道冲突与企业间协作：第三方介入的调节作用

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2020.0101

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以社会平衡理论和营销渠道组织间关系的相关研究为基础，探讨渠道冲突对企业间协作的影响，并检验第三方介入对冲突与企业间协作之间关系的调节作用。收集550份有效调查数据，应用统计方法分析数据和检验假设。结果发现：渠道冲突对制造商和经销商之间的协作有负向影响，会减少双方共同制定计划与共同解决问题的行为；而制造商邀请第三方介入进行调解，则有助于弱化渠道冲突对共同制定计划与共同解决问题的负向作用。另外，我们还发现，第三方介入还能够促进合作双方的共同制定计划与共同解决问题，进而对双方的渠道合作绩效有积极的影响。

关键词: 渠道冲突；第三方介入；共同制定计划；共同解决问题；合作绩效

Abstract: Scholars have paid remarkable attention to channel conflicts. One of the related theories is the social balance theory. It acknowledges that in the triangular relationship formed by the three individuals, they will try to avoid the imbalance of the relationship among them and balance it by taking action. Recently, researchers began to explore the possible impact of third-party interventions on channel conflicts. They hold that the third-party may mitigate the two parties’ negative hostility to the conflict and help them resolve the problem. Inspired by prior studies and taking interfirm collaborative activities as the research setting, the impact of channel conflicts on interfirm collaboration and the moderating effects of third-party interventions are proposed and tested.

Key words: channel conflict; third-party intervention; joint planning; joint problem-solving; cooperation performance

中图分类号:

F713.5

卢亭宇, 庄贵军. 道冲突与企业间协作：第三方介入的调节作用[J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(10): 277-286.

LU Ting-yu, ZHUANG Gui-jun. Channel Conflicts and Interfirm Collaboration: Roles of Third-party Interventions[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(10): 277-286.

