渠道模式、努力投入与生鲜农产品供应链运作效率研究

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2015.12.013

中国管理科学 ›› 2015, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (12): 105-112.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2015.12.013

渠道模式、努力投入与生鲜农产品供应链运作效率研究

浦徐进^1,2, 范旺达¹, 吴亚¹

1. 江南大学商学院, 江苏无锡 214122;
2. 江苏食品安全研究基地, 江苏无锡 214122

收稿日期:2013-11-01 修回日期:2014-07-16 出版日期:2015-12-20 发布日期:2015-12-31
作者简介:浦徐进(1979-),男(汉族),江苏无锡人,江南大学商学院教授,博士,研究方向:农产品供应链管理.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金面上项目(71371086),江南大学自主科研计划重点项目(JUSRP51416B)

Study on Channel Mode, Efforts Input & Efficiency of Fresh Agricultural Products Supply Chains

PU Xu-jin^1,2, FAN Wang-da¹, WU Ya¹

1. Business School Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China;
2. Jiangsu Food Safety Research Base, Wuxi 214122, China

Received:2013-11-01 Revised:2014-07-16 Online:2015-12-20 Published:2015-12-31

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 归纳总结我国生鲜农产品供应链三种主要渠道模式的特征和内涵,对比分析不同渠道模式下的生产努力投入、销售努力投入以及供应链效用水平。研究结果表明:(1)农户的风险规避偏好是影响其选择不同渠道模式的关键因素;(2)当农户的风险规避程度较低时,农户应该选择采用自产自销模式,此时的生产努力投入和销售努力投入也较其他模式下更高。而当农户的风险规避程度较高时,加入"农超对接"供应链不仅有利于增进农户效用,而且也能提高生产努力投入和销售努力投入;(3)相比于松散型"农超对接"模式,紧密型"农超对接"模式是一种更优的选择,能够同时提高农户和超市双方的效用水平。

关键词: 生鲜农产品供应链, 模式选择, 农超对接, 努力投入

Abstract: In this paper, the feature and implications of three main different channel modes of fresh agricultural products supply chain in China are summarized. Using game theory approach to build different channel modes, production efforts, sales efforts and the total utility of the supply chain are analyzed. The results show that farmer's risk-aversion preference is the key factor to the choice of different channel modes, when the farmer holds a low degree of risk-aversion, he should choose the "direct to consumers" mode, and production and sales efforts will be higher than others. While the farmer holds a high degree of risk-aversion, it is better for him to take part in the "farmers to supermarket" mode for the reason of a higher utility, and the production and sales efforts will be higher. In particularly, compared with loose-type "farmers to supermarket" mode, symbiotic-type "farmers to supermarket" mode can both improve the production efforts of farmers and the sales efforts of the supermarket. This study will provide a valuable guidance to the decision of fresh agricultural products supply chains.

Key words: fresh agricultural products supply chain, mode choice, "farmers + supermarket", efforts input

中图分类号:

O225
F3064

浦徐进, 范旺达, 吴亚. 渠道模式、努力投入与生鲜农产品供应链运作效率研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(12): 105-112.

PU Xu-jin, FAN Wang-da, WU Ya. Study on Channel Mode, Efforts Input & Efficiency of Fresh Agricultural Products Supply Chains[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2015, 23(12): 105-112.

参考文献

[1] 新金融观察报. 农超对接多地遇冷:超市潜规则被指最大障碍[N].[2012-06-24]. http://finance.sina.com.cn/nongye/nyhgjj/20120624/120212385215.shtml.

[2] 人民日报.永辉超市的小生鲜如何生出大钱?[N].[2013-12-02]. http://money.163.com/13/1202/04/9F2I32IQ00253B0H.html.

[3] Hu Dinghuan, Reardon T, Rozelle S, et al. The emergence of supermarkets with Chinese characteristics:Challenges and opportunities for China's agricultural development[J].Development Policy Review.2004,22(5):557-586.

[4] Miyata S, Minot N, Hu Dinghuan. Impact of contract farming on income:Linking small farmers, packers, and supermarkets in China[J].World Development, 2009,37(11):1781-1790.

