基于价值流动的服务型制造协调超GERT网络

doi:10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2023.0149

Abstract

Abstract:

Service oriented manufacturing is promoting the accelerated integration of manufacturing and service industries. With the improvement of factor agglomeration configuration， service-oriented manufacturing creates new value added and promotes the improvement of production quality. However， in practice， there are many difficulties in generating value-added capabilities for service-oriented manufacturing. On the one hand， service-oriented manufacturing faces coordination difficulties in manufacturing， service， and innovation activities； On the other hand， there are too many elements within service-oriented manufacturing that need to be sorted out， and the insufficient flow of elements may lead to the suppression of value appreciation. In this context， a conceptual system of service-oriented manufacturing is constructed and the network structure of service-oriented manufacturing is examined. Form a network of manufacturing， service， and innovation activities based on production and operation relationships. Secondly， based on the analysis of the relationship between service-oriented manufacturing and value added， a network hierarchy guided by manufacturing value flow， service value flow， and innovation value flow is constructed. Combining network principles and preference utility， a service-oriented manufacturing super network system is constructed. Then， based on the balanced expression and value flow solution of the hypernetwork， combined with the production operation node characteristics and GERT network relationships of service-oriented manufacturing， a service-oriented manufacturing hyperGERT network system is constructed to clarify the value-added mechanism of service-oriented manufacturing under multi-dimensional value flow. Finally， the scale of value added at each node is calculated within service-oriented manufacturing $E y (m) = ∂ ∂ S m W i j (S 1, S 2, …, S m, …, S n) W i j (0,0, …, 0, …, 0) S 1 = S 2 = … = S m = … = S n = 0$ ， and the evolution of value added in service-oriented manufacturing is analyzed from both static and dynamic perspectives， as well as the adjustment mechanism for value added. Research has found that：（1） in the value network， the manufacturing value flow under manufacturing relationships forms a “U” pattern along the industrial chain； The service value flow around the market is strong， and the value flow in the service network shows a “√” flow trend； The innovation value network mainly relies on the innovation chain to expand， with a trend of point like emission characteristics. （2） The increase in intrinsic value flow leads to the disorder of value-added in service-oriented manufacturing. Optimizing the input-output system under value allocation is the key to guiding service-oriented manufacturing enterprises to surpass traditional development models；（3） The value-added of service-oriented manufacturing shows significant differentiation on the input-output side， but the overall value structure performance is better， and the value-added ability of each node is good；（4） Each node has different preferences for dependence on various value flows， but there is a clear law of diminishing marginal utility of value flows. During the process of value appreciation， invalid value streams must be stripped off.

Key words: service-oriented manufacturing, value flow, coordination supernetwork, equilibrium analysis, simulation analysis, value network

CLC Number:

F272

Hongda Liu,Haifeng Zhao,Ying Zhang. Service-oriented Manufacturing Coordination Super-GERT Network Based on Value Flow[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2025, 33(11): 125-138.

