Since China's reform and opening-up, although the complete energy intensity of manufacturing industry has showed a trend of decline overly, it remains high compared with developed countries. Considering the two factors of economic efficiency and energy utilization, how to further reduce the complete energy consumption of manufacturing industry has become a hot issue in academic circles. It is also an important content to measure the effect of energy saving and emission reduction in manufacturing industry. In this paper, embodied energy of manufacturing industry is taken into account and the formula of complete energy intensity of manufacturing industry is constructed based on direct and complete consumption coefficients of input-output model. Based on the Wuli-Shili-Renli system methodology, the factors system of complete energy intensity of manufacturing industry, which contains technology progress, FDI, enterprise scale, energy consumption structure, industrial structure, etc is built. Based on time series data from 1980 to 2016, the SVAR model is used to explore the influence law of various factors on complete energy intensity of manufacturing industry. All time series that has been counted in currency are deflated into the price of 1980. Impulse response results show that in the short term, enterprise scale, industrial structure, energy price, technology progress, FDI, etc., have a relatively great influence on complete energy intensity of manufacturing industry. With the increase of enterprise average scale, proportion of heavy industry and technological progress rate, complete energy intensity of manufacturing industry starts to reduce; with the increase of energy price and FDI, complete energy intensity of manufacturing industry starts to rise. In the medium-long term, enterprise scale, property right structure, energy price, industrial structure, technology progress, etc., have a relatively large influence on complete energy intensity of manufacturing industry. With the increase of the energy price, the proportion of state-owned enterprises, and technological progress rate, complete energy intensity of manufacturing industry goes down and then goes up; with the increase of enterprise average scale and the proportion of heavy industry, complete energy intensity of manufacturing industry goes up and then goes down. Variance decomposition results show that enterprise scale, energy price, property right structure, industrial structure and technological progress have great contributions on complete energy intensity of manufacturing industry. In order to reduce complete energy intensity of manufacturing industry, it is relatively outstanding to expand enterprise scale moderately, regulate energy price reasonably, promote diversification of property right structure, etc.. The research of this paper fills the insufficiency of the research field, which is about the influence law of various factors on complete energy intensity of manufacturing industry, and extends the research perspectives of energy intensity from the perspective of embodied energy of manufacturing industry. The research results have a significant reference value to the state for making energy saving and emission reduction policies of manufacturing industry and the further achievements in reducing complete energy intensity of manufacturing industry.
[1] Wei Yiming,Liang Qiaomei, Fan Ying,et al. A scenario analysis of energy requirements and energy intensity for China's rapidly developing society in the year 2020[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2006,73(4):405-421.
[2] 张炎治,聂锐,冯颖.基于投入产出非线性模型的能源强度情景优化[J].自然资源学报,2010,25(8):1267-1273.
[3] 李根,刘家国,赵金楼.基于投入产出非线性优化的制造业完全能耗强度情景分析[J].中国管理科学,2016,24(03):31-40.
[4] Wright D. Goods and services:An input-output analysis[J].Energy Policy,1974,2(4):307-315.
[5] Fredrich K,David R H. Growth and structural change in China's energy economy[J]. Energy,2009,(34):894-903.
[6] Liu Hongtao,Xi Youmin,Guo Jue,et al.Energy embodied in the international trade of China:An energy input-output analysis[J].Energy Policy,2010,38(8):3957-3964.
[7] 廖明球.基于"节能减排"的投入产出模型研究[J].中国工业经济,2011,(7):26-34.
[8] 闾浩,周德群,周鹏. 基于能源投入产出分析的节能减排政策研究[J]. 北京理工大学学报(社会科学版),2013,(4):34-41.
[9] 崔百胜,朱麟.基于内生增长理论与GVAR模型的能源消费控制目标下经济增长与碳减排研究[J].中国管理科学,2016,24(01):11-20.
[10] 孟庆春,黄伟东,戎晓霞.灰霾环境下能源效率测算与节能减排潜力分析——基于多非期望产出的NH-DEA模型[J].中国管理科学,2016,24(08):53-61.
[11] 王会娟,夏炎.中国居民消费碳排放的影响因素及发展路径分析[J].中国管理科学,2017,25(08):1-10.
[12] Ma Chunbo, Stern D I. China's changing energy intensity trend:A decomposition analysis[J].Energy Economics, 2008,30(3):1037-1053.
[13] 王玉潜.能源消耗强度变动的因素分析方法及其应用[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2003,(8):151-154.
[14] Alcántara V,Duarte R. Comparison of energy intensities in European union countries:Results of structural decomposition analysis[J]. Energy Policy,2004,32(2):177-189.
