中国情境下企业社会责任与财务绩效关系的实证研究——基于大、中小型上市公司的对比分析

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2016.01.017

中国管理科学 ›› 2016, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (1): 143-150.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2016.01.017

中国情境下企业社会责任与财务绩效关系的实证研究——基于大、中小型上市公司的对比分析

杨皖苏, 杨善林

合肥工业大学管理学院, 安徽合肥 230009

收稿日期:2014-01-14 修回日期:2014-09-02 出版日期:2016-01-20 发布日期:2016-01-28
通讯作者: 杨皖苏(1964-),女(汉族),安徽枞阳人,合肥工业大学管理学院副教授,硕士生导师,博士,研究方向:企业管理、产业经济,E-mail:yangwans@126.com. E-mail:yangwans@126.com
基金资助:
中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(2012HGZY0034);国家自然科学基金重点资助项目(71131002)

An Empirical Study on the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance under the Chinese Context ——Based on the Contrastive Analysis of Large, Small and Medium-size Listed Companies

YANG Wan-su, YANG Shan-lin

The School of Management, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China

Received:2014-01-14 Revised:2014-09-02 Online:2016-01-20 Published:2016-01-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文以2012年发布的中国500强且在沪深上市的企业为大型企业样本,以中小板上市企业为中小型企业样本,选取各企业2010-2012年会计年报数据,运用结构化方程模型和多元回归分析方法,分别实证检验了大型企业、中小型企业承担社会责任对企业短期财务绩效和长期财务绩效的影响。研究结果表明:(1)无论是大型企业还是中小型企业,承担社会责任都不会引起其短期财务状况的恶化。(2)大型企业和中小型企业的社会责任与长期财务绩效关系的表现不完全相同,大型企业多呈正向关系,中小型企业则负向关系较多。(3)特别值得关注的是,无论大型企业还是中小型企业,对员工和顾客的社会责任与长期财务绩效都呈负相关关系。本文研究揭示了在当前中国情境下企业履行社会责任不容乐观的现状,同时研究结果对于引导企业履行社会责任,促进我国经济社会的健康和谐发展,也具有重要的借鉴价值。

关键词: 大型企业, 中小型企业, 企业社会责任, 财务绩效

Abstract: Taking the top 500 enterprises of China published in 2012 and listed in Shanghai and Shenzhen as the samples for large enterprises, small and medium-sized board listed companies as the samples for SMEs, selecting the enterprise accounting in 2010-2012 annual report date, using structural equation model and multiple regression analysis, the influence of large enterprise, SMEs of undertaking corporate social responsibility on corporate short-term financial performance and long-term financial performance are respectively tested. The results show that: (1) Whether it is large enterprise or SMEs, fulfilling social responsibility will not cause deterioration of its short-term financial conditions. (2) The performance of the relationship between corporate social responsibility of large enterprises and SMEs and long-term financial performance is not exactly the same, large enterprises are mostly positive relationship, while SMEs are mostly negative relationship. (3) In particular, there is significantly negative correlation between corporate social responsibility to employees and customers and long-term financial performance whether it is large enterprise or SMEs. In this paper,it is revealved that the current situation of corporate social responsibility is not optimistic in China, at the same time, the research results have important reference value in guiding enterprises to perform social responsibility and promoting the healthy and harmonious development of China's economic and society.

Key words: large enterprise, SMEs, corporate social responsibility, financial performance

中图分类号:

F270

杨皖苏, 杨善林. 中国情境下企业社会责任与财务绩效关系的实证研究——基于大、中小型上市公司的对比分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(1): 143-150.

YANG Wan-su, YANG Shan-lin. An Empirical Study on the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance under the Chinese Context ——Based on the Contrastive Analysis of Large, Small and Medium-size Listed Companies[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2016, 24(1): 143-150.

参考文献

[1] Carroll A B. Ethical challenges for business in the new millennium:Corporate social responsibility and models of management morality [J]. Business Ethical Quarterly, 2000, 10(1): 33-42.

[2] Orlitzky M, Schmidt F L, Rynes S L. Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis [J]. Organization Studies, 2003, 24(3): 403-441.

[3] Cornell B, Shapiro A C. Corporate stakeholders and corporate finance [J]. Financial Management, 1987, 16(1): 5-14.

[4] Stanwick P A, Stankwick S D. The relation between corporate social performance and organizational size, financial performance, and environmental performance: An empiricial examination [J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 1998, 17(2): 195-205.

[5] Preston L, O'Bannon D P. The corporate social-financial performance relationship: A typology and analysis [J]. Business and Society, 1997, 18(4): 303-319.

[6] Jo H, Harjoto M A. The causal effect of corporate governance on corporate social responsibility [J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2012, 106(1): 53-72.

[7] Friedman M. Capitalism and freedom [M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.

[8] McWilliams A, Siegel D. Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective [J]. Academy of Management Review, 2001, 26(1): 117-127.

[9] Schaltegger S, Synnestvedt T. The link between "Green" and economic success: Environmental management as the crucial trigger between environmental and economic performance [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2002, 65(4): 339-346.