Figures/Tables 8

References 21

[1]	Frohlich M T， Westbrook R. Demand chain management in manufacturing and services： Web-based integration， drivers and performance［J］. Journal of Operations Management， 2002， 20（6）： 729-745.
[2]	苏昕，牟春兰，张正. 服务型制造价值共创机理与实现路径研究—基于服务生态系统视角［J］. 宏观经济研究， 2021（1）：96-104+130.
	Su x， Mou C L， Zhang Z. A Study on the mechanism and realization path of service-oriented manufacturing value co-creation： Based on the perspective of service ecosystem［J］.Macroeconomics，2021（1）：96-104+130.
[3]	Liu X， Mattoo A， Wang Z， et al. Services development and comparative advantage in manufacturing［J］. Journal of Development Economics， 2020， 144： 102438.
[4]	Bamieh O， Fiorini M， Hoekman B， et al. Services input intensity and US manufacturing employment responses to the China shock［J］. Review of Industrial Organization， 2020， 57（2）： 333-349.
[5]	Yacoub G， Storey C， Haefliger S. Appropriability mechanisms for manufacturing and service firms： The contingencies of openness and knowledge intensity［J］. R&D Management， 2020， 50（5）： 551-572.
[6]	Peng F， Peng L， Wang Z. How do VAT reforms in the service sectors impact TFP in the manufacturing sector： Firm-level evidence from China［J］. Economic Modelling， 2021， 99： 105483.
[7]	Zhao Y， Liu D， Zhang W， et al. Top management service commitment and new product development in manufacturing firms： The moderating role of dysfunctional competition［J］. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing， 2022， 37（1）： 14-28.
[8]	Gebauer H， Fleisch E， Friedli T. Overcoming the service paradox in manufacturing companies［J］. European Management Journal， 2005， 23（1）： 14-26.
[9]	Kaihara T， Nishino N， Ueda K， et al. Value creation in production：Reconsideration from interdisciplinary approaches［J］. CIRP Annals， 2018， 67（2）： 791-813.
[10]	Wong D T W， Ngai E W T. Supply chain innovation： Conceptualization， instrument development， and influence on supply chain performance［J］. Journal of Product Innovation Management， 2022， 39（2）： 132-159.
[11]	Tong Y， Tang Z， Zhou K， et al. A service oriented manufacturing grid system with uncertain information［J］. Kybernetes， 2014， 43（5）： 764-782.
[12]	Wu Y， He F， Zhang D， et al. Service-oriented feature-based data exchange for cloud-based design and manufacturing［J］. IEEE Transactions on Services Computing， 2018， 11（2）： 341-353.
[13]	Zhao B， Kreuter U， Li B， et al. An ecosystem service value assessment of land-use change on Chongming Island， China［J］.Land Use Policy，2004，21（2）： 139-148.
[14]	Falkenreck C， Wagner R. From managing customers to joint venturing with customers： Co-creating service value in the digital age［J］. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing， 2022， 37（3）： 643-656.
[15]	Roper S， Du J， Love J H. Modelling the innovation value chain［J］. Research Policy， 2008， 37（6-7）： 961-977.
[16]	Hall J K， Martin M J C. Disruptive technologies， stakeholders and the innovation value-added chain： A framework for evaluating radical technology development［J］. R&D Management， 2005， 35（3）： 273-284.
[17]	Liu X， Fang Z， Zhang N. A value transfer GERT network model for carbon fiber industry chain based on input–output table［J］. Cluster Computing， 2017， 20（4）： 2993-3001.
[18]	俞斌，方志耕，杨保华，等.一种新的价值流动GERT网络模型及其应用［J］.系统工程，2009，27（7）： 43-48.
	Yu B， Fang Z G， Yang B H， et al. A new GERT network model and its application based on value flow process［J］. Systems Engineering， 2009， 27（7）： 43-48.
[19]	郭本海，陈玮，吕东东. 基于GERT网络的战略性新兴产业技术瓶颈探测模型［J］. 系统管理学报， 2017， 26（4）： 728-736.
	Guo B H， Chen W， Lu D D. A GERT network model for detection of technology bottleneck in strategic emerging industry［J］. Journal of Systems & Management， 2017， 26（4）： 728-736.
[20]	Liu X， Fang Z G， Zhang N. A value transfer GERT network model for carbon fiber industry chain based on input-output table［J］. Cluster Computing， 2017， 20（4）： 2993-3001.
[21]	Hobo M， Watanabe C， Chen C. Double spiral trajectory between retail， manufacturing and customers leads a way to service oriented manufacturing［J］. Technovation， 2006， 26（7）： 873-890.

