主管:中国科学院
主办:中国优选法统筹法与经济数学研究会
   中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院

中国管理科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (10): 282-292.doi: 10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2022.2709

• • 上一篇    下一篇

预售模式下考虑零售商公平关切的绿色产品供应链决策研究

杨浩雄1(), 陈欣冉1, 石伟1, 孙祎琪2   

  1. 1.北京工商大学商学院,北京 100048
    2.国网北京市电力公司物资分公司,北京 100051
  • 收稿日期:2022-12-19 修回日期:2023-05-21 出版日期:2025-10-25 发布日期:2025-10-24
  • 通讯作者: 杨浩雄 E-mail:yanghaoxiong@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家社会科学基金重点项目(20AJY016)

Decisions of Green Products Supply Chain by Considering Retailer's Fairness Concerns under Advance Selling

Haoxiong Yang1(), Xinran Chen1, Wei Shi1, Yiqi Sun2   

  1. 1.Business School,Beijing Technology and Business University,Beijing 100048,China
    2.Materials Branch of State Grid Beijing Electric Power Company,Beijing 100051,China
  • Received:2022-12-19 Revised:2023-05-21 Online:2025-10-25 Published:2025-10-24
  • Contact: Haoxiong Yang E-mail:yanghaoxiong@126.com

摘要:

品牌制造商采用线上“预售+现售”的模式推广绿色产品,零售商(入驻电商平台的商家)以“代销”的模式销售产品,由于零售商只能获得既定比例的佣金,容易因分配公平关切做出损害供应链合作的决策。鉴于此,本文考虑由制造商主导的二级供应链中,产品的现售需求受销售价格、消费者绿色敏感度、零售商现售促销努力水平和预售规模共同影响,构建非预售模式和预售模式下考虑零售商公平关切的供应链博弈模型,设计成本共担契约并验证契约的作用效果。研究发现:(1)集中决策下产品绿色水平高于分散决策,且公平关切会阻碍产品绿色水平的提高,采用预售模式有利于提高产品绿色水平,尤其当消费者绿色敏感度较高时,制造商更需要主动加强供应链合作关系,以促进产品绿色升级。(2)存在零售商公平关切时,引入预售模式有利于提高产品绿色水平,预售规模提高会促使制造商自身利润持续增加,零售商和供应链总利润先增后减,过高的预售规模不利于供应链运作,成本共担契约在预售规模较大情况下对供应链总利润的正向作用更显著。(3)公平关切系数和谈判系数的增加,在一定程度上使供应链整体利润向弱势方倾斜,过高的公平关切程度会使供应链成员和整体利润均下降,不利于供应链发展。(4)设置一定范围内的成本共担系数可以提高供应链成员利润,但仍会增加供应链成员间的利润差距,较大成本共担系数会加剧零售商公平关切行为对供应链整体利润的负面影响。本文的研究结果可以为绿色产品制造商开展预售活动提供决策支持,并为考虑零售商公平关切的供应链协调契约设计提供参考依据。

关键词: 预售模式, 公平关切, 成本共担契约, 绿色产品供应链

Abstract:

Manufacturers cooperate with merchants who are stationed on e-commerce platforms to promote green products through the pre-sale mode. Given that, a supply chain decision-making model considering the fairness concerns of the retailer under the pre-sale model is constructed based on Stackelberg Game, which considers that the dominant manufacturers and a retailer makes regular-sale promotional efforts, then the impact of green product pre-sale scales and the fairness concerns on the decision-making of supply chain members are analyzed. According to the model, the cost-sharing contract is established to relieve the uneven distribution of profits. It is found that: the improvement of consumers’ green sensitivity could urge the green upgrading of the supply chain, but lead to the reduction of promotion efforts. Increasing the scale of pre-sale could not continuously make up the profit gap. When a retailer has fairness concerns, it is not conducive for green products to upgrade, but the cost-sharing contract could weaken the negative effect of fairness concern behavior. In addition, the effects of adopting cost-sharing contract are more significant when the scale of pre-sale is large, and it could improve retailer' more profits than manufacturers. A larger cost-sharing coefficient would aggravate the negative effects of fairness concerns on the overall profits of the supply chain.

Key words: Pre-sale model, fairness concerns, cost-sharing contract, green products supply chain

中图分类号: