主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院

中国管理科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (1): 76-97.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2024.1390cstr: 32146.14.j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2024.1390

• • 上一篇    下一篇

基于生成式人工智能的经济管理学科相关研究综述

胡祥培, 周雅娴()   

  1. 大连理工大学经济管理学院,辽宁 大连 116024
  • 收稿日期:2024-08-13 修回日期:2024-11-21 出版日期:2025-01-25 发布日期:2025-02-14
  • 通讯作者: 周雅娴 E-mail:yaxian1118@mail.dlut.edu.cn

Review of Research on Economics and Management Based on Generative Artificial Intelligence

Xiangpei Hu, Yaxian Zhou()   

  1. School of Economics and Management,Dalian University of Technology,Dalian 116024,China
  • Received:2024-08-13 Revised:2024-11-21 Online:2025-01-25 Published:2025-02-14
  • Contact: Yaxian Zhou E-mail:yaxian1118@mail.dlut.edu.cn

摘要:

以国家自然科学基金委员会和FMS认定的管理类高质量中英文期刊为文献检索依据,按照管理科学部四个学科(管理科学与工程、工商管理、经济科学、宏观管理与政策)对生成式人工智能在经济管理学科的相关研究进行文献计量分析。研究结果表明:(1)中英文文献的期刊、研究机构和合作网络存在差异,中文文献集中于信息资源管理和图书情报领域,合作关系依赖于学科、机构和地理位置的相似性;英文文献更加多样和广泛,但机构间尚未形成持续稳定的合作成果输出;跨学科、跨机构和跨地域之间的协同研究有待加强。(2)现有研究主要集中在宏观管理与政策和管理科学与工程学科,侧重实证应用研究;工商管理和经济科学学科,以及专注于生成式人工智能技术和风险问题的研究相对较少;英文文献的研究主题和应用领域均比中文文献更加广泛,研究数量和聚焦程度也高于中文文献。未来研究可聚焦于生成式人工智能与管理工具、理论方法及复杂管理情境的交叉融合,并推动具体管理研究范式的变革。

关键词: 管理, 人工智能(AI), 生成式, 大语言模型(LLMs), ChatGPT

Abstract:

Using 87 high-quality Chinese management journals and 1177 high-quality English management journals as the basis for literature retrieval, a bibliometric analysis is conducted on research related to Generative Artificial Intelligence in Economics and Management. The analysis covers journal distribution, author and institution collaboration networks, and keyword-based literature analysis, organized according to the four subfields under the Management Science Department of the National Natural Science Foundation of China: Management Science and Engineering, Business Administration, Economic Sciences, and Macro Management and Policy. The findings include: 1) There are differences between Chinese and English-language literature. Chinese literature focuses on information resource management and library and information science. Collaborative relationships are primarily influenced by disciplinary, institutional, and geographical similarities. In contrast, English literature spans a wider range of journals, and institutions. However, consistent research outputs from cross-institutional collaboration have yet to emerge. Strengthening cross-disciplinary, cross-regional, and cross-institutional collaboration remains a need for both Chinese and English research. 2) In both Chinese and English literature, studies are mainly concentrated in the subfields of Macro Management and Policy, as well as Management Science and Engineering, with a strong emphasis on empirical and applied research. Business Administration and Economics have relatively fewer studies, and literature focusing on generative artificial intelligence technologies and associated risks is also limited. Furthermore, English-language literature exhibits a broader range of research themes and application areas than Chinese literature, with higher research volumes and greater thematic focus. Future research should emphasize the integration of generative artificial intelligence with management tools, theoretical theories, and complex management scenarios, as well as on addressing specific management research paradigms.

Key words: management, artificial intelligence (AI), generative, large language models (LLMs), ChatGPT

中图分类号: