基于案例推理的直觉模糊决策方法

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2015.07.014

中国管理科学 ›› 2015, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (7): 113-118.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2015.07.014

基于案例推理的直觉模糊决策方法

李鹏¹, 朱建军², 刘思峰²

1. 江苏科技大学经济管理学院, 江苏镇江 212003;
2. 南京航空航天大学经济与管理学院, 江苏南京 210016

收稿日期:2013-10-15 修回日期:2014-02-10 出版日期:2015-07-20 发布日期:2015-07-22
作者简介:李鹏(1980-),男(汉族),山东淄博人,江苏科技大学经济管理学院,博士,讲师,研究方向:决策分析、灰色系统理论.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(71401064,71171112);教育部人文社科基金(14YJCZH076);教育部博士基金(20133220120002);中国博士后基金(2014M560423);江苏省博士后基金(1401018C);江苏省高校哲社基金(2014SJB819);国家社科重点项目(14AGL001)

Intuitionistic Fuzzy Decision-making Methods Based on Case-based Reasoning

LI Peng¹, ZHU Jian-jun², LIU Si-feng²

1. College ofEconomics & Management, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang 212003, China;
2. College of Economics & Management, Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China

Received:2013-10-15 Revised:2014-02-10 Online:2015-07-20 Published:2015-07-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目前大多数决策方法的定权问题仅依靠决策矩阵而忽略了决策背景。针对上述问题,将案例推理方法融入到直觉模糊决策问题。首先根据直觉模糊数的内涵构建一种相似度公式,将案例推理模型跟相似度测度结合求得最优权重以及分类半径,进而进行择优排序。最后通过案例分析详细说明了本文方法的优势之处:根据决策数据又考虑专家意见,使得决策结果与现实情况更加一致,并提出一种解决面向直觉模糊决策问题的新思路。

关键词: 决策, 直觉模糊数, 相似度, 案例推理

Abstract: Most current decision methods of fixed weight problems rely on decision-making matrix and ignoring the background. Aiming at these problems, the method of case-based reasoning was fused into the intuitionistic fuzzy decision making problem. At first,according to the connotation of intuitionistic fuzzy numbers, a similarity formula was proposed. By combination of case-based reasoning model with similarity measure, the optimal weight and radius of classification were obtained, and by which the best alternative was gained.Finally, through case analysis details the advantages of this method were summarized as follows: this method not only took the decision data into consideration but also expert's advice, and made the decision results more consistent with the reality, and put forward a new idea to solve the problem of intuitionistic fuzzy decision making problems.

Key words: decision making, intuitionistic fuzzy number, similarity degree, case-based reasoning

中图分类号:

C934

李鹏, 朱建军, 刘思峰. 基于案例推理的直觉模糊决策方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(7): 113-118.

LI Peng, ZHU Jian-jun, LIU Si-feng. Intuitionistic Fuzzy Decision-making Methods Based on Case-based Reasoning[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2015, 23(7): 113-118.

参考文献

[1] Atanassov K . Intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1986, 20(1):87-96.

[2] Xu Zeshui. Some similarity measures of intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their applications to multiple attribute decision making[J]. Fuzzy Optimization Decision Making, 2007, 6(2):109-121.

[3] Li Dengfeng. Multi-attribute decision making models and methods using intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J]. Journal of Computer and System Science, 2005, 70(1):73-85.

[4] Wu Jianzhang, Zhang Qiang. Multicriteria decision making method based on intuitionistic fuzzy weighted entropy[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2011,38(1):916-922.

[5] Xia Meimei, Xu Zeshui. Entropy/cross entropy-based group decision making under intuitionistic fuzzy environment[J]. Information Fusion, 2012, 13(1):31-47.

[6] Liu Huawen, Wang Guojun. Multi-criteria decision-making methods based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J]. European Journal of Operations Research, 2007, 179(1):220-233.

[7] Yue Zhongliang. Deriving decision makers weights based on distance measure for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making[J]. Expert Systems with Applications,2011,38(9) :11665-11670.

