金融资产收益非对称性的多标度分形测度及其在VaR计算中的应用

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2015.03.002

中国管理科学 ›› 2015, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (3): 13-23.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2015.03.002

金融资产收益非对称性的多标度分形测度及其在VaR计算中的应用

王鹏^1,2, 袁小丽³

1. 西南财经大学中国金融研究中心, 四川成都 610074;
2. 金融安全协同创新中心, 四川成都 610074;
3. 西南财经大学金融学院, 四川成都 611130

收稿日期:2013-01-26 修回日期:2013-08-07 出版日期:2015-03-20 发布日期:2015-03-18
作者简介:王鹏(1981-),男(汉族),山东宁阳人,西南财经大学中国金融研究中心,博士,副教授,研究方向:金融工程与风险管理.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(71101119);西南财经大学和四川省教育厅创新团队建设项目(JBK130401)

A VaR Moldel Based on Multifractal Asymmetry Measurement

WANG Peng^1,2, YUAN Xiao-li³

1. Institute of Chinese Financial Studies, Southwest University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 610074, China;
2. Collaborative Innovation Center of Financial Security, Chengdu 610074, China;
3. School of Finance, Southwest University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130, China

Received:2013-01-26 Revised:2013-08-07 Online:2015-03-20 Published:2015-03-18

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 通过提炼多标度分形分析过程中所产生的对描述金融资产收益非对称特征有益的统计信息,提出了一种新的资产收益非对称测度——多标度分形非对称测度(Multifractal asymmetry measurement)Δf,并以沪深300指数长达7年左右的5分钟高频数据为实证样本,通过两种不同的VaR后验分析(Backtesting analysis)方法,实证对比了Δf测度和传统的偏度系数(Coefficient of skewness)测度在市场风险计算准确性方面的差异。实证结果表明:基于Δf测度的市场风险计算模型的VaR计算精度优于基于偏度系数测度的对应模型,Δf测度具有较偏度系数测度更为优异的对金融资产收益非对称特征的刻画能力。

关键词: 多标度分形理论, 非对称测度, 风险价值, 后验分析

Abstract: For describing asymmetry of financial returns, the validity of traditional measurement, i.e., skewness coefficient, is heavily dependent on the assumption that the data is independently and normally distributed. However, actual data in financial markets often has non-independent and non-normal distribution. So a new measurement should be explored to fit stylized facts of actual financial data. After a preliminary exploration for a long time, fractal analysis are found to provide highly targeted solutions for many problems in traditional research about asymmetry of financial returns. By refining useful statistical information to describe the asymmetric features of financial assets' yields during the process of multifractal analysis, a new asymmetry measurement (Δf) is constructed in this paper,whose theoretical properties is more excellent and are more suitable for typical statistical characteristics of actual financial data. Unconditional coverage test and conditional coverage test are used to compare the VaR computation accuracy differences for CSI 300 index between risk models augmented by the skewness coefficients and the Δf measurement. Empirical results show that the latter has higher VaR estimation accuracy. The new measurement which we present in this paper provides a more suitable tool for asymmetry testing to financial returns. Furthermore, this is a typical result of making use of statistical information embedded in the process of fractal analysis.

Key words: multifractal theory, asymmetry measurement, value at risk, backtesting analysis

中图分类号:

F224
F830

王鹏, 袁小丽. 金融资产收益非对称性的多标度分形测度及其在VaR计算中的应用[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(3): 13-23.

WANG Peng, YUAN Xiao-li. A VaR Moldel Based on Multifractal Asymmetry Measurement[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2015, 23(3): 13-23.

参考文献

[1] Christofferson P F. Elements of financial risk management[M]. San Diego: Academic Press, 2003.

[2] Korkie B, Sivakumar R, Turtle H J. Variance spillover and skewness in financial asset returns[J]. The Financial Review, 2006, 41(1): 139-156.

[3] Kendall M, Stuart A. The advanced theory of statistics[M]. London: McGraw-Hill Press, 1969.

[4] Engle R F. Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation[J]. Econometrica, 1982, 50(4): 987-1007.

[5] Mandelbrot B B. Fractals and scaling in finance[M]. New York: Springer Press, 1997.

[6] Mandelbrot B B. A multifractal walk down Wall Street[J]. Scientific American, 1999, 298(1): 70-73.

[7] 王鹏, 王建琼. 中国股票市场的多分形波动率测度及其有效性研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2008, 16(6): 9-15.

[8] Jiang Zhiqiang, Zhou Weixing. Multifractal analysis of Chinese stock volatilities based on the partition function approach[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2008, 387(19): 4881-4888.

[9] Calvet L, Fisher A. Multifractal volatility: Theory, forecasting, and pricing[M]. London: Academic Press, 2008.

[10] Ramirez J, Alvarez J, Solis R. Crude oil market efficiency and modeling: Insights from the multi-scaling autocorrelation pattern[J]. Energy Economics, 2010, 32(5): 993-1000.

[11] Schmitt F G, Ma Li, Angounou T. Multifractal analysis of the dollar-yuan and euro-yuan exchange rate before and after the reform of the peg[J]. Quantitative Finance, 2011, 11(4): 505-513.

[12] Faruk S, Ramazan G.Intraday dynamics of stock market returns and volatility [J]. Physica A, 2006, 367: 375-387.

[13] Lau H S, Wingender J R, Lau H L. On estimating skewness in stock returns[J]. Management Science, 1989, 35(9): 1139-1142.