链际活动	概率	价值流效用参数				贡献度
链际活动	概率	M	S	O	E	M	S	O	E
(1,1)	0.27	0.262	0.405	0.562	0.785	0.3	0.3	0.2	0.2
(1,2)	0.32	0.318	0.322	0.713	0.813
(1,3)	0.12	0.402	0.266	0.294	0.614
(1,5)	0.04	0.281	0.395	0.273	0.362
(1,6)	0.25	0.514	0.273	0.402	0.703
(2,2)	0.38	0.136	0.377	0.683	0.516	0.05	0.35	0.25	0.35
(2,6)	0.53	0.378	0.362	0.617	0.582	0.05	0.35	0.25	0.35
(3,3)	0.10	0.306	0.295	0.342	0.407	0.3	0.15	0.15	0.4
(3,4)	0.23	0.416	0.317	0.368	0.479
(3,5)	0.05	0.298	0.301	0.267	0.392
(3,6)	0.56	0.601	0.372	0.353	0.639
(4,4)	0.22	0.311	0.396	0.361	0.403	0.25	0.4	0.1	0.25
(4,5)	0.04	0.325	0.299	0.281	0.307
(4,6)	0.43	0.503	0.322	0.317	0.486
(4,7)	0.26	0.329	0.387	0.336	0.422
(5,5)	0.17	0.298	0.374	0.369	0.391	0.35	0.15	0.25	0.25
(5,6)	0.40	0.407	0.341	0.362	0.439
(5,7)	0.36	0.298	0.416	0.402	0.491
(6,6)	0.63	0.523	0.298	0.474	0.602
(6,7)	0.34	0.424	0.467	0.413	0.471
(7,7)	0.32	0.193	0.581	0.505	0.469	0.2	0.4	0.25	0.15
(7,8)	0.68	0.201	0.628	0.699	0.562	0.2	0.4	0.25	0.15

维度	节点	价值转移概率P	价值增值量					价值增值系数N
维度	节点	价值转移概率P	制造价值增量M	服务价值增量S	创新价值增量O	要素价值增量E	价值增量总和V	制造价值增量系数	服务价值增量系数	创新价值增量系数	要素价值增量系数	价值增值总和系数
产出视角	(1,8)	0.982	2.08122	2.04804	2.39277	2.41998	8.94202	3.11937	3.08558	3.43664	3.46434	10.10593
	(2,8)	0.77829	1.5485	1.72806	2.44623	2.33354	8.05632	2.98962	3.22034	4.14309	3.9983	11.35135
	(3,8)	0.84233	1.19226	1.0893	1.32071	1.542	5.14428	2.41543	2.2932	2.56792	2.83064	7.10719
	(4,8)	0.33634	1.41834	1.73228	1.86129	1.9982	7.01012	5.217	6.1504	6.53395	6.94102	21.84237
	(5,8)	0.87255	1.18524	1.60675	1.74517	1.80652	6.34368	2.35837	2.84145	3.0001	3.0704	8.27032
	(6,8)	0.91053	1.44859	1.69982	1.95093	2.05862	7.15797	2.59093	2.86686	3.14264	3.26091	8.86134
	(7,8)	1	0.29175	0.90118	0.93645	0.78252	2.9119	1.29175	1.90118	1.93645	1.78252	3.9119
投入视角	(1,7)	0.41224	0.57559	0.34415	0.44574	0.59712	1.96259	2.39624	1.83481	2.08125	2.44846	5.76075
	(1,6)	0.31587	1.33985	1.13203	1.2323	1.41976	5.12395	5.24184	4.58388	4.90134	5.49482	17.22187
	(1,5)	0.03448	0.02579	0.02417	0.01994	0.03096	0.10086	1.74802	1.70115	1.57844	1.8979	3.92552
	(1,4)	0.04209	0.03993	0.03224	0.03824	0.06018	0.17059	1.94868	1.76589	1.90855	2.42979	5.05291
	(1,3)	0.16498	0.08246	0.06883	0.08312	0.14965	0.38407	1.49982	1.41722	1.50384	1.9071	3.32798
	(1,2)	0.44324	0.16137	0.14615	0.29382	0.40322	1.00456	1.36406	1.32974	1.6629	1.90972	3.26641
	(1,1)	0.36986	0.13435	0.20768	0.28818	0.40254	1.03275	1.36324	1.5615	1.77917	2.08835	3.79226

