基于不对称需求信息的供应链最小订购量决策

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.201.06.013

中国管理科学 ›› 2015, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (6): 99-106.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.201.06.013

基于不对称需求信息的供应链最小订购量决策

丁平^1,2, 付超^1,2, 肖明^1,2, 赵敬^1,2

1. 合肥工业大学管理学院, 安徽合肥 230009;
2. 过程优化与智能决策教育部重点实验室, 安徽合肥 230009

收稿日期:2013-07-24 修回日期:2014-05-05 出版日期:2015-06-20 发布日期:2015-07-22
作者简介:丁平(1973-),女(汉族),安徽安庆人,合肥工业大学管理学院博士,研究方向:物流与供应链管理.
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(71201043);教育部人文社科基金资助项目(12YJC630046);安徽省自然科学基金资助项目(1208085QG130)

Decisions on the Minimum Order Quantity of Supply Chain Based on Asymmetric Demand Information

DING Ping^1,2, FU Chao^1,2, XIAO Ming^1,2, ZHAO Jing^1,2

1. School of Management, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei 230009, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Process Optimization and Intelligent Decision-making, Ministry of Education, Hefei 230009, China

Received:2013-07-24 Revised:2014-05-05 Online:2015-06-20 Published:2015-07-22

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在由一个供应商和一个零售商组成的两级分散供应链中,供应商通过制定最小订购量取得规模效应,保障自身利益。当零售商和供应商之间存在需求信息不对称时,即零售商掌握需求信息而供应商仅知道需求信息中价格敏感因子的分布,如何进行最小订购量决策成为供应商面临的一个重要问题。针对这一问题,从营销视角构建了基于Stackelberg博弈的利润最大化模型。假设供应商知道需求的价格敏感因子服从正态分布,通过严密的数学推导确定了模型中的最优最小订购量。将提出的最优最小订购量决策方法应用于云存储的销售供应链中,确定了云存储供应商销售的最优最小存储容量,阐释了方法的合理性与有效性。通过实验研究发现,最小订购量的设置提升了供应商的利润。所提方法对于考虑最小订购量的供应链协调研究具有积极的推动作用。

关键词: 信息不对称, 最小订购量, 价格弹性需求, Stackelberg博弈

Abstract: In a two-hierarchical decentralized supply chain composed of a supplier and a retailer, the supplier generally protects his/her own profits by means of determining minimum order quantity (MOQ). Sometimes demand information is asymmetrical between the supplier and the retailer; that is, the retailer catches the complete demand information but the supplier only knows the distribution of price-sensitive factor in the demand information. In this situation, how to determine MOQ becomes an important problem that the supplier faces. For this problem, from the marketing point of view, a profit maximization model is constructed based on Stackelberg game. Suppose the supplier knows that the price-sensitive factor in the demand follows normal distribution. The optimal MOQ in the model is then determined by strict mathematical deduction. The proposed determination method of the optimal MOQ is applied in the sales supply chain to determine the optimal minimum storage capacity sold by cloud storage supplier, which demonstrates the rationality and validity of the proposed method. Experimental results show that setting MOQ by the proposed method exactly increases the profits of the supplier. More important, the proposed method can significantly promote the research on supply chain coordination considering MOQ.

Key words: asymmetric information, minimum order quantity, price-elastic demand, Stackelberg game

中图分类号:

F272

丁平, 付超, 肖明, 赵敬. 基于不对称需求信息的供应链最小订购量决策[J]. 中国管理科学, 2015, 23(6): 99-106.

DING Ping, FU Chao, XIAO Ming, ZHAO Jing. Decisions on the Minimum Order Quantity of Supply Chain Based on Asymmetric Demand Information[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2015, 23(6): 99-106.

参考文献

[1] Halati A, He Yuangjie. Analysis of supply chains with quantity based fixed incentives [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2010, 202(1): 214—222.

[2] Esmaeili M, Zeephongsekul P. Seller–buyer models of supply chain management with an asymmetric information structure [J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2010, 123(1): 146—154.

[3] Zhao Yao, Katehakis M N. On the structure of optimal ordering policies for stochastic inventory systems with minimum order quantity [J]. Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences, 2006, 20(2): 257—270.

[4] Fisher M, Raman A. Reducing the cost of demand uncertainty through accurate response to early sales [J]. Operations Research, 1996, 44(1): 87—99.

