考虑消费者环保意识与政府补贴的企业绿色技术创新决策研究

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2020.0311

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在绿色经济时代，绿色技术创新已经成为越来越多企业获取竞争优势的途径。本文基于消费者需求偏好，在不同的政府补贴情形下，构建了包含绿色产品与普通产品生产企业的双寡头竞争模型和斯塔克博格模型，分析了企业绿色技术创新驱动因素和行动时机。研究表明：消费者环保意识有助于提升绿色产品市场份额和企业利润，而绿色产品的单位成本增加会降低其市场份额和企业利润，且绿色产品的单位成本与普通产品企业的利润呈倒U型关系；政府对绿色产品的补贴，可以促进企业绿色技术创新。补贴消费者与补贴企业两种方式下产品的市场份额和社会总福利相同，考虑到补贴的执行成本，补贴消费者更优；绿色产品生产企业作为追随者时，绿色产品的市场占有率最高，社会总福利也最高，因此，后发行动策略是企业绿色技术创新的占优行动策略。

关键词: 绿色技术创新；政府补贴；消费者环保意识；社会福利

Abstract: Abstract: In the context of green economy, more and more enterprises choose green technology innovation to gain competitive advantage in the market. Current research shows that under the perspective of green technology innovation, consumer awareness of environmental protection and government subsidies can be treated as two key factors for market and government drive for green technology innovation, and both of these factors havesignificantly impact on enterprises’green technology innovation decisions. The driving factors and action timing of enterprises’ green technology innovation are analyzed based on consumer environmental awareness and government green subsidies. Based on consumer demand theory, the duopoly competition model and the Stark-berg model including green products and ordinary products are conducted under different government subsidies. It is shown that consumers’ awareness of environmental protection can significantly improvethe market share of green products and corporate profits, while increasing of unit cost will reduce the market share and corporate profits of green products. It is found that there is an inverted U-shaped relationship between the unit cost of green products and the profits of ordinary product enterprises. This research indicated that government subsidies for green products can promote enterprises’ green technology innovation. In this essay, it is also found that either subsidize consumers or enterprises generate same effect on the market share and total social welfare of products,however while considering the implementation cost of subsidies, it is better to subsidize consumers. It is pointed out that green product manufacturers have the highest market share of green products and the highest overall social welfare when they were followers in the market. Therefore, the backwardness strategy is the better competitive strategy for enterprises’ green technology innovation. This research can provide useful suggestions for the government to formulate green subsidy policies and enterprises to formulate green technology innovation strategies.

Key words: green technology innovation； government subsidies； consumer environmental awareness； social welfare

中图分类号:

F273

杨晓辉, 游达明. 考虑消费者环保意识与政府补贴的企业绿色技术创新决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(9): 263-274.

YANG Xiao-hui, YOU Da-ming. Research on Enterprises Green Technology Innovation Decisions-Under the Perceptive of Consumer Environmental Awareness and Government Subsidies[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(9): 263-274.

