主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院

中国管理科学 ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (7): 145-156.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2023.1041

• • 上一篇    

基于成本学习效应的自有品牌引入与定价策略研究

叶林, 徐和(), 金力, 高丹   

  1. 华中科技大学管理学院,湖北 武汉 430074
  • 收稿日期:2023-06-21 修回日期:2024-09-18 出版日期:2026-07-25 发布日期:2026-06-18
  • 通讯作者: 徐和 E-mail:xuhe@mail.hust.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(71871099);国家自然科学基金项目(71821001);国家自然科学基金项目(71931005)

Store Brand Introduction and Equilibrium Price Decision in Supply Chain Considering the Manufacturer's Cost Learning Effect

Lin Ye, He Xu(), Li Jin, Dan Gao   

  1. School of Management,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430074,China
  • Received:2023-06-21 Revised:2024-09-18 Online:2026-07-25 Published:2026-06-18
  • Contact: He Xu E-mail:xuhe@mail.hust.edu.cn

摘要:

构建由单制造商和单零售商构成的两周期二级供应链结构,其中零售商在第一周期转售制造商品牌,并在第二周期决策是否引入零售商自有品牌与制造商品牌竞争。考虑制造商成本学习效应带来的竞争优势,零售商的最优自有品牌引入策略将受到第一周期中制造商定价策略的影响。研究结果表明,成本学习效应降低了零售商引入自有品牌的动机。成本学习效应的存在使制造商可以通过调整第一周期制造商品牌的批发价格选择不同的应对策略。当零售商自有品牌的相对竞争力很弱时,制造商不改变批发价格并选择“忽略引入”策略;当零售商自有品牌相对竞争力中等时,制造商降低批发价格并选择“实际阻止”或“名义阻止”策略;当零售商自有品牌相对竞争力很强时,制造商提高批发价格并选择“接受引入”策略。另外,通过算例分析发现,学习速率很小时,学习效应的存在反而可能不利于制造商。

关键词: 成本学习效应, 自有品牌, 产品竞争, 价格决策, 订购量决策

Abstract:

Store brands that are strategically introduced and controlled by retailers are developing rapidly and pose a threat to incumbent national brands. However, store brands are generally imitations of national brands. This means that incumbent manufacturers can gain a competitive advantage due to the cost learning effect. The cost learning effect refers to the phenomenon that manufacturers repeatedly learn from accumulated production activities, leading to a decrease in production costs with an increase in output. Therefore, retailers should consider the impact of the cost learning effect on store brand introduction strategies. Manufacturers can also respond to store brand introduction strategies by adjusting the wholesale price of national brands.Consider a dyadic supply chain that consists of a manufacturer and a retailer. A two-period Stackelberg game model is constructed to analyze their optimal decisions under different scenarios. To exclude inventory effects, we consider the pull production mode. In the first period, the retailer resells the national brand and decides whether to introduce a store brand at the beginning of the second period. Using backward induction, their optimal decisions are obtained under different scenarios with or without cost learning effect. By comparing their equilibrium solutions in these scenarios, how cost learning effect affects both retailer’s store brand introduction strategy and manufacturer’s pricing strategy can be determined.The main result shows that a) The cost learning effect reduces the retailer's incentive to introduce store brands. b) The existence of the cost learning effect enables the manufacturer to adjust the wholesale price of the national brand in the first period to compete with the store brand. When the relative competitive strength of the store brand is very small, the manufacturer does not change the wholesale price (“Ignorance” strategy). When the relative competitive strength of the store brand is moderate, the manufacturer reduces the wholesale price (“Resistance” strategy). When the relative competitive strength of the store brand is large, the manufacturer raises the wholesale price (“Acceptance” strategy). c) Numerical simulations show that when the learning rate is very small, existence of the learning effect may harm the manufacturer when the manufacturer chooses “Resistance” strategy.

Key words: cost learning effect, store brand, product competition, price decision, order quantity decision

中图分类号: