基于自由处置性的网络系统效率评价模型研究

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2015.11.018

中国管理科学 ›› 2015, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (11): 145-152.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2015.11.018

基于自由处置性的网络系统效率评价模型研究

周忠宝¹, 喻怀宁¹, 马超群¹, 刘佩¹, 刘文斌^1,2

1. 湖南大学工商管理学院, 长沙 410082;
2. Business School, University of Kent, Kent, CT2 7PE

收稿日期:2013-09-26 修回日期:2014-02-23 出版日期:2015-11-20 发布日期:2015-12-01
作者简介:周忠宝(1977-),男(汉族),山东齐河人,湖南大学工商管理学院教授,博士生导师,研究方向:金融工程与风险管理、系统优化与决策.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(71371067)

Research on Efficiency Evaluation Models for Network Systems Based on Free Disposability Principles

ZHOU Zhong-bao¹, YU Huai-ning¹, MA Chao-qun¹, LIU Pei¹, LIU Wen-bin^1,2

1. School of Business Administration, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, China;
2. Business School, University of Kent, Kent, CT2 7PE, England

Received:2013-09-26 Revised:2014-02-23 Online:2015-11-20 Published:2015-12-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 网络系统生产可能集是构建网络DEA模型的基础,而相邻生产子过程的投入产出连接条件则是构造生产可能集的关键。现有的网络DEA模型在本质上都假设所有子过程的投入产出都满足强自由处置性,然而在实际生产管理活动中,这一假设未必成立。本文从各类自由处置公理出发,系统地研究了各种类型的子过程投入产出连接条件,构建了一般网络系统的生产可能集,给出了相应的等价形式,并构建了相应的网络DEA模型用于评价决策单元的效率。最后利用本文提出的方法和模型对我国上市银行的效率进行了评价。本文的研究对于一般网络系统的绩效评价和改进具有重要的意义。

关键词: 网络系统, 自由处置性, 生产可能集, 数据包络分析, 效率评价

Abstract: Production possibility set (PPS) is the basis for constructing DEA models of network systems. The connection conditions of sub-processes are the key points for building the PPS. In nature, the existing network DEA models assume that all inputs and outputs of sub-processes satisfy the strongly free disposability principle. However, it is not always true in real production and management activities. Therefore, from the perspective of different free disposability principles, the connection conditions for inputs and outputs of sub-processes are studied; the production possibility sets and their equivalent formulations for general network systems are built. The DEA models are constructed accordingly for evaluating the efficiencies of network systems are built. In the end, the proposed models are used to evaluate the performance of China's listed banks. This research is quite informative for performance evaluation and improvement for general network systems.

Key words: network systems, free disposability principles, production possibility sets, data envelopment analysis, performance evaluation

中图分类号:

C931

周忠宝, 喻怀宁, 马超群, 刘佩, 刘文斌. 基于自由处置性的网络系统效率评价模型研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(11): 145-152.

ZHOU Zhong-bao, YU Huai-ning, MA Chao-qun, LIU Pei, LIU Wen-bin. Research on Efficiency Evaluation Models for Network Systems Based on Free Disposability Principles[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2015, 23(11): 145-152.

参考文献

[1] Castelli L, Pesenti R, Ukovich W. DEA-like models for efficiency evaluations of specialized and interdependent units[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2001,132(2):274-286.

[2] Castelli L, Pesenti R, Ukovich W. DEA-like models for the efficiency evaluation of hierarchically structured units[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2004, 154(2):465-476.

[3] Chang T-S, Tone K, Wei Quanling. Ownership-specified network DEA models[J]. Annals of Operations Research,214(1):1-26.

[4] Chen C, Yan Hong. Network DEA model for supply chain performance evaluation[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2011, 213(1):147-155.

[5] Färe R, Grosskopf S. Network DEA[J]. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences,2000, 34(1):35-49.

[6] Kao C. Efficiency decomposition in network data envelopment analysis:A relational model[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2009, 192(3):949-962.

[7] Kao C. Efficiency decomposition for parallel production systems[J]. Journal of operation Research Society,2012, 63(1):64-71.

