考虑交易模式和渠道权力结构的E-闭环供应链定价决策研究

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2023.1578

Abstract

Abstract:

With the development of mobile Internet technology and the popularization of e-commerce， more and more manufacturers choose to cooperate with online platforms to carry out sales and recycling business， thus forming an E-Closed Loop Supply Chain （E-CLSC）. However， in the process of cooperation between manufacturers and platforms， the diversity and complexity of transaction modes and channel power structures have an important impact on the pricing decisions of the supply chain. Meanwhile， with the wide application of carbon trading mechanism， it is also important to deeply analyze the role of carbon trading mechanism on E-CLSC.In view of this， both sales and recycling services are considered as endogenous variables in the context of the carbon trading mechanism， two transaction modes and three channel power structures are considered， six game models are constructed and the equilibrium results are derived by solving them respectively. Firstly， the role of carbon trading mechanism is analyzed in depth， then the equilibrium results concerning different channel power structures are compared and analyzed， and finally the two trading models are discussed through a set of numerical values.The results show that （1） the implementation of carbon trading mechanism is effective in controlling carbon emissions， but supply chain members should also pay attention to the impact of carbon price fluctuations on pricing and service decisions， specifically， the increase in carbon price will lead to an increase in retail and recycling prices， and the impact on the level of service is closely related to the transaction modes and the power structure of the channel. （2） E-CLSC optimal pricing and service decisions are significantly affected by differences in transaction modes and channel power structures. In the self-operated model， the Nash gaming supply chain has the lowest retail price， the highest recycling price， and the highest forward and reverse channel service level； while in the agency model， the platform-dominated supply chain has the lowest retail price， the highest recycling price， and the lowest forward and reverse channel service level. （3） From an economic point of view， members themselves tend to bring more revenue to themselves when they act as dominant players， and the choice of transaction mode depends on the level of commission. （4） From an environmental point of view， the dominant supply chain with the lowest carbon emissions is significantly affected by differences in transaction modes.

Key words: electronic closed-loop supply chain, carbon trading, platform services, channel power structure

CLC Number:

F275

Fuan Zhang,Hongxin Zhang,Qingli Da. E-Closed-Loop Supply Chain Decision Making Considering Trading Modes and Power Structures[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2025, 33(12): 294-305.

Figures/Tables 7

符号	含义说明
$a$	潜在市场需求
$b$	销售价格敏感系数
$γ$	销售服务敏感系数
$λ$	回收价格敏感系数
$η$	回收服务敏感系数
$c$	单位新产品的生产成本
$c r$	单位再制造产品的生产成本
$e n$	单位新产品的碳排放量
$e r$	单位再制造产品的碳排放量
$E$	碳配额
$p e$	单位碳交易价格
$G$	供应链碳排放量
$ρ$	基于销售价格的佣金率
$ρ 2$	回收佣金
$t$	表示通过再制造节约的单位成本
$e 0$	表示通过再制造节约的单位碳排放量
$π$	供应链成员的利润函数
决策变量
$w$	批发价
$p$	销售价格
$s$	销售服务水平
$p r$	回收价格
$s r$	回收服务水平
$h$	单位转移价格

变量	$W - M$ 模型（1）	$W - N$ 模型（2）	$W - P$ 模型（3）
$w$	$w W - M = a + b A 0 2 b$	$w W - N = a k 1 + A 0 (2 b k 1 - γ 2) 3 b k 1 - γ 2$	$w W - P = a k 1 + A 0 (3 b k 1 - γ 2) 4 b k 1 - γ 2$
$h$	$h W - M = A 1 2$	$h W - N = A 1 (η 2 - 2 k 2 λ) η 2 - 3 k 2 λ$	$h W - P = A 1 (η 2 - 3 k 2 λ) η 2 - 4 k 2 λ$
$p$	$p W - M = b A 0 A 2 + a (2 b k 1 - A 2) 2 b (b k 1 - A 2)$	$p W - N = 2 a k 1 + A 0 A 2 3 b k 1 - γ 2$	$p W - P = 3 a k 1 + A 0 A 2 4 b k 1 - γ 2$
$p r$	$p r W - M = A 3 (η 2 - k 2 λ) 2 (η 2 - 2 k 2 λ)$	$p r W - N = A 3 (η 2 - k 2 λ) η 2 - 3 k 2 λ$	$p r W - P = A 3 (η 2 - k 2 λ) η 2 - 4 k 2 λ$
$s$	$s W - M = (a - b A 0) γ 4 b k 1 - 2 γ 2$	$s W - N = (a - b A 0) γ 3 b k 1 - γ 2$	$s W - P = (a - b A 0) γ 4 b k 1 - γ 2$
$s r$	$s r W - M = - A 3 η λ 2 (η 2 - 2 k 2 λ)$	$s r W - N = - A 3 η λ η 2 - 3 k 2 λ$	$s r W - P = - A 3 η λ η 2 - 4 k 2 λ$
$D$	$D W - M = b k 1 (a - b A 0) 4 b k 1 - 2 γ 2$	$D W - N = b k 1 (a - b A 0) 3 b k 1 - γ 2$	$D W - P = b k 1 (a - b A 0) 4 b k 1 - γ 2$
$τ$	$τ W - M = k 2 A 1 (2 b k 1 - γ 2) λ 2 b k 1 (b A 0 - a) (η 2 - 2 k 2 λ)$	$τ W - N = k 2 A 1 (3 b k 1 - γ 2) λ 2 b k 1 (b A 0 - a) (η 2 - 3 k 2 λ)$	$τ W - P = k 2 A 1 (4 b k 1 - γ 2) λ 2 b k 1 (b A 0 - a) (η 2 - 4 k 2 λ)$

变量	$D - M$ 模型（1）	$D - N$ 模型（2）	$D - P$ 模型（3）
$p$	$p D - M = (a B 1 + b c) k 1 - c γ 2 ρ 2 B 0 B 1$ $+ p e e n B 0 2 B 0 B 1$	$p D - N = k 1 (a B 1 + b c + b p e e n) B 1 (b k 1 + B 0)$	$p D - P = 2 k 1 (a B 1 + b c) - c γ 2 ρ 2 B 1 (b k 1 + B 0)$ $+ p e e n (b k 1 + B 0) 2 B 1 (b k 1 + B 0)$
$p r$	$p r D - M = k 2 λ (B 2 + p e e 0) - η 2 ρ 2 2 k 2 λ$	$p r D - N = k 2 λ (B 2 + p e e 0) - η 2 ρ 2 2 k 2 λ$	$p r D - P = 14 (2 B 2 - η 2 ρ 2 k 2 λ + 2 p e e 0)$
$s$	$s D - M = γ ρ (a (B 1 + b c) k 1 2 k 1 B 0 B 1$ $- c γ 2 ρ + p e B 0 e n) 2 k 1 B 0 B 1$	$s D - N = γ ρ (a B 1 + b c + b p e e n) B 1 (b k 1 + B 0)$	$s D - P = a γ ρ 2 b k 1 - γ 2 ρ$
$s r$	$s r D - M = η ρ 2 k 2$	$s r D - N = η ρ 2 k 2$	$s r D - P = η ρ 2 2 k 2$
$D$	$D D - M = B 0 (c + p e e n) - a k 1 B 1 - 2 k 1 B 1$	$D D - N = b (B 0 (c + p e e n) B 1 (b k 1 + B 0)$ $- a k 1 B 1) B 1 (b k 1 + B 0)$	$D D - P = b (2 k 1 (a B 1 - b c) + c γ 2 ρ 2 B 1 (b k 1 + B 0)$ $- p e e n (b k 1 + B 0)) 2 B 1 (b k 1 + B 0)$
$τ$	$τ D - M = B 1 k 1 (k 2 λ (p e e 0 + B 2) k 2 (a k 1 B 1 - A 0 B 0)$ $+ η 2 ρ 2) k 2 (a k 1 B 1 - A 0 B 0)$	$τ D - N = B 1 (b k 1 + B 0) (k 2 λ (B 2 2 b k 2 (a k 1 B 1 - B 0 A 0)$ $+ p e e 0) + η 2 ρ 2) 2 b k 2 (a k 1 B 1 - B 0 A 0)$	$τ D - P = B 1 (b k 1 + B 0) (2 k 2 λ (B 2 + p e e 0) + η 2 ρ 2) 2 b k 2 (2 k 1 (a B 1 - b c) + c γ 2 ρ - p e (b k 1 + B 0) e n)$

References 23

[1]	王玉燕，李璟. 公平关切下基于网络平台销售、回收的E-闭环供应链的主导模式研究［J］. 中国管理科学， 2018， 26（1）： 139-151.
	Wang Y Y， Li J. Research on dominant models of E-CLSC based on network sale and recycle considering fairness concern［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science， 2018， 26（1）： 139-151.
[2]	刘凯. 平台主导型E-闭环供应链回收渠道、销售模式及协调机制研究［D］. 天津：天津理工大学， 2021.
	Liu K. Research on recovery channels， sales models and coordination mechanism of platform-oriented E- closed-loop supply chain［D］. Tianjin： Tianjin University of Technology， 2021.
[3]	Wang Y Y， Chen Y L， Cheng W， et al. Equilibrium analysis of transaction modes and recycling channels in a closed-loop supply chain with an online platform［J］. Computers & Industrial Engineering， 2023， 177： 109090.
[4]	Wang Y， Yu Z， Shen L， et al. Operational modes of E-closed loop supply chain considering platforms’ services［J］. International Journal of Production Economics， 2022， 251： 108551.
[5]	Chen L， Nan G F， et al. Wholesale pricing or agency pricing on online retail platforms： The effects of customer loyalty［J］. International Journal of Electronic Commerce，2018，22（4）：576-608.
[6]	Liu K， Li C， Gu R. Pricing and logistics service decisions in platform-led electronic closed-loop supply chain with remanufacturing［J］. Sustainability， 2021， 13（20）： 11357.
[7]	Wang Y， Fan R， Shen L， et al. Recycling decisions of low-carbon e-commerce closed-loop supply chain under government subsidy mechanism and altruistic preference［J］. Journal of Cleaner Production， 2020， 259： 120883.
[8]	白世贞，张雪莲，姜曼，等. 政府补贴下E-闭环供应链定价及回收服务决策［J］. 计算机应用与软件， 2020， 37（12）： 54-62.
	Bai S Z， Zhang X L， Jiang M， et al. Pricing and recycling service decision of e-closed loop supply chain under the government subsidy［J］. Computer Applications and Software， 2020， 37（12）： 54-62.
[9]	Wang Q， Chen K， Wang S， et al. Channel structures and information value in a closed-loop supply chain with corporate social responsibility based on the third-party collection［J］. Applied Mathematical Modelling， 2022， 106： 482-506.
[10]	王竟竟，许民利. 不同权力结构和联盟策略下风险规避型闭环供应链决策［J］. 中国管理科学， 2021， 29（9）： 111-122.
	Wang J J， Xu M L. Study on decisions of a closed-loop supply chain with risk aversion under different power structures and alliance strategies［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science， 2021， 29（9）： 111-122.
[11]	Chen H， Dong Z， Li G， et al. Remanufacturing process innovation in closed-loop supply chain under cost-sharing mechanism and different power structures［J］. Computers & Industrial Engineering， 2021， 162： 107743.
[12]	Wang T Y， Wang Z Q， He P. Impact of information sharing modes on the dual-channel closed loop supply chains under different power structures［J］. Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research， 2021， 38（2）： 2050051.
[13]	Gao J， Han H， Hou L， et al. Pricing and effort decisions in a closed-loop supply chain under different channel power structures［J］. Journal of Cleaner Production， 2016， 112： 2043-2057.
[14]	李春发，解雯倩，楚明森，等. 消费者细分下考虑不同主导者的E-闭环供应链定价决策［J］. 工业工程与管理， 2020， 25（3）： 94-102.
	Li C F， Xie W Q， Chu M S， et al. Pricing decision of E-closed-loop supply chain with different dominators under consumer segmentation［J］. Industrial Engineering and Management， 2020， 25（3）： 94-102.
[15]	Shen L， Wang X， Liu Q， et al. Carbon trading mechanism， low-carbon E-commerce supply chain and sustainable development［J］. Mathematics， 2021， 9（15）： 1717.
[16]	张桂涛，王广钦，赵欣语，等. 碳配额交易体系下闭环供应链网络的生产与碳交易策略研究［J］. 中国管理科学， 2021， 29（1）： 97-108.
	Zhang G T， Wang G Q， Zhao X Y， et al. Production and carbon trading strategy of closed-loop supply chain network under cap-and-trade system［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science， 2021， 29（1）： 97-108.
[17]	Wang Y， Yu T， Zhou R. The impact of legal recycling constraints and carbon trading mechanisms on decision making in closed-loop supply chain［J］. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health， 2022， 19（12）： 7400.
[18]	Xia X， Li M， Li B， et al. The impact of carbon trade on outsourcing remanufacturing［J］. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health， 2021， 18（20）： 10804.
[19]	Wang J， Shao W. Optimal decisions in the closed-loop supply chain considering capacity constraints and stochastic demand under the cap-and-trade regulation［J］. Complexity， 2022， 2022： 2600196.
[20]	张川，田雨鑫，崔梦雨. 电动汽车动力电池制造商混合渠道回收模式选择与碳减排决策［J］. 中国管理科学， 2024， 32（6）： 184-195.
	Zhang C， Tian Y X， Cui M Y. Selection of hybrid channel recycling modes and carbon emission reduction decisions for the electric vehicle battery manufacturer［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science， 2024， 32（6）： 184-195.
[21]	Sun Q， Chen H， Long R， et al. Comparative evaluation for recycling waste power batteries with different collection modes based on Stackelberg game［J］. Journal of Environmental Management， 2022， 312： 114892.
[22]	伊辉勇，刘佳. 碳交易政策下动力电池闭环供应链定价决策［J］. 计算机集成制造系统， 2024， 30（6）： 2228-2240.
	Yi H Y， Liu J. Dynamic pricing in power battery closed-loop supply chain with carbon trading policy［J］. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems， 2024， 30（6）： 2228-2240.
[23]	闫彦超，马祖军. “线上销售/回收+线下服务” 的闭环供应链定价与服务决策［J］. 中国管理科学， 2022， 30（1）： 175-184.
	Yan Y C， Ma Z J. Pricing and service decisions in a closed-loop supply chain with online sales/collection and offline services［J］. Chinese Journal of Management Science， 2022， 30（1）： 175-184.