[10] Wagner M, Schaltegger S. The effect of corporate environmental strategy choice and environmental performance on competitiveness and economic performance: An empirical study of EU manufacturing [J]. European Management Journal, 2004, 22(5): 557-572.

[11] 宋建波, 盛春艳. 企业履行社会责任对财务绩效影响研究——来自中国制造业上市公司的实证检验[J].财经问题研究, 2012, (8):99-104.

[12] 张兆国, 靳小翠, 李庚秦. 企业社会责任与财务绩效之间交互跨期影响实证研究[J].会计研究, 2013, (8):32-39.

[13] 温素彬, 方苑.企业社会责任与财务绩效关系的实证研究[J].中国工业经济, 2008, (10):150-160.

[14] Bowen H R. Social responsibilities of the businessman [M]. New York: Harper and Borthers, 1953.

[15] Carroll A B. Three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance [J]. The Academy of Management Review, 1979, 4(4): 497-505.

[16] 杜中臣.企业的社会责任及其实现方式[J].中国人民大学学报, 2005, 19(4):39-46.

[17] Wood D J, Jones R E. Stakeholder mismatching: A theoretical problem in empirical research on corporate social performance [J]. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 1995, 3(3): 229-267.

[18] Clarkson M A. Stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance [J]. Academy of Management Review, 1995, 20(1): 92-117.

[19] Donaldson T, Preston L E. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications [J]. Academy of Management Review, 1995, 20(1): 65-91.

[20] Griffin J, Mahon J. The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: Twenty-five years of incomparable research [J]. Business and Society, 1997, 36(3): 5-31.

[21] Hillman A J, Keim G D. Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What's the bottom line? [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2001, 22(2): 125-139.

[22] 黎友焕, 龚成威.基于外部性的企业社会责任福利分析[J].西安电子科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2008, 18(6):80-85.

[23] Waddock S A, Graves S B. The corporate social performance financial performance link [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1997, 18(4): 303-319.

[24] Becker B, Gerhart B. The impact of human resource management on organizational performance: Progress and prospects [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1996, 39(4): 779-801.

[25] Freeman R, Liedtka J. Corporate social responsibility: A critical approach [J]. Business Horizons, 1991, 34: 92-98.

[26] Preston L. Analyzing corporate social performance: Methods and results [J]. Journal of Contemporary Business, 1978, 7(1): 135-150.

[27] Lanis R, Richardson G. Corporate social responsibility and tax aggressiveness: An empirical analysis [J]. Accounting and Public Policy, 2012, 31(1): 86-108.

[28] 陈玉清, 马丽丽.我国上市公司社会责任会计信息市场反应实证分析[J].会计研究, 2005, (11):76-81.

[29] 朱明秀.财务业绩、CEO薪酬与商业银行社会责任——基于我国上市商业银行的实证分析[J].财经理论与实践, 2011, 32(2):57-61.

中国情境下企业社会责任与财务绩效关系的实证研究——基于大、中小型上市公司的对比分析

An Empirical Study on the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance under the Chinese Context ——Based on the Contrastive Analysis of Large, Small and Medium-size Listed Companies

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 13

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	曹裕, 周默亭, 胡韩莉. 考虑政府补贴与企业社会责任的两级供应链优化[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(5): 101-111.
[2]	唐书传, 刘云志, 肖条军. 考虑社会责任的供应链定价与碳减排决策[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(4): 99-108.
[3]	李新然, 李刚. 考虑企业社会责任承担的两阶段闭环供应链协调机制研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(12): 77-86.
[4]	杨艳, 程燕培, 陈收. 不同权力结构下供应链企业社会责任激励[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(3): 144-156.
[5]	范建昌, 倪得兵, 唐小我, 洪定军. 产品责任、企业社会责任偏好与供应链中的质量-数量协调[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(1): 85-98.
[6]	王建玲, 李玥婷, 吴璇. 社会责任的信号作用——基于中国市场的研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(8): 31-41.
[7]	郑本荣, 杨超, 杨珺. CSR投入对闭环供应链定价与协调决策的影响[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(10): 64-78.
[8]	李余辉, 倪得兵, 唐小我. 基于企业社会责任的供应链企业质量信号传递博弈[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(7): 38-47.
[9]	宋岩, 滕萍萍, 秦昌才. 企业社会责任与盈余管理:基于中国沪深股市A股制造业上市公司的实证研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(5): 187-196.
[10]	刘计含, 王建琼. 基于社会网络视角的企业社会责任行为相似性研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(9): 115-123.
[11]	陶文杰, 金占明. 媒体关注下的CSR信息披露与企业财务绩效关系研究及启示——基于我国A股上市公司CSR报告的实证研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2013, 21(4): 162-170.
[12]	宁亚春, 罗之仁. 政府管制与双寡头企业社会责任行为的博弈研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2010, 18(2): 157-164.
[13]	纪建悦, 刘艳青, 王翠, 吕帅. 利益相关者影响企业财务绩效的理论分析与实证研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2009, 17(6): 186-192.