网店信息呈现的框架效应对消费者购买决策的影响研究

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2018.1318

中国管理科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (3): 152-161.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2018.1318

网店信息呈现的框架效应对消费者购买决策的影响研究

戴建华¹, 马海云¹, 吴滢滢²

1. 南京理工大学经济与管理学院, 江苏南京 210009;
2. 安徽大学科学技术处, 安徽合肥 230601

收稿日期:2018-09-14 修回日期:2019-04-23 出版日期:2020-03-20 发布日期:2020-04-08
通讯作者: 戴建华(1969-),女(汉族),江苏南京人,南京理工大学经济与管理学院,副教授,研究方向:消费者行为,E-mail:djh705@163.com E-mail:djh705@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目（71303111）

Reference Point Adjustment and Purchasing Intention under Different Frame of Price Presentation

DAI Jian-hua¹, MA Hai-yun¹, WU Ying-ying²

1. School of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210009, China;
2. Department of Science and Technology, Anhui University, Hefei 230601, China

Received:2018-09-14 Revised:2019-04-23 Online:2020-03-20 Published:2020-04-08

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目前有关在线消费者购买意愿的研究，绝大多数是基于实验统计的方法，分析影响消费者购买决策的因素，网店信息呈现的框架形式往往仅作为其中的关键因素被一些研究提及并加以验证。但是，"形态各异"的信息到底如何影响消费者心理进而影响到他们的决策？商家如何从消费者心理的微观层面来设计信息呈现策略，从而增强其购买意愿？目前关于此的研究尚不多见。本研究从前景理论的决策参考点视角，以价格因素为例，一方面，通过情境实验，验证了价格信息的不同呈现框架对于消费者购买意愿的影响作用；另一方面，在利用情境实验界定了消费者心理价格参考点的基础上，通过决策模型的构建和计算，从微观层面分析了不同价格信息呈现框架下，消费者购买选择大相径庭的原因。研究结果表明：（1）在风险框架下，相对于用不确定的语言来描述商品价格信息，确定性语言描述会使消费者的心理价格参考点和购买意愿更高。（2）在属性框架下，相对于用负面的语言来描述商品信息，正面的语言描述更能提高消费者的心理价格参考点和购买意愿。（3）在目标框架下，相对于强调购买行为可能给消费者带来的收益，强调不购买该商品可能给消费者带来的损失更有助于消费者的心理价格参考点和购买意愿的提高。基于上述研究结果，作者围绕网店如何有效的呈现信息提出了管理建议，并讨论了本研究的理论意义与应用价值。

关键词: 信息呈现, 框架效应, 心里参考点, 购买意愿

Abstract: At present, most of the research on online consumers’ purchase intention is based on the statistical experiment method to analyze the factors that affect the consumers’ purchasing intention. The way that online store presenting their information is often mentioned as the characteristic factor. However, there is little research considered how "different forms" of information presentationaffect consumers’ psychology and their purchasing intention. The influence of different information presentation frameworks on consumers’ psychological reference points and purchase intention is studied. And a purchase decision model is built based on consumer psychological points. Then some advice for the future business is provided to present their information effectively. The results prove that:(1) The certain description and uncertain description of the same information will significantly affect the consumer's purchase intention under the risky framing effect, and the consumers' purchase intention and reference point under certain description is higher than that of the uncertain description. (2) Under the attribute framing effect, positive description and negative description will make the consumer purchase decision different. The consumer purchase intention and reference point under the positive description is higher than the negative description. (3)Under target framing effect, positive and negative information will affect the consumer purchase decision behavior. Consumers' purchase intention and reference point under the negative framework will be higher than the positive framework.Based on the above research results, the research of online consumers’ decision-making process is enriched from the micro level, and put forward management suggestions on how to effectively present information for online stores.

Key words: information presentation, the framing effect, reference point, purchasing intention

中图分类号:

C934

戴建华, 马海云, 吴滢滢. 网店信息呈现的框架效应对消费者购买决策的影响研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(3): 152-161.

DAI Jian-hua, MA Hai-yun, WU Ying-ying. Reference Point Adjustment and Purchasing Intention under Different Frame of Price Presentation[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2020, 28(3): 152-161.

参考文献

[1] 中国互联网络信息中心.第43次《中国互联网络发展状况统计报告》[R].中国互联网络发展状况统计报告.北京:中国互联网络信息中心,2019.
[2] Rahman A, Crouch G I, Laing J H. Tourists' temporal booking decisions:A study of the effect of contextual framing[J]. Tourism Management, 2018, 65:55-68.
[3] Kahneman D, Tversky A. The prospect theory:An analysis of decision under risk[J]. Econometrica, 1979, 47(2):263-291.
[4] Levin I P, Schneider S L, Gaeth G J. All frames are not created equal:A typology and critical analysis of framing effects[J]. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 1998, 76(2):149-188.
[5] 于会会, 徐富明, 黄宝珍, 等.框架效应中的个体差异[J].心理科学进展, 2012, 20(6):894-901.
[6] 王海忠,王晶雪,何云.品牌名、原产国、价格对感知质量与购买意向的暗示作用[J].南开管理评论,2007,(6):19-25+32.
[7] Tversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decision and the psychology of choice[J]. Science, 1981, 211(4481):453-458.
[8] McNeil B J, Pauker S G, Tversky A. On the framing of medical decisions[J]. Decision Making:Descriptive, Normative, and Prescriptive Interactions, 1982,18(2):122-138.
[9] Stacy L G, Judith, A G F. Cause-related marketing (CRM):The influence of donation proximity and message-framing cues on the less-involved consumer[J]. Journal of Advertising, 2007, 36(4):19-33.
[10] Kramer T, Kim H M. Processing fluency versus novelty effects in deal perceptions[J]. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 2007, 16(2):142-147.
[11] Ward C S G. Consumer behavior in online auctions:An examination of partitioned prices on eBay[J]. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 2008, 16(1):57-66.
[12] Zhang Zhe, Fang Qianrong. Framing effect of discount coupon[J]. Management Science, 2011, 24(1):47-55.
[13] 金立印, 邹德强, 裘理瑾. 服务定制情境下选项的战略呈现:呈现框架对消费者选择的影响[J].南开管理评论, 2009, 12(6):90-100.
[14] 朱翊敏. 慈善营销中契合类型与信息框架对消费者响应的影响[J]. 南开管理评论, 2014, 17(4):128-139.
[15] 乐为,韩笑,尹洪娟.属性框架下产品感知质量差异测量:基于眼动追踪技术[J].管理工程学报, 2018,32(4):88-94.
[16] Chaiken S. The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior[J]. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 1987, 52(3):500-510.
[17] Chang Chuntuan. Health-care product advertising:The influences of message framing and perceived product characteristics[J]. Psychology & Marketing, 2010, 24(2):143-169.
[18] 杨剑,方易新,杜少甫.考虑参照依赖的企业合作创新演化博弈分析[J].中国管理科学, 2020, 28(1):191-200.
[19] Bodur H O, Arora N. Asymmetric impact of reference point confidence on consumer evaluations[J]. Customer Needs and Solutions, 2014, 1(4):277-287.
[20] Janiszewski C, Cunha M. The influence of price discount framing on the evaluation of a product bundle[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 2004, 30(4):534-546.
[21] Heilman C M, Wright B G P. The evolution of brand preferences and choice behaviors of consumers new to a market[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 2000, 37(2):139-155.
[22] 周尔凤,张廷龙,倪蕾,等.竞争中的参考价格效应及承诺[J].中国管理科学,2018,26(8):75-85.
[23] Gao S, Frejinger E, Akiva M. Adaptive route choices in risky traffic networks:A prospect theory approach[J]. Transportation Research Part C Emerging Technologies, 2010, 18(5):727-740.
[24] 徐海军,田晓丽,徐泽水.基于犹豫模糊语言信息的前景决策方法[J].中国管理科学,2018,26(8):179-185.
[25] 杨慧,陈兰. 考虑乘客有限理性的Littlewood存量分配模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(S1):175-179.
[26] 左文明,陈少杰,王旭,等.基于前景理论的网络消费者多属性行为决策模型[J].管理工程学报,2019,33(3):125-135.
[27] Mayhew G E, Winer R S. An empirical analysis of internal and external reference prices using scanner data[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 1992, 19(1):62-70.
[28] Wells J D, Valacich J S, Hess T J. What signal are you sending? How website quality influences perceptions of product quality and purchase intentions[J]. MIS Quarterly, 2011, 35(2):373-396.
[29] Liu Chang, Marchewka J T, Lu June. Beyond concern-aprivacy-trust-behavioral intention model of electronic commerce[J]. Information & Management, 2005, 42(2):289-304.
[30] Mayhew G E, Winer R S. An empirical analysis of internal and external reference prices using scanner data[J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 1992, 19(1):62-70.
[31] 苗蕴慧,唐加福,张铁军.基于参考依赖的改进MNL模型预测电信套餐选择行为[J]. 系统工程, 2013,(6):82-86.

网店信息呈现的框架效应对消费者购买决策的影响研究

Reference Point Adjustment and Purchasing Intention under Different Frame of Price Presentation

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 1

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10