[5] Porras E, Dekker R. Controlling inventories in a supply chain: A case study [J], International Journal of Production Economics, 2005, 93-94(8): 179—188.

[6] Porras E, Dekker R. An efficient optimal solution method for the joint replenishment problem with minimum order quantities [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2006, 174(3): 1595-1615.

[7] Chen F Y, Krass D. Analysis of supply contracts with minimum total order quantity commitments and stationary demands [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2001, 131(2): 309—323.

[8] Zhou Bin, Katehakis M N, Zhao Yao. Managing stochastic inventory systems with free shipping option [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2009, 196(1): 186—197.

[9] 华国伟,李健,田歆,等. 带有免费送货选择的最优订货策略 [J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2010, 30(3): 506—512.

[10] Zhou Bin, Zhao Yao, Katehakis M N. Effective control policies for stochastic inventory systems with a minimum order quantity and linear costs [J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2007, 106(2): 523—531.

[11] Kiesmüller G P, de Kok A G, Dabia S. Single item inventory control under periodic review and a minimum order quantity [J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2011, 133(1): 280-285.

[12] Li Xiuhui, Wang Qinan. Coordination mechanisms of supply chain systems [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2007, 179(1): 1—16.

[13] 周永务,杨善林. 基于不对称需求信息的供应链协调定价 [J]. 系统工程学报, 2006, 21(6): 591—597.

[14] 丁平, 祁玉青, 闵杰. 价格弹性需求下基于最小订购量的契约及供应链收益分析 [J]. 计算机集成制造系统, 2013, 19(4): 850—858.

[15] 杜瑞芝. 关于积分中值定理的注记[J]. 高等数学研究, 2001, 4(4): 14—17.

[16] 陈康, 郑纬民. 云计算:系统实例与研究现状 [J]. 软件学报, 2009,20(5): 1337- 1348.

[17] Buyya R, Yeo C S, Venugopal S, et al. Cloud computing and emerging IT platforms: Vision, hype, and reality for delivering computing as the 5th utility [J]. Future Generation Computer Systems, 2009, 25(6): 599-616.

基于不对称需求信息的供应链最小订购量决策

Decisions on the Minimum Order Quantity of Supply Chain Based on Asymmetric Demand Information

PDF (PC)

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	高鹏, 杜建国, 聂佳佳, 朱宾欣. 消费者品牌忠诚对品牌商再制造市场策略的影响[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(1): 47-58.
[2]	潘永明, 邹丁华, 张志武. 基于碳标签制度的两级供应链协调机制研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(1): 109-115.
[3]	蒲勇健, 余沙, 黄毅祥. 中国电力市场长期产业组织架构与电价趋势研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2021, 29(1): 158-167.
[4]	林志炳. 基于网络外部性的绿色制造策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(9): 137-145.
[5]	马本江, 尹鹏华, 陈晓红, 徐赛雪. 逆向选择条件下带奖惩金的两期保险契约模型及其Pareto改进性研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(8): 30-41.
[6]	曹兵兵, 樊治平, 尤天慧, 刘春怡. 基于提前支付且考虑银行存贷的资金约束供应链最优定价决策[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(8): 52-64.
[7]	熊勇清, 李小龙, 黄恬恬. 基于不同补贴主体的新能源汽车制造商定价决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(8): 139-147.
[8]	赵志明, 王姚, 舒建平. 信息不对称下逆周期缓冲资本对银行投融资的影响[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(6): 13-23.
[9]	王珊珊, 张李浩, 范体军. 基于碳减排技术的竞争供应链投资均衡策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(6): 73-82.
[10]	孙红霞, 李晓芳, 周珍. 双渠道零售商和传统零售商的定价策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(6): 104-111.
[11]	金亮, 吴应甲, 赵新杰. 消费者退货对在线零售商促销与合同设计的影响研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(6): 123-136.
[12]	张盼, 余莉婷, 熊中楷. 政府奖惩下闭环供应链中信息不对称时的最优合同设计[J]. 中国管理科学, 2020, 28(5): 89-100.
[13]	龚本刚, 汤家骏, 程晋石, 刘志. 产能约束下考虑消费者偏好的双渠道供应链决策与协调[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(4): 79-90.
[14]	王宁宁, 樊治平, 王育彩. 电信服务与手机捆绑销售模式下考虑公平的均衡策略[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(3): 66-76.
[15]	金雁南, 田林. 信息不对称下供应链成员的决策顺序研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(11): 158-165.