E-Closed-Loop Supply Chain Decision Making Considering Trading Modes and Power Structures

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 7

References 23

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	Bo Wu, Jianheng Zhou. Incentives for Carbon Emission Reduction in the Supply Chain under the Demand and the Trading Price of the Emission Permit Uncertainty [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2025, 33(9): 349-358.
[2]	Zhongmiao Sun, Qi Xu. Dynamic Incentive Subsidy of Government for Renewable Energy Power Consumption under Blockchain Technology [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2025, 33(7): 346-359.
[3]	Jin Li, Heqi Jiang, Shengqi Ding, Haixia Zhang, Bei Wu. Research on Optimal Emission Reduction and Regulatory Policies for Competitive Supply Chains under Carbon Trading Mechanism [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2025, 33(7): 360-368.
[4]	Tingqiang Chen, Wenjuan Lin, Lei Wang, Lean Yu. Low-carbon Behavior Decision of Chemical Enterprises Based on Carbon Trading and Green Credit [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2025, 33(6): 322-334.
[5]	Guochang Fang,Yu He,Lixin Tian. Evolutionary Game Analysis of Government and Enterprises Carbon-reduction under the Driven of Carbon Trading [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(5): 196-206.
[6]	XIA Xi-qiang, LU Meng-yuan, LI Biao. Study on the Impact of Carbon Trading on Remanufacturing under Intellectual Property Protection [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(7): 115-125.
[7]	WANG Jing-jing, XU Min-li. Study on Decisions of A Closed-loop Supply Chain with Risk Aversion under Different Power Structures and Alliance Strategies [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2021, 29(9): 111-122.
[8]	WU Dan, YANG Yu-xiang. Study on the Differential Game Model for Supply Chain with Consumers' Low Carbon Preference [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2021, 29(4): 126-137.
[9]	LINGHU Da-zhi, WU Xin-li, YE Fei. Carbon Quota Allowance & Trading Mechanism Considering Double Heterogeneity [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2021, 29(3): 176-187.
[10]	LIAO Nuo, LU Chen, HE Yong. Research on the Strategy of Cooperative Emission Reduction in Supply Chain Involving ESCO under Carbon Trading Policy [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2021, 29(2): 160-167.
[11]	ZHANG Gui-tao, WANG Guang-qin, ZHAO Xin-yu, LIU Yang. Production and Carbon Trading Strategy of Closed-loop Supply Chain Network under Cap-and-Trade System [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2021, 29(1): 97-108.
[12]	ZHANG Ling-rong, WANG Jian, PENG Bo. Research on Emission Reduction Decision under the Trading Path of Carbon Quota Within and Outside the Supply Chain [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2020, 28(11): 145-154.
[13]	HUANG Shuai, FAN Zhi-ping. The Purchasing and Financing Strategies of Capital-constrained Retailer under Different Channel Power Structures [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2020, 28(1): 79-88.
[14]	LIAO Nuo, ZHAO Ya-li, HE Yong, ZHOU Ya. Effects of Carbon Trading Policies on Profit and Carbon Emission of Electric-coal Supply Chain Based on Simulation Analysis [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2018, 26(8): 154-163.
[15]	CAI Wu-gan, LI Guang-pei. Research on Enterprise Eco-innovation Strategy Based on Carbon Trading System [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2018, 26(12): 168-176.