参考文献

［1］新浪网. 汽车之家遭经销商抵制股价暴跌, 工商联撮合双方沟通［EB/OL］. (2019-01-15)［2019-05-15］. http://finance.sina.com.cn/chanjing/gsnews/2019-01-15/doc-ihqhqcis6310386.shtml. 2019-01-15.Sina.com. Autohome.com suffered boycotts from dealers, which caused the plummeted stock price, and the business federation intervened to facilitate communication\[EB/OL\]. (2019-01-15)\[2019-05-15\]. http://finance.sina.com.cn/chanjing/gsnews/2019-01-15/doc-ihqhqcis6310386.shtml. 2019-01-15.
［2］丰超, 庄贵军, 陈慧, 等. 经销商“抱团”如何改变渠道中的合同治理［J］. 南开管理评论, 2019, 22(2):4-13.Feng Chao, Zhuang Guijun, Chen Hui, et al. How does distributors’ “banding together” affect contractual governance in marketing channels［J］. Nankai Business Review, 2019, 22(2):4-13.
［3］张闯, 张涛, 庄贵军. 渠道关系强度对渠道权力应用的影响——关系嵌入的视角［J］. 管理科学, 2012, 25(3):56-68.Zhang Chuang, Zhang Tao, Zhuang Guijun. Impacts of channel tie strength on the channel power exercises: From the perspective of relational embeddedness［J］. Journal of Management Science, 2012, 25(3):56-68.
［4］付晓蓉, Tang Thuong Phat, 谢庆红. 长期关系中渠道冲突对企业创新能力的影响研究［J］. 科研管理, 2016, 37(3):59-67.Fu Xiaorong, Tang Thuong Phat, Xie Qinghong. Influence of channel conflict on innovation capability in long-term relationships［J］. Science Research Management, 2016, 37(3):59-67.
［5］寿志钢, 张起元. 渠道冲突真的一无是处吗?——分销商的感知冲突、感知承诺与信息分享意愿的关系［J］. 经济管理, 2011(11):130-137.Shou Zhigang, Zhang Qiyuan. Is marketing channel conflict good for nothing? — Distributor’s perceived conflict，perceived commitment and intention of information sharing［J］. Economic Management, 2011(11):130-137.
［6］谢庆红, 王嘉馨, 江柱忠. 渠道冲突后第三方介入对关系修复的影响［J］. 科研管理, 2018, 39(12):162-170.Xie Qinghong, Wang Jiaxin, Jiang Zhuzhong. Influence of third party intervention on relationship repair after channel conflict［J］. Science Research Management, 2018, 39(12):162-170.
［7］ Yu Ying, Yang Yan, Jing Fengjie. The role of the third party in trust repair process［J］. Journal of Business Research, 2017, 78: 233-241.
［8］ Brodt S E, Neville L. Repairing trust to preserve balance: A balance-theoretic approach to trust breach and repair in groups［J］. Negotiation & Conflict Management Research, 2013, 6(1):49-65.
［9］ Berscheid E S, Regan P C. The psychology of interpersonal relationships［M］. New York: Psychology Press, 2016.
［10］庄贵军. 营销渠道中的人际关系与跨组织合作关系: 概念与模型［J］. 商业经济与管理, 2012, 1(1):25-33.Zhuang Guijun. Interpersonal guanxi and inter-firm relationship in marketing channels: A conceptual model［J］. Journal of Business Economics, 2012, 1(1):25-33.
［11］ Stern L W, EI-Ansary A. Marketing channels (4th ed.)［M］. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1992, 12-14.
［12］董滨, 庄贵军. 网络交互策略与企业间协作的任务技术匹配效应检验［J］. 管理科学, 2018, 31(5):30-41.Dong Bin, Zhuang Guijun. Testing the task-technology fit effects between internet interactive strategies and interfirm coordination［J］. Journal of Management Science, 2018, 31(5):30-41.
［13］ Claro D P, Claro P B, Hagelaar G. Coordinating collaborative joint efforts with suppliers: The effects of trust, transaction specific investment and information network in the Dutch flower industry［J］. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 2006, 11(3): 216-224.
［14］ Gilliland D I, Bello D C, Gundlach G T. Control-based channel governance and relative dependence［J］. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2010, 38(4):441-455.
［15］ Claro D P, Hagelaar G, Omta O. The determinants of relational governance and performance: How to manage business relationships?［J］. Industrial Marketing Management, 2003, 32(8): 703-716.
［16］ Zhou Yin, Zhang Xubing, Zhuang Guijun, et al. Relational norms and collaborative activities: Roles in reducing opportunism in marketing channels［J］. Industrial Marketing Management, 2015, 46: 147-159.
［17］庄贵军, 李汝琦, 丰超, 等. IT能力、渠道治理与企业间协作［J］. 系统管理学报, 2019, 28(3):467-475.Zhuang Guijun, Li Ruqi, Feng Chao, et al. IT capability, channel governance, and inter-fem collaboration［J］. Journal of System & Management, 2019, 28(3):467-475.
［18］庄贵军, 席酉民, 周筱莲. 权力、冲突与合作——中国营销渠道中私人关系的影响作用［J］. 管理科学, 2007, 20(3):38-47.Zhuang Guijun, Xi Youmin, Zhou Xiaolian. Power, conflict and cooperation: The impact of personal guanxi in a Chinese marketing channel［J］. Journal of Management Science, 2007, 20(3):38-47.
［19］ Koza K L, Dant R P. Effects of relationship climate, control mechanism, and communications on conflict resolution behavior and performance outcomes［J］. Journal of Retailing, 2007, 83(3):279-296.
［20］ Vinhas A S, Anderson E. How potential conflict drives channel structure: concurrent (direct and indirect) channels［J］. Journal of Marketing Research, 2005, 42(4):507-515.
［21］ Chen Chao, Chen Ya Ru, Xin Katherine. Guanxi practices and trust in management: A procedural justice perspective［J］. Organization Science, 2004, 15(2):200-209.
［22］ Fisher R J, Keashly L. The potential complementarity of mediation and consultation within a contingency model of third party intervention［J］. Journal of Peace Research, 1991, 28(1), 29-42.
［23］ Woolthuis R K, Nooteboom B, De Jong G. Roles of third parties in trust repair: Lessons from high-tech alliances for public trust［J］. Public Trust in Business, 2014: 290-325.
［24］ Bachmann R, Gillespie N, Priem R. Repairing trust in organizations and institutions: Toward a conceptual framework［J］. Organization Studies, 2015, 36(9): 1123-1142.
［25］ Balliet D, Van Lange P A. Trust, conflict, and cooperation: A meta-analysis［J］. Psychological Bulletin, 2013, 139(5): 1090-1112.
［26］ Poppo L, Zenger T. Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements?［J］. Strategic Management Journal, 2002, 23(8):707-725.
［27］ Fornell C, Larcker D F. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error［J］. Journal of Marketing Research, 1981: 39-50.
［28］ Bagozzi R P, Yi Y. On the evaluation of structural equation models［J］. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 1988, 16(1): 74-94.
［29］ Lindell M K, Whitney D J. Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs［J］. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001, 86(1): 114.
［30］王勇, 庄贵军, 张闯, 等. 营销渠道中的合同治理、公平与角色外利他行为［J］. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(6):188-196.Wang Yong, Zhuang Guijun, Zhang Chuang, et al. Contractual governance, justice and extra-role altruistic behaviors in marketing channels［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2018, 26(6):188-196.
［31］ Aiken L S, West S G, Reno R R. Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions［M］. California: Sage Publications, 1991.
［32］庄贵军, 刘宇. 渠道投机行为的相互性以及交易专有资产的影响［J］. 管理科学, 2010, 23(6):43-52.Zhuang Guijun, Liu Yu. Reciprocity of interfirm opportunisms in marketing channels and impact of transaction specific assets［J］. Journal of Management Science, 2010, 23(6):43-52.
［33］ Mackinnon D. Introduction to statistical mediation analysis［M］. London: Routledge, 2012.
［34］ Achrol R S, Reve T, Stern L W. The environment of marketing channel dyads: A framework for comparative analysis［J］. Journal of Marketing, 1983, 47(4):55-67.

