主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院
论文

引导基金模式下协同创新利益分配机制研究

展开
  • 1. 重庆大学经济与工商管理学院, 重庆 400044;
    2. 重庆市科学技术研究院, 重庆 401123
黄波(1972-),男(汉族),重庆人,重庆大学经济与工商管理学院,副教授,博士后,研究方向:创新管理、机制设计等方面的研究.

收稿日期: 2012-09-11

  修回日期: 2013-01-30

  网络出版日期: 2015-03-18

基金资助

国家自然科学基金资助项目(71102178);中国教育部人文社科项目(11YJC630070);中央高校基本科研业务费(CQDXWL-2014-025)

Research on Revenue Sharing Mechanism in Collaborative Innovation with Venture Capital Fund of Funds

Expand
  • 1. College of Economics and Business Administration, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, China;
    2. Chongqing Academy of Science & Technology, Chongqing 401123, China

Received date: 2012-09-11

  Revised date: 2013-01-30

  Online published: 2015-03-18

摘要

本文构建了创新引导基金模式下的协同创新博弈模型,研究了创新投资基金如何通过协同创新利益分配机制及基金投资策略的设计,激励企业和创新承包方提高协同创新投入,提升协同创新投资规模和绩效;得出了引导基金模式下协同创新最优分配机制和基金投资策略。研究表明:基金应将市场收益所有分配份额交给企业,基金和承包方向企业索取固定收益,从而使企业成为协同创新剩余价值的唯一索取者,激励企业按契约规定进行投资;基金应在满足承包方创新投入资金需求的情况下,尽可能在创新后期阶段才向承包方投资,以激励承包方提高创新投入,最大化基金期望净利润。

本文引用格式

黄波, 陈晖, 黄伟 . 引导基金模式下协同创新利益分配机制研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015 , 23(3) : 66 -75 . DOI: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2015.03.008

Abstract

Moral hazard is the main factor obstructing the scale enlarging and efficiency improving in collaborative innovation. In this paper, a game model of collaborative innovation with venture capital fund of funds is developed, in order to study how the innovation fund use revenue sharing mechanism and investment policy to raise the investment from enterprise and innovation supplier, as well as performance of collaborative innovation. The optimal revenue sharing mechanism and the investment policy of fund are obtained through theoretic and numerical analysis. It is found that the fund should give the whole revenue share ratio to the enterprise, while the fund and the innovation supplier should claim a fixed revenue from enterprise to motivate the enterprise to make commitment according to contract; and the fund should give the innovation supplier the investment as late as possible, while the innovation supplier invests its own capital at earlier stages, in order to stimulate it to raise innovation commitment, as a result the expected profit of the fund is maximized.

参考文献

[1] 生延超. 创新投入补贴还是创新产品补贴:技术联盟的政府策略选择[J]. 中国管理科学, 2008, 16(6):184-192.

[2] 江静. 公共政策对企业创新支持的绩效——基于直接补贴与税收优惠的比较分析[J]. 科研管理, 2011, 32(4):1-8,50.

[3] 买忆媛, 李江涛, 熊婵. 风险投资与天使投资对创业企业创新活动的影响[J]. 研究与发展管理, 2012, 24(2):79-84.

[4] Lerner J. The future of public efforts to boost entrepreneurship and venture capital[J]. Small Business Economics, 2010, 35(3):255-264.

[5] Cumming D J, MacIntosh J G. Crowding out private equity: Canadian evidence[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2006, 21(4):569-609.

[6] Avnimelech G., Teubal M. Venture capital start-up co-evolution and the emergence & development of Israel's new high tech cluster[J]. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 2004, 13(1):33-60.

[7] 孟卫东, 王利明, 熊维勤. 创业投资引导基金中公共资本对私人资本的补偿机制[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2010, 30(9):1572-1578.

[8] Da Rin M, Nicodano G, Sembenelli A. Public policy and the creation of active venture capital markets[J]. Journal of Public Economics, 2006, 90(8):1699-1723.

[9] D' Aspremont C, Jacquemin A. Cooperative and non-cooperative R&D in duopoly with spillover[J]. American Economic Review, 1988, 78(5):1133-1137.

[10] Kamien M I, Muller E, Zang I. Research joint ventures and R&D cartels[J]. American Economic Review, 1992, 82(5):1293-1306.

[11] Martin S. Spillovers, appropriability, and R&D[J]. Journal of Economics, 2002, 75(1):1-32.

[12] Matsumura T, Matsushima N. Endogenous cost differentials between public and private enterprises: a mixed duopoly approach[J]. Economica, 2004, 71(284):671-688.

[13] Amir R, Jim Y J, Troege M. On additive spillovers and returns to scale in R&D[J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2008, 26(3):695-703.

[14] Amaldoss W. Collaboration to compete[J]. Marketing Science, 2000, 19(2):105-126.

[15] 孟卫东, 黄波, 李宇雨. 基于投资溢出的研发联盟成员投资策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2009, 17(4):133-140.

[16] 生延超. 纵向技术联盟利益分配机制研究[J]. 华东经济管理, 2008, 22(8):153-158.

[17] Dechenaux E, Thursby J, Thursby M. Inventor moral hazard in university licensing: The role of contracts[J]. Research Policy, 2011, 40(1):94-104.

[18] Crama P, Reyck B D, Degraeve Z. Milestone payments or royalties? Contract design for R&D licensing[J]. Operations Research, 2008, 56(6):1539-1552.

[19] 黄波, 孟卫东, 李宇雨. 基于双边激励的产学研合作最优利益分配方式[J]. 管理科学学报, 2011, 14(7):31-42.

[20] Wong A, Bhatia M, Freeman Z. Angel finance: The other venture capital[J]. Strategic Change, 2009, 18(7-8):221-230.

[21] Fairchild R. An entrepreneur's choice of venture capitalist or angel-financing: A behavioral game-theoretic approach[J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 2011, 26(3):359-374.
文章导航

/