量柔性采购管理供应商随机产出带来的风险。制造商的主要供应商的产出是随机的且单价较低,另外一个供应商以数量柔性合同方式提供产品给制造商且单价较高。分别讨论了确定需求和随机需求下制造商的采购策略,分析了不同条件下制造商的订货决策,得出了制造商单源订货和双源订货的条件。

本文引用格式

何波, 张霞 . 随机产出下数量柔性采购策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017 , 25(5) : 52 -60 . DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2017.05.007

Abstract

Random yield of the upstream supplier is often seen in the semiconductor, electronics and chemical industries, which has a significant negative impact on the downstream manufacturer's operations. Since the major supplier's (risky supplier) yield is random, to mitigate supply risk, the manufacturer can procure from an alternative reliable supplier (QF supplier) with quantity flexibility contract. So, the manufacturer faces a problem of how to determine its procurement strategy in the presence of random yield. Using stochastic modelling and optimization, the manufacturer's optimal procurement decisions are investigated under deterministic and stochastic demand, respectively. The structural properties of optimal solutions are analyzed and the conditions under which the quantity flexibility procurement policy should be used are identified. Furthermore, by theoretical analysis and numerical computations, the effect of random yield, flexibility, wholesale price and demand risk on the procurement decisions are examined. It is found that the higher supply risk and demand risk reduce the manufacturer's expected profit but have different impacts on the manufacturer's order decisions. For the QF supplier, it may not obtain more orders by providing larger flexibility to the buyer,on the contrary, doing this may benefit the risky supplier. For the QF supplier or risky supplier, given its competitor's wholesale price, it can increase its order share by lower wholesale price. Our results can facilitate the manufacturer to mitigate its supply risks.

参考文献

[1] Yang W, Wu E. Manufacturing a brand. Available at http://www.amcham-shanghai.org/
[2] Osborne C. Apple cuts supply risk, pits Pegatron vs. Foxconn[2013-5-30].www.zdnet.com/article/apple-supply-risk-pits-pegatron-vs-foxconn/.
[3] Agrawal N,Nahmias S. Rationalization of the supplier base in the presense of yield uncertainty[J]. Production and Operations Management, 1997,6(3):291-308.
[4] Krause D R,Handfield R B, Tyler B B. The relationships between supplier development, commitment, social capital accumulation and performance improvement[J]. Journal of Operations Management, 2007, 25(2):528-545.
[5] 慕银平, 刘利明. 价格柔性合同下的原材料采购策略及风险分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(3):108-117.
[6] Gupta V, He Bo,Sethi S P. Contingent sourcing under supply disruption and competition[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2015,53(10):3006-3027.
[7] Guo Shanshan, Zhao Lei, Xu Xiaowei. Impact of supply risks on procurement decisions[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2013,24(1):1-20.
[8] Babich V. Independence of capacity ordering and financial subsidies to risky suppliers[J]. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 2010, 12(4):583-607.
[9] 李毅鹏, 马士华. 供求不确定下的通用零部件供应商协同研究[J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2013,19(12):3184-2192.
[10] 陈志明, 陈志祥. 议价的OEM供应链在随机供需下的协调决策[J]. 管理科学学报, 2014,17(5):43-51.
[11] Gurnani H, Gerchak Y. Coordination in decentralized assembly systems with uncertain component yields[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2007,176(3):1559-1576.
[12] Li Tao,Sethi S P, Zhang Jun. Supply diversification with responsive pricing[J]. Production and Operations Management, 2013,22(2):447-458.
[13] Tang S Y,Kouvelis P. Pay-back-revenue-sharing contract in coordinating supply chains with random yield[J]. Production and Operations Management, 2014,23(12):2089-2102.
[14] Chen K B, Yang L.Random yield and coordination mechanisms of a supply chain with emergency backup sourcing[J]. International Journal of Production Research. 2014,52(16):4747-4767.
[15] He Yuanjie, Zhang Jiang. Random yield risk sharing in a two-level supply chain[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2008,112(2):769-781.
[16] 郑克俊. 期权契约下易逝品供应链协调[J]. 系统工程学报, 2011, 26(2):211-215.
[17] Tsay A A. The quantity flexibility contract and supplier-customer incentives[J]. Management Science, 1999, 45(10):1339-1358.
[18] Sethi S P, Yan Houmin, Zhang Hanqin. Quantity flexibility contracts:Optimal decisions with information updates[J]. Decision Sciences, 2004, 35(4):691-712.
[19] Tsay A A, Lovejoy W S. Quantity flexibility contracts and supply chain performance[J]. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 1999, 1(2):89-111.
[20] Chung W,Talluri S, Narasimhan R. Flexibility or cost saving? Sourcing decisions with two suppliers[J]. Decision Sciences, 2010, 41(3):623-650.
[21] Hu Fei, Lim C C, Lu Zudi. Coordination of supply chains with a flexible ordering policy under yield and demand uncertainty[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2013,146(2):686-693.
文章导航

/