参考文献

［1］ Frenken K,Faber A. Introduction: Evolutionary methodologies for analyzing environmental innovations and the implications for environmental policy［J］. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2009,76(4):449-452.
［2］ Zhuang Juan. R&D for environmental innovation and policy:The implications for new energy automobile industry in China［J］.Energy Procedia,2011,5:1003-1007.
［3］贾维尔·卡里略-赫莫斯拉,巴勃罗·戴尔里奥·冈萨雷斯,托蒂·康诺拉.生态创新:社会可持续发展和企业竞争力提高的双赢［M］.闻朝君(译). 上海:上海世纪出版集团,2014.Javier Carrillo-Hermosella,Pablo del Rio Gonzalez,Totti Cannola. Eco-Innovation: When sustainability and competitiveness shake hands［M］. Wen Chaojun (trans). Shanghai: Shanghai Century Publishing Group,2014.
［4］ Eiadat Y, Kelly A, Roche F,et al. Green and competitive? An empirical test of the mediating role of environmental innovation strategy［J］.Journal of World Business,2008, 43(1):131-145.
［5］ Testa F, Iraldo F, Frey M. The effect of environmental regulation on firm’s competitive performance:The case of the building & construction sector in some EU regions［J］.Journal of Environmental Management,2011,92:2136-2144.
［6］郑君君,王璐,王向民,等.考虑消费者环保意识及企业有限理性的生产决策研究［J］.系统工程理论与实践,2018,38(10):2587-2599.Zheng Junjun,Wang Lu,Wang Xiangmin,et al.Research on production decision-making considering consumers’ environmental consciousness and enterprises’ bounded rationality［J］.System Engineering-Theory & Practice,2018,38(10):2587-2599.
［7］ Rennings K. Redefining innovation: Eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics［J］. Ecological Economics,2000,32(2):319-332.
［8］ Horbach J. Determinants of environmental innovation—New evidence from German panel data sources［J］.ResearchPolicy,2008,37(1):163-173.
［9］马小明,赵月炜.环境管制政策的局限性与变革——自愿性环境政策的兴起［J］. 中国人口.资源与环境,2005,15(6):19-23.Ma Xiaoming,Zhao Weiyue.Limitation and reformation of governmental regulation—Rise of voluntary environmental policy［J］.ChinaPopulation.Resourcesand Environment,2005, 15(6):19-23.
［10］ Stigler G J. The theory of economic regulation［J］.Bell Journal of Economics,1971(2):3-21.
［11］颜建军,杨晓辉,游达明.企业低碳技术创新政策工具及其比较研究［J］.科研管理,2016,37(9):105-112.Yan Jianjun,Yang Xiaohui,You Daming. A comparative study of the corporate low carbon technology innovation policy tools［J］.Science Research Management,2016,37(9):105-112.
［12］ Carraro C,Soubeyran A. Environmental policy and the choice of production technology［M］∥Carraro C，et al (Eds). Environmental Policy and Market Structure，Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher，1996: 151-180.
［13］ Stranlund J K. Public technological aid to support compliance to environmental standards［J］.Journal of Environmental Economics＆Management，1997,34(3): 228-239.
［14］ Carraro C, Siniscalco D. Environmental innovation policy and international competition［J］. Environmental and Resource Economics,1992,2(2):183-200．
［15］ Krass D,Nedorezov T, Ovchinnikov A. Environmental taxes and the choice of green technology［J］.Production ＆ Operations Management，2013,22(5):1035-1055.
［16］徐晓亮,程倩,车莹.资源政策调整对减排和环境福利影响--以煤炭资源税改革为例［J］.管理科学学报，2017,20(2):18-31.Xu Xiaoliang,Cheng Qian,Che Ying.The impacts of resource policy adjustment on CO2 emission reduction and environment welfare: Based on coal resource tax reform［J］.Journal of Management Sciences in China,2017,20(2): 18-31.
［17］ Hattori K.Optimal combination of innovation and environmental policies under technology licensing［J］.Economic Modelling，2017,64(8):601-609.
［18］ Boldrin M,Levine D K.Rent-seeking and innovation［J］Journal of Monetary Economics，2008,51(1):127-160.
［19］赵璨,王竹泉,杨德明,等．企业迎合行为与政府补贴绩效研究——基于企业不同盈利状况的分析［J］.中国工业经济,2015,(7):130-145.Zhao Can,Wang Zhuquan,Yang Deming,et al. Research on the catering behavior of enterpriseand government subsidy performance——Based on the analysis of the enterprise’sprofitability［J］. ChinaIndustrial Economics, 2015,(7):130-145.
［20］武咸云,陈艳,杨卫华．战略性新兴产业的政府补贴与企业R＆D 投入［J］.科研管理,2016, 37(5):19-23.Wu Xianyun,Chen Yan,Yang Weihua.A research on the effect of government subsidies on R&D investment of strategic emerging industries［J］.Science Research Management，2016,37(5):19-23.
［21］王旭,王非.无米下锅抑或激励不足?政府补贴、企业绿色创新与高管激励策略选择［J］.科研管理,2019,40(7):131-139.Wang Xu,Wang Fei.No resource or no motivation? Government subsidies,green innovation and incentive strategy selection［J］.Science Research Management, 2019,40(7):131-139.
［22］姚洪心,吴伊婷.绿色补贴、技术溢出与生态倾销［J］.管理科学学报,2018,21(10):47-60.Yao Hongxin,Wu Yiting.Green subsidy，technology spillover and eco-dumping［J］. Journal of Management Sciences in China,2018, 21(10):47-60.
［23］李婧婧,李勇建,刘露,等.激励绿色供应链企业开展生态设计的机制决策［J］.系统工程理论与实践,2019,39(9):2287-2299.Li Qianqian,Li Jianyong,Liu Lu. Mechanism decision to encourage Product eco-design implemented by green supply chain enterprises［J］.System Engineering-Theory & Practice,2019,39(9):2287-2299.
［24］石平,颜波,石松.考虑公平的绿色供应链定价与产品绿色度决策［J］.系统工程理论与实践,2016,36(8):1937-1950.Shi Ping,Yan Bo,Shi Song.Pricing and product green degree decision in green supply chains with fairness concerns［J］.System Engineering-Theory & Practice,2016,36(8): 1937-1950.
［25］江世英,李随成.考虑产品绿色度的绿色供应链博弈模型及收益共享契约［J］．中国管理科学,2015,23(6):169-176.Jiang Shiying,Li Suicheng.Green supply chain game models and revenue sharing contract with product green degree［J］.Chinese Journal of Management Science,2015,23(6):169-176.
［26］ Atasu A,Sarvary M,Van Wassenhove L N. Remanufacturing as a marketing strategy［J］.Management Science,2008,54(10):1731-1746
［27］ Liu Z L，Anderson T D，Cruz J M. Consumer environmental awareness and competition in two-stage supply chains［J］. European Journal of Operational Research,2012,218(3):602-613.
［28］王芹鹏,赵道致.消费者低碳偏好下的供应链收益共享契约研究［J］.中国管理科学,2014, 22(9):106-113.Wang Qinpeng,Zhao Daozhi. Revenue-sharing contract of supply chain based on consumers' preference for lowcarbon Products［J］.Chinese Journal of Management Science,2014,22(9):106 -113.
［29］周艳菊,胡凤英,周正龙.零售商主导下促进绿色产品需求的联合研发契约协调研究［J］．管理工程学报,2020,34(2):194-204.Zhou Yanju,Hu Fengying,Zhou Zhenglong. Study on joint contract coordination to promote green product demand under the retailer-dominance［J］.Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management,2020, 34(2):194-204.
［30］赵爱武,杜建国,关洪军.消费者异质需求下企业环境创新行为演化模拟与分析［J］.中国管理科学,2018,26(6):124-132.Zhao Aiwu,Du Jianguo,Guan Hongjun. Evolution of enterprise environmental innovation behavior under heterogeneity demands of consumers［J］.Chinese Journal of Management Science,2018,26(6):124-132.
［31］ Torani K,Rausser G,Zilberman D. Innovation subsidies versus consumer subsidies: A real options analysis of solar energy［J］.Energy Policy,2016,92:255-269.
［32］ Axsen J,Langman B, Goldberg S. Confusion of innovations: Mainstream consumer perceptions and misperceptions of electric-drive vehicles and charging programs in Canada［J］.Energy Research & Social Science,2017,27:163-173.
［33］张艳丽,胡小建,杨海洪,等.政府补贴下考虑消费者策略行为的绿色供应链决策模型［J］.预测,2017(2):57-63.Zhang Yanli,Hu Xiaojian,Yang Haihong,et al.Green supply chain decision model based on government subsidies and consumer strategic behaviors［J］.Forecasting,2017(2):57-63.
［34］江世英,方鹏骞.基于绿色供应链的政府补贴效果研究［J］.系统管理学报,2019,28(3):594-600.Jiang Shiying, Fang Pengqian. Effect of government subsidieson manufacturers based on green supply chain［J］.Journal of Systems&Management,2019,28(3):594-600.
［35］曹裕,李青松,胡韩莉.不同政府补贴策略对供应链绿色决策的影响研究［J］．管理学报,2019，16(2):297-305.Cao Yu,Li Qingsong,Hu Hanli.Research on the influence of different government subsidy strategies on the green decision-making of supply chain［J］.Chinese Journal of Management, 2019,16(2):297-305.

