债务约束下的企业广告与R&D投资研究

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2015.12.017

中国管理科学 ›› 2015, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (12): 142-149.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2015.12.017

债务约束下的企业广告与R&D投资研究

陈有华¹, 聂普焱², 彭璧玉³

1. 华南农业大学经济管理学院, 广州 510642;
2. 广东财经大学, 广州 510320;
3. 华南师范大学经济与管理学院, 广州 510006

收稿日期:2013-12-13 修回日期:2014-07-09 出版日期:2015-12-20 发布日期:2015-12-31
作者简介:陈有华(1984-),男(汉族),江西瑞昌人,华南农业大学经济管理学院讲师,研究方向:产业组织理论、食品安全.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(71271100);国家社科基金重点项目(14AJY020);广东省软科学项目(2014A070704008);广东省社会科学基金资助项目(GD13YLJ02)

Advertising and R&D Innovation under Debt Constraint

CHEN You-hua¹, NIE Pu-yan², PENG Bi-yu³

1. College of Economics and Management, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China;
2. Guangdong University of Finance & Economics, Guangzhou 510320, China;
3. School of Economics and Management, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510006, China

Received:2013-12-13 Revised:2014-07-09 Online:2015-12-20 Published:2015-12-31

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文以Brander和Lewis的资本结构产业组织理论为基础,结合资本市场与产品市场,分析了企业负债与广告投资、R&D投资之间的关系。通过模型推导提出理论命题,并运用我国沪深两市A股上市公司数据进行验证得到相关结论。研究结果显示负债对企业广告投入存在刺激作用而对R&D投资存在抑制效应。企业广告投入与R&D投入行为存在明显的行业差异,制造业企业两种投入相对均衡,非制造业企业通常偏好于二者之一。企业广告与R&D投入之间相互影响,制造业两种投资之间存在互补关系,而非制造业两种投资之间存在替代关系。负债对企业广告与R&D投资行为的影响存在差异,并且不同债务类型的影响同样存在差异。本研究可进一步促进资本结构产业组织理论的发展,同时为企业改善广告与R&D投资策略提供理论和经验依据。

关键词: 负债, 广告投入, R&, D投入, 互补性, 刺激效应

Abstract: Combining output market with capital market and based on the capital structure industrial organization theory, how debt affects firm's advertising and R&D investment behavior along with what are the relationships between advertising and R&D innovation are studied in this paper. After theoretical and empirical analyzing, the following conclusions are achieved. Firstly, debt increases firm's advertising but inhibits R&D investment and different kinds of debts have different effects. Besides, firm's advertising and R&D behavior are different between different industries and manufacturing firms invest both of them while non-manufacturing firms only perform one of them. Moreover, advertising investment is complementary with R&D investment in manufacturing firms but it is competitive with R&D innovation in non-manufacturing firms. This study is valuable for the improving of capital structure industrial organization theory and helpful for firm's advertising as well as R&D competition strategy.

Key words: debt, advertising investment, R&D investment, complementary, stimulating effect

中图分类号:

F062.9

陈有华, 聂普焱, 彭璧玉. 债务约束下的企业广告与R&D投资研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(12): 142-149.

CHEN You-hua, NIE Pu-yan, PENG Bi-yu. Advertising and R&D Innovation under Debt Constraint[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2015, 23(12): 142-149.

参考文献

[1] Schumpeter J A. Capitalism, socialism and democracy[M]. New York, Harper:Routledge, 1942.

[2] Hirschey M. Intangible capital aspects of advertising and R & D expenditures[J]. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 1982, 30(4):375-390.

[3] William B. Correlations between advertising and R&D expenditures:Dealing with important intangibles[J]. South African Journal of Science, 2007, 103:94-98.

[4] Chauvin K W, Hirschey M. Advertising, R&D expenditures and the market value of the firm[J]. Financial Management, 1993, 22(4):128-140.

[5] Brander J A, Lewis T R. Oligopoly and financial structure:The limited liability effect[J]. The American Economic Review, 1986, 76(5):956-970.

[6] Maksimovic V. Capital structure in repeated oligopolies[J]. The RAND Journal of Economics, 1988, 19(3):389-407.

[7] 何枫,陈荣. R&D与广告对中日家电企业技术效率影响的比较研究[J].中国管理科学,2008,16(4):140-147.

[8] Andras T L, Srinivasan S S. Advertising intensity and R&D intensity:Differences across industries and their impact on firm's performance[J]. International Journal of Business and Economics, 2003, 2(2):167-176.

[9] Ho Y K, Keh H T, Ong J M. The effects of R&D and advertising on firm value:An examination of manufacturing and nonmanufacturing firms. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2005, 52(1):3-14.