活动 (i,j)	(1,8)		(2,8)		(3,8)		(4,8)
活动 (i,j)	V	变化（%）	V	变化（%）	V	变化（%）	V	变化（%）
基准	8.94202	——	8.05632	——	5.14428	——	7.01012	——
M(+10%)	9.13119	2.12	8.21117	1.92	5.26351	2.32%	7.15195	2.02
M(+20%)	9.31578	4.18	8.35664	3.73	5.37572	4.50%	7.28869	3.97
M(+30%)	9.48238	6.04	8.48125	5.28	5.46794	6.29%	7.41092	5.72
S(+10%)	9.13521	2.16	8.22913	2.15	5.25321	2.12%	7.18335	2.47
S(+20%)	9.32372	4.27	8.39275	4.18	5.35233	4.04%	7.34797	4.82
S(+30%)	9.48998	6.13	8.53512	5.94	5.42873	5.53%	7.4968	6.94
O(+10%)	9.19128	2.79	8.30095	3.04	5.27635	2.57%	7.19625	2.66
O(+20%)	9.42586	5.41	8.53623	5.96	5.39542	4.88%	7.37797	5.25
O(+30%)	9.61056	7.48	8.73121	8.38	5.49688	6.85%	7.5461	7.65
E(+10%)	9.22372	3.15	8.28968	2.90	5.29848	3.00%	7.20994	2.85
E(+20%)	9.49098	6.14	8.49604	5.46	5.43798	5.71%	7.39856	5.54
E(+30%)	9.73662	8.89	8.66232	7.52	5.56931	8.26%	7.57728	8.09
活动 (i,j)	(5,8)		(6,8)		(7,8)
活动 (i,j)	V	变化（%）	V	变化（%）	V	变化（%）
基准	6.34368	——	7.15797	——	2.9119	——
M(+10%)	6.46221	1.87	7.30282	2.02	2.94108	1.00
M(+20%)	6.57663	3.67	7.44069	3.95	2.96825	1.94
M(+30%)	6.67926	5.29	7.57174	5.78	2.97203	2.07
S(+10%)	6.50436	2.53	7.32795	2.38	3.00202	3.10
S(+20%)	6.65823	4.96	7.48683	4.59	3.08754	6.03
S(+30%)	6.79471	7.11	7.62521	6.53	3.16249	8.61
O(+10%)	6.5182	2.75	7.35306	2.73	3.00555	3.22
O(+20%)	6.67982	5.30	7.53965	5.33	3.08617	5.99
O(+30%)	6.82625	7.61	7.70065	7.58	3.15127	8.22
E(+10%)	6.52433	2.85	7.36383	2.88	2.99016	2.69
E(+20%)	6.69929	5.61	7.53519	5.27	3.05931	5.06
E(+30%)	6.85244	8.02	7.67542	7.23	3.11746	7.06

活动 (i,j)	(1,1)		(1,2)		(1,3)		(1,4)
活动 (i,j)	V	变化（%）	V	变化（%）	V	变化（%）	V	变化（%）
基准	1.03275	——	1.00456	——	0.38407	——	0.17059	——
M(+10%)	1.04618	1.30	1.0066	0.20	0.39232	2.15	0.17459	2.34
M(+20%)	1.05739	2.39	1.00812	0.36	0.39856	3.77	0.17824	4.48
M(+30%)	1.06825	3.44	1.01022	0.56	0.39981	4.10	0.18007	5.56
S(+10%)	1.05351	2.01	1.0049	0.03	0.39096	1.79	0.17382	1.89
S(+20%)	1.07182	3.78	1.00512	0.06	0.39663	3.27	0.17592	3.13
S(+30%)	1.08835	5.38	1.00543	0.09	0.40172	4.60	0.17746	4.03
O(+10%)	1.06157	2.79	1.00234	-0.22	0.39238	2.17	0.17442	2.24
O(+20%)	1.08148	4.72	1.00007	-0.45	0.40012	4.18	0.17804	4.37
O(+30%)	1.1018	6.69	0.99339	-1.11	0.402	4.67	0.17997	5.50
E(+10%)	1.073	3.90	1.00885	0.43	0.39904	3.90	0.17661	3.53
E(+20%)	1.10135	6.64	1.01227	0.77	0.41361	7.69	0.18164	6.48
E(+30%)	1.12731	7.76	1.01586	0.92	0.42033	7.14	0.18761	7.46
活动 (i,j)	(1,5)		(1,6)		(1,7)
活动 (i,j)	V	变化（%）	V	变化（%）	V	变化（%）
基准	0.10086	——	5.12395	——	1.96259	——
M(+10%)	0.10344	2.56	5.14183	0.35	2.02097	2.97
M(+20%)	0.10598	5.08	5.15712	0.65	2.06983	5.46
M(+30%)	0.1075	6.58	5.1673	0.85	2.11219	7.62
S(+10%)	0.10328	2.40	5.13715	0.26	1.99683	1.75
S(+20%)	0.10543	4.53	5.14985	0.51	2.02995	3.43
S(+30%)	0.10699	6.08	5.15785	0.66	2.05896	4.91
O(+10%)	0.10286	1.98	5.14718	0.45	2.00809	2.32
O(+20%)	0.10475	3.86	5.16821	0.86	2.04976	4.44
O(+30%)	0.10636	5.46	5.18584	1.21	2.08689	6.33
E(+10%)	0.10396	3.07	5.15638	0.63	2.02332	3.09
E(+20%)	0.10697	6.06	5.17766	1.05	2.08297	6.13
E(+30%)	0.10915	5.52	5.19023	0.94	2.13983	5.88

