养老服务补贴研究：补需方比补供方更好吗？

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2021.0923

中国管理科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (9): 266-277.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2021.0923

• • 上一篇

养老服务补贴研究：补需方比补供方更好吗？

冯华, 邱雨如, 黄宇, 唐紫璇

武汉大学经济与管理学院，湖北武汉430072

收稿日期:2021-05-10 修回日期:2021-10-30 发布日期:2023-09-19
通讯作者: 邱雨如(1997-)，女(汉族)，江西抚州人，武汉大学经济与管理学院，硕士研究生，研究方向：供应链管理/协同，Email：13277062862@163.com. E-mail:13277062862@163.com
基金资助:
教育部人文社会科学基金资助项目(16YJA630010)；武汉大学自主科研项目(201806);教育部人文社会科学基金资助项目（16YJA630010）；武汉大学柯力数字管理研究中心资助项目（2023-001）

The Impact of Different Government Subsidy Models on the Elderly Care Service Market

FENG Hua, QIU Yu-ru, HUANG Yu, TANG Zi-xuan

Economics and Management School, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China

Received:2021-05-10 Revised:2021-10-30 Published:2023-09-19
Contact: 邱雨如 E-mail:13277062862@163.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 中国已进入人口老龄化社会，为加快养老服务业发展，政府积极推动养老服务补贴政策。养老服务补贴根据对象不同可分为两类，供方补贴面向养老服务机构，需方补贴面向养老服务对象。本文选择由一个养老服务机构和两种类型的养老服务消费者组成的养老服务市场为研究对象，讨论并比较了不同的财政补贴方式对养老服务定价、市场需求量和养老服务机构收益的影响。结果表明：供方补贴在充分激发养老服务市场活力方面显著优于需方补贴，缺点是政府财政支出偏高；需方补贴在提高经济困难的老年群体购买力上效果强于供方补贴，但可能损害其他消费者的利益；混合补贴可以减轻政府财政压力，通过选择合适的补贴系数，能够同时改善处在不同经济水平的养老服务消费者的境况。

关键词: 养老服务；政府补贴；补贴研究

Abstract: In order to cope with the aging population, the government issue a series of policies, and the pension service subsidy is of great significance to stimulate the vitality of the pension service market, improve the effective supply of elderly care services and release the potential of pension service consumption. The Chinese government launch different types of subsidy programs, which can be divided into supplier subsidies (S) and demander subsidies (D) according to the subject. Starting from the profit function of pension institutions, institutional income and government financial benefit under different subsidy modes are studied. A simple model is constructed, and the consumers are divided into (1) sensitive consumers and (2) ordinary consumers.

Key words: elderly care service; government subsidies; subsidy research

中图分类号:

D669.6

冯华, 邱雨如, 黄宇, 唐紫璇. 养老服务补贴研究：补需方比补供方更好吗？[J]. 中国管理科学, 2023, 31(9): 266-277.

FENG Hua, QIU Yu-ru, HUANG Yu, TANG Zi-xuan. The Impact of Different Government Subsidy Models on the Elderly Care Service Market[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(9): 266-277.