[10] Matraves C. Market structure, R&D and advertising in the pharmaceutical industry. The Journal of Industrial Economics,1999,47(2):169-194.

[11] Graevenitz G V, Sandner P. Are advertising and R&D complements?. Working Paper,Ludwig Maximilians University,2009.

[12] Askenazy P, Breda T, Irac D. Advertising and R&D:Theory and evidence from france.Working Paper, Paris-Jourdan Science Economics, 2010.

[13] Carlton D W. Why barriers to entry are barriers to understanding[J]. The American Economic Review, 2004, 94(2):466-470.

[14] 席酉民,陆晓鸣.广告的动态最优控制模型[J]. 系统工程理论与实践,1998,18(8):11-18.

[15] 张荣,付宪法.企业最优R&D与广告投入策略分析[J]. 科技进步与对策,2010,27(14):86-90.

[16] Sutton J. Sunk costs and market structure:Price competition, advertising, and the evolution of concentration[M]. Massachusetts:MIT Press, 1991.

[17] Sutton J. Market structure:Theory and evidence[J]. Handbook of Industrial Organization, 2007,3:2301-2368.

[18] Tanr?sever F, Erzurumlu S S. Production, process investment, and the survival of debt-financed startup firms[J]. Production and Operations Management, 2012, 21(4):637-652.

[19] Haan M A, Toolsema L A. The strategic use of debt reconsidered[J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2008, 26(2):616-624.

[20] 童盼,陆正飞.负债融资、负债来源与企业投资行为[J].经济研究,2005,40(5):75-84.

[21] 姜付秀,刘志彪.行业特征、资本结构与产品市场竞争[J].管理世界,2006,(10):74-81.

[22] 徐峰,盛昭瀚,姚洪兴,等.延迟决策对一类双寡头广告博弈模型的影响分析[J].管理科学学报,2007,10(5):1-10.

[23] 刘端,陈收.上市公司权益与负债双重融资决策实证研究[J].管理科学学报,2009,12(1):125-136.

[24] Buehlmaier M M. Debt, equity, and information[J]. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 2014, 50:54-62.

[25] Gopinath S, Chintagunta P K, Venkataraman S. Blogs advertising and local-market movie box office performance[J]. Management Science, 2013, 59(12):2635-2654.

[26] Sena V, Higon D A.Productivity, R&D spillovers and educational attainment[J]. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 2014, 76(1):1-23.

[27] 泰勒尔.产业组织理论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1997.

[28] Liu L, Wang X H. Entry bias and product substitutability[J]. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 2013, 169(2):304-319.

[29] Sacco D, Schmutzer A. Is there a U-shaped relation between competition and investment?[J]. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 2011, 29 (1):65-73.

债务约束下的企业广告与R&D投资研究

Advertising and R&D Innovation under Debt Constraint

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	王昌荣, 马红, 王元月. 基于宏观经济政策视角的我国企业负债融资研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(5): 158-167.
[2]	杨晓花, 夏火松, 谷伟, 陈文磊. 内生时机下多阶段R&D博弈的均衡行动顺序[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(5): 83-90.
[3]	曾燕, 李仲飞, 朱书尚, 伍慧玲. 基于CRRA效用准则的资产负债管理[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(10): 1-8.
[4]	宋小保. 股权集中,投资决策与代理成本[J]. 中国管理科学, 2013, 21(4): 152-161.
[5]	黄炎 . 负债企业控制权转移的时机和均衡价格[J]. 中国管理科学, 2012, 20(5): 178-184.
[6]	冯宝军, 闫达文, 迟国泰. 基于非线性区间数风险控制的资产负债优化模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2012, (1): 79-90.
[7]	张春辉, 陈继祥. 考虑内生溢出与R&D投入的创新模式选择[J]. 中国管理科学, 2011, 19(3): 26-32.
[8]	李美娟, 陈国宏, 林志炳. 基于漂移度的组合预测方法研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2011, 19(3): 111-117.
[9]	张栋. 终极控制人、负责融资与企业非效率投资[J]. 中国管理科学, 2009, 17(6): 177-185.
[10]	王长峰. 研发项目过程风险管理方法综合集成问题研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2009, 17(4): 148-155.
[11]	方海燕, 达庆利. 基于差异产品的政府最优R&D补贴策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2009, 17(3): 166-172.
[12]	薛明皋. 具有技术许可联盟的R&D投资决策[J]. 中国管理科学, 2008, 16(4): 104-110.
[13]	何枫, 陈荣. R&D与广告对中日家电企业技术效率影响的比较研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2008, 16(4): 140-147.
[14]	房海滨, 王春峰. 基于利率风险的保险公司资产负债管理研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2007, 15(2): 9-14.
[15]	金秀, 黄小原. 资产负债管理多阶段模型及应用[J]. 中国管理科学, 2006, (5): 38-44.