[8] Kao C, Hwang S N. Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis:An application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2008, 185(1):418-429.

[9] Kao C, Hwang S N. Efficiency measurement for network systems:IT impact on firm performance[J]. Decision Support Systems,2010, 48(3):437-446.

[10] Lewis H F, Sexton T R. Network DEA:Efficiency analysis of organizations with complex internal structure[J]. Computers & Operations Research,2004, 31(9):1365-1410.

[11] Liang Liang, F. Yang Feng, Zhu J, et al. DEA models for supply chain efficiency evaluation[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2006,145(1):35-49.

[12] Liu W B, Meng W, Li X X, et al. DEA models with undesirable inputs and outputs[J]. Annals of Operations Research,2010, 173(1):177-194.

[13] Prieto A M, Zofío J L. Network DEA efficiency in input-output models:With an application to OECD countries[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2007, 178(1):292-304.

[14] Tone K, Tsutsui M. Network DEA:A slack-based measure approach[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2004, 197(1):243-252.

[15] Yang Feng, Wu Dexiang, Liang Liang, et al. Supply chain DEA:production possibility set and performance evaluation model[J]. Annals of Operations Research,2011, 185(1):195-211.

[16] Yang Yinsheng, Ma Benjiang, Koike M. Efficiency-measuring DEA model for production system with k independent subsystems[J]. Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan,2000, 43(3):343-354.

[17] Zhou Zhongbao, Wang Mei, Ding Hui, et al. Further study of production possibility set and performance evaluation model in supply chain DEA[J]. Annals of Operations Research,2013, 206(1):585-592.

[18] 毕功兵,梁樑,杨锋.资源约束型两阶段生产系统的DEA效率评价模型[J].中国管理科学,2009, 17(2):71-75.

[19] 杨锋,梁樑,凌六一,等并联结构决策单元的DEA效率评价研究[J].中国管理科学,2009, 17(6):157-162.

[20] 杨锋.含有多个子系统的决策单元的DEA效率评估研究[D].合肥:中国科技大学,2006.

基于自由处置性的网络系统效率评价模型研究

Research on Efficiency Evaluation Models for Network Systems Based on Free Disposability Principles

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	王昱, 杨珊珊. 考虑多维效率的上市公司财务困境预警研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(2): 32-41.
[2]	夏琼, 杨峰, 吴华清. “三重底线”下中国商业银行经营效率及其影响因素分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(8): 26-36.
[3]	王恰. 额外资源按需分配方法研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(6): 206-216.
[4]	金飞飞, 倪志伟, 陈华友, 朱旭辉, 武文颖. 基于一致性局部调整算法和DEA的语言偏好决策模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(12): 152-163.
[5]	伊茹, 马占新. 只有输出的广义样本区间DEA模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(1): 194-204.
[6]	谷晓燕, 何锋. 风险条件下研发项目改进DEA选择模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(7): 47-54.
[7]	刘文丽, 王应明, 吕书龙. 基于交叉效率和合作博弈的决策单元排序方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(4): 163-170.
[8]	冯颖, 张炎治. 不同权力结构下TPL服务增值的供应链决策与效率评价[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(10): 164-175.
[9]	杜涛, 冉伦, 李金林, 曹雪丽. 基于效率的组织多属性决策及实证研究：DEA-TOPSIS组合方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(7): 153-162.
[10]	成达建, 薛声家. 基于交叉效率新计算方法的区间效率值排序[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(7): 191-196.
[11]	陶杰, 卢超. 整数DEA问题的求解方法与改进[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(6): 151-160.
[12]	周忠宝, 金倩颖, 曾喜梅, 吴乾, 刘文斌. 存在基数约束的投资组合效率评价方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(2): 174-179.
[13]	冯晨鹏, 王慧玲, 毕功兵. 存在多种非期望产出的非径向零和收益DEA模型我国区域环境效率实证研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(10): 42-51.
[14]	王有森, 许皓, 卞亦文. 工业用水系统效率评价:考虑污染物可处理特性的两阶段DEA[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(3): 169-176.
[15]	范建平, 陈静, 吴美琴, 田璇. 三元效率区间下决策单元的全局绩效评价[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(2): 153-161.