参考文献

［1］李芳. 供给侧视角下养老服务业发展的着力点［J］.管理世界,2018, 34(6):177-178.Li Fang. The focus of the development of pension service industry from the perspective of supply side［J］. Management World, 2018, 34(6):177-178.
［2］胡宪.支持我国养老服务业发展的财税政策分析［J］. 湖南社会科学,2017,182(4):143-148.Hu Xian. Analysis of fiscal and tax policies supporting the development of old-age service industry in China［J］. Social Sciences in Hunan, 2017,182(4): 143-148.
［3］钟慧澜.中国社会养老服务体系建设的理论逻辑与现实因应［J］.学术界,2017,229(6):65-77+322-323.Zhong Huilan. Theoretical logic and real response of constructing Chinese social care service system［J］. Academics,2017,229(6): 65-77+322-323.
［4］张翔,林腾.“补砖头”、“补床头”还是“补人头”——基于浙江省某县养老机构的个案研究［J］.社会保障研究, 2012, 23(4): 39-48.Zhang Xiang, Lin Teng. Grant subsidy according to “Bricks”, “Beds” or “Heads”: a case study of institute for the aged in X county of Zhejiang province［J］. Social Security Studies, 2012, 23(4): 39-48.
［5］穆光宗.我国机构养老发展的困境与对策［J］.华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2012,51(2):31-38.Mu Guangzong. Difficulties and countermeasures of institutional endowment development in China［J］.Journal of Central China Normal University(Humanities and Social Sciences), 2012, 51(2): 31-38.
［6］冯占联,詹合英,关信平,等.中国城市养老机构的兴起:发展与公平问题［J］.人口与发展,2012,18(6): 16-23.Feng Zhanlian, Zhan Heying, Guan Xinping, et al. The rise of long-term care facilities in urban China: emerging issues of access disparities［J］.Population and Development,2012, 18(6): 16-23.
［7］董红亚.中国养老服务补贴制度研究［J］.社会科学辑刊,2012,198(1): 55-60.Dong Hongya. Research on subsidy system of China’s old-age service［J］. Social Science Journal,2012, 198(1): 55-60.
［8］郭倩,王效俐.基于政府补贴的养老服务市场供给研究［J］.运筹与管理,2020,29(2):219-228.Guo Qian, Wang Xiaoli. Research on the supply of pension service market based on government subsidy［J］.Operations Research and Management Science, 2020, 29(2): 219-228.
［9］于凌云.推进养老机构市场化的财政补贴机制研究［J］.财政研究,2015,385(3):74-78.Yu Lingyun. Research on the financial subsidy mechanism of promoting the marketization of pension institutions［J］. Public Finance Research, 2015,385(3):74-78.
［10］ Carrie H,Eliza L, Valerie L, et al.What is the long term impact of voucher scheme on primary care? Findings from a repeated crosssectional study using propensity score matching［J］.BMC Health Services Research,2019,19(4):1-2.
［11］ Angel L,Zoey K, Carrie Y, et al. Vouchers for primary healthcare services in an ageing world? The perspectives of elderly voucher recipients in Hong Kong［J］.Health & Social Care in the Community,2018,26(3):374-382.
［12］ Doty P. Family care of the elderly: the role of public policy［J］.The Milbank Quarterly, 1986, 64(1): 34-75.
［13］ Campbell J, Ikegami N, Gibson M. Lessons from public long-term care insurance in Germany and Japan［J］. Health affairs (ProjectHope), 2010,29(1): 87-95.
［14］ Chin C, Phua K.Long-term care policy: Singapore’s experience［J］. Journal of Aging & Social Policy,2016,28(2):113-129.
［15］陈志勇,张薇.我国养老服务市场化中的财政补贴方式及标准测度［J］.求索,2017(1):144-148.Chen Zhiyong, Zhang Wei. Financial subsidy mode and standard measure in the marketization of old-age care service in China［J］. Seeker, 2017(1): 144-148.
［16］桑秀丽,李金蔓,肖汉杰,等.基于政府补贴的养老服务供应链资源分配研究［J］.经济与管理评论,2016,32(5): 118-122.Sang Xiuli, Li Jinman. Xiao HanJie, et al. A study of the resource allocation of senior service supply chain based on government subsidies［J］. Review of Economy and Management, 2016, 32(5): 118-122.
［17］ Masaya Y. Elderly care service in an aging society［J］.Journal of Economic Studies,2019,46(1):18-34.
［18］ Posner M, Dror Z. A note on socially optimal R&D programs and their inducement［J］. Operations Research 40(3-supplement-2), 1992,40(S2): 335-338.
［19］邱国斌. 不同政府补贴模式对制造商与零售商决策的影响［J］.科学决策,2013, 192(7):12-24.Qiu Guobin. The influence of different government subsidy patterns on the decision-making of manufacturers and retailers［J］. Scientific Decision Making, 2013, 192(7): 12-24.
［20］ Yu Jiayi, Christopher S,Shen Zuojun. Improving consumer welfare and manufacturer profit via government subsidy programs: subsidizing consumers or manufacturers?［J］. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2018, 20(4): 752-766.
［21］ Xiao Ping, Xiao Ruli, Liang Yitian, et al. The effects of a government’s subsidy program: accessibility beyond affordability［J］. Management Science, 2019, 66(7): 3211-3233.
［22］ Wu Yuzhe, Luo Jiaojiao, Yi Peng. An optimization-based framework for housing subsidy policy in China: theory and practice of housing vouchers. Land Use Policy，2020, 94(1):104526.
［23］熊勇清,李小龙,黄恬恬.基于不同补贴主体的新能源汽车制造商定价决策研究［J］. 中国管理科学,2020,28(8):139-147.Xiong Yongqing, Li Xiaolong, Huang Tiantian. Research on new energy vehicle manufacturers pricing decision basis for different subsidy bodies［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2020, 28(8): 139-147.
［24］ Argyro K, Jean-Sébastien, Tancrez C.Joint product assortment,inventory and price optimization to attract loyal and non-loyal customers［J］.Omega, 2014,46(9):36-50.
［25］周建亨,李颖潇.顾客忠诚对企业传递成本信号的影响研究［J］.中国管理科学,2023,31(4): 275-286.Zhou Jianheng, Li Yingxiao. Effect of customer loyalty on signaling cost Information［J］.Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023,31(4): 275-286.
［26］徐春秋,赵道致,原白云.政府补贴政策下产品差别定价与供应链协调机制［J］.系统工程,2014,32(3):78-86.Xu Chunqiu, Zhao Daozhi, Yuan Baiyun. Products differential pricing and supply chain coordination mechanism under the government subsidy policy［J］. Systems Engineering, 2014, 32(3): 78-86.
［27］柳键,舒斯亮.政府与民办养老机构互动机理及管理策略研究［J］.华东经济管理,2013,27(10):151-156.Liu Jian, Shu Siliang. A research on interaction mechanism and management strategy of government and private pension institutions［J］. East China Economic Management, 2013,27(10):151-156.
［28］温兴琦,程海芳,蔡建湖,卢超.绿色供应链中政府补贴策略及效果分析［J］.管理学报,2018,15(4):625-632.Wen Xingqi, Cheng Haifang, Cai Jianhu, Lu Chao. Government subside policies and effect analysis in green supply chain［J］. Chinese Journal of Management, 2018,15(4):625-632.
［29］李祉佑,钱本华,张瑞友,等.考虑政府补贴的绿色旅游供应链博弈模型［J/OL］.控制工程:1-8［2021-07-06］.https://doi.org/10.14107/j.cnki.kzgc.20200258.Li Zhiyou, Qian Benhua, Zhang Ruiyou et al.Game model of green tourism supply chain considering governmental subsidies［J/OL］. Control Engineering of China: 1-8［2021-07-06］.https://doi.org/10.14107/j.cnki.kzgc.20200258.
［30］曹裕,李青松,胡韩莉.不同政府补贴策略对供应链绿色决策的影响研究［J］.管理学报,2019,16(2):297-305+316.Cao Yu, Li Qingsong, Hu Hanli. Research on influence of different government subsidy strategy on the green decision-making of supply chain［J］. Chinese Journal of Management, 2019,16(2): 297-305+316.

养老服务补贴研究：补需方比补供方更好吗？

The Impact of Different Government Subsidy Models on the Elderly Care Service Market

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 0

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0