Service-oriented Manufacturing Coordination Super-GERT Network Based on Value Flow

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 8

References 21

Related Articles 14

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

[1]	Xiang Liu,Zhaojun Yang,Suhua Liu. Bayesian Equilibrium Analysis with Information Asymmetry and Credit Guarantee [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(7): 1-10.
[2]	Cheng Cheng,Runfei An,Kangyin Dong,Xiaohang Ren,Zhen Wang,Guohao Zhao. Research on Innovation Strategy for Renewable Power Generation Enterprises under the Background of Carbon Trading Mechanism——from the Perspective of Evolutionary Game [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(3): 82-94.
[3]	Rongjian Xie, Yucai Jia, Xiaoyue Mu, Feng Wang. Analysis of Decision-Making Behavior of Tripartite Stakeholders in the Farmland Transfer [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2024, 32(11): 37-52.
[4]	Guo-qiang SUN,Yu-fei XIE. Blockchain Technology, Supply Chain Networks and Data Sharing: Based on the Perspective of Evolutionary Game [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2023, 31(12): 149-162.
[5]	FENG Chang-li, MA Rui-ze. Analysis of Evolutionary Game between Manufacturing Enterprises and Service Providers Based on Servitization [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(6): 263-274.
[6]	WANG Jing-yi, SHE Jin-feng, DONG Shuang. Value Network Analysis and Driver Paths Study for Organizational Safety Behaviors in Megaproject Based on SVN [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2022, 30(5): 275-286.
[7]	ZHU Li-long, RONG Jun-mei, Zhang Si-yi. Three-party Evolutionary Game and Simulation Analysis of Drug Quality Supervision under the Government Reward and Punishment Mechanism [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2021, 29(11): 55-67.
[8]	ZHU Li-long, RONG Jun-mei. Drug Quality Supervision Strategy Considering Patient Feedback Mechanism under the Background of “Internet+Medical Health” [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2020, 28(5): 122-135.
[9]	GONG Zhi-wen, CHEN Jin-long. Study on the Incentive Mechanism of Internal Capital Transfer in Enterprise Groups based on Evolutionary Game [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2017, 25(4): 26-32.
[10]	JIANG Ji-hai, CAI Chun-hua. An Empirical Study on Relationship Between Internal Attributes of OpenBusiness Model and Value Creation [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2016, 24(5): 100-110.
[11]	XU Bing, YANG Jin-mei. Research on the Competition of Closed-loop Supply Chains and Coordinative Contract Design within Supply Chain under Determinant Functions of Product Demand and Used Product Supply [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2014, 22(2): 48-55.
[12]	ZHANG Ya-qi, CHEN Ju-hong, GUO Fu-li, LI Sai-sai. Cross Selecting and Equilibrium Analysis in 2-2 Substitutable Product Supply Chain Under Hybrid Distribution Channels [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2013, (1): 98-104.
[13]	GUO Chun-rong, CHEN Gong-yu. Price Competition and Equilibrium Analysis in Supply Chain with Double Hybrid Distribution Channels [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2009, 17(3): 65-71.
[14]	CHEN Yan-tai, CHEN Guo-hong, LI Mei-juan. Research on Determining Weights of Combination Evaluation Method Using Cooperative Games [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2005, (3): 89-94.