中国管理科学 ›› 2012, Vol. ›› Issue (3): 167-174.
胡锋, 赵红, 王焱, 赵宇彤
收稿日期:2011-11-23
修回日期:2012-02-29
出版日期:2012-06-29
发布日期:2012-07-05
基金资助:HU Feng, ZHAO Hong, WANG Yan, ZHAO Yu-tong
Received:2011-11-23
Revised:2012-02-29
Online:2012-06-29
Published:2012-07-05
摘要: 本文在系统梳理现有品牌重叠相关理论的基础上,重新给出了品牌重叠的定义、界定了四种品牌重叠类型。在此基础上以品牌无形特征中的品牌个性构造品牌重叠维度,基于感知品牌定位视角,以中国手机市场为例,对无形感知品牌重叠进行了实证分析。定量分析中本文创新性地引入由最小误判率构造的两两品牌之间的相似矩阵,以此为基础进行MDS分析并用直观的二维图给出了7个手机品牌在品牌个性维度上的相似程度。进一步经过模糊C聚类得到4个手机品牌类别:高功能类、高情感类、中情感低功能类和低情感低功能类。本文最后给出相应的研究结论和未来研究方向。
中图分类号:
胡锋,赵红,王焱, 等. 品牌重叠测度理论模型及实证研究 [J]. 中国管理科学, 2012, (3): 167-174.
HU Feng,ZHAO Hong,WANG Yan, et al. Empirical Study on the Theoretical Model of Brand Overlap Measurement[J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2012, (3): 167-174.
| [1] Kaplan B M. Zapping-the real issue is communication [J]. Journal of Advertising Research, 1985, 25(2): 9-12. [2] Simon H A.Models of a man: social and rational [M]. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons, 1957. [3] Schiffman L G, Kanuk L L. Consumer behavior [M]. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2007. [4] Brown T J, Dacin P A, Pratt M G, et al. Identity, intended image, construed image and reputation: an interdisciplinary framework and suggested terminology [J]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2006, 34(2): 99-106. [5] Krishnan S H. Characteristics of memory associations: a consumer-based brand equity perspective [J]. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 1996,13: 389-405. [6] Jain S C. Market planning & strategy [M]. Cincinnati: South-Western College Publishing, 2000. [7] Crawford M C. A new positioning typology [J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 1985, 2: 243-253. [8] Kerin R A, Hartley S W, Rudelius W. Marketing: the core [M]. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2007. [9] Keller K L. Strategic brand management [M]. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2008. [10] de Chernatony L. Brand management through narrowing the gap between brand identity and brand reputation [J]. Journal of Marketing Management, 1999, 15: 157-179. [11] Forsythe S. Effect of private, designer and national brand names on shoppers' percerption of apparel quality and price [J]. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 1991, 9: 1-6. [12] Abraham-Murali L. Consumers' conceptualization of apparel attributes [J]. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 1995, 13: 65-74. [13] Chakravarti D, MacInnis D J,Nakamoto K. Product category perceptions, elaborative processing and brand name extension strategies [J]. Advances in Consumer Research, 1990, 17(1): 910-916. [14] Smith D C, Andrews J. Rethinking the effect of perceived fit on customers' evaluations of new products[J]. Journal of The Academy of Marketing Science, 1995, 23(1): 4-14. [15] Bhat S, Reddy S K. The impact of parent brand attribute associations and affect on brand extension evaluation [J]. Journal of Business Research, 2001,53(3): 111-122. [16] Park C W, Milberg S, Lawson R. Evaluation of brand extensions: the role of product feature similarity and brand concept consistency [J]. Journal of Consumer Research, 1991,18(2): 185-193. [17] Escalas J E, Bettman J R. You are what they eat: the influence of reference groups on consumers' connections to brands [J]. