基于失效情景的应急设施选址评估指标体系与模型

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2016.11.015

中国管理科学 ›› 2016, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (11): 129-136.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2016.11.015

基于失效情景的应急设施选址评估指标体系与模型

张敏¹, 张玲²

1. 北京建筑大学机械与车辆工程学院, 北京 100044;
2. 福州大学经济与管理学院, 福建福州 350116

收稿日期:2015-07-30 修回日期:2016-05-30 出版日期:2016-11-20 发布日期:2017-01-23
作者简介:张敏(1978-),女(汉族),山西大同人,北京建筑大学机械与车辆工程学院,讲师,博士,研究方向:应急管理、最优化方法,E-mail:zhangmin@bucea.edu.cn.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金重大研究计划集成平台项目（91024031）；北京建筑大学博士基金（00331614030）；城市轨道交通车辆服役性能保障北京市重点实验室

System of Evaluation Indices of Emergency Facility Location and Model Based on Facility Failure Scenarios

ZHANG Min¹, ZHANG Ling²

1. School of Mechanical-electronic and Automobile Engineering, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China;
2. Schoole of Economics & Management, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350116, China

Received:2015-07-30 Revised:2016-05-30 Online:2016-11-20 Published:2017-01-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 突发事件具有巨大的破坏性、不确定性，应急设施有可能失效，本文研究基于失效情景的应急设施选址评估指标体系与评估模型。首先基于定义的失效情景研究应急设施选址评估指标。构建全局性、可靠性、时效性、均衡性、经济性评估指标。可靠性作为重要评估指标有助于提高应急设施对需求区域的物资保障程度，保证系统的稳定性，采用多重覆盖率刻画。然后，设计具有不同侧重评估目标的一般情景评估指标体系、设施失效情景评估指标体系以及多区域情景评估指标体系。最后，由于应急设施选址评估具有多影响因素特征，涉及输入和输出多个指标的测度，选取处理多输入\多输出问题具有优势的评估方法—数据包络法，对应急设施选址的合理性进行评估。实例验证评估指标体系的实用性和有效性。

关键词: 应急设施选址, 评估指标体系, 可靠性, 设施失效情景, 数据包络法

Abstract: Because of the destructive power and uncertainty of emergencies, it is possible that the emergency facility will fail. System of evaluation indices and model of emergency facility location based on the facility failure scenarios are studied in this paper. At first, failure scenarios of emergency facility are defined. Evaluation indices of facility location are studied based on the definition of failure scenarios. The evaluation indices of global, efficiency, equilibrium, reliability and economy are defined. Multi-covering concept is used to present the reliability evaluation index. It is helpful to improve the material security degree of emergency resource for the demand region and the reliability of the emergency system. The system of general scenario evaluation indices, the system of facility failure scenario evaluation indices and the system of multi-region scenario evaluation indices, which have the different evaluation target-oriented, are designed in the end, the measure of more indices of input and output is involved in the emergency facility location generally. The data envelope analysis which is the predominant method to solve the problem of multiple inputs and multiple outputs is used to evaluate the rationality of emergency facility location.The computational experiment shows the practicability and validity of the proposed system of facility location evaluation indices.

Key words: emergency facility location, systems of location evaluation indices, reliability, facility failure scenarios, data envelopment analysis

中图分类号:

C934

张敏, 张玲. 基于失效情景的应急设施选址评估指标体系与模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(11): 129-136.

ZHANG Min, ZHANG Ling. System of Evaluation Indices of Emergency Facility Location and Model Based on Facility Failure Scenarios[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2016, 24(11): 129-136.

参考文献

[1] Hakimi S L. Optimum locations of switching centers and the absolute centers and medians of a graph[J].Operations Research, 1964, 12(3):450-459.

[2] Hakimi S L.Optimum distribution of switching centers in a communication network and some relatedgraph theoretic problems[J]. OperationResearch,1965,13(3): 462-475.

[3] Toregas C, Swain R, Revelle C. The locati on of emergency service facilities[J].Oper-ations Research,1971,19(2):1363-1373.

[4] 何武军.蓄意散布在美国邮政系统的炭疽芽胞事件[J].环境与职业医学,2004,21(4):269-270.

[5] 杨然.卡特里娜飓风中的应急通信[J].电信世界,2005,(10):10-12.

[6] 李东,晏湘涛,匡兴华.考虑设施失效的军事物流配送中心选址模型[J].计算机工程与应用,2010,46(11):3-5.

[7] Drezner Z. Heuristic solution meth-ods for two location problems with unreliable facilities[J].Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1987, 38(6):509-514.

[8] Krass D O, Berman M. Menezes. Reliability issues in median models[C]. EURO/INFORMS Joint Internat. Istanbul, Turkey,July 6-10,2003.

[9] Snyder L V, Daskin M S.Reliability models for facility location: The expected failure cost case[J].Transportation Science, 2005, 39(3): 400-416.

[10] Berman O, Krass D, Menezes M B C. Facility reliability issues in network P-median problems: Strategic centraliza tion and co-location effects[J].Operation Research, 2007, 55(2) : 332-350.