[8] Wei Guiwu. Gray relational analysis method for intuitionistic fuzzy multiple attribute decision making[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2011;38(9):11671-11677.

[9] 李鹏,刘思峰,朱建军.基于前景理论的随机直觉模糊决策方法[J]. 控制与决策. 2012, 27(11):1601-1606.

[10] Chen Ye, Marc Kilgour D, Hipel K W. A case-based distance method for screening in multiple-criteria decision aid[J]. Omega,2008, 36(3): 373-383.

[11] Chen Ye, Kilgour D M, Hipel K W. Multiple criteria sorting using case-based distance models with an application in water resources management[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics,Part A, 2007, 37(5): 680-691.

[12] Chen S M, Tan J M. Handling multi-criteria fuzzy decision-making problems based on vague set theory[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1994, 67(2): 163-172.

[13] Ye Jun. Improved method of multicriteria fuzzy decision-making based on vague sets[J]. Computer Aided Design, 2007, 39(2):164-169.

[14] 徐泽水.直觉模糊信息集成理论及应用[M].北京:科学出版社, 2008.

[15] 张洪美,徐泽水,陈琦.直觉模糊集的聚类方法研究[J]控制与决策,2007,22(8):882-888.

[16] Wang Zhong, Xu Zeshui, Liu Shousheng, et al. A netting clustering analysis method under intuitionistic fuzzy environment[J]Applied Soft Computing,2011,11(8): 5558-5564.

[17] Xu Zeshui,Yager R R. Some geometric aggregation operators based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets[J].International Journal of GeneralSystem,2006,35( 4):417-433.

[18] 梁昌勇, 戚筱雯,丁勇,等.一种基于TOPSIS的混合型多属性群决策方法[J]中国管理科学,2012,20(4):109-117.

基于案例推理的直觉模糊决策方法

Intuitionistic Fuzzy Decision-making Methods Based on Case-based Reasoning

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	刘培德, 滕飞. 基于共识模型和ORESTE的扩展概率语言多属性群决策方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(3): 199-209.
[2]	王昱, 杨珊珊. 考虑多维效率的上市公司财务困境预警研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(2): 32-41.
[3]	邱慧, 闫相斌, 翟庆庆, 彭锐. 具有多阶段任务需求的温备份系统可靠性分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(2): 99-107.
[4]	徐贤浩, 王倩, 曾款, 彭红霞. 延迟支付条件下易逝品的最优订货决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(2): 108-116.
[5]	李磊, 张曙阳. 共识条件下最小最大妥协的直觉模糊数集结方法研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(2): 168-176.
[6]	王泽洲, 陈云翔, 项华春. 一种改进型专家模糊核聚类赋权方法研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(2): 177-183.
[7]	顾婧, 曾璐璇, 李雯欣, 徐泽水. 一类序贯决策方法的提出:透镜与直觉模糊信息的视角[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(1): 24-35.
[8]	潘永明, 邹丁华, 张志武. 基于碳标签制度的两级供应链协调机制研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(1): 109-115.
[9]	王治莹, 李勇建, 刘小弟. 考虑多种诱导信息下公众满意度的舆情危机响应决策方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(1): 207-216.
[10]	李鹏, 沈志杰. 基于Heronian平均算子的Pythagorean模糊不确定语言决策方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(1): 217-225.
[11]	郎骁, 邵晓峰. 消费者导向类型与电商全渠道决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(9): 164-175.
[12]	陈中洁, 于辉. 需求扰动下供应链反向保理的鲁棒决策[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(7): 89-101.
[13]	周品, 徐和, 陆芬. 存在议价能力和副产品协同生产的制造商最优产量决策[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(7): 156-163.
[14]	潘文军, 缪林. 考虑跨渠道退货的双渠道闭环供应链决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(6): 112-122.
[15]	钱丽丽, 刘思峰, 邓桂丰. 考虑后悔规避的灰色群体偏离靶心度决策方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(6): 193-200.