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2003, 13(3): 339-348. [18] Plummer J T. Brand personality: a strategic concept for multinational advertising. Marketing Educators' Conference, New York: Young & Rubicam, 1985. [19] Plummer J T. How personality makes a difference [J]. Journal of Advertising Research, 2000, 40: 79-84. [20] Geuens M, Weijters B,Wulf K D. A new measure of brand personality [J]. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 2009, 26(2): 97-107. [21] Hutchinson G E. Concluding remarks [M]. Long Island: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1957. [22] 赵红, 韩福荣. 基于顾客最小误判率的品牌重叠测度方法初探 [J]. 管理评论, 2008, 20(4): 25-30. [23] Aaker D A. Building strong brands [M]. New York: The Free Press, 1996. [24] Kapferer J N, Gibbs P. Strategic Brand Management [M]. London: Kogan Page, 1992. [25] Aaker J L. Dimensions of brand personality [J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 1997, 34(3): 347-356. [26] 黄胜兵, 卢泰宏. 品牌的阴阳二重性—品牌形象的市场研究方法 [J]. 南开管理评论, 2000, (2): 27-30. [27] 范秀成, 陈洁. 品牌形象综合测评模型及其应用 [J]. 南开学报: 哲学社会科学版, 2002, (3): 65-71. [28] 罗伯特. 量表编制: 理论与应用 [M]. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2004. [29] 福勒. 调查问卷的设计与评估 [M]. 重庆: 重庆大学出版社, 2010. [30] Malhotra N K. 市场营销研究: 应用导向[M].涂平,译. 北京: 电子工业出版社, 2006. [31] Miaoulis G, Amato N D. Consumer confusion & trademark infringement [J]. The Journal of Marketing,1978, 42(2): 48-55. [32] Boush D M, Loken B. A process-tracing study of brand extension evaluation[J]. Journal of Marketing Research, 1991, 28(1): 16-28. [33] Simonson I. Trademark infringement from the buyer perspective: conceptual analysis and measurement implications [J]. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 1994, 12(2): 181-199. [34] Kapferer J. Brand confusion: empirical study of a legal concept [J]. Psychology & Marketing, 1995,12(6): 551-568. |
| [1] | 孙嘉轶, 路阳阳, 滕春贤. 区块链技术对低碳供应链合作策略的影响研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(10): 293-303. |
| [2] | 王莺潼, 计小宇, 孟庆春. 动态不确定环境下基于多层级备份策略的供应链网络性能研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(10): 316-326. |
| [3] | 李梦祺, 李登峰, 南江霞. 考虑链间竞争与链内研发成本共担的绿色供应链决策——基于非合作-合作两型博弈方法[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(10): 339-349. |
| [4] | 何爽, 赵亮, 张剑, 李琳. 替代竞争情境下关联需求固定产出比联产品加工决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(10): 76-85. |
| [5] | 伏红勇, 雷一峰, 但斌, 掌曙光. 应对供应商减排不合规的碳审计策略:独立vs联合[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(9): 339-348. |
| [6] | 陈威, 田永乐, 白春光, 马永开. 考虑极端天气的电力供应链可再生能源维护策略研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(9): 359-368. |
| [7] | 吕希琛, 田银凤, 田世海, 刘佳缘, 孔庆伟. MRV机制下碳数据质量监管多主体行为决策研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(8): 355-368. |
| [8] | 李志文, 徐贤浩, 关旭, 柏庆国, 陈程. 农产品市场双寡头区块链采纳决策的演化博弈分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(7): 324-336. |
| [9] | 孙中苗, 徐琪. 区块链技术下政府对可再生能源电力消纳的动态激励补贴研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(7): 346-359. |
| [10] | 扈衷权, 梁倩, 沈奥, 刘阳. 基于期权契约的应急物资生产能力储备模型研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(5): 247-258. |
| [11] | 张文明, 杜玉禄. 相邻价格相关的在线单向交易问题的数据驱动型策略设计[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(5): 26-33. |
| [12] | 何洪阳, 张彬, 田苏俊. 平台经济政企协同治理的演化博弈分析[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(5): 76-87. |
| [13] | 周驰, 李赫, 于静. 委托代理关系下品牌商网络直播营销激励机制设计[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(4): 265-274. |
| [14] | 白雨, 赵昕, 丁黎黎. 考虑企业时间偏好的碳配额存储与借贷机制研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(4): 357-368. |
| [15] | 许书琴, 徐琪. 能源平台供应链可再生能源电力消纳激励契约研究[J]. 中国管理科学, 2025, 33(3): 326-338. |
| 阅读次数 | ||||||
|
全文 |
|
|||||
|
摘要 |
|
|||||
|
||