主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院

中国管理科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (10): 304-315.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2022.1773

• • 上一篇    下一篇

不对称质量信息下供应链中的CSR策略互动

李余辉1, 张榆芸1, 张发明1, 倪得兵2()   

  1. 1.桂林电子科技大学商学院,广西 桂林 541004
    2.电子科技大学经济与管理学院,四川 成都 611731
  • 收稿日期:2022-08-16 修回日期:2024-01-15 出版日期:2025-10-25 发布日期:2025-10-24
  • 通讯作者: 倪得兵 E-mail:nidb@uestc.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(71972026);国家自然科学基金项目(71840007);教育部人文社会科学研究项目(22XJA630003);陕西省社会科学基金项目(2024R031);陕西省自然科学基础研究计划项目(2025JC-YBQN-980);广西高校千名中青年骨干教师培育计划人文社科类项目(2021QGRW039)

Strategic Interaction of CSR in Supply Chain with Asymmetric Quality Information

Yuhui Li1, Yuyun Zhang1, Faming Zhang1, Debing Ni2()   

  1. 1.School of Business,Guilin University of Electric and Technology,Guilin 541004,China
    2.School of Management and Economics,University of Electronic Science and Technology of China,Chengdu 611731,China
  • Received:2022-08-16 Revised:2024-01-15 Online:2025-10-25 Published:2025-10-24
  • Contact: Debing Ni E-mail:nidb@uestc.edu.cn

摘要:

基于战略企业社会责任(CSR)的视角,在产品质量信息不对称的供应链中研究节点企业的CSR策略互动问题。考虑一条由上游制造商、下游零售商和具有CSR偏好的消费者构成的供应链,占主导地位的制造商拥有产品质量这一私人信息,制造商和零售商在产品交易之前策略性地选择CSR行为,构建了上下游企业的CSR策略互动和质量信号博弈模型。分离均衡结果表明:(1)制造商和零售商CSR行为的互补性导致前者对后者具有CSR激励功能,从而克服了供应链中CSR动机不足的问题。(2)在二者的CSR策略互动下,制造商选择适中的CSR水平向零售商和消费者传递出高质量信号,且当两类制造商的CSR边际成本差异足够小时,高质量制造商和零售商的CSR策略(相对完全信息情形)将向上“扭曲”,零售商的CSR边际成本增大则会导致高质量制造商的CSR水平降低,经济利润则增大。(3)不论质量信息是否具有对称性,制造商对零售商的CSR激励功能都不受影响,而零售商的CSR边际成本的降低则有助于强化上述激励功能。这些结果揭示了在制造商与零售商均实施CSR行为的供应链中处于不对称信息中的节点企业的CSR动机。

关键词: 供应链, CSR策略互动, 产品质量, 不对称信息, 信号博弈

Abstract:

This study’s primary aim is to investigate the interaction of Corporate Social Responsibility(CSR) strategies in a supply chain with asymmetric quality information from the perspective of strategic CSR. A supply chain consisting of an upstream manufacturer, a downstream retailer and final consumers with CSR-preference is considered. It is assumed that the product made by the manufacturer has two different quality levels: high and low, and the manufacturer privately owns the information on the quality level. Under this quality information asymmetry, the manufacturer and the retailer strategically invest in CSR sequentially before product trading. The manufacturer tries to disclose quality information by its observable CSR strategy with the retailer and consumers, meanwhile, the manufacturer and the retailer try to promote product demand by their CSR strategies, they transact with a wholesale price contract. A signaling model with interaction of CSR strategies in the supply chain is built.The sequence of the game model is as follows. Firstly, the manufacturer chooses a CSR level to its will to disclose quality information. Secondly, after observing the CSR level to form Posterior Bayesian belief on quality, the retailer determines its CSR level. Thirdly, the manufacturer determines its wholesale price according two CSR levels. Fourthly, the retailer determines its order and retail price. Finally, consumers determine whether to purchase according to their Posterior Bayesian belief on quality, two CSR levels and the retail price. With this model, it focuses mainly on the following three questions: (1) What kind of CSR strategy interaction will occur between the manufacturers and the retailer under quality information asymmetry? (2) Do the CSR behaviors of the manufacturer have a signaling effect that conveying their quality type information under the CSR strategy interaction? (3) What are the impact of CSR marginal costs and product production costs on their CSR strategies and economic profits?The separating equilibrium results show that(1) strategically complementarity between the manufacturer’s CSR and the retailer’s CSR leads to that the manufacturer’s CSR stimulates the retailer to invest in CSR, which overcomes the lack of CSR motivation in the supply chain, (2) the manufacturers’ moderate CSR level provides a function of signaling high-quality information to the retailer and consumers. When the difference of CSR margin cost between the high-quality and the low-quality manufacturers is sufficiently small, compared to the complete-information case, information asymmetry leads the high-quality manufacturer and the retail to distort their CSR strategy upwards. With the increase of the retailer’ CSR margin cost, the high-quality manufacturer’s CSR level decreases and his profits increase, (3)the CSR incentive function is effective whether the quality information is symmetrical or not, and gets strengthen with the decrease of the retailer’ CSR margin cost. These results reveal the CSR motivation of node enterprises in an information asymmetry supply chain with joint investment in CSR.

Key words: supply chain, strategic interaction of CSR, product quality, asymmetric information, signaling game

中图分类号: