中国融资融券业务处置效应的实证分析

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2018.09.005

中国管理科学 ›› 2018, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (9): 41-51.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2018.09.005

中国融资融券业务处置效应的实证分析

肖琳^1,2, 赵大萍³, 房勇^1,2

1. 中国科学院数学与系统科学研究院, 北京 100190;
2. 中国科学院大学经济与管理学院, 北京 100190;
3. 首都经济贸易大学金融学院, 北京 100070

收稿日期:2017-06-30 修回日期:2018-01-15 出版日期:2018-09-20 发布日期:2018-11-23
通讯作者: 房勇(1974-),男(汉族),山东人,中国科学院数学与系统科学研究院副研究员,研究方向:金融工程与风险管理,E-mail:yfang@amss.ac.cn E-mail:yfang@amss.ac.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目（71701138，71631008，71271201）

An Empirical Analysis on Disposition Effect of Chinese Margin Trading

XIAO Lin^1,2, ZHAO Da-ping³, FANG Yong^1,2

1. Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, Chian;
2. School of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, Chian;
3. School of Finance, Capital University of Economics and Business, Beijing 100070, Chian

Received:2017-06-30 Revised:2018-01-15 Online:2018-09-20 Published:2018-11-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 处置效应阐述了投资者较早卖出盈利而长时间保留亏损的倾向。2010年我国融资融券业务的启动，大大提高了市场的流动性和活跃性，同时也带来了信用交易的投机特性，加强了市场阶段性波动并放大风险，这为我们研究处置效应提供了独特的样本。本文以某大型券商2014年11月至2016年10月30512个账户共3239305条交易记录为样本，采用衡量处置效应的经典指标PGR-PLR以及生存分析中的cox比例风险回归模型检验了两融市场上处置效应的存在性，并进一步利用生存分析方法对影响个体处置效应的相关因素进行了研究。实证结果表明，融资融券市场整体上存在显著的处置效应；就个体层面而言，性别、年龄、投资水平均能影响投资者处置效应的强度。本文发现，与男性投资者相比，女性投资者的处置效应更为强烈。并且，若依据年龄将样本分为青年、中年、老年投资者三组，青年投资者处置效应显著低于中年投资者，而老年投资者处置效应最低。此外，无论以观察期内购买的不同标的物的合约数目还是合约总成交量作为投资者投资水平的代理变量，结果均显示，投资水平越高的投资者处置效应更低。最后，应用weibull风险模型替代cox比例风险模型重新计算，结果稳健。

关键词: 处置效应, 融资融券, cox比例风险模型, 行为金融

Abstract: The disposition effect is the tendency to sell winning assets too soon, while holding onto losers too long. Since the start of securities margin business in 2010, the liquidity and activeness of the market has been greatly enhanced, along with the increase in the speculation brought by credit trading and the magnification of periodic volatility, which provides us with a unique sample for studying the disposition effect. In this paper, data from a famous national brokerage firm, which is comprised of 3239305 trading records of 30512 accounts from November 2014 to October 2016, is used. The classic PGR-PLR measure and the Cox proportional hazard model have been utilized to test the existence of disposition effect in the securities margin market, and the survival analysis is used to study the demographical factors influencing disposition effect. Empirical evidence shows that, overall, disposition effect exists in China's margin trading market. The female investor exhibits a stronger disposition effect than the male investor. People of middle age are more disposition-prone than people under the age of 35 while the magnitude of disposition effect of people of age over 50 is the largest. Using the number of different types of contracts that have been bought during the observation period and the overall volumes of contracts respectively as proxies for an investor's investment level, both results demonstrate that the better an investor is at investment, the lower his disposition effect is. Our results are robust when we rerun the model using Weibull hazard function. Our paper helps investors gain insight into their inherent behavioral bias and thus guide them to make rational investment decisions.

Key words: disposition effect, margin trading, cox proportional hazard model, behavioral finance

中图分类号:

F830

肖琳, 赵大萍, 房勇. 中国融资融券业务处置效应的实证分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(9): 41-51.

XIAO Lin, ZHAO Da-ping, FANG Yong. An Empirical Analysis on Disposition Effect of Chinese Margin Trading[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2018, 26(9): 41-51.

参考文献

[1] Bondt W F M, Thaler R. Does the stock market overreact?[J]. The Journal of finance, 1985, 40(3):793-805.

[2] Von Neumann J, Morgenstern O. Theory of games and economic behavior[M]. Princeton, US:Princeton University Press, 2007.

[3] 马德青, 胡劲松, 姜伟,等. 具损失厌恶和损失概率厌恶的报童问题研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017,25(9):188-196.

[4] Lakonishok J, Smidt S. Volume for winners and losers:Taxation and other motives for stock trading[J]. The Journal of Finance, 1986, 41(4):951-974.

[5] Odean T. Are investors reluctant to realize their losses?[J]. The Journal of Finance, 1998, 53(5):1775-1798.

[6] Grinblatt M, Keloharju M. What makes investors trade?[J]. The Journal of Finance, 2001, 56(2):589-616.

[7] Jordan D, Diltz J D. Day traders and the disposition effect[J]. The Journal of Behavioral Finance, 2004, 5(4):192-200.

[8] Locke PR, Mann S C. Professional trader discipline and trade disposition[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2005, 76(2):401-444.

[9] Jin Li, Scherbina A. Inheriting losers[J]. The Review of Financial Studies, 2011, 24(3):786-820.

[10] Szyszka A, Zielonka P. The disposition effect demonstrated on IPO trading volume[J]. ICFAI Journal of Behavior Finance,2007,4(1):40-48.

[11] 赵学军, 王永宏. 中国股市"处置效应"的实证分析[J]. 金融研究, 2001,(7):92-97.

[12] 任德平, 龚旭, 文凤华, 等. 中国股票投资者的处置效应检验和参考价格选择. 中国管理科学, 2013,21(3):1-10.

[13] 池丽旭, 庄新田, 王健. 基于IPO交易量对我国投资者处置效应的研究[J]. 管理学报, 2008, 5(1):118-122.

[14] 伍燕然,黄文婷,苏凇,等. 基金投资者处置效应的个体差异[J]. 国际金融研究, 2016, 347(3):84-96.

[15] 张伟强, 王珺, 廖理. 中国个人权证投资者处置效应研究[J]. 清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2011,(4):112-122.

[16] 陈建瑜. 我国证券融资融券的实现路径[J]. 中国金融, 2006,(8):30-32.

[17] 陈海强, 范云菲. 融资融券交易制度对中国股市波动率的影响——基于面板数据政策评估方法的分析[J]. 金融研究, 2015,(6):159-172.

[18] 李科, 徐龙炳, 朱伟骅. 卖空限制与股票错误定价——融资融券制度的证据[J]. 经济研究, 2014,(10):165-178.

[19] 胡伦超, 余乐安, 汤铃. 融资融券背景下证券配对交易策略研究——基于协整和距离的两阶段方法[J].中国管理科学, 2016, 24(4):1-9.

[20] 赵智. 证券公司开展融资融券业务风险防范研究[D]. 大连:大连理工大学, 2008.

[21] Shapira Z, Venezia I. Patterns of behavior of professionally managed and independent investors[J]. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2001, 25(8):1573-1587.

[22] Weber M, Camerer C F. The disposition effect in securities trading:An experimental analysis[J]. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1998, 33(2):167-184.

[23] Heisler J. Loss aversion in a futures market:An empirical test[J]. Review of Futures Markets, 1994, 13(3):793-826.

[24] Coval J D, Shumway T. Do behavioral biases affect prices?[J]. The Journal of Finance, 2005, 60(1):1-34.

[25] Case K E, Shiller R J. The behavior of home buyers in boom and post-boom markets[J]. New England Economic Review, 1988,(Nov):29-46.

[26] Byrnes J P, Miller D C, Schafer W D. Gender differences in risk taking:A meta-analysis[J].Psychological Bulletin, 1999, 125(3):367-383.

[27] Lusardi A, Mitchelli O. Financial literacy and retirement preparedness:Evidence and implications for financial education[J]. Business Economics, 2007, 42(1):35-44.

[28] Barber B M, Odean T. Boys will be boys:Gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2001, 116(1):261-292.

[29] Feng L, Seasholes M S. Do investor sophistication and trading experience eliminate behavioral biases in financial markets?[J]. Review of Finance, 2005, 9(3):305-351.

[30] Wegener D T, Petty R E. Flexible correction processes in social judgment:The role of naive theories in corrections for perceived bias[J]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1995, 68(1):36-51.

[31] Van Rooij M, Lusardi A, Alessie R. Financial literacy and stock market participation[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2011, 101(2):449-472.

[32] 陈磊, 曾勇. 基于股市下跌背景的处置效应研究[J]. 管理评论, 2005, 17(3):24-29.

中国融资融券业务处置效应的实证分析

An Empirical Analysis on Disposition Effect of Chinese Margin Trading

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 11

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	赵鹏举, 张维. 基于随机动力系统的证券市场演化动态研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(5): 50-56.
[2]	徐元栋. BSV、DHS等模型中资产定价与模糊不确定性下资产定价在逻辑结构上的一致性[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(6): 22-31.
[3]	胡伦超, 余乐安, 汤铃. 融资融券背景下证券配对交易策略研究——基于协整和距离的两阶段方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(4): 1-9.
[4]	任德平, 龚旭, 文凤华, 杨晓光. 中国股票投资者的处置效应检验和参考价格选择[J]. 中国管理科学, 2013, 21(3): 1-10.
[5]	翟爱梅, 周彤. 基于市场参与者行为假设的股票市场量价关系研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2011, 19(4): 31-37.
[6]	陈暮紫, 黄意球, 陈敏, 杨晓光. 基于logistic模型族的不良贷款极端零回收强度模型研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2011, 19(2): 16-23.
[7]	崔海蓉, 何建敏, 胡小平. 结构化金融产品的最优设计与定价——基于发行者与投资者视角[J]. 中国管理科学, 2010, 18(4): 8-13.
[8]	谢晔, 文凤华, 杨晓光. 基于调查与实验的个体投资者羊群行为研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2008, 16(5): 134-140.
[9]	杨春鹏, 吴冲锋, 陈敏. 行为金融:认知风险与认知期望收益[J]. 中国管理科学, 2005, (3): 15-19.
[10]	姜继娇, 杨乃定. 基于行为金融的证券组合风险管理研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2005, (3): 32-36.
[11]	文凤华, 马超群, 巢剑雄. 基于风险价值偏好的最优投资决策分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2002, (5): 26-29.