主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院

中国管理科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (3): 156-166.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2021.2084

• • 上一篇    下一篇

不同成本分担契约对产品定价、质量和售后服务的影响研究

周永务(),李斐,刘婕   

  1. 华南理工大学工商管理学院,广东 广州 510641
  • 收稿日期:2021-10-13 修回日期:2022-03-16 出版日期:2024-03-25 发布日期:2024-03-25
  • 通讯作者: 周永务 E-mail:zyw_666@hotmail.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(72071082)

The Impact of Different Cost-sharing Contracts on Product Pricing, Quality and After-sales Service

Yongwu Zhou(),Fei Li,Jie Liu   

  1. School of Business Administration,South China University of Technology,Guangzhou 510641,China
  • Received:2021-10-13 Revised:2022-03-16 Online:2024-03-25 Published:2024-03-25
  • Contact: Yongwu Zhou E-mail:zyw_666@hotmail.com

摘要:

本文针对现实生活中常见的两种供应链成本分担契约:一种是制造商为零售商承担部分售后服务成本;另一种是制造商为零售商承担部分售后服务成本,零售商也为制造商承担部分质量成本。分析了采用不同成本分担契约对产品定价、质量水平、售后服务水平以及供应链成员利润的影响。研究发现:(1)当售后成本分担比例和质量成本分担比例都低于一定水平时,两种成本分担契约下的产品质量水平和售后服务水平都能得到提升,但质量成本和售后成本相互分担契约下的产品质量水平和售后服务水平会更高。(2)制造商在质量成本和售后成本相互分担契约下的利润总是高于单一售后成本分担契约下的利润,但制造商只有在分担售后服务成本比例较小、消费者对售后服务成本较不敏感、质量成本系数较大时,与不使用成本分担契约相比,使用单一售后成本分担契约才能提升利润。这也解释了为什么新兴行业中,制造商倾向于使用质量和售后成本相互分担契约,因为新兴行业中的消费者对售后服务成本往往比较敏感,而使用质量成本和售后成本相互分担契约与使用单一售后成本分担契约相比,能使产品售后服务水平提升得更高,进而提升制造商利润。(3)零售商并不一定能从单一售后成本分担契约下获益,只有当质量成本系数较小时,与不使用成本分担契约相比,零售商在单一售后成本分担契约下的利润才会更高。与单一售后服务成本分担契约相比,当质量成本系数和售后服务成本系数都较大时,零售商在质量成本和售后成本相互分担契约下的利润会更低。

关键词: 供应链, 成本分担契约, 产品定价, 售后服务水平, 质量水平

Abstract:

It focuses on two common supply chain cost sharing contracts in real life in this paper: one is that the manufacturer bears part of the after-sales service cost for the retailer, the other is that the manufacturer bears parts of the after-sales service cost for the retailer, and the retailer bears parts of the quality cost for the manufacturer. The impact of using different cost sharing contracts on product pricing, quality level, after-sales service level and the profit of supply chain members is analyzed.It is found that (1) When the after-sales cost sharing ratio and the quality cost sharing ratio are lower than a certain level, the product quality level and after-sales service level under the two cost-sharing contracts can be improved, but the quality cost and after-sales cost are shared by each other The product quality level and after-sales service level under the contract will be higher. (2) The manufacturer’s profit under the contract for the mutual sharing of quality cost and after-sales cost is always higher than the profit under a single after-sales cost-sharing contract, but the manufacturer can only share a small proportion of after-sales service costs and consumers have a greater impact on after-sales service costs. When insensitive and the quality cost coefficient is large, compared with not using a cost sharing contract, the use of a single after-sales cost sharing contract can increase profits. This also explains why in emerging industries, manufacturers tend to use quality and after-sales cost sharing contracts, because consumers in emerging industries are often more sensitive to after-sales service costs, and use quality cost and after-sales cost sharing contracts and use single Compared with the after-sales cost sharing contract, the after-sales service level of the product can be improved to a higher level, thereby increasing the profit of the manufacturer. (3) Retailers may not necessarily benefit from a single after-sales cost-sharing contract. Only when the quality cost coefficient is small, compared with not using a cost-sharing contract, the retailer’s profit under a single after-sales cost-sharing contract will be higher. Compared with a single after-sales service cost-sharing contract, when both the quality cost coefficient and the after-sales cost coefficient are large, the retailer's profit under the contract for mutual sharing of quality cost and after-sales cost will be lower.

Key words: supply chain, cost sharing contract, product pricing, after-sales service level, quality level

中图分类号: