主管：中国科学院
主办：中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
　　　中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
中国管理科学

中国管理科学 >

2016 , Vol. 24 >Issue 4: 148 - 158

DOI: https://doi.org/10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2016.04.017

论文

新产品开发网络资源与技术资源匹配关系:基于中国制造业企业的实证研究

展开
  • 湖南大学工商管理学院, 湖南 长沙 410082

收稿日期: 2015-03-30

  修回日期: 2015-11-12

  网络出版日期: 2016-04-29

基金资助

国家自然科学基金重点项目(71431008);国家自然科学基金创新研究群体项目(71521061);国家自然科学基金资助项目(71403086);教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金资助项目(14YJC630170);湖南省自然科学基金项资助目(14JJ3064);湖南省哲学社会科学基金资助项目(13YBA073);湖南省教育厅资助项目(湘财教字[2102]244号);湖南大学青年教师成长计划

收起

Matching Relationship between Network Resources and Technology Resources of New Product Development: EmpiricalStudy Based on Chinese Manufacturing Enterprises

Expand
  • Business School, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China

Received date: 2015-03-30

  Revised date: 2015-11-12

  Online published: 2016-04-29

Fold

摘要

新技术革命背景下新产品开发所需资源的广度和深度与日俱增,不同资源的匹配组合对于新产品开发成功具有直接决定性作用。本文结合资源基础理论与社会网络理论,深入研究了新产品开发中不同程度网络-技术资源组合对新产品开发市场绩效与风险的作用机理,并探究了产品多元化对网络-技术资源组合与新产品开发市场绩效、风险之间关系的调节效应。基于143家中国制造业企业实地调研数据,运用结构方程模型与分层回归分析方法进行实证,结果发现:网络资源广度-技术资源深度组合以及网络资源深度-技术资源广度组合对新产品开发市场绩效有正向影响,对新产品开发风险有负向作用;网络资源广度-技术资源广度组合以及网络资源深度-技术资源深度组合对新产品开发市场绩效有负向影响,对新产品开发风险有正向作用;产品多元化正向调节网络资源广度-技术资源深度组合与新产品开发风险之间的关系,以及网络资源广度-技术资源广度组合与新产品开发市场绩效、风险之间的关系。本文的研究为企业提高新产品开发资源配置效率、降低开发风险提供了决策支持与理论依据。

关键词： 新产品开发; 网络资源; 技术资源; 匹配关系; 产品多元化

本文引用格式

姚铮, 马超群, 杨智 . 新产品开发网络资源与技术资源匹配关系:基于中国制造业企业的实证研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016 , 24(4) : 148 -158 . DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2016.04.017

Abstract

In the background of new technological revolution, the requirements of breadth and depth for resources in new product development are increasing. The Matching combination of different resources has played a direct and decisive role for the success of new product development. By combining the resource based view and social network theory, the effects of varying degrees of combination of network-technology resources on the market performance/risk of enterprises' new product development are intensively investigated, and the adjustment effect of product diversification on the relationship between the combination of network-technology resources and the market performance/risk of new product development is explored. By using the survey data from 143 Chinese manufacturing enterprises structural equation modeling and hierarchical regression analyzes method are utilized, an empirical study is conducted and then the results are obtained as follows: the combination of network resources breadth-technology resources depth and network resources depth-technology resources breadth have positive impacts on the market performance and negative ones on the risk of new product development; the combination of network resources breadth-technology resources breadth and network resources depth-technology resources depth have negative impacts on the market performance and positive ones on the risk of new product development; the product diversification has positive impacts on the adjustment of the relationship between the combination of network resources breadth-technology resources depth and the risk of new product development, and it also has positive impacts on the adjustment of the relationship between the combination of network resources breadth-technology resources breadth and the market performance/risk of new product development. This study provides a theoretical basis and decision support for the enterprises to improve the efficiency of resources allocation and reduce the risk of new product development.

Key words： new product development; network resources; technology resources; matching relationship; product diversification

参考文献

[1] 杰里米·里夫金. 第三次工业革命: 新经济模式如何改变世界[M]. 张体伟, 孙豫宁, 译. 北京: 中信出版社, 2012.

[2] 约瑟夫·阿洛伊斯·熊彼特. 经济发展理论: 对利润、资本、信贷、利息和经济周期的探究[M]. 叶华, 译. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社, 2009.

[3] Teece D J. Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing[J]. Research Policy, 1986, 15(6): 285-305.

[4] Teece D J. Capturing value from knowledge assets: The new economy, markets for know-how, and intangible assets[J]. California Management Review, 1998, 40(3): 55-79.

[5] Cooper L P. A research agenda to reduce risk in new product development through knowledge management: A practitioner perspective[J]. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management. 2003, 20(1-2): 117-140.

[6] Eisenhardt K M, Martin J A. Dynamic capabilities: What are they?[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2000, 21(10-11): 1105-1121.

[7] Song M, Parry M E. A cross-national comparative study of new product development processes:Japan and the United States[J]. Journal of Marketing, 1997, 61(2): 1-18.

[8] Li Haiyang, Atuahene-Gima K. Product innovation strategy and the performance of new technology ventures in China[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2001, 44(6): 1123-1134.

[9] Chesbrough H W. The era of open innovation: The way in which organizations generate ideas and bring them to market[J]. MIT Sloan Management Review, 2003, 44(3): 35-41.

[10] Jarillo J C. On strategic networks[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1988, 9(1): 31-41.

