“减规模”还是“增绿色”？异质性环保政策工具下的企业环保行为响应

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2022.0106

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 市场机制和绿色投资型环保政策工具既是对命令控制型工具的有益补充，也可能在企业层面引致更加复杂的环保行为响应，企业“减规模”抑或“增绿色”还存在不确定性。为此，本文借助计量模型，基于2011-2019年重污染上市公司的微观数据，探讨企业在不同政策工具下的环保行为响应。研究发现：各类环保政策工具的“增绿色”属性突出；环境监管和排污收费均引致企业环保支出和绿色创新水平提升的“增绿色”响应；环保补助则带来企业以环保支出为主的“增绿色”响应；环境监管和排污收费两种政策工具并不相容，互相阻滞了对环保支出的激励效应；宽松的融资约束和富有的企业家精神将放大排污收费的“增绿色”效果，而环保补助对引导融资约束下的“增绿色”响应更加有效。本文结论启示环保部门需了解不同政策工具的异质性后果，合理进行工具组合，并面向不同特征企业精准施策。

关键词: 环保政策工具；环保行为响应；政策工具组合；重污染企业

Abstract: Market-based and green-investment-based environmental policy instruments enrich the existing command-and-control instrument, and may also induce more complex corporate environmental protection behavior responsiveness. There has the uncertainty of the“production cut” and “green development.” Based on the micro-dataset of pollution-intensive and listed enterprises in during 2011-2019, econometric models are adopted and the corporate environmental protection behavior responsiveness induced by heterogeneous environmental policy instruments is analyzed. The results show that, both environmental supervision and pollution fee induce green development, including significant environmental expenditure and green innovation. Environmental subsidy leads to the green development majored by environmental expenditure. As for the instrument mix, the incompatibility is concluded between environmental supervision and pollution fee, and two instruments weaken each other’s green development effect. Furthermore, in enterprises with looser financial constraints and higher entrepreneurship levels, pollution fee induces more significant green development. Environmental subsidy is more effectiveness for green development in enterprises with financial constraints. The results imply that governments should understand the heterogeneous outcomes by policy instruments, choosing the appropriate instrument and mix to specific enterprise with different characteristics.

Key words: environmental policy instrument; environmental protection behavior responsiveness; policy instrument mix; pollution-intensive enterprise

中图分类号:

F062.1

王群伟, 周波, 张成. “减规模”还是“增绿色”？异质性环保政策工具下的企业环保行为响应[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(1): 256-266.

WANG Qun-wei, ZHOU Bo, ZHANG Cheng. “Production Cut” or “Green Development?” The Corporate Environmental Protection Behavior Responsiveness Induced by Heterogeneous Environmental Policy Instruments[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(1): 256-266.