[1]	何迎朝, 徐以汎, 王凯. 店铺形象和店铺位置在O2O环境中还重要吗？[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(6): 171-181.
[2]	任小静, 李琪. “负面偏见”对平台认证型评论感知有用性的影响[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(9): 149-159.
[3]	张旭, 侯光明. 双口碑效应下新产品扩散研究——以电影为例[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(10): 79-88.
[4]	郭燕, 吴价宝, 王崇, 卢珂. 多渠道零售环境下消费者渠道选择意愿形成机理研究——产品类别特征的调节作用[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(9): 158-169.
[5]	许诗康, 廖成林. 基于顾客崇洋心理刻板印象的国内品牌产品洋化广告决策[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(7): 123-133.
[6]	但斌, 田丽娜, 董绍辉. 考虑溢出效应的互补品企业间广告决策模型研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2013, (2): 66-75.
[7]	王毅, 赵平. 顾客满意对企业财务绩效的影响研究——基于中国部分上市公司的面板数据[J]. 中国管理科学, 2012, (1): 185-192.
[8]	张德鹏, 陈少霞. 顾客忠诚对盈利能力的影响效应[J]. 中国管理科学, 2011, 19(4): 84-92.
[9]	杨珺, 王玲, 郑娜, 杨超. 多用途易腐物品配送中心选址问题研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2011, 19(1): 91-99.
[10]	黄松, 杨超, 杨珺. 基于Stackelberg博弈的变质物品分销网络设计模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2009, 17(6): 122-129.
[11]	黄松, 杨超. 随机需求下联合选址-库存模型研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2009, 17(5): 96-103.
[12]	贺炎林. 基于状态转移信息对FF三因子模型的改进[J]. 中国管理科学, 2008, 16(1): 7-15.
[13]	郭战琴, 周宗放, 李建平. 基于联合风险的商业银行贷款定价研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2007, 15(6): 1-6.
[14]	唐凯, 杨超, 杨珺. 随机多阶段分销网络设计模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2007, 15(6): 98-104.
[15]	戴俊良, 刘承水. 基于客户价值的客户序位评价研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2007, 15(3): 123-129.