[15] 夏炎,杨翠红,陈锡康.基于可比价投入产出表分解我国能源强度影响因素[J].系统工程理论与实践,2009,29(10):21-27.
[16] 李玲,张俊荣,汤铃,等.我国能源强度变动的影响因素分析-基于SDA分解技术[J].中国管理科学,2017,25(09):125-132.
[17] Herrerias M J, Cuadros A, Orts V. Energy intensity and investment ownership across Chinese provinces[J].Energy economics,2013, 36(3):286-298.
[18] 蔡圣华,杜立民,毕清华.我国提高能源效率的目标设计[J].中国管理科学,2012, 20(3):152-160.
[19] 赵新刚,刘平阔. 经济增长与能源强度:基于面板平滑转换回归模型的实证分析[J].中国管理科学,2014, 22(6):103-113.
[20] 唐建荣,贾梨淙.能源价格与能源强度的耦合与内聚研究[J].软科学,2015,29(5):125-129.
[21] 陈庆江,杨蕙馨,焦勇.信息化和工业化融合对能源强度的影响[J].中国人口资源与环境, 2016,(1):55-63.
[22] 张国兴,高晚霞,张振华,等.产业协同是否有助于提升节能减排的有效性?——基于1052条节能减排政策的研究[J].中国管理科学,2017,25(03):181-189.
[23] 李力,王凤.中国制造业能源强度因素分解研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2008,(10):66-74.
[24] 郑若娟,王班班.中国制造业真实能源强度变化的主导因素-基于LMDI分解法的分析[J]. 经济管理, 2011,(10):23-32.
[25] 孙荣庭,孙林岩,何哲.制造业能耗强度影响因素的实证研究[J].中国科技论坛, 2008,(2):71-73.
[26] 孔婷,孙林岩,何哲.能源价格对制造业能源强度调节效应的实证研究[J].管理科学,2008,21(3):2-8.
[27] 冯泰文,孙林岩,何哲.生产性服务业影响制造业能耗强度的路径分析[J].科研管理, 2009, 30(4):80-88.
[28] 王一帆.我国制造业能源强度的影响因素分析[J].地理与地理信息科学,2011,27(6):50-54.
[29] 周龙权,叶仁道.中国制造业能耗强度变动的实证研究[J].杭州电子科技大学学报, 2013,(6):173-176.
[30] 王钰,张连城.中国制造业向低碳经济型增长方式转变的影响因素及机制研究[J].经济学动态, 2015,(4):35-41.
[31] 周五七.能源价格、效率增进及技术进步对工业行业能源强度的异质性影响[J].数量经济技术经济研究, 2016,(2):130-143.
[32] 吴振信,薛冰,王书平.基于VAR模型的油价波动对我国经济影响分析[J].中国管理科学, 2011,19(1):21-28.
[33] 张宏民,葛家理.我国能源经济复杂系统仿真研究[J].系统仿真学报,2002,(11):1443-1446.
[34] Dust C, Vigfusson R. The power of long-run structural vars[R].International Finance Discussion Paper, Federal Reserve Board, 2009.
[35] 高铁梅.计量经济分析方法与建模[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2009.
[36] Kcating J. Structural approaches to vector autoregressions[J]. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review,1992,74:31-56.
[37] Pfaff B. VAR,SVAR,and SVEC Models:Implementation within R package vars[J].Journal of Statistical Software,2008,27(4):1-32.
[38] 单豪杰. 中国资本存量K的再估算:1952-2006年[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2008,25(10):17-31.
[39] 邵军.中国工业部门能源使用效率及其影响因素研究[J].经济学家,2009,(1):58-65.
[40] 赵金楼, 李根, 苏屹,等.我国能源效率地区差异及收敛性分析——基于随机前沿分析和面板单位根的实证研究[J].中国管理科学, 2013, 21(2):175-184.
[41] 何凌云,程怡,金里程,等.国内外能源价格对我国能源消耗的综合调节作用比较研究[J].自然资源学报,2016,31(01):1-16.
[42] Chang M C. Energy intensity,target level of energy intensity and room for improvement in energy intensity:An application to the study of regions in the EU[J].Energy Policy,2014,67:648-655.
[43] Zeng Lin,Xu Ming,Liang Sai,et al. Revisiting drivers of energy intensity in China during 1997-2007:A structural decomposition analysis[J].Energy Policy,2014,67:640-647.
[45] Chontanawat J,Wiboonchutikula P,Buddhivanich A. Decomposition analysis of the change of energy intensity of manufacturing industries in Thailand[J]. Energy,2014,77:171-182.