参考文献

［1］ Greenstone M, He Guojun, Li Shanjun, et al. China’s war on pollution: evidence from the first 5 years［J］. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2021, 15(2): 281-299.
［2］ Hartwick J. Intergenerational equity and the investing of rents from exhaustible resources［J］. The American Economic Review, 1977, 67(5): 972-974.
［3］ Nordhaus W. Resources as a Constraint on Growth［J］. The American Economic Review, 1974, 64(2): 22-26.
［4］ Bowen A, Stern N. Environmental policy and the economic downturn［J］. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 2010, 26(2): 137-163.
［5］李青原, 肖泽华. 异质性环境规制工具与企业绿色创新激励——来自上市企业绿色专利的证据［J］. 经济研究, 2020, 55(9): 192-208.Li Qingyuan, Xiao Zehua. Heterogeneous environmental regulation tools and green innovation incentives: evidence from green patents of listed companies［J］. Economic Research Journal, 2020, 55(9): 192-208.
［6］ Gray W, Shadbegian R. Plant vintage, technology, and environmental regulation［J］. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2003, 46(3): 384-402.
［7］ Zhang Qi, Yu Zhi, Kong Dongmin. The real effect of legal institutions: environmental courts and firm environmental protection expenditure［J］. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2019, 98: 102254.
［8］ Heyes A, Kapur S. Regulatory attitudes and environmental innovation in a model combining internal and external R&D［J］. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2011, 61(3): 327-340.
［9］纪建悦, 张懿, 任文菡. 环境规制强度与经济增长——基于生产性资本和健康人力资本视角［J］. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(8): 57-65.Ji Jianyue, Zhang Yi, Ren Wenhan. Research on the relationship between environmental regulation intensity and China’s economic growth rate—Based on physical capital and human capital perspective［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2019, 27(8): 57-65.
［10］ Liu Mengdi, Tan Ruipeng, Zhang Bing. The costs of “blue sky”: environmental regulation, technology upgrading, and labor demand in China［J］. Journal of Development Economics, 2021, 150: 102610.
［11］ Cao Jing, Ho M S, Ma Rong, et al. When carbon emission trading meets a regulated industry: evidence from the electricity sector of China［J］. Journal of Public Economics, 2021, 200: 104470.
［12］ Acemoglu D, Aghion P, Bursztyn L, et al. The environment and directed technical change［J］. American Economic Review, 2012, 102(1): 131-166.
［13］王林辉, 王辉, 董直庆. 经济增长和环境质量相容性政策条件——环境技术进步方向视角下的政策偏向效应检验［J］. 管理世界, 2020, 36(3): 39-60.Wang Linhui, Wang Hui, Dong Zhiqing. Policy conditions for compatibility between economic growth and environmental quality: a test of policy bias effects from the perspective of the direction of environmental technological progress［J］. Journal of Management World, 2020, 36(3): 39-60.
［14］ Porter M, Van der Linde C. Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship［J］. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1995, 9(4): 97-118.
［15］ Stiglitz J. Leaders and followers: perspectives on the Nordic model and the economics of innovation［J］. Journal of Public Economics, 2015, 127: 3-16.
［16］ Greenstone M, Hanna R. Environmental regulations, air and water pollution, and infant mortality in India［J］. American Economic Review, 2014, 104(10): 3038-3072.
［17］ Iraldo F, Testa F, Melis M, et al. A literature review on the links between environmental regulation and competitiveness［J］. Environmental Policy and Governance, 2011, 21(3): 210-222.
［18］ He Qiuqin, Wang Minglin, Martínez-Fuentes C. Impact of corporate entrepreneurial strategy on firm performance in China［J］. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 2020, 16: 1427-1444.
［19］张琦, 郑瑶, 孔东民. 地区环境治理压力, 高管经历与企业环保投资——一项基于《环境空气质量标准(2012)》的准自然实验［J］. 经济研究, 2019, 54(6): 183-198.Zhang Qi, Zheng Yao, Kong Dongmin. Local environmental governance pressure, executive’s working experience and enterprise investment in environmental protection: a quasi-natural experiment based on China’s “ambient air quality standards 2012”［J］. Economic Research Journal, 2019, 54(6): 183-198.
［20］ Kaplan S, Zingales L. Do investment-cash flow sensitivities provide useful measures of financing constraints?［J］. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1997, 112(1): 169-215.
［21］ Heckman J. Sample selection bias as a specification error［J］. Econometrica, 1979,47(1): 153-161.
［22］王宇, 李海洋. 管理学研究中的内生性问题及修正方法［J］. 管理学季刊, 2017, 2(3): 20-47.Wang Yu, Li Haiyang. Dealing with endogeneity issues in management research: a review and solutions［J］. Quarterly Journal of Management, 2017, 2(3): 20-47.
［23］ Hering L, Poncet S. Environmental policy and exports: evidence from Chinese cities［J］. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2014, 68(2): 296-318.
［24］盛丹, 张国峰. 两控区环境管制与企业全要素生产率增长［J］. 管理世界, 2019, 35(2): 24-42.Sheng Dan, Zhang Guofeng. Environmental regulations of two control zones and enterprise total factor productivity growth［J］. Journal of Management World, 2019, 35(2): 24-42.
［25］ Kostka G. Command without control: The case of China’s environmental target system［J］. Regulation & Governance, 2016, 10(1): 58-74.
［26］郭俊杰, 方颖, 杨阳. 排污费征收标准改革是否促进了中国工业二氧化硫减排［J］. 世界经济, 2019, 42(1): 121-144.Guo Junjie, Fang Ying, Yang Yang. Does China’s pollution levy standards reform promote emissions reduction?［J］. The Journal of World Economy, 2019, 42(1): 121-144.
［27］ Xepapadeas A. Environmental policy, adjustment costs, and behavior of the firm［J］. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1992, 23(3): 258-275.
［28］苏媛, 李广培. 绿色技术创新能力、产品差异化与企业竞争力——基于节能环保产业上市公司的分析［J］. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(4): 46-56.Su Yuan, Li Guangpei. Green technological innovation ability, product differentiation and enterprise competitiveness: analysis of energy saving and environmental protection industry listed companies［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2021, 29(4): 46-56.
［29］ Dess G, Lumpkin G. The role of entrepreneurial orientation in stimulating effective corporate entrepreneurship［J］. Academy of Management Perspectives, 2005, 19(1): 147-156.
［30］ Kyrgidou L, Spyropoulou S. Drivers and performance outcomes of innovativeness: an empirical study［J］. British Journal of Management, 2013, 24(3): 281-298.
［31］ Mukherjee I, Giest S. Designing policies in uncertain contexts: entrepreneurial capacity and the case of the European Emission Trading Scheme［J］. Public Policy and Administration, 2019, 34(3): 262-286.