[1]	杨伟, 吉梨霞, 周青. 企业数字化转型对创新生态系统的影响：基于市场规模动态的多agent模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(6): 223-232.
[2]	解学梅, 朱琪玮. 创新支点还是保守枷锁：绿色供应链管理实践如何撬动企业绩效？[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(5): 131-143.
[3]	刘健, 张珣, 陈杰, 刘思峰. 全渠道零售商退货方式和定价研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(4): 252-263.
[4]	刘勤明, 刘文溢, 叶春明. 考虑缓冲区库存不足情况下的设备维护与缓冲区库存联合优化研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(1): 143-153.
[5]	蔡强, 卫贵武, 黄晶, 夏晖. 基于社会福利的可再生能源R&D激励政策评价[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(1): 206-221.
[6]	张华, 顾新, 王涛. 知识链视角下开放式创新主体的联盟策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(1): 263-274.
[7]	翟东升, 李梦洋, 何喜军, 徐硕. 非线性技术演化条件下的专利研发投资决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(12): 168-178.
[8]	王军进，刘家国，徐文力. 公平偏好下制造商主导型供应链风险传递研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(10): 96-106.
[9]	海江涛, 李旭. 需求不确定情况下绿色产品消费过程中政府的最优补贴[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(5): 180-189.
[10]	韩东亚, 陈然, 余玉刚, 郭晓龙. 自动化立体仓库中出入库任务顺序与出库位置选择集成优化研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(10): 156-164.
[11]	潘文军, 缪林. 考虑跨渠道退货的双渠道闭环供应链决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(6): 112-122.
[12]	曹裕, 周默亭, 胡韩莉. 考虑政府补贴与企业社会责任的两级供应链优化[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(5): 101-111.
[13]	夏德建, 王勇, 石国强. 自建VS.并购:物流一体化竞争下的电商平台演化博弈[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(4): 122-130.
[14]	华胜亚, 翟昕. 考虑初创企业的供应链融资与期权交易策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(2): 80-90.
[15]	刘长玉, 夏同水, 于涛. 基于低碳视角的政府监管与制造商生产的演化博弈研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(11): 96-106.