[11] Cui Tingting, Ouyang Yangfeng, Shen Z J M. Reliable facility location design under the risk of disruptions[J].Operations Research, 2010, 58(4): 998-1011.

[12] O'hanleyJ R, Church R L. Designing robust coverage networks to hedge against worst-case facility losses[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2011, 209(1):23-36.

[13] 朱建明. 基于损毁情景的可靠连通应急设施选址问题[J].电子科技大学学报(社科版), 2012, 14 (3) :44-48.

[14] Zhang Min, Huang Jun, Zhu Jianming.Reliable facility location problem consider-ing facility failure scenarios[J]. Kybernetes, 2012, 41(10): 1440-1461.

[15] 于瑛英,池宏,贾明亮,等.应急管理中资源布局评估与调整的模型和算法[J]. 系统工程,2008,(1):75-81.

[16] 张衡,花兴来,彭飞.军事物流中心选址评估模型[J].运筹与管理,2007,16(4):137-143.

[17] 胡艺馨.避险车道选址评估指标选取研究[J].物流工程与管理,2015,10(56):141-142.

[18] 魏国强,杨永清.应急资源布局评估与调整策略研究[J]. 计算机工程与应用, 2011,47(28):215-218.

[19] 邓爱民,张凡. 基于模糊灰色综合评估方法的应急物流能力评估[J].统计与决策, 2010,(6):174-176.

[20] Ebeling C E. An introduction toreliability and maintainabilityengineering[M]. Boston:McGraw Hill publication, 1997.

[21] Daskin M S,Hesse S.M.Areliable p-min max regret:a new model for strategic facility location modeling[J]. Location Science, 1997,(5):227- 246.

[22] 王继光,李景峰. 随机中断情境下的离散型设施选址问题研究[J].计算机工程与应用,2015,51(17):1-7.

[23] 刘勇,魏宗田,王婷,等.边失效情形下一类供应链系统的可靠性分析[J].计算机工程与用,2015,51(8):236-240.

[24] 周愉峰,马祖军,王恪铭.有容量限制的可靠性固定费用选址问题[J].运筹与管理,2015,24(3):6-13.

[25] 周愉峰,马祖军,王恪铭.应急物资储备库的可靠性P-中位选址模[J].管理评论, 2015, 27(5): 198-208.

[26] 葛春景,王霞,关贤军.重大突发事件应急设施多重覆盖选址模型及算法[J].运筹与管理, 2011,20 (5): 50-56.

[27] 肖俊华,侯云先. 大规模突发事件应急设施选址模型及算法[J].计算机工程与应用,2013,49(8):67-72.

[28] 付德强,陈煜舟,万晓榆.自然灾害风险下区域应急储备设施选址可靠性研究[J].运筹与管理,2015,24(3):14-19.

[29] 曹德胜,吕靖,艾云飞,等.基于集合覆盖的雷达站选址优化模型[J].北京理工大学学报,2014,34(7):752-756.

[30] 邢鑫鑫. 基于DEA 的模糊综合评估方法在应急物流方案选择中的应用[J].物流科技,2011,(3):124-126.

[31] 方磊. 基于偏好DEA 模型的应急资源优化配置[J].系统工程理论与实践,2008(5):98-104.

[32] 顾婧,任珮嘉,徐泽水. 基于直觉模糊层次分析的创业投资引导基金绩效评价方法研究[J]. 中国管理科学,2015,23(9):124-131.

[33] 杜栋,庞庆华,吴炎.现代综合评估方法与案例精选[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2008.

基于失效情景的应急设施选址评估指标体系与模型

System of Evaluation Indices of Emergency Facility Location and Model Based on Facility Failure Scenarios

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 11

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	邱慧, 闫相斌, 翟庆庆, 彭锐. 具有多阶段任务需求的温备份系统可靠性分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(2): 99-107.
[2]	项寅. 基于双层规划的反恐应急设施选址模型及算法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(7): 147-157.
[3]	潘和平, 张承钊. FEPA-金融时间序列自适应组合预测模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(6): 26-38.
[4]	方志耕, 王欢, 董文杰, 曹颖赛. 基于可靠性基因库的民用飞机故障智能诊断网络框架设计[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(11): 124-131.
[5]	周瑜, 寇纲, 尔古打机. 某大型装置现场可靠性的贝叶斯分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(11): 170-176.
[6]	朱卫东, 刘芳, 王东鹏, Jian-Bo Yang. 科学基金项目立项评估:综合评价信息可靠性的多指标证据推理规则研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(10): 141-148.
[7]	吴六三, 谭清美, 张跃辉. 网络弧生长对网络可靠性的影响[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(1): 65-72.
[8]	祝硕, 许保光, 刘世骞. 周转件构成的可修复系统的可靠性分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(7): 67-75.
[9]	温源, 肖勇波. 面临汇率和供应风险的双渠道采购决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2013, 21(4): 35-43.
[10]	侯立文, 谭家美. 城市交通中利用Gram-Charlier分布估计行程时间可靠性[J]. 中国管理科学, 2009, 17(6): 139-146.
[11]	龚哲君. SCEM-UA算法在混合Weibull分布参数估计中的应用[J]. 中国管理科学, 2006, (6): 66-70.