[1]	梁雁茹,徐建中. 企业生态创新驱动系统激励政策优化研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(6): 281-289.
[2]	李陆苗,周鹏,李整军,刘嘉赓. 考虑分时电价与光伏出力关系的分布式光伏投资决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(5): 179-186.
[3]	方国昌,何宇,田立新. 碳交易驱动下的政企碳减排演化博弈分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2024, 32(5): 196-206.
[4]	徐乐, 马永刚, 王小飞. 基于演化博弈的绿色技术创新环境政策选择研究：政府行为VS.公众参与[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(3): 30-42.
[5]	孙传旺, 徐淑华. 城市机动车限行对PM_2.5的影响与效果检验[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(1): 196-206.
[6]	刘海英, 王钰. 基于历史法和零和DEA方法的用能权与碳排放权初始分配研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(9): 209-220.
[7]	郭正权, 张兴平, 郑宇花. 能源价格波动对能源-环境-经济系统的影响研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(11): 22-30.
[8]	黄书培, 安海忠, 高湘昀, 闻少博. 供给与需求驱动型原油价格变动对股票市场的多时间尺度影响研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(11): 62-73.
[9]	柴建, 梁婷, 周友洪, 汪寿阳, 黎建强. 不同区制工业化水平下的石油消费分析——基于Path-STR模型的实证研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(11): 47-57.
[10]	黄志成, 赵林度, 王敏, 欧阳娇. 碳排放交易制度差异下的国际供应链生产计划问题[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(11): 58-65.
[11]	危小超, 李岩峰, 聂规划, 陈冬林. 基于后悔理论与多Agent模拟的新产品扩散消费者决策互动行为研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(11): 66-75.
[12]	柴建, 卢全莹, 周友洪, 邢丽敏, 汪寿阳. 国际原油价格拐点分析及统计推断[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(5): 33-41.
[13]	钟美瑞, 曾安琪, 黄健柏, 谌金宇. 代际公平与社会偏好视角下优势金属矿产定价权分析——基于古诺均衡模型的分析框架[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(1): 47-55.
[14]	黄建欢, 杨晓光, 成刚, 汪寿阳. 生态效率视角下的资源诅咒: 资源开发型和资源利用型区域的对比[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(1): 34-42.
[15]	蔡圣华, 杜立民, 毕清华. 我国提高能源效率的目标设计 [J]. 中国管理科学, 2012, (3): 152-160.