[11] Dyer J H, Hatch N W. Relation-specific capabilities and barriers to knowledge transfers: Creating advantage through network relationships[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2006, 27(8): 701-719.

[12] Koka B R, Prescott J E. Designing alliance networks: The influence of network position, environmental change, and strategy on firm performance[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2008, 29(6): 639-661.

[13] Ansoff H I. Strategies for diversification[J]. Harvard Business Review, 1957, 35(5): 113-124.

[14] 吴伟伟, 邓强, 于渤. 技术能力对新产品开发绩效的影响: 以技术管理为调节变量[J]. 科学学研究, 2010, 28(3): 429-435.

[15] 姚山季, 王永贵. 顾客参与新产品开发及其绩效影响: 关系嵌入的中介机制[J]. 管理工程学报, 2012, 26(4): 39-48.

[16] 秦剑. 研发/制造/营销跨职能整合与新产品开发: 产品创新性的差异效应研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(1): 130-138.

[17] Calantone R J, Benedetto C A, Schmidt J B. Using the analytic hierarchy process in new product screening[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 1999, 16(1), 65-76.

[18] Chen H H, Lee A H I, Tong Yunhuan. Prioritization and operations NPD mix in a network with strategic partners under uncertainty[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2007, 33(2):337-346.

[19] Gatignon H, Xuereb J M. Strategic orientation of the firm and new product performance[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 1997, 34(1): 77-90.

[20] Mullins J W, Sutherland D J. New product development in rapidly changing markets: An exploratory study[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 1998, 15(3): 224-236.

[21] Kahraman C, Büyüközkan G, Ate? N Y. A two phase multi-attribute decision-making approach for new product introduction[J]. Information Sciences, 2007, 177(7): 1567-1582.

[22] Ogawa S, Piller F T. Reducing the risks of new product development[J]. MIT Sloan Management Review, 2006, 47(2): 65-72.

[23] Penrose E T.The theory of the growth of the firm[M]. New York: Blackwell, 1959.

[24] Barney J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage[J]. Journal of Management, 1991, 17(1): 99-120.

[25] Wernerfelt B. A resource-based view of the firm[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1984, 5(2): 171-180.

[26] Sirmon D G, Hitt M A, Arregle J L, et al. The dynamic interplay of capability strengths and weaknesses: Investigating the bases of temporary competitive advantage[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2010, 31(13): 1386-1409.

[27] Song M, Droge C, Hanvanich S, et al.Marketing and technology resource complementarity: An analysis of their interaction effect in two environmental contexts[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2005, 26(3): 259-276.

[28] Stieglitz N, Heine K. Innovations and the role of complementarities in a strategic theory of the firm[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2007, 28(1): 1-15.

[29] Emirbayer M, Goodwin J. Network analysis, culture, and the problem of agency[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 1994, 99(6): 1411-1454.

[30] Laumann E O, Galaskiewicz J, Marsden P V. Community structure as interorganizational linkages[J]. Annual Review of Sociology, 1978, 4: 455-484.

[31] Gulati R. Alliances and networks[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1998, 19(4): 293-317.

[32] Dyer J H, Singh H. The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1998, 23(4): 660-679.

[33] Mouzas S. Marketing action in networks[J]. European Journal of Marketing, 2006, 40(11): 1271-1291.

[34] Kogut B B, Shan W, Walker G. The make or cooperate decision in the context of an industry network[M]. Nohria N and Eccles R. Networks and organizations Boston Harvard Business School Press, 1992.

[35] Dutta S, Narasimhan O M, Rajiv S.Conceptualizing and measuring capabilities: Methodology and empirical application[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2005, 26(3): 277-285.

[36] Hunt S D, Morgan R M. The comparative advantage theory of competition[J]. Journal of Marketing, 1995, 59(2): 1-15.

[37] Gulati R. Network location and learning: The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1999, 20(5): 397-420.

[38] Pisano G P. The R&D boundaries of the firm: An empirical analysis[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1990, 35(1): 153-176.

[39] Katila R, Ahuja G. Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2002, 45(6): 1183-1194.

[40] Wang Qing, Tunzelmann N. Complexity and the functions of the firm: breadth and depth[J]. Research Policy, 2000, 29(7-8): 805-818.

[41] Tsai W. Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2001, 44(5): 996-1004.

[42] Bianchi P, Bellini N. Public policies for local networks of innovators[J]. Research Policy, 1991, 20(5): 487-497.

[43] Hagedoorn J, Schakenraad J. The effect of strategic technology alliances on company performance[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1994, 15(4): 291-309.

[44] Montgomery C A, Wernerfelt B. Diversification, ricardian rents, and Tobin's q[J]. The Rand Journal of Economics, 1988, 19(4): 623-632.

[45] Huang Yifen, Chen C J. The impact of technological diversity and organizational slack on innovation[J]. Technovation, 2010, 30(7-8): 420-428.

[46] Miller D J. Technological diversity, related diversification, and firm performance[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2006, 27(7): 601-619.

[47] Ramanujam V, Varadarajan P. Research on corporate diversification: A synthesis[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1989, 10(6): 523-551.

[48] Kim W C, Hwang P, Burgers W P. Global diversification strategy and corporate profit performance[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1989, 10(1): 45-57.

[49] Miller D. Thestructural and environmental correlates of business strategy[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1987, 8(1): 55-76.
Options
文章导航

/

〈 〉