[5] 古川,安玉发,刘畅."农超对接"模式中质量控制力度的研究[J].软科学,2011,25(6):21-24.

[6] 刘李峰,张照新.超市与供应链上游主体农产品质量控制行为的博弈分析[J].中国农业经济评论,2006,4(3):376-387.

[7] 刘磊,乔忠,刘畅.农超对接模式中的合作博弈问题研究[J].管理工程学报,2012,26(4):100- 106.

[8] Catherine D, Humphrey J.Governance and trade in fresh vegetables:The impact of UK supermarkets on the African horticulture industry[J]. Journal of Development Studies,2000,37(2):147-176.

[9] Traill W B. The rapid rise of supermarkets[J].Development Policy Review,2006, 24(2):163-174.

[10] Wang Hongling, Dong Xiaoxia, Rozelle S, et al.Producing and procuring horticultural crops with chinese characteristics:The case of Northern China[J].World Development, 2009, 37(11):1791-1801.

[11] Federico G. Barbe T, Magdalena, et al. The challenges of a consolidated supply chain to British dairy farmers[J]. Social Research,2011,2(23):90-99.

[12] Michelson H, Reardon T, Perez F. Small farmers and big retail:Trade-offs of supplying supermarkets in Nicaragua[J].World Development,2012,40(2):342-354.

[13] 罗必良,刘成香,吴小立.资产专用性、专业化生产与农户的市场风险[J].农业经济问题, 2008,(7):10-15.

[14] Iannarelli A. Contractual frameworks and inter-firm co-operation in the agricultural sector[J]. Uniform Law Review-Revue, 2012, 17(1-2):247-262.

[15] 凌六一,郭晓龙,胡中菊,等.基于随机产出与随机需求的农产品供应链风险共担合同[J].中国管理科学, 2013,21(2):50-57.

[16] 熊万胜,石梅静.企业"带动"农户的可能与限度[J].开放时代.2011,(4):85-101.

[17] Xie Gang, Yue Wuyi, Wang Shouyang, et al. Quality investment and price decision in a risk-averse supply chain[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2011, 214(2):403-410.

[18] 孟卫东,代建生,熊维勤,等.基于纳什谈判的供应商——销售商联合促销线性合约设计[J].系统工程理论与实践, 2013, 33(4):870-877.

[19] Chiu C H, Choi T M. Supply chain risk analysis with mean-variance models:A technical review[J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2013,(5):1-19.

[20] Xu Guangye, Dan Bin, Zhang Xumei, et al. Coordinating a dual-channel supply chain with risk-averse under a two-way revenue sharing contract[J].International Journal of Production Economics, 2013,147(Part A):171-179.

渠道模式、努力投入与生鲜农产品供应链运作效率研究

Study on Channel Mode, Efforts Input & Efficiency of Fresh Agricultural Products Supply Chains

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 8

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	熊峰, 方剑宇, 袁俊, 金鹏. 盟员行为偏好下生鲜农产品供应链生鲜努力激励机制与协调研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(4): 115-126.
[2]	金亮. 不对称信息下“农超对接”供应链定价及合同设计[J]. 中国管理科学, 2018, 26(6): 153-166.
[3]	浦徐进, 金德龙. 生鲜农产品供应链的运作效率比较:单一“农超对接”vs.双渠道[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(1): 98-105.
[4]	刘凯宁, 樊治平, 李永海, 戴相全. 基于价值链视角的企业商业模式选择方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(1): 170-180.
[5]	张伟, 周根贵. 一次提前订购下生鲜农产品的最优订货[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(11): 138-144.
[6]	滕文波, 庄贵军. 基于电子渠道需求预测的渠道模式选择[J]. 中国管理科学, 2011, 19(5): 71-78.
[7]	张春辉, 陈继祥. 考虑内生溢出与R&D投入的创新模式选择[J]. 中国管理科学, 2011, 19(3): 26-32.
[8]	田银华, 周志强, 廖和平, 李石新. 基于BP神经网络的家族企业契约治理模式识别与选择研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2011, 19(1): 159-166.