[14] Christofferson P F. Elements of financial risk management[M]. San Diego: Academic Press, 2003.

[15] Korkie B, Sivakumar R, Turtle H J. Variance spillover and skewness in financial asset returns[J]. The Financial Review, 2006, 41(1): 139-156.

[16] Kendall M, Stuart A. The advanced theory of statistics[M]. London: McGraw-Hill Press, 1969.

[17] 陈雄兵, 张宗成. 基于修正GARCH模型的中国股市收益率与波动周内效应实证研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2008, 16(4): 44-49.

[18] Mcmillan D G, Speight A E. Volatility dynamics and heterogeneous markets[J]. International Journal of Finance and Economics, 2006, 11(1): 115-121.

[19] Poshakwale S, Aquino K. The dynamics of volatility transmission and informationflow between ADRs and their underlying stocks[J]. Global Finance Journal, 2008, 19(1): 187-201.

[20] Linden M. A model for return distribution[J]. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 2001, 6(2): 159-170.

[21] 王鹏, 王建琼. 中国股票市场的收益分布及其SPA检验[J]. 系统管理学报, 2008, 17(5): 542-547.

[22] 黄德龙, 杨晓光. 中国股票市场股指收益分布的实证分析[J]. 管理科学学报, 2008, 11(1): 68-77.

[23] Peters E E. Fractal market analysis: Applying chaos theory to investment and economics[M]. New York: Jone Wiley & Sons Press, 1994.

[24] Tolikas K, Gettinby G. Modelling the distribution of the extreme share returns in Singapore[J]. Journal of Empirical Finance, 2009, 16(2): 254-263.

[25] Matto T D. Multi-scaling in finance[J]. Quantitative Finance, 2007, 7(1): 21-36.

[26] Calvet L, Fisher A. Multifractal volatility: Theory, forecasting, and pricing[M]. London: Academic Press, 2008.

[27] Bai Manying, Zhu Haibo. Power law and multi-scaling properties of the Chinese stock market[J]. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2010, 389(9): 1883-1890.

[28] 汪富泉, 李后强. 分形几何与动力系统[M]. 哈尔滨: 黑龙江教育出版社, 1993.

[29] Sydney C L, Serena N. The empirical risk-return relation: A factor analysis approach[J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2007, 83(1): 171-222.

[30] Kupiec P.Techniques for verifying the accuracy of risk measurement models[J]. Journal of Derivatives, 1995, 3(2): 173-184

[31] Engle R F, Manganelli S. CAViaR: Conditional autoregressive value at risk by regression quantiles[J]. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 2004, 22(3): 367-381.

[32] Engle R F, Patton A. What good is volatility model?[J]. Quantitative Finance, 2001, 1(2): 237-245.

[33] Mcneil A J, Frey R. Estimation of tail related risk measures forheteroscedastic financial time series: An extreme value approach[J]. Journal of Empirical Finance, 2000, 7(3): 271-300.

[34] Talpsepp T, Rieger M O. Explaining asymmetric volatility around the world[J]. Journal of Empirical Finance, 2010, 17(8): 938-956.

金融资产收益非对称性的多标度分形测度及其在VaR计算中的应用

A VaR Moldel Based on Multifractal Asymmetry Measurement

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	柴尚蕾, 周鹏. 基于非参数Copula-CVaR模型的碳金融市场集成风险测度[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(8): 1-13.
[2]	吕永健, 符廷銮, 胡颖毅, 戴丹苗. 基于拔靴滤波历史模拟法的黄金市场VaR测度研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(7): 46-55.
[3]	张清叶, 高岩. 基于CVaR投资组合优化问题的非光滑优化方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2017, 25(10): 11-19.
[4]	代建生, 秦开大. 具有风险规避销售商的供应链最优回购契约[J]. 中国管理科学, 2016, 24(7): 72-81.
[5]	简志宏, 彭伟. 基于CAViaR模型的汇率隔夜风险研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(6): 17-24.
[6]	张晨, 丁洋, 汪文隽. 国际碳市场风险价值度量的新方法——基于EVT-CAViaR模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(11): 12-20.
[7]	黄金波, 李仲飞, 周先波. VaR与CVaR的敏感性凸性及其核估计[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(8): 1-9.
[8]	于文华, 魏宇, 淳伟德. 欧债危机环境中资产组合ES模型比较研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2014, 22(5): 8-15.
[9]	淳伟德, 陈王, 潘攀. 典型事实约束下的上海燃油期货市场动态VaR测度研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2013, (2): 24-31.
[10]	王鹏, 魏宇. 中国燃油期货市场的VaR与ES风险度量[J]. 中国管理科学, 2012, 20(6): 1-8.
[11]	魏宇 . 基于多分形理论的动态VaR预测模型研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2012, 20(5): 7-15.
[12]	王亦奇, 刘海龙, 张海亮. 结合资产配置策略测算收益保证的风险[J]. 中国管理科学, 2010, 18(2): 8-13.
[13]	李宏杰. 机会约束下的含有资本结构因子和交易成本的均值-VaR投资组合模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2008, 16(3): 31-36.
[14]	刘小茂, 杜红军. 金融资产的VaR和CVaR风险的优良估计[J]. 中国管理科学, 2006, (5): 1-6.
[15]	金秀, 黄小原, 马丽丽. 基于VaR的多阶段金融资产配置模型[J]. 中国管理科学, 2005, (4): 13-16.